Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
43 minutes ago, Dahobbs said:

Complete non-sequiturs. None of that has anything to do with Ukraine, Russian aggression, or NATO.  Putin rose to power initially as a challenge to Oligarchs before becoming one. Why you think that justifies Russian invading Ukraine, Russia targeting civilians, or the US ceasing support of Ukraine is beyond me. Actually, no it isn't. You are a Russian stooge. 

Fucking exactly. Obfuscate and spin. 

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted
10 hours ago, Willfully Horn said:

image.png.2d0972fedfe41bbfc8e9536e82dae202.png

Looks like they left out Latvia in 1940 and East Germany in 1953 as well.  So many countries being mean to Russia over the years.

1 hour ago, InkaUtexas said:

Ana, guess they should not have been there.

KYIV, Ukraine (AP) — Russia launched heavy aerial attacks on Ukraine for a second night Saturday after the United States stopped sharing satellite images with the Ukrainian government, officials said. At least 20 people have been killed.

https://apnews.com/article/russia-ukraine-war-dobropillya-us-intelligence-3d0bad105a93933e9cdaca5cf31fcf74

Thank you, JD?

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, 4th&Five said:

image.png.a324e9ffad49b136250051cd11899115.png

Zelensky has an approval rating of 67% which is up 10% from last month. But they should hold wartime elections because Ana sucks Putin’s dick. 
What a dipshit

  • Hook 'Em 4
Posted (edited)


Motion to change the name turnip to krashnov.

 

Alex Mussayev

Biography in quotes and reason for motion below. All this info is pulled from Wikipedia.

Quote

In 1979, he was called up for active military service in the KGB of the Soviet Union,[1] and entered the KGB Higher School (now FSB Academy).[2] After graduating, he was assigned to the counterintelligence agencies of the KGB of the Kazakh Soviet Socialist Republic.[2] In 1983–1984, during the Iran–Iraq War, he visited Baghdad, Iraq on a special mission.[1][2] In 1986–1989, he was seconded to the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the USSR[1][2] and held senior positions in its 8th Main Directorate,[1] after which he returned to the KGB.[2]

Since 1992, he has held senior positions in the National Security Committee of Kazakhstan, the Ministry of Internal Affairs and the Presidential Security Service.[1] In 1994, Mussayev headed the National Security Committee's Special Group for Combating Corruption under the Prosecutor General's Office and the Main Directorate for Combating Organized Crime and Corruption of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Kazakhstan.[1] In November 1995, he became an assistant to the president, and then the first deputy commander of the Republican Guard and head of the Presidential Security Service.[2]

In 1995, by his own admission, Musayev, acting on orders from Kazakhstan's president Nazarbayev, orchestrated the sale of 578 kg (1,274 lb) of weapons-grade uranium abroad.[2]

In 2025, Mussayev claimed that Donald Trump had been recruited by the KGB when he visited "Moscow as a real estate developer in 1987" and was given the codename "Krasnov". Several sources note that he doesn't provide any clear evidence to support his claim.[a] "Mussayev did not specify that Trump actively or knowingly participated in any espionage activities or provide examples, only that he was recruited",[10] claims that are also asserted by former KGB spies Yuri Shvets[9][16][17][18] and Sergei Zhyrnov.[19] Mussayev also asserted that Trump is compromised:

Although the credibility of the 'Steele dossier' has been vehemently contested by Trump supporters, especially for its use of anonymous sources, Mussayev confirms the existence of kompromat on Trump...:
'I have no doubt that Russia has kompromat on the US President, that over the course of many years the Kremlin has been promoting Trump to the post of President of the main world power.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alnur_Mussayev#Krasnov

Edited by Willfully Horn
  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted

Summary of the latest from the Institute for the Study of War.

Kremlin rejects possibility of compromise and refuses to discuss ceasefire – ISW

Russia has rejected the possibility of any concessions in future peace talks regarding the war in Ukraine. The Kremlin has stated that it will not make compromises, denied the possibility of deploying peacekeepers in Ukraine and dismissed the prospect of a ceasefire through talks.

