Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, wildcat09 said:

This kind of pedantry is insanely fucking stupid and ghoulish.

Mistaking pedantry for skepticism of the press and adherence to the truth is what got us here.

Posted
27 minutes ago, royiv said:

He should be taking more of a beating for posting a picture of that abortion of a brisket.

You didn't like the splitting of the point and the flat on the board? I tend to agree. Maybe a little under? I generally prefer slicing the point perpendicular instead of separating.  But the reference was Cornyn's brisket, which was an abomination before all things Texan and holy. Anyways, palette cleanser for you. 

 

IMG-3642.jpg  

 

  • Fuck You 1
Posted
47 minutes ago, Anastasis said:

I am on the American side of finding a path to cease the death and destruction quickly, and stop dumping endless amount of US taxpayer dollars into conflicts all around the world that only undermine our national security interests in the long run.

.....and of boosting the Russian threat to perform the exact same geopolitical function (incentivizing nuclear armament of any number of states) that he claims to be so steadfastly against when he can point his finger at the US.

Ana is not in any way, shape, or form concerned about aggression by large, nuclear armed states incentivizing nuclear proliferation.  He is 100% in favor of it, and openly favors REWARDING it and thus incentivizing it, when it's Russia as the actor.  

Russia does it = fully support it, and it's all the West's fault anyway, look how they were dressed, they were asking for it, you can't blame Russia for invading its neighbor, relentlessly attacking civilian targets, using systematic rape and murder of civilians in Bucha etc. as a tool.

US does it = WARMONGERS!  MAKING THE WORLD LESS SAFE!

"Both sides" my ass.  Ana has one side, and no guiding principles.  Everything he laments happens and is evident in spades on his chosen side, and he whistles right past them.  His posts could come straight from Lavrov's keyboard and you'd never know the difference.

  • Hook 'Em 7
  • Like 2
Posted (edited)
39 minutes ago, Brisketexan said:

.....and of boosting the Russian threat to perform the exact same geopolitical function (incentivizing nuclear armament of any number of states) that he claims to be so steadfastly against when he can point his finger at the US.

Ana is not in any way, shape, or form concerned about aggression by large, nuclear armed states incentivizing nuclear proliferation.  He is 100% in favor of it, and openly favors REWARDING it and thus incentivizing it, when it's Russia as the actor.  

Russia does it = fully support it, and it's all the West's fault anyway, look how they were dressed, they were asking for it, you can't blame Russia for invading its neighbor, relentlessly attacking civilian targets, using systematic rape and murder of civilians in Bucha etc. as a tool.

US does it = WARMONGERS!  MAKING THE WORLD LESS SAFE!

"Both sides" my ass.  Ana has one side, and no guiding principles.  Everything he laments happens and is evident in spades on his chosen side, and he whistles right past them.  His posts could come straight from Lavrov's keyboard and you'd never know the difference.

 

Just a bunch of jingoistic bullshit. I do think it's funny that you and other posters constantly try to plant a flag for me on positions that I have never taken. 

Some of y'all want to fight this thing to the last Ukranian. I get it. I think that Ukraine would have been better off coming to some sort of an agreement back in 2022. But what is a few hundred thousand more dead bodies with few meaningful distinctions in outcome, I guess.   

Edited by Anastasis
  • Fuck You 2
Posted
5 minutes ago, 'stache said:

You can totally tell his position of neutrality when he repeated the "Ukraine is full of nazis" line. All he wants is peace, y'all!

FTR, that is not a direct quote of what I said. 

  • Fuck You 1
Posted

I don't remember Russia seeking any agreements in 2022 except surrender bitches? Anyone else?

Or just another Ana statement cuz he is right?

My favorite was there should be no intel groups and every citizen has the right to know everything.

  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Like 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, Brisketexan said:

How about we let the Ukrainian people say when they've had enough of fighting for their homeland?  It's their home. 

Agree that they should hold elections to determine the matter. 

  • Fuck You 4
Posted
Just now, Anastasis said:

Agree that they should hold elections to determine the matter. 

They did. Zelensky won. Pissed off Putin, so he attacked. Come on man, justify your shit.

Now can we do 2014?

  • Hook 'Em 5
  • Like 2
Posted
7 minutes ago, InkaUtexas said:

I don't remember Russia seeking any agreements in 2022 except surrender bitches? Anyone else?

Or just another Ana statement cuz he is right?

My favorite was there should be no intel groups and every citizen has the right to know everything.

When this all ends, you think that the ultimate terms will be better or worse than what could have been achieved in Istanbul? 

