Jump to content

Active shooter thread

Hugo Stiglitz

By Hugo Stiglitz
in Cloak Room

 Share

Recommended Posts

speed817

speed817 19379

Posted
Posted
56 minutes ago, Horn Under a Bad Sign said:



This dude --- no kidding ----- was on a TV show called Intevention in 2009. Reason? He was a porn actor and mixed martial artist who had developed a severe addiction to porn and meth. He appeared in such films as "I Wanna Get Titty Fucked"  and "Latina Slut Academy."


https://heavy.com/news/aaron-brink-anderson-lee-aldrich-father-dad/

Shark Tank Writing GIF

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 13.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

4th&Five
4th&Five

Fuck off. You vote for this shit. Explain that to your kids. 

Pancho
Pancho

3rd leg of my move from Houston to the Bay Area, and I made it to LA.   I’m just now catching up on the news in my hotel.  I’ve said it before, and I’ll say it again—I don’t have kids, but this e

royiv
royiv

WTF world are we living in when people are having a discussion about survival rates of certain rounds? People are being terrorized by gun violence and we're discussing which bullet has worse/better ch

Posted Images

Brisketexan

Brisketexan 105154

Posted
Posted


This dude --- no kidding ----- was on a TV show called Intevention in 2009. Reason? He was a porn actor and mixed martial artist who had developed a severe addiction to porn and meth. He appeared in such films as "I Wanna Get Titty Fucked"  and "Latina Slut Academy."


https://heavy.com/news/aaron-brink-anderson-lee-aldrich-father-dad/

It gets worse. I have it on good authority that the Latina Slut Academy WASN’T EVEN ACCREDITED.
  • Haha 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jhawkmvp

Jhawkmvp 1489

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, henrygandorf said:


this situation needs straight-up deprogramming. 

A "loving" God who is all powerful and knows everything. Made them gay and non-Christian. And knew they would never "decide" to be straight or accept Christianity. He loves them so much he will torture them forever for being the way he made them and knowing the decisions they would make. And people wonder why the non-religious segment of the U.S. population is growing quickly.

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Popular Post
NameAlreadyInUse

NameAlreadyInUse 5114

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted
4 hours ago, TexEx15 said:

 

Lest anyone wonder why people like me spend time here specifically arguing about gays having an equal right to exist, people like this motherfucker are why.  He's literally created a weapon that at some point would be deployed against some group of "others" and he's fucking happy about it.  

It is for people like him that I hope that he's right and God is real, and that his first glimpse of the afterlife is the moment of judgement where he sees what an evil person he's been.  And then he realizes that he has all of eternity to pay the price for that evilness. That would be justice.  Fuck him. I hope he dies destitute and alone.

  • Hook 'Em 9
  • Like 2
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Al Bundy's Napoleon Hand

Al Bundy's Napoleon Hand 13585

Posted
Posted
14 hours ago, Jhawkmvp said:

A "loving" God who is all powerful and knows everything. Made them gay and non-Christian. And knew they would never "decide" to be straight or accept Christianity. He loves them so much he will torture them forever for being the way he made them and knowing the decisions they would make. And people wonder why the non-religious segment of the U.S. population is growing quickly.

Do not taunt Absentee Magic Sky Daddy. 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Al Bundy's Napoleon Hand

Al Bundy's Napoleon Hand 13585

Posted
Posted

https://www.msn.com/en-US/news/crime/sheriffs-office-in-county-where-deadly-lgbt-club-shooting-took-place-has-never-used-red-flag-law/ar-AA14wvIV?ocid=sapphireappshare

"Following the law’s passage, the Board of El Paso County Commissioners voted to adopt a resolution to formally oppose the red-flag measure.

Commissioners pledged to “actively resist” the legislation, committed to “legal action if warranted”, and invited “all like-minded counties” to join the county’s opposition, according to the resolution.

The commissioners also vowed against the appropriation of “any funds or resources to initiate unconstitutional seizures” and pledged to collaborate with El Paso County Sheriff Bill Elder, who personally opposed the law.

