Jump to content
Required Reading for any Longhorn ×

IG Horowitz report on Clinton email due soon

Ragnarok

By Ragnarok
in Cloak Room

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Mojo Hand
Mojo Hand

My prediction is that it will confirm that Comey and McCabe acted improperly when they did the things that hurt Hillary and helped Trump win, and that Trump will cite those conclusions as support for

Bama Chick
Bama Chick

Can we stop using "cunt" and "bitch" for little babies who cry about rep points? Us girls don't whine about it nearly as much as you fellas.  Why use female pejoratives? Call him "tiny dick"

Degenerate Gardner
Degenerate Gardner

Pussies are people who ignore IG findings because their fragile, irrational bubble just can't bear popping.  Pussies are those whose principles are so malleable that they embrace wannabe fascists rath

Hugo Stiglitz

Hugo Stiglitz 23,367

Posted
Posted

Peter Strozk is one of the FBI’s best spy hunters, maybe the best (Counterintelligence officer).

While it’s unfortunate his character was assassinated for political reasons, he is going to be much more effective at protecting the country outside the government. 

Fuck Russia.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
David Dennison

David Dennison 18,951

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, LongestHorn said:

It is very frustrating to them POTUS has failed to charge Hillary, let alone lock her up.  Because deep state dems.

They're never gonna get her. For anything. Ever. They control the government and it's the Trump Foundation that's getting sued. There will probably be charges filed.

That's hilarious.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Equinox

Equinox 95

Posted
Posted

There's nothing they could do to Hillary that would be worse than the fact that Strzok and the rest of her minions failed to deliver the presidency to her. Unless they locked her away for the rest of her life, which we know would never happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
dOUblewide

dOUblewide 101

Posted
Posted

Strzok falls under the "further restricted employees" category under the Hatch Act. 

Not sure someone would try to stretch those text messages to somehow mean that he used his "official authority or influence to interfere with or affect the result of an election" 

Im sure someone will look into it though. 

  • Fuck You 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
David Dennison

David Dennison 18,951

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, dOUblewide said:

Strzok falls under the "further restricted employees" category under the Hatch Act. 

Not sure someone would try to stretch those text messages to somehow mean that he used his "official authority or influence to interfere with or affect the result of an election" 

Im sure someone will look into it though. 

They already have. A few times.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
dOUblewide

dOUblewide 101

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, David Dennison said:

They already have. A few times.

I could be wrong...it happens...but I thought those allegations were based on finding out that he made "anti-trump" comments in text messages. Not that he told another colleague that they would "stop" Trump from becoming president. 

Im sure they will look at it again. 

  • Fuck You 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
David Dennison

David Dennison 18,951

Posted
Posted
50 minutes ago, dOUblewide said:

I could be wrong...it happens...but I thought those allegations were based on finding out that he made "anti-trump" comments in text messages. Not that he told another colleague that they would "stop" Trump from becoming president. 

Im sure they will look at it again. 

They already have. They concluded it was inappropriate, but not indicative of bias. Because no shit. It's a guy texting a political opinion to the chick he's fucking. They realized he was talking about voting. Because they aren't insane.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Equinox

Equinox 95

Posted
Posted
32 minutes ago, David Dennison said:

They already have. They concluded it was inappropriate, but not indicative of bias. Because no shit. It's a guy texting a political opinion to the chick he's fucking. They realized he was talking about voting. Because they aren't insane.

lol

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ragnarok

Ragnarok 103

Posted
  • Author
Posted
22 hours ago, TornACL said:

I hate to break it to you champ, but what you think is a clever gotcha is a clumsy, flawed and sad approach which is better suited for a sixth grade debate contest than a discussion between two (presumably) adults. 

You didn't even read my post because you were so eager to spring your little trap. 

In case you missed the memo, people in this country are free to believe in any religion they choose. It's a shame that some extreme facets of all religions advocate violence. It's wrong, in my mind. 

You know what else is wrong? Denying someone entry to this country based solely on their religion. That's not my personal belief or opinion. That is a fact that cannot be disputed. 

I don't have to support or endorse the beliefs of every person who visits or emigrates to this country. Likewise, I don't need to support or endorse any of the beliefs of any of my fellow Americans. If you want to be a racist piece of shit and spout bullshit on the internet that makes you look like a moron, I can't stand in your way. 

I will, however, speak up and take action when our government oversteps its boundaries and tries to suppress those beliefs, even if I find them personally detestable. 

That's kind of how this whole deal works. Perhaps you need a civics class. You definitely lack class. 