Source: Institute for the Study of War (ISW)

Details: During a visit to the Moscow branch of the Defenders of the Fatherland Foundation on 6 March, Russia's ruler Vladimir Putin emphasised that Russia will not "give in to anyone" and intends to achieve peace conditions that will provide it with long-term guarantees.

Quote: "Putin has also declared 2025 the 'Year of the Defender of the Fatherland' – underlining Putin's efforts to prioritise militarising Russian society and rallying support behind Russia's war effort in Ukraine in 2025.

Putin stated that Russia 'will not give up' its 'own' territory in future peace negotiations – likely referring to illegally annexed territory in occupied Ukraine."

Details: Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov stated at a press conference that Moscow will not consider any initiatives to deploy European peacekeeping forces in Ukraine. According to Lavrov, such actions would be tantamount to the deployment of NATO forces and therefore Russia would consider this move to be direct involvement of the Alliance in the war.

Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova also stressed that any proposals that might give Ukraine a "respite" on the battlefield are unacceptable to the Kremlin.

Furthermore, Lavrov emphasised that Russia will insist on taking into account the so-called "root causes" of the war, which, as he claims, include halting NATO expansion and security guarantees for Russia. He claimed that US President Donald Trump understands these demands, whereas European countries are ignoring them.

Quote: "Russian officials often invoke the concept of 'root causes' to allude to their demands for NATO to abandon its open-door policy and to blame the West and Ukraine for Putin's decision to invade Ukraine."

To quote the ISW's Key Takeaways on 6 March:

  • Russian leader Vladimir Putin and other Kremlin officials explicitly rejected making any concessions in future peace negotiations or accepting any US, European, or Ukrainian peace proposals and the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs rejected the possibility of a negotiated ceasefire on 6 March.
  • Russian officials will likely take advantage of the suspension of US military aid and intelligence sharing with Ukraine to spread a longstanding Russian information operation meant to falsely portray Russian victory as inevitable.
  • The Kremlin welcomed a Trump administration official's recent comments mischaracterising Russia's illegal and unprovoked invasion of Ukraine as a "proxy war", and Russian media portrayed the statement as an admission that the United States is a participant in the war.
  • US and Ukrainian delegations will conduct bilateral meetings in Saudi Arabia next week.
  • Ukrainian opposition politicians rejected the possibility of holding elections in Ukraine before the end of the war.
  • European countries continue to announce new military assistance packages and other measures to support the Ukrainian military.
  • Ukrainian forces recently advanced on the Pokrovsk front and Russian forces recently advanced on the Kupiansk, Borova, Siversk, Pokrovsk and Kurakhove fronts.
  • Russian leader Vladimir Putin attempted to assuage Russian fears about conscripts going to war amid continued reports that Russian military units are forcing conscripts to sign contracts with the Russian Ministry of Defence (MoD).
  • Rage+1 2
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, hobbes2702 said:

Zelensky has an approval rating of 67% which is up 10% from last month. But they should hold wartime elections because Ana sucks Putin’s dick. 
What a dipshit

Let's be accurate: Annie wants Zelensky to violate Ukraine's constitution and hold wartime elections so that Russia can have Ukraine (while Annie sucks Putin's dick of course). 

Edited by Dahobbs
  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted (edited)
6 hours ago, Anastasis said:

I just gave you shock therapy as one example. I think that it is a pretty mainstream assessment that shock therapy was a failure, primarily hurt ordinary Russian people, consolidated broad anti-Western sentiment, and directly led to the rise of the oligarchs. 

We botched the biggest moment of influence at the end of the Cold War. Both economically and militarily. 

Ani has a point. Don’t you remember when the United States sent in the military and took over the legislative functions of Russia and forced them all into that model?   Remember when we put on the sanctions unless they created oligarchs and threatened economic ruin to everyone unless they did the United States bidding in the minutest detail when creating the new Russia?  Remember how the US had to show our handpick oligarchs Russian history books to explain what a Boyer was? Remember how there was no corruption in Russia, no Russian mob, and no attempts to grift or cheat the state before the Americans interfered in the 1990s?