Sheriff Elder has issued more than 45,500 concealed carry permits to citizens and retired peace officers, according to the county, which noted that the sheriff has issued more permits “than any other sheriff in the state.”

More than half of Colorado counties drafted similar “Second Amendment preservation” resolutions.

In 2019, Sheriff Elder said he opposed the law because “we’re going to be taking personal property away from people without having due process.” ***

“The sheriff’s office isn’t going to run over and try to get a court order,” he told local NBC affiliate KOAA News.

It is unclear whether Aldrich’s 2021 case could have been eligible for an extreme risk protection order, which would likely have expired by the time of the Club Q shooting."

 

*** https://gazette.com/government/attempt-to-fix-colorados-2017-civil-asset-forfeiture-bill-moves-forward/article_c73e8a1f-b3b7-5c7d-a43a-76e19798a068.amp.html

"The heart of the 2017 bill, and what caused the most angst for law enforcement, was a requirement that law enforcement agencies that seize private property be barred from receiving the proceeds of those forfeitures valued at more than $50,000 and when those assets were tied to a federal criminal case. Assets of $50,000 or less would go through the existing state forfeiture system.

One of the complaints, from the Colorado Springs Police Department and others, was that the law would hurt already tight law enforcement budgets."

  • Rage+1 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bullneck

Bullneck 19168

Posted
Posted
Teslag
 
AG
 
It was never about "weapons of war". They don't want to stop at the AR-15. They've always wanted the common guns most of us have.
https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2022/11/24/politics/biden-assault-weapons-mass-shootings/index.html
Quote:
"The idea (that) we still allow semiautomatic weapons to be purchased is sick, it's just sick. It has no social redeeming value, zero, none. Not a single, solitary rationale for it,"
 
Funky Winkerbean
 
AG
 
Go for it.
 
bigcat22
 
AG
 
FJB
 
HumbleAg04
 
AG
 
FAFO
 
Johnny04
 
 
Roll footage of the 2020 riots
  • Rage+1 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Chooky

Chooky 13315

Posted
Posted

Tiny, bulbous-faced, egg-shaped man boy and turd torso, Kyle Rittenhouse, is promoting a video game that features him as the main character who goes around and shoots "turkeys who spread lies and propaganda."

Sources have reported that it will still continue to get dumber than this. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Biff Tannen

Biff Tannen 45691

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Chooky said:

Tiny, bulbous-faced, egg-shaped man boy and turd torso, Kyle Rittenhouse, is promoting a video game that features him as the main character who goes around and shoots "turkeys who spread lies and propaganda."

Sources have reported that it will still continue to get dumber than this. 

How has the Right devolved to the point where literally everything they do is just a grift?  Can you imagine if the whole country worked this way?  Just bilk people out of their money as a way of life?  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Chooky

Chooky 13315

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Biff Tannen said:

How has the Right devolved to the point where literally everything they do is just a grift?  Can you imagine if the whole country worked this way?  Just bilk people out of their money as a way of life?  

Anther good video game would be "Roger Stone Forceps Snare." You are a first person tong and forceps carrier and you have to snatch Roger Stone from floating space wombs, rendering his head into various shapes depending on how you grab him. "Snatch Snatcher" was another title considered but all the details haven't been worked out yet. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
tigol

tigol 2398

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Satchel said:

I don’t know, but it seems there’s something wrong about being able to buy a murder weapon on your way to commit murder. Is it that easy anywhere else in the civilized world? Happened in Tulsa and now in Chesapeake. 

I was talking with my husband this evening about duck hunting.  I like duck and dove meat.  I thought I'd try to hunt with my Uncle and asked my husband about a shotgun for birds.  He rattled off a few brands and then told me about the licenses and stamps and shit that I have to get before I can step foot out of the house.

Birds. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Satchel

Satchel 6938

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, tigol said:

I was talking with my husband this evening about duck hunting.  I like duck and dove meat.  I thought I'd try to hunt with my Uncle and asked my husband about a shotgun for birds.  He rattled off a few brands and then told me about the licenses and stamps and shit that I have to get before I can step foot out of the house.

