Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
New contract has a no-trade clause. He’s in SF for the year

That only means he has to waive if to be traded. If a starting QB for a contending team goes down, SF would trade Jimmy for the right offer. That’s all the no trade means.
Posted (edited)
40 minutes ago, Hate said:


That only means he has to waive if to be traded. If a starting QB for a contending team goes down, SF would trade Jimmy for the right offer. That’s all the no trade means.

Sure. But he could and would complicate matters with contract demands to the acquiring team in order to waive his no trade. And that would also affect SF return. Think Deshaun Watson

Edited by TonyTexas
Posted
Sure. But he could and would complicate matters with contract demands to the acquiring team in order to waive his no trade. And that would also affect SF return. Think Deshaun Watson

He is going to test FA. Also, if he is an emergency replacement for a starting franchise QB then his contract is actually perfect. If he is traded in season, it is only as a rental until the end of the season.
Posted
10 minutes ago, Hate said:


He is going to test FA. Also, if he is an emergency replacement for a starting franchise QB then his contract is actually perfect. If he is traded in season, it is only as a rental until the end of the season.

Honestly I think shanahan is not sold on Lance

Posted
42 minutes ago, TonyTexas said:

The Browns really fucked up the QB market with their 100% guaranteed Watson contract. 

 

 

Yep and with that MVP on the shelf, he's probably looking for close to $300M. All guaranteed. wow

 

Wonder which team is going to take that risk?

 

Posted

Eric Johnson is a moron. He has no clue how the NFL works. There is no expansion coming. They won’t approve a move of any team to Dallas or any other market. I expect the chargers back in San Diego some day. They don’t want dual team cities other than New York. And Jerry will just have him offed. It’s just so stupid.

Posted

What happens if a “retired” coach returns a few years later? Sean Payton says he wants to coach, and all the media keeps jumping on “how much compensation will a new team have to pay the Saints because he still had two years left on his contract?!” Presumably Payton wouldn’t want his new team to lose one or more first round picks. So what if he just shows up at the Superdome and says “honey I’m home!” If he’s still under contract that would be violated if he coached another team, doesn’t that mean the Saints would have to pay him if showed back up?

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...