Jump to content

Sid Meier’s Civilization

Celery Man

By Celery Man
in Video Games

 Share

Recommended Posts

ztejas

ztejas 43411

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, High Plains Drifter said:

 

So, I've never played beyond III. Should I got to IV, V, or all the way to VI?

What say the surl?

I wouldn't start with 6. It's too different. The learning curve from 3 to 5 is probably steep as well (I haven't played 3 in forever) but 5 is such a vast improvement in so many ways. 4 is a great game. Nothing wrong with just starting there - it's basically like 3 just improved across the board. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
UT_OB1

UT_OB1 2213

Posted
Posted

Plenty of people pick the game up that have never played, so I wouldn’t be worried about learning curve.  I remember enjoying 4 the most out of all of them, and would probably say that one if you’re only going to play one. Have they released an updated graphics version of 4?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
vtaenz

vtaenz 601

Posted
Posted
 
So, I've never played beyond III. Should I got to IV, V, or all the way to VI?
What say the surl?
I loved 4, especially with some of the custom mods people made like A New Dawn and another mod for that same mod Rise of Mankind. I may have that backwards maybe RoM was the mod and AND was the mod mod.

5 was very enjoyable after the final expansion pack.

I've enjoyed 6 a lot, I think I enjoy it more than 5 but prefer the art direction of 5. Good news, there is a mod by an artist that worked on civ 5 that changes the graphics of 6 to match those of 5.

One thing that stood out to me was up through civ 4 you could really do these massive empires on massive maps.

I think in 5 city spam started to get curtailed some and you would be a bit more strategic in fitting your cities into available space.

Also I stopped playing on maps larger than Standard in 5 and 6 because the game was so resource intensive.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
MillerEP

MillerEP 30446

Posted
Posted

You're fine to jump into the series whenever each is an independent game, it's not a sequel system. They're only numbered to keep them apart. They need to remake the game every so often to take advantage of new tech and graphics, or try out or expand on existing systems.

I love all the Civ games, but I think Civ 6 is a decent "beginners Civ" since it's dumbed down a bit from previous ones like Civ 4 and 5. They also went with a more cell-shaded look for Civ 6, as opposed to more realism of the past so you don't need a beefy pc for big maps. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 3 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...
MisterP

MisterP 127

Posted
Posted

same one I am on. I handle 6 no problem. I play with Scythia and just go heavy heavy military build. Once you research horseback, all horse back units become two for one. I conquer the first two people I can and go heavy into building to get that science back up and by that point I have around 6-9 cities. Cake walk once you conquer that second one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
elfenix

elfenix 34221

Posted
Posted
13 minutes ago, MisterP said:

same one I am on. I handle 6 no problem. I play with Scythia and just go heavy heavy military build. Once you research horseback, all horse back units become two for one. I conquer the first two people I can and go heavy into building to get that science back up and by that point I have around 6-9 cities. Cake walk once you conquer that second one.

your avatar seems nice

 

 

https://www.tiktok.com/@georginamazzeo

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 3 weeks later...
Hawndoh

Hawndoh 2386

Posted
Posted

I don't have a screenshot or anything but I just won a Rome religious victory and I was able to make a capital that had Chichen Itza hit 11 rainforest tiles and another city with a Petra that hit I think it was 10 mines.

I normally never build Chichen Itza because I usually chop all rainforest but I happen to try the rainforest pantheon because it was going to give me a great early game holy site, so I left all the rainforest I would normally chop.

Probably nobody cares but I do love it when you can pull off a ridiculous yield wonder.

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 10 months later...
  • 3 weeks later...
randomhorn

randomhorn 1722

Posted
Posted (edited)

I think I prefer the tile and terrain of 6 over 5. But the ugly looking leaders have got to go 

3600 hours in Civ 6, and 1300 in Civ 5. Don’t even ask about 2-4. I can quit anytime, but just one more turn…

Edited by randomhorn
  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Intercourse With Gray

Intercourse With Gray 140

Posted
Posted
On 7/6/2024 at 8:47 AM, randomhorn said:

I think I prefer the tile and terrain of 6 over 5. But the ugly looking leaders have got to go 

3600 hours in Civ 6, and 1300 in Civ 5. Don’t even ask about 2-4. I can quit anytime, but just one more turn…

I agree. I do think base Civ 6 was not better than Civ 5 but the expansions made it way better. I love districts but I am open to whatever they have planned

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 4 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing


Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!

×
×
  • Create New...