Birds. 

Again, more evidence that we value guns more than people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
956 Worldwide

956 Worldwide 34715

Posted
Posted

Great article about a place that has some of the most permissible gun laws in the first world yet minimal gun crime.  
 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2022/11/25/gun-rights-test-czech-republic/ 

 

Quote

In an America riven by gun violence, with recent mass shootings at a Walmart in Virginia and an LGBTQ club in Colorado, weapons can often be purchased without even a background check. With the country divided about even the smallest changes to gun laws, the question is only hypothetical: What if anybody who wanted a gun had to first prove their competence?

The Czech Republic embodies an answer. By European standards, its gun laws are permissive. It allows people to carry concealed weapons for the purpose of self-defense, and it is one of the few countries in the world — and the only one in Europe — that provide the constitutional right to bear arms. But exercising that right is contingent on the test.

Czech lawmakers and gun owners say their national system dramatically increases the odds of responsible ownership. The rules also require a health clearance and a background check, and demand safe storage of weapons once they are purchased. In a country more populous than New York City, there were seven homicides using guns during all of last year.

“We really have bad politics in many ways here — corruption. But something I am proud of is this law,” said Martin Fiser, 35, a weapons instructor. “It can be a model for the rest of the world.”

Thailand gets tougher on guns after child-care massacre that killed dozens

The test is obligatory for anybody who wants a weapon, including hunters, collectors, even someone inheriting a shotgun from a grandfather. The standards are high: The test consists of questions randomly drawn from a pool of 501 possible. Those trying to obtain the hardest-to-get license — for concealed carry — can miss no more than one question. The failure rate is around 40 percent.


 

 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
tchookem

tchookem 3900

Posted
Posted
Great article about a place that has some of the most permissible gun laws in the first world yet minimal gun crime.  
 
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2022/11/25/gun-rights-test-czech-republic/ 
 
In an America riven by gun violence, with recent mass shootings at a Walmart in Virginia and an LGBTQ club in Colorado, weapons can often be purchased without even a background check. With the country divided about even the smallest changes to gun laws, the question is only hypothetical: What if anybody who wanted a gun had to first prove their competence?
The Czech Republic embodies an answer. By European standards, its gun laws are permissive. It allows people to carry concealed weapons for the purpose of self-defense, and it is one of the few countries in the world — and the only one in Europe — that provide the constitutional right to bear arms. But exercising that right is contingent on the test.
Czech lawmakers and gun owners say their national system dramatically increases the odds of responsible ownership. The rules also require a health clearance and a background check, and demand safe storage of weapons once they are purchased. In a country more populous than New York City, there were seven homicides using guns during all of last year.
“We really have bad politics in many ways here — corruption. But something I am proud of is this law,” said Martin Fiser, 35, a weapons instructor. “It can be a model for the rest of the world.”
Thailand gets tougher on guns after child-care massacre that killed dozens
The test is obligatory for anybody who wants a weapon, including hunters, collectors, even someone inheriting a shotgun from a grandfather. The standards are high: The test consists of questions randomly drawn from a pool of 501 possible. Those trying to obtain the hardest-to-get license — for concealed carry — can miss no more than one question. The failure rate is around 40 percent.

 
 
But then the libs would use that registry to create a watchlist and target their political enemies.... because that's what I'd do.
- Republicans
  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bozo_Casanova

Bozo_Casanova 26488

Posted
Posted
5 hours ago, Captainant said:

Register?? ThEn ThE gOvErNmEnT wIlL tAx Me!!!! /dt

- well-trained gun owners like @fattyflattie and @Anastasis who are horrified by red flag laws but think nothing of being on a registry and buying a tax stamp then waiting six months to take possession of a totally benign noise suppression device after purchase.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Anastasis

Anastasis 23475

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, Bozo_Casanova said:

well-trained gun owners like @fattyflattie and @Anastasis who are horrified by red flag laws

Stop acting like a clown Bozo. I am not horrified by red flag laws, and I don't think that I have ever argued against them here in the general sense. Maybe you quote me instead of being a clown if you want to talk. Because I can easy cite the times that I have indicated an openness to red flag laws on this board. LMK when you want to have a [serious] discussion buddy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
fattyflattie

fattyflattie 4639

Posted
Posted
8 hours ago, Bozo_Casanova said:

- well-trained gun owners like @fattyflattie and @Anastasis who are horrified by red flag laws but think nothing of being on a registry and buying a tax stamp then waiting six months to take possession of a totally benign noise suppression device after purchase.

