Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
5 minutes ago, TonyTexas said:

Everyone one is talking about Odo’s contract being terrible. He’s due to make $6.5M next year. That’s lower-middle class in today’s MLB

Yep.  The money isn’t big.  But the Astros have several options that provide better value than Odo - less money for the same or better level of performance.  

Posted
2 minutes ago, TonyTexas said:

Everyone one is talking about Odo’s contract being terrible. He’s due to make $6.5M next year. That’s lower-middle class in today’s MLB

When you might have to offer JV $35-$40M, have Bregs moving from $11M to $28.5, and have a holes to fill at 1B and LF, every little bit helps. 

Posted
4 minutes ago, kevwun said:

He has some performance clauses that roughly double his salary and buyout.  I am not sure if he has met them.

He hasn't 

Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, kevwun said:

He has some performance clauses that roughly double his salary and buyout.  I am not sure if he has met them.

Yeah I could be wrong, but I thought I read somewhere last night that after 1 more start he should reach those.  I can't find where I read that at now though 

Edit: OK so what I am seeing is he still should be short for awhile at least:

  • 2023 player option includes a $3.25M buyout
    Option escalates $2M & buyout increases $1M each for:
    20, 25, 30 starts, or any game with 12+ outs, max $12.5M/$6.25M
  • 2022 Incentives:
    $500,000 for 100 innings pitched
    $1M each for 110, 120, 130, 140, 150 innings pitched
    $1.25M for 160 innings pitched
Edited by Scraps
more info
  • Like 1
Posted

Odorizzi's contract bonuses.

Spoiler

The contract of Odorizzi plays a role here. He’s making $5 million this year (about $1.79 million remaining), but would win $500,000 if he hit 100 innings, plus $1 million each on 110, 120, 130, 140 and 150 innings. Odorizzi is currently at 60 innings, so 120 seems like the likely upper limit. Odorizzi also has a $6.5 million player option with a $3.25 million buyout, but as Chandler Rome of the Houston Chronicle explains, “Odorizzi’s player option can be exercised at a base salary of $12.5 million.” Dollars and a $6.25 million buyout – but only if he tackles with 30 games where he gets 12 or more outs in 2021-22. After Sunday, Odorizzi has 29 such games in 2021-22.” Given that the pitcher appears to have at least $3 million at stake to get another four-inning start, it was mutually beneficial for the Astros to find a team that would make him more comfortable hitting that threshold and getting a few performance bonuses.

 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

I can't blame Crane and Click for not wanting to pay him 3 million dollars for his next start when Lance will be back shortly.

Edited by kevwun
Posted

All we need now is a badass centerfielder with a monster bat.  Juan Soto is a badass centerfielder with a monster bat.  Coincidence?

Meyers, Urquidy or Javier and another 10-20 level prospect. Do it.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted

 

3 hours ago, TonyTexas said:

Will Smith? That’s a real slap in the face. 

Yeah he is a DO NOT WANT but Roughnedizzi was even more of a DO NOT WANT so I guess it is an addition...

Posted
26 minutes ago, Ojo Rojo said:

All we need now is a badass centerfielder with a monster bat.  Juan Soto is a badass centerfielder with a monster bat.  Coincidence?

Meyers, Urquidy or Javier and another 10-20 level prospect. Do it.

… except Soto is an average RF.

Posted (edited)

I think Michael Taylor would likely be the best CF improvement that wouldn't cost much in prospects. +9 DRS in CF and has a career high BB%, and hitting a solid .280/.352/.395. Wouldn't be shocked if his StatCast data shows he would have double digit HRs in MMP compared to Kaufmann. Yep. he'd have 10 in MMP. Also. signed for a respectable $4.5M next year.

Edited by HtownHorn
  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, HtownHorn said:

I think Michael Taylor would likely be the best CF improvement that wouldn't cost much in prospect cost. +9 DRS in CF and has a career high BB%, and hitting a solid .280/.352/.395. Wouldn't be shocked if his StatCast data shows he would have double digit HRs in MMP compared to Kaufmann. Yep. he'd have 10 in MMP.

and he's under contract through next year.

Posted
3 minutes ago, The Dog said:

and he's under contract through next year.

and his career OPS of .686 is underwhelming. I don't see the point in trading for him when we already have a better hitting CF in McCormick.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
9 minutes ago, HtownHorn said:

I think Michael Taylor would likely be the best CF improvement that wouldn't cost much in prospects. +9 DRS in CF and has a career high BB%, and hitting a solid .280/.352/.395. Wouldn't be shocked if his StatCast data shows he would have double digit HRs in MMP compared to Kaufmann. Yep. he'd have 10 in MMP. Also. signed for a respectable $4.5M next year.

Michael A. Taylor can do that job.

Posted
3 minutes ago, runthebone said:

I think Click was smart to move yesterday instead of fucking around waiting for Contreras/Bell.  Or maybe the cost was nuts anyway.


now that that trade cleared, deals are about to fly 

Posted
2 minutes ago, kevwun said:

I don't even want to guess what the Padres gave up and yeah, much better than the Dodgers or Yankees.

10:47am: The Padres and Nationals are in agreement on a deal that sends Soto and first baseman Josh Bell to San Diego, Morosi reports. San Diego will send back rookie shortstop C.J. Abrams, top outfield prospect Robert Hassell III, right-hander Jarlin Susana and top outfield prospect James Wood, according to Morosi.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...