If you think about it, poor innocent Russia was just waiting for a western style democracy to happen - and when it happened, the United States took control of the entirety of the former Soviet Union and changed its entire culture in a decade. These are important facts to consider when looking at the Russian-Ukraine war.  

Edited by Gatorubet
  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
  • Haha 6
Posted
33 minutes ago, Gatorubet said:

Ani has a point. Don’t you remember when the United States sent in the military and took over the legislative functions of Russia and forced them all into that model?   Remember when we put on the sanctions unless they created oligarchs and threatened economic ruin to everyone unless they did the United States bidding in the minutest detail when creating the new Russia?  Remember how the US had to show our handpick oligarchsRussian history books to explain what a Boyer was? Remember how there was no corruption in Russia, no Russian mob, and no attempts to grift or cheat the state before the Americans interfered in the 1990s?

If you think about it, poor innocent Russia was just waiting for a western style democracy to happen - and when it happened, the United States took control of the entirety of the former Soviet Union and changed its entire culture in a decade. These are important facts to consider when looking at the Russian-Ukraine war.  

Yeah, and all this former eastern bloc nations that ended up allied with United States have had a terrible time installing western, liberal democracies, and haven't created very economically successful societies. Nope. The US definitely hasn't been a stabilizing and empowering force for the betterment of those nations. Only the countries that stayed within Russia's influence have prospered. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
40 minutes ago, Gatorubet said:

Ani has a point. Don’t you remember when the United States sent in the military and took over the legislative functions of Russia and forced them all into that model?   Remember when we put on the sanctions unless they created oligarchs and threatened economic ruin to everyone unless they did the United States bidding in the minutest detail when creating the new Russia?  Remember how the US had to show our handpick oligarchsRussian history books to explain what a Boyer was? Remember how there was no corruption in Russia, no Russian mob, and no attempts to grift or cheat the state before the Americans interfered in the 1990s?

If you think about it, poor innocent Russia was just waiting for a western style democracy to happen - and when it happened, the United States took control of the entirety of the former Soviet Union and changed its entire culture in a decade. These are important facts to consider when looking at the Russian-Ukraine war.  

Kobe Bryant Laughing GIF
 

 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted

But Anastasis doesn’t even have to take my word for it.  Putin explained why he invaded for 90 minutes to Tucker Carlson, which was the perfect venue to rant about NATO and shock therapy.  Instead he explained that Ukraine isn’t a real country and he took it because Russia wanted it, with references to Rurik and the Zaporizhian Sich.  It’s absolutely incredible how asshole Russophiles simply refuse to let the man speak for himself. 

  • Hook 'Em 5
  • Like 3
Posted

The democracies of the world should pull off the gloves and plaster pics of Putin’s victims - maimed, injured and murdered children, every damn where. And while we’re at it, we should do the same in Gaza.

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted
15 minutes ago, Satchel said:

The democracies of the world should pull off the gloves and plaster pics of Putin’s victims - maimed, injured and murdered children, every damn where. And while we’re at it, we should do the same in Gaza.

Are there even any walls left in Gaza where posters could be plastered?

Posted
6 hours ago, Gil Bang said:

I've had about enough of this Ana asshole.  Fucking putinist piece of shit.

I hope that you are able to find some peace. 

  • Fuck You 2
Posted
On 3/7/2025 at 8:01 AM, South Austin said:

Fucker probably has his eye on some cheap cleared land in Manhattan.

He'll have to fight whatever is left of Bill Snyder's family for it.

  • Haha 2
Posted
7 hours ago, 956 Worldwide said:

Russia’s behavior is a choice made by Russians.  Poor, persecuted Russia is not forced to march into its much smaller neighbors and take things to defend itself. It does that because for centuries it has been a predatory, expansionist empire and Russians continue to see the world in those terms. 

At a certain point it just has to be realized that this is who Russia is. How many times have we had people just on this site trying to remind us that this is who that country is. Hundreds of years of being ruled by strongmen (and women) has made them EXACTLY WHO THEY ARE.