90% of what I own is registered.  Only inherited guns that go back and forth between my brother and me aren’t registered to me (maybe uncles, dad, and grandpa, I don’t know how long there has been registry).
 

I’m not afraid of common sense red flag stuff. What I’m not ok with is some dipshit cop dinging my 3k Birdseye maple stock I had commissioned for my Wby, as he tosses it in the back of his trunk, because my exwife finds out I fucked her friend.   Or my minty pre-64 270. Or a half dozen others that clock in at > a month of that cops salary.  There’s some good red law ideas, and there’s some bad red law ideas.    But I need to know who’s handling what, and how, and where they’re stored before I get behind anything.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
fattyflattie

fattyflattie 4639

Posted
Posted
22 minutes ago, NameAlreadyInUse said:

And I need to know where to expect the next mass shooting before I know whether or not to get behind more guns rather than less. Fatty, do you see how that argument is nonsense?  Also don’t fuck around on your wife, man, that’s not cool.  

I don’t. The first red flag laws proposed had provisions going back to ex-spouses for your approval to own firearms. If a jilted lover from 15 years ago can fuck up a constitutional right, miss me with that.   Im probably for some legitimate red flagish type legislation.  Still would be interested in seeing how it would work thru the entire process.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bullneck

Bullneck 19168

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, fattyflattie said:

What I’m not ok with is some dipshit cop dinging my 3k Birdseye maple stock I had commissioned for my Wby, as he tosses it in the back of his trunk, because my exwife finds out I fucked her friend.   

Do you even know what red flag laws are?  Doesn't sound like you do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bullneck

Bullneck 19168

Posted
Posted (edited)
9 minutes ago, fattyflattie said:

I don’t. The first red flag laws proposed had provisions going back to ex-spouses for your approval to own firearms. If a jilted lover from 15 years ago can fuck up a constitutional right, miss me with that.   Im probably for some legitimate red flagish type legislation.  Still would be interested in seeing how it would work thru the entire process.   

Quote

Petitioner alleges that the above-named respondent is likely to engage in conduct that would result in serious harm to self or others as defined in MHL § 9.39(a)2 and petitions the Court to issue a temporary extreme risk protection order against the respondent pursuant to CPLR § 6342 based upon the facts and circumstances set forth in the following sworn application justifying the issuance of the order, to wit: Petitioner believes that the respondent is likely to engage in conduct that would result in serious harm to self or others because the respondent has engaged in, exhibited, or committed the following behavior(s) or act(s) [check all that apply]:

A threat or act of violence or use of physical force directed toward self, the petitioner, or another person;

A violation or alleged violation of an Order of Protection; A pending charge or conviction for an offense involving the use of a weapon;

The reckless use, display or brandishing of a firearm, rifle or shotgun;

A history of a violation of an Extreme Risk Protection Order; Evidence of recent or ongoing abuse of controlled substances or alcohol;

Evidence of recent acquisition of a firearm, rifle, shotgun or other deadly weapon or dangerous instrument, or any ammunition therefor;

Other [specify any other relevant factors the Court should consider]:

It doesn't look like any of these fall into your "ex-spouse approval" thinking. In other words, you are against something you don't really grasp.

Edited by Bullneck
  • Hook 'Em 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites
fattyflattie

fattyflattie 4639

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Bullneck said:

Evidence of recent or ongoing abuse of controlled substances or alcohol; Evidence of recent acquisition of a firearm, rifle, shotgun or other deadly weapon or dangerous instrument, or any ammunition therefor; Other [specify any other relevant factors the Court should consider]:

Please explain the bolded.
 