  • Fuck You 2
Posted
2 minutes ago, Anastasis said:

Agree that they should hold elections to determine the matter. 

Of course you do.  Because that's what Lavrov wants....and you never once ponder why.  Say....do we have a rather long, recent, and documented history of Russia interfering in and manipulating Ukrainian elections?  Of course we do....which is exactly why Russia is bucking for them.  Not because Russia thinks that's what the Ukrainian people want, but because Russia KNOWS they can manipulate the results in their favor.  If you wanted free and fair elections, that might be credible.  You don't, because while it is under relentless attack by Russia, including every asymmetrical angle possible, the prospect of free and fair elections in Ukraine is zero.  Which, of course, you know.

And of course you do.  Because it would violate the Ukrainian constitution to hold an election during wartime.  Even the Ukrainian opposition agrees.  Again, the Ukrainian people and opposition are perfectly capable of putting their foot down and saying "enough, damn the Constitution, we need an election."  They have not done so.

The only party that has done so has been....Russia.  And now its new ally, the Trump regime.

Your unflinching and undistinguishable parroting of statements right out of Lavrov's mouth is perfection.  It's not often someone makes my point for me as bullseye-accurately as you continue to do.

  • Hook 'Em 6
  • Like 2
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Posted
16 minutes ago, Anastasis said:

When this all ends, you think that the ultimate terms will be better or worse than what could have been achieved in Istanbul? 

No. I think the Russians are fucked. EU won't forgive so quickly, now they REALLY have NATO on their borders, and China is fucking them once again. Their weapons industry is crap. Hell, they got their asses kicked by rebels in Chad.

Russia should have surrendered.

  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Drool 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, bolverk said:

Hey! When's Russia going to hold free and fair elections?

Ana can run for mayor of some shit hole or be the peoples appointed director of a mining "hospital" near Yar-Sale.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
1 minute ago, bolverk said:

Hey! When's Russia going to hold free and fair elections?

When they can poison and/or throw all known and potential Putin opponents off buildings. They’re also not above crashing a plane or two to thin the herd.

Posted
3 minutes ago, InkaUtexas said:

He got fucking invaded AFTER he was elected.

 

22 minutes ago, InkaUtexas said:

Pissed off Putin, so he attacked.

Pissed off Ukrainian nationalists. Somewhere in that timeline Biden also put NATO membership on the table, and notably more temporally proximal to the invasion. 

https://www.latimes.com/world-nation/story/2019-10-14/ukraine-protest-zelensky-peace-plan

Far-right groups protest Ukrainian president’s peace plan

Far-right groups protest Ukrainian president's peace plan - Los Angeles  Times

  • Fuck You 3
Posted
2 minutes ago, Anastasis said:

 

Pissed off Ukrainian nationalists. Somewhere in that timeline Biden also put NATO membership on the table, and notably more temporally proximal to the invasion. 

https://www.latimes.com/world-nation/story/2019-10-14/ukraine-protest-zelensky-peace-plan

Far-right groups protest Ukrainian president’s peace plan

Far-right groups protest Ukrainian president's peace plan - Los Angeles  Times

So you are saying you side with the Far right? What point are you trying to make? If none then please go make brisket.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
9 minutes ago, InkaUtexas said:

So you are saying you side with the Far right? What point are you trying to make? If none then please go make brisket shitty potroast.

ftfy

  • Hook 'Em 4
Posted
8 minutes ago, InkaUtexas said:

So you are saying you side with the Far right? What point are you trying to make? If none then please go make brisket.

Here are two senators rallying with a neo-nazi and the media treatment at the time. But tell me more about who sided with neo-nazi nationalists in Ukraine. 

https://grabien.com/story?id=517212

HAYES: “When Senator John McCain and Senator Chris Murphy went to stand with these protesters in December, they stood next to this guy, who is an opposition leader and who also happens to lead Ukraine's right-wing nationalist party, Svoboda. They were also first registered as a neo-Nazi party and they're in the streets right now shooting at police. You know what arguably could be called naive? Going on stage at a Ukrainian opposition rally and not realizing you're standing next to a man who heads Ukraine's right-wing nationalist party, a party that was first registered as a neo-Nazi party, which is exactly what John McCain did back in December when he stood next to Oleh Tiahnybok, the leader of Ukraine's Svoboda Party, which according to 'The New York Times' traces its roots to the Ukrainian partisan army of World War II, which was loosely allied with Nazi Germany.”