This is not to mean every individual Russian goes along with how they are as a society and country. I have a friend that is an American citizen now, but she grew up in Russia. She does not really identify with any of these normalized Russian values of hate and degradation. This is who Russia is and I applaud Europe for finally at least taking a stand politically. Now they'll likely have to back that up with military force at some point because dictators like Putin only understand power through a show of force. That is something I hope does not happen, but Europe has had so many wars in its history that you can just not rule out anything with so many different cultures and countries having to agree on what to do here.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
17 hours ago, tx 3 putt said:

IMG_3265.jpeg

The Ukrainian War has been the most successful and cost effective war for the United States with the exception of the Revolutionary War. We were putting in the final nails into the coffin of the Russian non-nuclear military when Trump took office.

  • Hook 'Em 8
Posted
Good to see that 986 just relegated to rolling out propaganda artistry again. And who laps that shti up. 

“Russia has agency”
”That’s just obvious propaganda!”

This. It’s fantastic. Did not address any of the substantive points made, just dismissed it all out of hand as propaganda. Including the part where 956 suggested that maybe, if you’d like to understand Russia’s motives and perspective, we should listen to its autocratic leader’s words.
And those words, from his mouth, are apparently - to Ana - American imperialist propaganda.
The beclowning is spectacular.
  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Posted

Y’all got to really admire the Aggy audacity of dismissing the warnings of Kennan, Cohen and a litany of cold wars diplomats as “Putin talking points, right off Lavrovs desk” and then in the next breath regurgitating literal Putin media talking points from a Tucker fn Carlson interview. 

  • Fuck You 1
Posted
Y’all got to really admire the Aggy audacity of dismissing the warnings of Kennan, Cohen and a litany of cold wars diplomats as “Putin talking points, right off Lavrovs desk” and then in the next breath regurgitating literal Putin media talking points from a Tucker fn Carlson interview. 

As you completely sidestep you calling his actual words western propaganda.
Perfection.
  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted

I will fully cop to believing that refusing to believe what Russians say to each other in favor of Western technocratic explanations that we understand better is a big reason why we are all here today.
 

The thing is that Russia doesn’t need a reason to invade its neighbors.  When Russia is weak, it lashes out.  When it’s strong, it takes what it can.  When Russias neighbors start to get too strong, Russia gets nervous and attacks.  When Russia’s neighbors are too weak Russia seizes the opportunity. Russia, contrary to Russophiles’ fantasy, is a massive and well-armed nation that has more and not less agency than all of its neighbors.  
 

The only field-tested way to keep Russia in its box is to extend the Western deterrent, clearly and decisively.   

  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Like 2
Posted
24 minutes ago, Anastasis said:

Y’all got to really admire the Aggy audacity of dismissing the warnings of Kennan, Cohen and a litany of cold wars diplomats as “Putin talking points, right off Lavrovs desk” and then in the next breath regurgitating literal Putin media talking points from a Tucker fn Carlson interview. 

Is this a real post? Holy shit 

  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Drool 1
Posted
53 minutes ago, Brisketexan said:

 


This. It’s fantastic. Did not address any of the substantive points made, just dismissed it all out of hand as propaganda. Including the part where 956 suggested that maybe, if you’d like to understand Russia’s motives and perspective, we should listen to its autocratic leader’s words.
And those words, from his mouth, are apparently - to Ana - American imperialist propaganda.
The beclowning is spectacular.

 

My favorite part of Ana’s bit is his firm belief that imperialism and interventionism is bad but at the same time Russia should get to explicitly tell Poles, Czechs, Balts, Ukrainians, Moldovans, and anyone else within their “near abroad” what  alliance they can join. 

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 4
Posted
3 hours ago, Nice Guy Eddie said:

The Ukrainian War has been the most successful and cost effective war for the United States with the exception of the Revolutionary War. We were putting in the final nails into the coffin of the Russian non-nuclear military when Trump took office.

They're doing so well that they've invited North Korean and Syrian troops to join in the fun!

No person who cares about the long term interests of the US would oppose supporting Ukraine. 

