Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
21 minutes ago, Richard Kimball said:

All five B12 teams advance to the field of 32: Baylor, Kansas, Texas Tech, Texas and Iowa State. 

And the Frogs are looking solid so far. 

Posted (edited)
24 minutes ago, Jive Turkey said:

SEC was 3-3 in the first round.  Committee got it right.  SEC was overrated, and fortunate that Arkansas got a win.

Half the SEC teams, including arguably its best team, have been knocked out in one round.  And this walking, talking Tapout shirt is still clamoring that more SEC teams should have gotten in.

You're wrong, and no one cares, mouth-breather.

Edited by TexArcher
Just noticed his tweet was from a few days ago. So he was wrong then, which I guess is slightly less dumb that being wrong now. Whatever. Go cover the NIT or some bass fishing tournament.
  • Like 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, miguelito said:

what the hell does "from word to wire" mean?

"From the outside looking in, you can't understand it. And from the inside looking out, you can't explain it."

  • Haha 2
Posted
Just now, WhatTheBuck said:

Great game going on between Davidson and MSU.

yeah, I don't know if I'll win or lose, but I couldnt pass up betting Izzo on the ML (+115) in the first round to win in the tourney. 

Posted

Fun fun fun day here in milwaukee. So happy to get the W 🤘🏼

Currently have my kiddo asleep on my lap while I root for the Colgate raiders to pull off the big upset. It’s basically a Wisconsin home game. Impressive first half from the raiders 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Posted
Just now, TexArcher said:

If you're moving your foot clear of the restricted arc at the last moment, you're not set and it's not a charge, right?

i guess i no longer understand the rules. his feet were fucking moving

Posted

So why do you get the charging call when you rush out of the arc in order to draw contact? You’re in motion and diving into a player who’s already up in the air. And the other guy gets called for the foul? That doesn’t seem fair. 

Posted
1 minute ago, TexArcher said:

If you're moving your foot clear of the restricted arc at the last moment, you're not set and it's not a charge, right?

Since it wasn’t an RA play, that doesn’t matter. 

Now, he was clearly outside the RA so it’s just straight block/charge.  The problem is he was never legally set outside the RA before the offensive player left the air.  That’s a block. 

The ref when explaining it to the tv crew used his words, very, very well.  Notice what he didn’t say. 

Posted
1 minute ago, TexArcher said:

If you're moving your foot clear of the restricted arc at the last moment, you're not set and it's not a charge, right?

well, that depends on if you are an official just making shit up on the fly.

legal guarding position is in the eye of the beholder.

Posted
1 minute ago, WhatTheBuck said:

So why do you get the charging call when you rush out of the arc in order to draw contact? You’re in motion and diving into a player who’s already up in the air. And the other guy gets called for the foul? That doesn’t seem fair. 

Because reviewing is just for straight RA (restricted area) calls.  That was outside the restricted area.  He got it wrong, but you can’t overturn a judgment call that doesn’t involve the RA.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Pancho said:

Since it wasn’t an RA play, that doesn’t matter. 

Now, he was clearly outside the RA so it’s just straight block/charge.  The problem is he was never legally set outside the RA before the offensive player left the air.  That’s a block. 

The ref when explaining it to the tv crew used his words, very, very well.  Notice what he didn’t say. 

can you tell us what he didn't say?

davidson has been on the wrong end of several bullshit calls in the last two minutes

Posted
3 minutes ago, Pancho said:

Since it wasn’t an RA play, that doesn’t matter. 

Now, he was clearly outside the RA so it’s just straight block/charge.  The problem is he was never legally set outside the RA before the offensive player left the air.  That’s a block. 

The ref when explaining it to the tv crew used his words, very, very well.  Notice what he didn’t say. 

I feel like we're saying the same thing: he wasn't set, so it's not a charge.

But you're saying that part isn't reviewable; the reviewable part is only if he was or wasn't clear of the arc?

Well why isn't the whole thing reviewable?  Because I don't see the set/not set as subjective.  He was objectively not set and I don't even see how the kid's mom could argue that he was.

College basketball reffing is downright stupid.

Posted
Just now, hayden_horn said:

can you tell us what he didn't say?

davidson has been on the wrong end of several bullshit calls in the last two minutes

He said something along the lines of “he was outside the RA, it’s a charge.”

What he didn’t say: “because this involves a play outside the RA, we can’t overturn the call. We can overturn calls in the last 2min that are RA related.”

 

 

  • Hook 'Em 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...