Jump to content

EPL 2018-19

Goo Punch

By Goo Punch
in Other Sports

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Jograves
Jograves

You're a frontrunner. That's why you 'support' that team. 

Firemans4Horn
Firemans4Horn

There’s still time to choose a different team. 

mdmost
mdmost

He gets in fist fights with his family just like you!

mdmost

mdmost 42843

Posted
Posted
47 minutes ago, Schulz2.0 said:

So former Southampton chairman Ralph Krueger just got hired as the head coach of the NHL’s Buffalo Sabres. 

So tons of other NHL teams are going to benefit from Sabres free agents and trades now?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
pied

pied 252

Posted
Posted
20 hours ago, Cheeseweasel said:

I guess there's been a lot of "put our guy in the wall and make him duck" plays in the playbook. Seems reasonable. 

I don't get what that solves.  Who cares if they duck?  I'd argue, if a team can pull it off, then cool.  They usually kick it straight into one of the other ~5 guys though.

 

Other new rules:

  • Ball doesn't need to leave the penalty area on goal kicks.  Don't think that matters much at the pro level, but if it migrates to the youth level, watch out.
  • PKs - ball will be dead after the kick/save just like they are in a PK tiebreaker situation.  Can't put the rebound in.  I'm torn on that one.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
MoJames

MoJames 8241

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, pied said:

I don't get what that solves.  Who cares if they duck?  I'd argue, if a team can pull it off, then cool.  They usually kick it straight into one of the other ~5 guys though.

 

Other new rules:

  • Ball doesn't need to leave the penalty area on goal kicks.  Don't think that matters much at the pro level, but if it migrates to the youth level, watch out.
  • PKs - ball will be dead after the kick/save just like they are in a PK tiebreaker situation.  Can't put the rebound in.  I'm torn on that one.

That PK rule is interesting. It gets rid of the issue of retaking a PK b/c someone ran into the zone, but there are plenty of PKs that are initially saved and the PK taker puts them back in easily. I like it.

The wall rule is ok in my opinion only to get rid of the ref having to go "break up" two players only to have them return to the exact same pushing match.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
yoladu

yoladu 4066

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Schulz2.0 said:

So former Southampton chairman Ralph Krueger just got hired as the head coach of the NHL’s Buffalo Sabres. 

he was always a Hockey guy, masquerading as a Football guy.

Played 350 games of professional German hockey. Coached the Edmonton Oilers in 2012-2013.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Schulz2.0

Schulz2.0 28764

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, yoladu said:

he was always a Hockey guy, masquerading as a Football guy.

Played 350 games of professional German hockey. Coached the Edmonton Oilers in 2012-2013.

I know about his hockey background. I’m more surprised someone hired him as a head coach instead of a front office position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
pied

pied 252

Posted
Posted
32 minutes ago, MoJames said:

That PK rule is interesting. It gets rid of the issue of retaking a PK b/c someone ran into the zone, but there are plenty of PKs that are initially saved and the PK taker puts them back in easily. I like it.

The wall rule is ok in my opinion only to get rid of the ref having to go "break up" two players only to have them return to the exact same pushing match.

Then they should do the same on corners IMO.  To me, it's attempting to solve one issue by addressing a similar issue.  You're not allowed to shove a player out of the way in a wall or corner or whatever.  Enforce that first.

 

The crap that happens on corners is silly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Firemans4Horn

Firemans4Horn 17827

Posted
Posted
41 minutes ago, Schulz2.0 said:

https://www.standard.co.uk/sport/football/manchestercity/man-city-set-for-dday-as-uefa-meet-to-decide-their-fate-over-financial-fair-play-rules-a4142816.html

Leaked documents suggest the airline paid £8million of its own cash. The rest of the £65m fee, it is alleged, was funnelled through Etihad from a holding company connected to Sheikh Mansour bin Zayed al-Nahyan, the club’s owner. 

 

shocked claude rains GIF

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Huckleberry

Huckleberry 32694

Posted
Posted

While all this should actually be in the UCL thread, the bottom line is that UEFA has to ban City from it next year or else the rules are not only dumb, they're toothless and therefore pointless. Of course with soccer orgs they might simply be looking for some hush money. When the decision is being reached in the "investigatory chamber" to forward the case to the "adjudicatory chamber" your bureaucracy might not intend to actually get things done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Schulz2.0

Schulz2.0 28764

Posted
Posted
35 minutes ago, Firemans4Horn said:

Leaked documents suggest the airline paid £8million of its own cash. The rest of the £65m fee, it is alleged, was funnelled through Etihad from a holding company connected to Sheikh Mansour bin Zayed al-Nahyan, the club’s owner. 

 

shocked claude rains GIF

They also had one of the sheikh’s shell companies buy a bank in Iceland. That bank bought the image rights to various Man City players for vastly inflated sums. There are multiple examples where they fraudulently inflated their revenue with Sheikh Mansour bankrolling hundreds of millions of pounds of “revenue” each year. Fuck City.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Longhornfan1024

Longhornfan1024 1707

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Huckleberry said:

Yeah, fuck owners spending money to improve a team. I LOVE THE PITTSBURGH PIRATES OF THE 2000s DECADE THAT IS THE DREAM, DON'T SPEND ANYTHING, JUST RAKE IN THE MONEY. WE NEED MORE OWNERS WHO ARE IN IT ONLY TO TURN A PROFIT!

Spending money is fine.  Consistently spending money in a way that circumvents the rules is not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Schulz2.0

Schulz2.0 28764

Posted
Posted
16 minutes ago, Huckleberry said:

Yeah, fuck owners spending money to improve a team. I LOVE THE PITTSBURGH PIRATES OF THE 2000s DECADE THAT IS THE DREAM, DON'T SPEND ANYTHING, JUST RAKE IN THE MONEY. WE NEED MORE OWNERS WHO ARE IN IT ONLY TO TURN A PROFIT!

giphy.gif

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
JimmyHoffa

JimmyHoffa 1188

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, pied said:

 

Other new rules:

 

  • PKs - ball will be dead after the kick/save just like they are in a PK tiebreaker situation.  Can't put the rebound in.  I'm torn on that one.

 

Fuck that and I wish I had video- my son had a rebound goal on a missed PK earlier this season when the goalie was celebrating after making the initial save. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
pied

pied 252

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, JimmyHoffa said:

 

Fuck that and I wish I had video- my son had a rebound goal on a missed PK earlier this season when the goalie was celebrating after making the initial save. 

My kid’s a keeper so I’m ok with it. Not sure when/how long it will take to work down. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Schulz2.0

Schulz2.0 28764

Posted
Posted
43 minutes ago, Huckleberry said:

lulz

The bin Laden family is fucking huge and lots of them hated Osama. His dad had over 50 children. We'll need more details to know if this money was related to terrorism (aside from standard Saudi human rights violations). But good effort.

Derka Derka Muhammad jihad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Captain Ron

Captain Ron 12793

Posted
Posted
40 minutes ago, Schulz2.0 said:

I hadn’t read about the controversy of the song City played in celebrating its title. Also, City is a shitty organization. 

https://www.si.com/soccer/2019/05/17/manchester-city-success-ownership-controversy-uefa-investigation

Dude, that song is fucked up. Fuck that club and fuck their fans too (about the sportswashing on the Matthew Hedges angle.

https://www.theguardian.com/football/blog/2018/nov/24/manchester-city-fans-defence-uae-sportswashing-tribal-loyalty

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing


Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!

×
×
  • Create New...