You thought quantum mechanics was weird: check out entangled time

[Dolemite 143]

Quote

Updates on everything new at Aeon.

DailyWeekly

Photo by Alan Levine/Flickr

In the summer of 1935, the physicists Albert Einstein and Erwin Schrödinger engaged in a rich, multifaceted and sometimes fretful correspondence about the implications of the new theory of quantum mechanics. The focus of their worry was what Schrödinger later dubbed entanglement: the inability to describe two quantum systems or particles independently, after they have interacted.

Until his death, Einstein remained convinced that entanglement showed how quantum mechanics was incomplete. Schrödinger thought that entanglement was the defining feature of the new physics, but this didn’t mean that he accepted it lightly. ‘I know of course how the hocus pocus works mathematically,’ he wrote to Einstein on 13 July 1935. ‘But I do not like such a theory.’ Schrödinger’s famous cat, suspended between life and death, first appeared in these letters, a byproduct of the struggle to articulate what bothered the pair.

https://aeon.co/ideas/you-thought-quantum-mechanics-was-weird-check-out-entangled-time

[Upgrayedd 5,812]

[Biff Tannen 45,691]

I'm convinced Dolemite is a master troll who is playing the long con like no one else.

[HOOK'EMHOOAH 1,610]

There are so many issues with that article. First, the author is an assistant professor of history, not physics or mathematics or anything having to do with the subject matter; next, the funding for this article was a religious trust; followed-up by claiming science is a philosophy as if science is somehow given to be on par with theology. Lastly, they didn't actually provide sources for anything they referenced in that article.

In conclusion, I don't find this to be anything but gobbledygook. I got about past the first diagram where they explained the experiment and recognized that this is bollocks. The article is a sham.

[RayDog 682]

The title and article show that the author does not understand the experiment. It has nothing to do with entangled time. The state of photons 1 and 2, 2 and 3, and 3 and 4 are each paired, so we know the relationship between 1 and 4.

[Doc Holliday 199]

So can photon 1 be impacted by photon 4, 2 years apart?

[Dolemite 143]

Quote

In recent years, physicists have played with the timing in the scheme. For example, last year a team showed that entanglement swapping still works even if they make the projective measurement after they've already measured the polarizations of photons 1 and 4. Now, Eisenberg and colleagues have shown that photons 1 and 4 don't even have to exist at the same time, as they report in a paper in press at Physical Review Letters.

https://www.wired.com/2013/05/quantum-linked-photons/

https://physics.aps.org/synopsis-for/10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.053601

Edited June 6, 2018 by Dolemite

[Doc Holliday 199]

Real world application of this theory will be really interesting.  I figure we are still a couple decades or three away from seeing it's full potential and will be very interested to see what these smart folks come up with.

[miguelito 11,266]

Obviously they don't come up with a time machine, or we'd have heard about it by now.

[Doc Holliday 199]

On ‎6‎/‎20‎/‎2018 at 4:24 PM, miguelito said:

Obviously they don't come up with a time machine, or we'd have heard about it by now.

No, we wouldn't.  It would be the ultimate weapon.  Change the course of history and the control of history and future states.

[Dolemite 143]

[Dolemite 143]

From a "fantasy" site:

http://glamour-and-discourse.blogspot.com/p/blank-slate-technology.html

[Doc Holliday 199]

2 hours ago, Dolemite said:

From a "fantasy" site:

http://glamour-and-discourse.blogspot.com/p/blank-slate-technology.html

Started reading it and it's interesting, at least.  From remote viewing to intervention points.  The intervention points are the most interesting, at the moment, since there could be thousands of thought points, action points, etc.  Choosing the right one seems nearly impossible other than choosing the first seed of thought that someone dreamt up or the moment someone turns on a new technology.  Then memory restructuring.  Let's erase all your memories and replace them with what we want which entails that someone has the technology already to change memories since they quoted time travel experiments have occurred for 30 years.

add in the fact that it requires computing power 4000x more powerful than our current super computers! This is where quantum computing comes into play for scenario based processing but that also opens the question of how do you write an algorithm that complicated to view all the scenarios and ripple effects?  How do you account for human emotions, human thoughts that are not expressed, and for what we may consider fleeting moments that actually impact us beyond our comprehension? 

Anyway, thanks for posting! It's interdasting potatoes indeed.

Edited June 26, 2018 by Doc Holliday

[Doc Holliday 199]

Thinking about this more, I completely agree that energy harmonics and resonation is key for anything in this realm of thought or action.   If energy or light is key, and light/energy can be measured in wavelengths, you have to be able to match the tonal resonance in order to not disrupt your own being and then to essentially ride the wave like a hitchhiker.

The question I have though is can someone, a human being, even be a hitchhiker if quantum entanglement is needed?  Wouldn't object A (an event in say 1949) need to already be entangled with object D (a human in 2002 wanting to go back to 1949)?   

Even further stretch thought - could this be where "reincarnation" comes into play?  If someone was reincarnated and was connected to or indeed was that person in 1949, would that allow the harmonics to be similar in nature and allow that travel to occur?

Edited June 26, 2018 by Doc Holliday

[Dolemite 143]

This goes along with the above post. I found this site in 2001 or so. Before it was changed. I posted it on Shaggy back 2010 or so. You can imagine the reaction. It reads like its historical but its pretty far out. https://www.wingmakers.us/  Check out the Glossary available on this link: https://www.wingmakers.us/wingmakersorig/wingmakers/ancient_arrow_project.shtml. It parallels the Urantia Book. Also, check out the Interview Transcripts. 

This explains the changes that were made by someone: https://www.wanttoknow.info/wingmakersorig/wingmakerschanges

Have fun.

[Doc Holliday 199]

They're good reads since I'm not doing much at the office as my last day is on Thursday.  It's good time to read for entertainment and potatoes.