Jump to content

Realignment talk not going away

The Tower

By The Tower
in Football

 Share

Recommended Posts

Recommended

Posted by Sandbagging Steve,

How many teams will be left when the dust settles in a few years? I think there's a way for all the teams to still have some involvement. I will explain that at the end of this list. Here's my list of the top 32 programs and a list if it goes to 48. There's some debate if it goes to 48, but not much debate if it stops at 32. I guess one could debate Arizona State, but that's about it. The top 32 at least come close to carrying their own weight. Everyone below that line is losing money for t

This is great content for free.

Recommended by immamac

  • Hook 'Em

6 reactions

Go to this post
Scholz

Scholz 12302

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, theBigHen said:

I have friends and relatives bombarding me with texts telling me how Texas is the bad guy and how we have fucked everyone in the conference over. Can someone provide me a brief and factual retort to this that will shut them up? 

A-lion-doesnt-concern-himself-with-the-o

  • Hook 'Em 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 36.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • bullet

    1514

  • Hurtlocker

    1324

  • Al_4_ISU

    1085

  • BurntOrange&White

    978

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Hiphopopotamos
Hiphopopotamos
MAUFRAIS
MAUFRAIS

Aggy should abstain so the vote is 13-0 and then we can then brand it on their dog.

jofus
jofus

Posted Images

Druggist

Druggist 303

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Eggo said:

While it's true that academically UT is closer to Michigan, Illinois, etc, there's no rule saying researchers can't collaborate outside their own athletic conference. The parallels people try to draw are really dumb.

My father in law is faculty at UT and the only big 12 collaborator he has ever mentioned is a former post-doc of his.  He mostly works with with people at places like Stanford, Cal Tech , MIT, Cambridge, etc.  Conference affiliation doesn’t mean shit.

  • Hook 'Em 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Speedway

Speedway 152

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Huckleberry said:

Except for Baylor you're correct. I wish it weren't this way but it is. Could have been great with adequate conference leadership. 

Do I remember correctly that somehow Dodds was leveraging his relationship with Swarbrick to get Notre Dame to join the Big XII?  And then Florida St, Clemson, and Georgia Tech would follow.  Am I hallucinating that memory?

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Huckleberry

Huckleberry 34407

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Druggist said:

My father in law is faculty at UT and the only big 12 collaborator he has ever mentioned is a former post-doc of his.  He mostly works with with people at places like Stanford, Cal Tech , MIT, Cambridge, etc.  Conference affiliation doesn’t mean shit.

"I'm sorry, did you say you want your department at MIT to collaborate with ours? I'm sorry, but I believe MIT is primarily in the NEWMAC and we don't even collaborate with the old MAC. Good day, sir."

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Huckleberry

Huckleberry 34407

Posted
Posted (edited)
1 minute ago, Speedway said:

Do I remember correctly that somehow Dodds was leveraging his relationship with Swarbrick to get Notre Dame to join the Big XII?  And then Florida St, Clemson, and Georgia Tech would follow.  Am I hallucinating that memory?

That was a rumor that he was trying to get that done, yes. But I don't think anyone ever thought Notre Dame was actually going to join the Big 12.

Edited by Huckleberry
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Randolph Duke

Randolph Duke 4034

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, theBigHen said:

I did but wanted to follow up with some facts to shut them up for good. 

The SEC tried to get Texas to join the conference 30 years ago, even before Arky was ever thought about as a SEC member.

At some point, time runs out for the other conference schools to position themselves. 30 years has been plenty of time for the negatively affected programs to get their affairs together.

Thanks for the memories. We hope you have put the last 30 years to good use.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Nueces River Rat

Nueces River Rat 5758

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Speedway said:

Do I remember correctly that somehow Dodds was leveraging his relationship with Swarbrick to get Notre Dame to join the Big XII?  And then Florida St, Clemson, and Georgia Tech would follow.  Am I hallucinating that memory?

No, you are correct...   That was all rolled into the  same talk of Texas, Ousux, Okie Lite, and Tech going to the Pac 10/12.    

B

Link to comment
Share on other sites
orangebird

orangebird 1147

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, Richard Kimball said:

That's the first time I've ever heard Bowlsby referred to as being a good leader. 

I always thought of him more like this:

05c0fc95e900a2ce2c0aeb969abf5cc2.jpg

Seriously, how can anyone call Bowlsby competent? All this conference has done is lose schools and hide under the table.

I respect the shit out of what Bill Snyder accomplished at Kansas State during his prime, but at this point, you have to wonder if late-stage dementia is setting in.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
bullet

bullet 1628

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, Lobo said:

Iowa State, Kansas, and Texas.  There are a few others that are considered Carnegie Tier I research universities for the purposes of federal research grants, aeronautical opportunities, etc.  TCU is kind of in a hybrid space between the two categories.  Baylor, Texas Tech, Kansas State, Oklahoma, Oklahoma State, and West Virginia are fucking academic jokes.  I know it's not popular to discuss, but it's relevant to the realignment thread.  But the Pac-12, Big East, and Big 10 aren't going to swoop in and take those remnant universities because they are the only academically driven conferences in the U.S.  And most of the schools in our league are glorified community colleges.  I know it's sounds snooty so neg rep me.  But they're generic, land grant pieces of shit.  Don't get me wrong, they whoop our ass more often than they should on the field/court/diamond.

Arkansas, Ole Miss, Miss. St., LSU and Alabama all fall in the same category.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
89Horn

89Horn 1735

Posted
Posted
20 minutes ago, theBigHen said:

I have friends and relatives bombarding me with texts telling me how Texas is the bad guy and how we have fucked everyone in the conference over. Can someone provide me a brief and factual retort to this that will shut them up? 