Also, what type of penalty are we looking at for false reports?  As of this minute, I’ve got firarms registered to me in 2 houses, and 2 ranch houses across Texas. How does that work?  What’s the maximum amount of time one would be without, while the claim is going thru court?  I’m sure you’ve heard of “Swatting”.  Let’s pretend I get a similar call made about me and they come take all my shit Oct 15. Guess I just eat damn near 5 figures on the ranch dues this year?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
NameAlreadyInUse

NameAlreadyInUse 5114

Posted
Posted

Yeah I just read about a restaurant owner in Northern Ireland who had someone go on Facebook and claim that there were gay orgies going on in the restaurant while it was being remodeled. The restaurant owner ended up having to close up shop. So, I guess the moral of the story is that it doesn’t matter what you do, if someone is up to something nefarious, you could suffer some pretty serious consequences as collateral damage. That sucks, for sure. But what you are asking for is a situation where no one could act nefariously before you’d even consider an alternative to continuous mass shootings. The problem is, if no one could act nefariously we wouldn’t be having mass shootings to begin with. 
 

what it comes down to is that if you want to have unfettered access to a resource, you also have a responsibility to make sure that you are a proper steward of that resource, and that means in this case you help people figure out how to keep as many guns out of the hands of people who won’t use that resource wisely. If you aren’t doing that, you are part of the problem. 

  • Hook 'Em 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites
fattyflattie

fattyflattie 4639

Posted
Posted
7 hours ago, NameAlreadyInUse said:

But what you are asking for is a situation where no one could act nefariously before you’d even consider an alternative to continuous mass shootings. The problem is, if no one could act nefariously we wouldn’t be having mass shootings to begin with. 

I disagree.  I just want it spelled out. You tell me that nefarious act carries a no plea minimum of 25, I’m on it.  Anything as absolutely subjective as this needs to be clear.  Clear? Crystal.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Fudge Nuggets

Fudge Nuggets 19206

Posted
Posted
13 hours ago, fattyflattie said:

90% of what I own is registered.  Only inherited guns that go back and forth between my brother and me aren’t registered to me (maybe uncles, dad, and grandpa, I don’t know how long there has been registry).
 

I’m not afraid of common sense red flag stuff. What I’m not ok with is some dipshit cop dinging my 3k Birdseye maple stock I had commissioned for my Wby, as he tosses it in the back of his trunk, because my exwife finds out I fucked her friend.   Or my minty pre-64 270. Or a half dozen others that clock in at > a month of that cops salary.  There’s some good red law ideas, and there’s some bad red law ideas.    But I need to know who’s handling what, and how, and where they’re stored before I get behind anything.  

Now we're you're going with "THere's nothing we can do about gun violence because my pew pew pews might get a scratch on them."?

Go fuck yourself.

  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Brisketexan

Brisketexan 105154

Posted
Posted
I disagree.  I just want it spelled out. You tell me that nefarious act carries a no plea minimum of 25, I’m on it.  Anything as absolutely subjective as this needs to be clear.  Clear? Crystal.  

Dude. Our existing CRIMINAL laws aren’t “CRYSTAL” clear. People are convicted based on evidence that a jury concludes makes it beyond a reasonable doubt that they’re guilty. There is always an element of human judgment and evidence in every single law.
Demanding that red flag laws clear a hurdle that laws against MURDER can’t clear means that you oppose red flag laws, completely and totally.
  • Hook 'Em 7
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Covri

Covri 6249

Posted
Posted
11 hours ago, fattyflattie said:

Please explain the bolded.
 

Also, what type of penalty are we looking at for false reports?  As of this minute, I’ve got firarms registered to me in 2 houses, and 2 ranch houses across Texas. How does that work?  What’s the maximum amount of time one would be without, while the claim is going thru court?  I’m sure you’ve heard of “Swatting”.  Let’s pretend I get a similar call made about me and they come take all my shit Oct 15. Guess I just eat damn near 5 figures on the ranch dues this year?  

image.gif.3723f2bd3374a55c90e54148520ecd3d.gif

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing


Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!

×
×
  • Create New...