  • Fuck You 3
Posted
Just now, Anastasis said:

Here are two senators rallying with a neo-nazi and the media treatment at the time. But tell me more about who sided with neo-nazi nationalists in Ukraine. 

https://grabien.com/story?id=517212

HAYES: “When Senator John McCain and Senator Chris Murphy went to stand with these protesters in December, they stood next to this guy, who is an opposition leader and who also happens to lead Ukraine's right-wing nationalist party, Svoboda. They were also first registered as a neo-Nazi party and they're in the streets right now shooting at police. You know what arguably could be called naive? Going on stage at a Ukrainian opposition rally and not realizing you're standing next to a man who heads Ukraine's right-wing nationalist party, a party that was first registered as a neo-Nazi party, which is exactly what John McCain did back in December when he stood next to Oleh Tiahnybok, the leader of Ukraine's Svoboda Party, which according to 'The New York Times' traces its roots to the Ukrainian partisan army of World War II, which was loosely allied with Nazi Germany.”

Yep. big mistake. And bernie went to moscow before the wall fell.

Can we define loosely allied? I mean, I know you are a master of history and all.

Ukrainians were some murderous fucks in ww2. So that means they should be attacked? Erased? Can we do 1923 if we want to get into revisionist history.

  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Like 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, mchookem said:

didn't the opposition party leaders just tell Trump this week to fuck off, they weren't interested in having an election while they were at war either?

Yes. But come on man, that is not was Ana wants. So cannot be real.

  • Hook 'Em 4
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Anastasis said:

 

Just a bunch of jingoistic bullshit. I do think it's funny that you and other posters constantly try to plant a flag for me on positions that I have never taken. 

Some of y'all want to fight this thing to the last Ukranian. I get it. I think that Ukraine would have been better off coming to some sort of an agreement back in 2022. But what is a few hundred thousand more dead bodies with few meaningful distinctions in outcome, I guess.   

Again, who invaded who? You agree, don't you, that Russia invaded Ukraine? What power does Ukraine have to end the war? Only Russia can stop, you know, fucking invading, you fucking fuck. Have you explained to your family what a fucking shit stain you are? Maybe let them read your blatant support of genocide on here? 

Edited by Dahobbs
  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, mchookem said:

'did Russia invade Ukraine?' is the new 'did Biden win in 2020?' 🙄

my second thought before "Please don't trade Wyatt Johnston" before I feel asleep last night was, "goddamn gaslighting is a fucking problem in this country." I really don't know how we unfuck this. it's not just alternative facts anymore. it's outright lies purported as truth. it's maddening.

spoiler: we didn't trade Johnston

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted
5 minutes ago, hobbes2702 said:

Dude fuck all the way off. My friends and their families in Kiev would prefer to not have been involved in an armed conflict. They didn’t have much choice in the matter. You’ve been a clown before but this is embarrassing even for you.

Just plainly cheering on the ethnic cleansing of Ukrainians for reasons. What an absolute piece of shit you are.

He's not cheering them on, per se, just saying that ethnic cleansing is necessary for peace. Makes tons of sense when you think about it.

  • Like 3
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Dahobbs said:

We have Nazis in the United States as well. You voted for them. 

The political party he’s bleating about won exactly one seat in the 2019 parliamentary elections.  There are far fewer Nazis in Ukrainian structures than there are in America (or Russia) for that matter. Actually there are an equivalent number of Nazis in his own house. 

Edited by 956 Worldwide
  • Hook 'Em 7
  • Like 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, hobbes2702 said:

Just plainly cheering on the ethnic cleansing of Ukrainians for reasons.

I am cheering no such thing.

I think that this war needs to come to an end as quickly as possible. Two ways forward, either Ukraine fights on for another who knows how many years, or some form of ceasefire and terms happen. I wish that that the latter would have been achieved back in 2022. Would have saved tens if not hundreds of thousands of lives. If the people of Ukraine want to keep this going for another 3+ years, that is certainly their prerogative. You mentioned family in Kyiv. Curious what their positions are? Do they support going to the negotiation table to bring hostilities to at least a temporary end, or do they want to continue on?   

  • Fuck You 2
Posted
7 hours ago, Ojo Rojo said:

Nuance is a part of everything. So, it depends.  9/11 - terrorism, more than obviously.  Most recent missile attack in Ukraine? It's too soon to know for sure, but it appears to me to be collateral damage.  Was it really "indiscriminate bombings of civilians?"  Was the hotel the intended target?  From what I understand, Russia frequently targets that city because it's Zelensky's hometown. Can they aim the missile used with pinpoint accuracy?  Did it hit its intended target?

The intel failure surrounding 9/11 isn't the same thing as what has happened here.  It's not in the same ballpark; it's not even the same fucking sport. 