“You say that like it’s a bad thing.”

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Dnaguy

Dnaguy 12579

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Nueces River Rat said:

No, you are correct...   That was all rolled into the  same talk of Texas, Ousux, Okie Lite, and Tech going to the Pac 10/12.    

B

 

Which a Pac16 w/ those teams would be a fun league to watch.

In addition, a B1G w/ OU & Texas is also at on par w/ the SEC in regards to brands, etc.

 

But after seeing how the PAC12 has shit the bed w/ TV + the B1G AND the Pac12 both shitting the bed during COVID, there's really only 1 prudent landing place now.

 

 

  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Nueces River Rat

Nueces River Rat 5758

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, Dnaguy said:

 

Which a Pac16 w/ those teams would be a fun league to watch.

In addition, a B1G w/ OU & Texas is also at on par w/ the SEC in regards to brands, etc.

 

But after seeing how the PAC12 has shit the bed w/ TV + the B1G AND the Pac12 both shitting the bed during COVID, there's really only 1 prudent landing place now.

 

 

Yep..  agreed..   The indecision last fall confirmed this.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
bullet

bullet 1628

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, Hurtlocker said:

Its part of the bylaws now and they seem to have altered it since the last realignment.   Now as soon as you signal your intent to withdraw, you lose your vote, the percent is only of the schools who haven't withdrawn.

But Texas and OU have not indicated their intent to withdraw.  They just said they won't renew the GOR.

  • Hook 'Em 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Nueces River Rat

Nueces River Rat 5758

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Texas73 said:

John Sharp is a Democrat so he is hated in Aggy land. 

True, but since he last held office one has to wonder if he would run for office again as an Elephant as the political winds have changed quite a bit since then.   That's if he really wanted a statewide elected job and not just doing it for the heck of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TexArcher

TexArcher 38819

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Fud said:

Gerry H- "Was told about 30 minutes ago that Houston and Cincinnati are expecting to be invited to the Big 12. That is coming from the Houston basketball side. We shall see."

Hey, shoutout to the Coogs!  You finally made it in!

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Huckleberry

Huckleberry 34407

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Fud said:

Gerry H- "Was told about 30 minutes ago that Houston and Cincinnati are expecting to be invited to the Big 12. That is coming from the Houston basketball side. We shall see."

I mean that would be a ridiculously salty basketball league. Not a bad idea for creating a new identity.

Then watch them finally figure out football should be a round robin without a championship game.

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Rage+1 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Vertigo

Vertigo 20463

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, 'stache said:

Oh don't worry, there is plenty of blame to go around. I blame arky for making a short sighted decision to leave the SWC just a few years before a better alignment became available. I blame Baylor (and maybe Tech if I have my history right) for forcing themselves into the conference in a way that ticked some people off from the outset. I blame UT, OU, NU, and aggy for demanding unequal revenue share that was almost certain to destabilize the conference. I blame whoever made the shit decision to not have a permanent cross-division rivalry to salvage OU-NU at the outset. I blame the networks for the "oNE schOOl PER TV MARkEt" bullshit that drove the last round and for destroying long time rivalries because of cable package nonsense that was already a dying model. I blame aggy again for blowing up the Pac-16 move a bunch of us agreed to at a time where everyone else probably could have found a comfortable landing spot. I blame Mizzou for lifting its skirt to the Big 10 which is the earlier I remember this latest wave of bullshit starting. I actually don't blame NU or CU for their moves, which was at a time that it looked pretty inevitable that the Big 12 wouldn't last. And yes, I blame OU and Texas for their moves now when they could have salvaged the conference a decade ago and did nothing to help knowing that they had their eyes set elsewhere because of a few extra million. It's all bullshit. 

Well I blame Gundy for beating us when i didn't want him to. So we're even I guess. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BachelorTrek

BachelorTrek 3271

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, BornAndRaised said:

https://www.cbssports.com/college-football/news/college-football-realignment-fallout-whats-next-with-texas-oklahoma-stating-intent-to-leave-big-12-for-sec/

E7PnzhLXsAchd8W?format=jpg&name=large

9 Million? OOF.

And guess which teams have already spent their money plus future-money that they now won't have......  
 


"Moose! Rocco! Help the judge find his checkbook!"  Lulz.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
UncleSonny

UncleSonny 6790

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Fud said:

Gerry H- "Was told about 30 minutes ago that Houston and Cincinnati are expecting to be invited to the Big 12. That is coming from the Houston basketball side. We shall see."

Doesn't do much of anything to make the Big 12 viable in the long term so I'm skeptical but we'll see.

Out of curiosity though, what are the rules for adding teams to the Big 12? Do they need TX/OU 'yes' votes to get them in considering we currently have to posture that we'll be in the conference until the GOR expire in 2025? Is playing ball with adding members something can use to leverage our earlier release at a smaller payout?

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
bullet

bullet 1628

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, mdmost said:

This guy Adam seems like a bitch. In one tweet he's saying "see Nebraska was right about Texas". Then in the next he's saying Texas is a better fit for the Big 10. All the while ignoring in the typical Big 10 douchebag trope that Texas only cares about unequal revenue sharing. Yet, we're going to a conference with equal revenue sharing. The stupid is amazing. Everyone hates us yet everyone wanted us in their conference even though we supposedly suck as conference mates. 

And the Big 10 is still charging $100 million or more admission fee to Nebraska, Rutgers and Maryland.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing


Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!

×
×
  • Create New...