I make the guess that defense industry guy voted Trump. A lot of sales are now ceasing. Fuck you.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 2
Posted (edited)
38 minutes ago, Anastasis said:

Y’all got to really admire the Aggy audacity of dismissing the warnings of Kennan, Cohen and a litany of cold wars diplomats as “Putin talking points, right off Lavrovs desk” and then in the next breath regurgitating literal Putin media talking points from a Tucker fn Carlson interview. 


Holy fuck ... dude you are twisted.

Here is the text of Putin's actual fucking interview.

https://www.rev.com/transcripts/tucker-carlson-interviews-vladimir-putin-transcript

Here's the BBC fact check of that interview.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-68255302


I hope this helps, but I don't think it will. 




 

Edited by Horn Under a Bad Sign
  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 1
Posted
13 minutes ago, Horn Under a Bad Sign said:


Holy fuck ... dude you are twisted.

Here is the text of Putin's actual fucking interview.

https://www.rev.com/transcripts/tucker-carlson-interviews-vladimir-putin-transcript

Here's the BBC fact check of that interview.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-68255302


I hope this helps, but I don't think it will. 




 

How dare you use vlads own words

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, 956 Worldwide said:

Holy shit it is unreal how much Marco is debasing himself. 
 

image.thumb.png.a045d4689cfb6bd0898bd97d283640a5.png

What’s with these fuckheads and the “say thank you” garbage?

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, 956 Worldwide said:

Holy shit it is unreal how much Marco is debasing himself. 
 

image.thumb.png.a045d4689cfb6bd0898bd97d283640a5.png

Marco saying the quiet part out loud wrt Russian expansion.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 3
Posted
3 minutes ago, royiv said:

What’s with these fuckheads and the “say thank you” garbage?

It's how fuckheads think having power works.

Posted
9 minutes ago, hobbes2702 said:

Marco saying the quiet part out loud wrt Russian expansion.

QFMFT ... I was told by the GQP that Russia just wanted a buffer between themselves and NATO, and Ukraine's ambitions of joining NATO were the cause for Russia having to "defend itself" by invading Ukraine.  You're telling me now that Russia wants to be "on the border with Poland"?  The hell, you say.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Posted
My favorite part of Ana’s bit is his firm belief that imperialism and interventionism is bad but at the same time Russia should get to explicitly tell Poles, Czechs, Balts, Ukrainians, Moldovans, and anyone else within their “near abroad” what  alliance they can join. 

Again…irony is dead.
Anything America does abroad is evil American imperialism….including accepting other states into alliance as chosen by those states (like Poland and the Baltics…who MAYBE have significant reason to turn away from Russia).

Russian imperialism by open conquest, threats and intimidation…well, that’s natural, and they cannot help it, and the world should accommodate and coddle them, and apologize for being in their way.
It’s just f’n awesome to watch.
  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted

So transparent. "So we're gonna take your shit, and Russia is going to take your shit. Also we want you to resign. Also, if you have any young daughters, we'll need them too." 

star-wars-lando.gif

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Rage+1 1
Posted
1 hour ago, 956 Worldwide said:

The only field-tested way to keep Russia in its box is to extend the Western deterrent, clearly and decisively.   

Certainly, 1000,000 Russian casualties and the elimination of their modern tanks and APCs and fighter-bombers  and naval assets is a pretty damn good adjunct.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Posted
52 minutes ago, 956 Worldwide said:

Holy shit it is unreal how much Marco is debasing himself. 
 

image.thumb.png.a045d4689cfb6bd0898bd97d283640a5.png

Surely the US Secretary of State knows that Russia is already on the border with Poland, right?

spacer.png

But maybe I assume too much.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 2
Posted
1 minute ago, Party_Taco said:

Ukraine should tell them to kick rocks with that deal.

What is being demanded of Russia? What do they have to give up? You know, the invading country. Who invaded our democratic ally. 

  • Like 3
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Posted

What is being demanded of Russia? Quid pro quos for Dotard. That is 100% certainty.
Dotard delivers Ukraine to Putin. Putin delivers wealth to Dotard. Everything Dotard does is 1) purely transactional, and 2) for personal benefit.

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 2
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1


×
×
  • Create New...