Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

every WVU drive is a foul.

Allen got fouled on that last put back. no call.

edit - ESPN shows 14-10.  maybe the chyron guy was behind.

Edited by dcar00
Posted
Just now, dcar00 said:

every WVU drive is a foul.

Allen got fouled on that last put back. no call.

15-7 fouls.

14 to 10 per ESPN app

Posted
29 minutes ago, Braff Zacklin said:

It probably was excessive. Brock kind of went through the opponent's face to get at the ball. I'll defer to @Pancho.

So Flagrant 1 seemed appropriate. Flagrant 2 is a joke and supports yet again what a travesty officiating in Morgantown consistently is. Already eight fouls on Texas and a baseless ejection.

Just watched it. F2 because of the hit on the head is probably how they justified it. Not sure if the mens rule is the same as womens but the terms “violent and/or severe” apply to F2 (disqualifying).

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, jimmyjazz said:

Am I on drugs or is ESPN2 doing a horrible job of showing things like THE FUCKING SHOT CLOCK?

I was just about to ask about that. How do we not have a shot clock?

Posted
1 minute ago, dcar00 said:

yeah, just corrected it.  I think the chyron guy was behind.

Wouldn’t trust that thing today to tell me which teams are playing 

  • Haha 1
Posted
Just now, Pancho said:

Just watched it. F2 because of the hit on the head is probably how they justified it. Not sure if the mens rule is the same as womens but the terms “violent and/or severe” apply to F2 (disqualifying).

Let me turn it around on you one more time: would you have called an F2 there or an F1?

I certainly agree that it was excessive and warranted something more than a common foul, but it seems harsh to eject a player for that.

Posted

the team is playing well.  the D out top on the drives needs to tighten up but the foul trouble is probably some of the cause of that.

I'd be nice if we actually got some calls since WVU winning this game does nothing for the Big 12 but.....bowlsby.

Posted (edited)

Not sure how it’s even an F1 there. Ramey’s contact to the head only came because of the foul from Bishop. Not an F1.

Called an F1 which I’m not surprised but I don’t agree with that call

Edited by hobbes2702
Posted
Just now, David Dennison said:

Aesthetics. Brock's looked worse.

It was an intentional foul and the contact was entirely caused by Brock. Ramey’s contact here is mostly unintentional and the result of 3 bodies coming together 

  • Hook 'Em 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...