The Newsweek article, which is the one I was talking about as being flawed information, did not use Tenet as a source.

People have got to be able to recognize bias, misinformation and propaganda.  Especially now that so much of the "media" is solely focused on making money and journalistic integrity is a quaint concept from the past.  Look at the headline:  "Missile Strike on Americans."  Really?  Was the missile strike intentionally aimed at Americans, like the headline would lead you to believe?  Or is it that there just happened to be Americans staying at the hotel that was hit?  (No Americans were injured or killed, by the way.)  Why would the Russians target Americans now?  Right after our president just publicly sucked off Putin?  Putin's going to do something to turn the American people against Trump at the moment he has us right where he wants us?  That doesn't make any fucking sense.

I don’t know how to tell you this dawg but targeting the downtown of a city simply for its symbolic and personal value to a nation and its leader is kind of the definition of terror bombing. This is the same logic behind Al Qaeda’s constant targeting of WTC. 

  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Like 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, hobbes2702 said:

It’s pretty amazing you haven’t just said “Russia could fuck off”. Why should Ukraine negotiate? They’ve been slaughtered by a hostile foreign aggressor. 
They didn’t want to give up Crimea and they don’t want to capitulate to an invasion. 
You’re absolutely cheering it and acting like Ukrainians deserved it because some people there are Nazis. Newsflash, there are Nazis here too. You’re parroting Russian propaganda with regularity in this thread. Zelensky is a fucking hero in Ukraine according to everyone I’ve spoken to.
This is truly a low point for you. I’m not sure what’s wrong with your brain but you’re just shitty. So yea, fuck right off.

Anastasis got very angry that anyone on this board noticed what happened in Bucha and got drunk last night and revealed he supported gas attacks on civilians in Syria.  There is no way to go farther down.  He just really likes it when Russians murder lots of innocent people, maybe because he gets hard at when he can claim that U.S. foreign policy failed or maybe because he’s just aligned with Russia for any number of reasons.  It’s really that simple and it doesn’t really matter either way— it’s who he is.

  • Hook 'Em 8
  • Haha 1
Posted
On 3/5/2025 at 10:20 AM, SL Xpress said:

BTW, to play the whataboutism game, I never felt like Obama did enough when Russian took Crimea and took over the Donbas with proxies supplemented by the Russian military when the Ukraine government was still trying to get on its feet.


That is because Obama COULDN'T. The Republicans were obstructing him at every turn. As soon as he made any kind of move like that, they would have been screaming from the highest hills.  He was effectively neutered to a large degree by Mitch McConnell's opposition to everything he ever tried to do. 

Fuck Mitch McConnell. 

  • Hook 'Em 6
  • Like 1
Posted

There are some shortcuts to figuring out which side is the bad actor vs. good actor (while acknowledging the human reality that nobody in any conflict in the history of ever has worn a perfectly white hat or perfectly black hat)....check in with the people who know the players best.

Check with the people of Finland, which was invaded by Russia.  Russia attacked, conducted a naked land grab, and still subjugates and holds Karelia.

Check with the people of Latvia, Lithuania, and Estonia, who have suffered Russian invasion several times, most recently in WWII, when Russia flat-out seized them as "Soviet Republics."

Check with Poland, which was a client state fully controlled by Russia as a Warsaw Pact country during the Cold War.

The overwhelming sentiment is that they fucking HATE Russia and the Russians.  Sure, there are local sympathizers, but the great weight is "Fuck Russia."  And it's not fucking subtle.  Go to Estonia, and tell them "hey, just bend over and take it, let Russia occupy you -- after all, your mere existence, what with all of your talking with and cooperating with western powers, is an unacceptably aggressive threat, and you're really asking for it."  Please do that.  So I can watch some dude in Tallinn beat your ass.  Do it in Helsinki, where they have every bridge between them and Russia rigged to position explosives to blow it, because they fucking know Russia and what Russia does.

If you actually know Russia, and have experience with Russia - unless, of course, you are using Russian support to prop you up in power that you otherwise couldn't hold on to because your own people don't want you there (looking at you, Lukashenko) - you loathe Russia.  To know them is to loathe them.

Ana over here spouting Lavrov's daily newsletter word-for-word is perfection.  True perfection.

  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Like 2
  • Drool 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Brisketexan said:

There are some shortcuts to figuring out which side is the bad actor vs. good actor (while acknowledging the human reality that nobody in any conflict in the history of ever has worn a perfectly white hat or perfectly black hat)....check in with the people who know the players best.

Check with the people of Finland, which was invaded by Russia.  Russia attacked, conducted a naked land grab, and still subjugates and holds Karelia.

Check with the people of Latvia, Lithuania, and Estonia, who have suffered Russian invasion several times, most recently in WWII, when Russia flat-out seized them as "Soviet Republics."

Check with Poland, which was a client state fully controlled by Russia as a Warsaw Pact country during the Cold War.

The overwhelming sentiment is that they fucking HATE Russia and the Russians.  Sure, there are local sympathizers, but the great weight is "Fuck Russia."  And it's not fucking subtle.  Go to Estonia, and tell them "hey, just bend over and take it, let Russia occupy you -- after all, your mere existence, what with all of your talking with and cooperating with western powers, is an unacceptably aggressive threat, and you're really asking for it."  Please do that.  So I can watch some dude in Tallinn beat your ass.  Do it in Helsinki, where they have every bridge between them and Russia rigged to position explosives to blow it, because they fucking know Russia and what Russia does.

If you actually know Russia, and have experience with Russia - unless, of course, you are using Russian support to prop you up in power that you otherwise couldn't hold on to because your own people don't want you there (looking at you, Lukashenko) - you loathe Russia.  To know them is to loathe them.

Ana over here spouting Lavrov's daily newsletter word-for-word is perfection.  True perfection.

What is really funny is he would never go live there. And if he did, they would not like how he talks about things.

 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, 956 Worldwide said:

There is a rational, and even ethically grounded case to be made for the U.S. to shift towards a push for a negotiated settlement where Ukraine has to make concessions.  I vehemently disagree with that case, but it can be made in good faith and from a place of support for America and its values. 
 

That case doesn’t involve the following: confusing aggressors with victims, smearing a suffering nation as Nazis who deserved it, repeating Russia’s justification for its war crimes and atrocities, denying Russia’s war crimes and atrocities, projecting your own shitty and ill-informed “grievances” into the case as a means to advance your miserable politics, or apologizing for the mass gassing of people in a different war on a different continent. 
 

Yet all the people arguing for “peace” do the latter and utterly fail at the former.  Because they don’t want peace, they are pieces of shit who like Russia, want Russia to win, and want America to be more like Russia. 

THIS.

I don't even vehemently disagree with the case.  I live in the real world, and have to make and counsel people to make real-world decisions that may not be even close to their optimal outcome.  I disagree with it, but I can see it even being a rational take.  

But yeah, what you're getting from Ana and the Trump Regime and Lavrov and crew (seriously, the messaging is 100% identical for all three) is your second paragraph.

Ana doesn't want peace.  He wants complete capitulation by Ukraine, and total victory for Russia.  If he actually believed in using "leverage," he'd acknowledge that Ukraine indeed has some (much of that leverage being tied to its allies), and can and should use it.  Instead, he wants complete, unconditional surrender.  Because -- and this is important -- that's what he wants.

Peace is not the absence of conflict.  Your wife can have "peaceful sex" if she just lays back and lets her rapist have his way.  Which is exactly what Ana wants.  In the actual literal sense -- Russia has unquestionably used rape as a weapon of war in this conflict, and will continue to do so (even after any "peace" is imposed).

  • Hook 'Em 6
  • Like 1
  • Drool 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, Brisketexan said:

THIS.

I don't even vehemently disagree with the case.  I live in the real world, and have to make and counsel people to make real-world decisions that may not be even close to their optimal outcome.  I disagree with it, but I can see it even being a rational take.  

But yeah, what you're getting from Ana and the Trump Regime and Lavrov and crew (seriously, the messaging is 100% identical for all three) is your second paragraph.

Ana doesn't want peace.  He wants complete capitulation by Ukraine, and total victory for Russia.  If he actually believed in using "leverage," he'd acknowledge that Ukraine indeed has some (much of that leverage being tied to its allies), and can and should use it.  Instead, he wants complete, unconditional surrender.  Because -- and this is important -- that's what he wants.

Peace is not the absence of conflict.  Your wife can have "peaceful sex" if she just lays back and lets her rapist have his way.  Which is exactly what Ana wants.  In the actual literal sense -- Russia has unquestionably used rape as a weapon of war in this conflict, and will continue to do so (even after any "peace" is imposed).

Well, and they also want some sweet, juicy mineral rights. Because “no blood for oil” is more what you’d call a “guideline” than actual rules. 
 

Fake libertarian/anti-neocon MAGATs are the worst.  DJT does everything they claim to hate except with the subtlety of a goombah shaking down a bodega owner and all of a sudden it’s an attack on the “blob.”  It’s just adult oppositional defiant disorder. 

  • Hook 'Em 5


×
×
  • Create New...