Well, I'm sure this is an exercise in futility. People like you are really a large part of the problem. You are so anxious to do your virtue-signaling thing and prove yourself open minded that you turn a blind eye to obvious truths, and the immense pain and suffering that Islam causes.  What you lack is guts and a brain. The important thing to you is not that women all over the world are treated as second class citizens under Islam's boot, but that nobody think that you are a racist.  Race has nothing to do with it. Islam is a religion.  The percentage of "good" people who are Muslims is no higher or lower than anywhere else. But their religion is broken. Look at the governments of Muslim majority nations. Look at the problems facing every nation with large Muslim minorities. Why do you think America will be any different.  Uf people in Scotland and Ireland were treating women the way they are treated in Egypt, Iran, and Saudia Arabia, you'd have no problem be outraged and organizing boycotts, and demanding we halt immigration from such odious countries. And I think you suffer from the soft bigotry of low expectations. We can expect Muslims to act civilized. And they are capable of it. But step 1 is for people like you to quit making excuses for them and exert pressure. Man up. Call a spade a spade.  Here it is in the words of a woman who managed to escape the boot of Islam in Egypt. Recognize the truth when you see it:

For 30 years, Nonie Darwish lived under sharia law as a Muslim in Egypt. After moving to the United States, she became a follower of Jesus Christ and quietly lived the American dream.

Her latest book, Cruel and Usual Punishment: The Terrifying Global Implication of Islamic Law, dives into the history of sharia law and what it calls for, and examines the global campaign that aims to install the legal system in Western countries, including the United States.

The following are excerpts from a recent Christian Post interview with Darwish.

CP: .... What don't Westerners understand about sharia law and what do they need to understand about the dangers of imposing sharia in Pakistan?

Darwish: Unfortunately, sharia - even in Muslim countries - is so against human nature that it has to be imposed by force because often it is rejected. So wherever you see sharia being practiced, it has always come and existed in that society through violence.

So the same dynamic is happening in Western Europe now. Muslims always use the word "impose" sharia. They never say let's pass sharia, no, they say let's impose sharia. The word impose is used.

It's very important to the West before they start considering sharia as a religious right for Muslims to know what it is.

I don't believe that sharia is a religious right. The West must really define what is a religious right and one of the basics in my opinion is that it does not hurt non-members of that religion. You can have all the religious rights you want but if your right to practice your religion violates the human rights of other people then that ceases to be a religious right.

Sharia law violates the human rights of women, of non-Muslims because it is part and parcel of sharia law to discriminate against non-Muslims. The commandment to do jihad is perhaps the centerpiece of Islam. It is not just the duty of a Muslim individual to do jihad, it is the duty of the Muslim head of state.

According to sharia books and mainstream Islam, the definition of jihad is "to war against non-Muslims to establish the religion."

So after 9/11 in America a lot of Muslims appeared on Western TV and said no the meaning of jihad does not mean violence, it means an inner struggle, self-analysis. But the truth is they are denying what the word jihad really means.

Jihad 97 percent of the time when it is mentioned in the Quran it refers to violence, annihilation, subjugation, humiliation, [and] subdue. So the word jihad almost always comes in the context of aggression.

If you read the Quran or Muslim scriptures, jihad is really the centerpiece of the ideology, which is the constant growth of Islam. In sharia books, it is one of the main jobs of Muslim heads of states to do offensive and aggressive jihad, especially against neighboring non-Muslim countries.

That means the sovereignty of neighboring countries are not really respected by Islam. And that law can explain to us why the Arab conflicts exist.

............

Under sharia law, for a woman to prove that she has not committed adultery, she can only prove rape by having four male witnesses. So how can a woman prove rape? She can't. How can she get four male witnesses?

So what happens is usually men who commit rape are either not proven or they will not get punished as much as she will get punished.

Muslim countries range from extreme countries like Saudi Arabia and Iran, and then very moderate countries like Turkey, and all in between. But unfortunately, sharia can apply unofficially. So the beheading done in Saudi Arabia, or the stoning, can happen in Turkey unofficially by her family.

So sharia can happen in a Muslim country or in a Muslim family in Europe. They can do honor killing.

CP: You made an intriguing observation that Muslim woman living under sharia law are in an odd predicament because they are like prisoners who guard their own jail cells. Could you explain what you mean?

Darwish: Islam gives no way out of the prison for women. For example, a woman can be beaten by her husband, she has no right for divorce, her testimony in court is half the value of the man, her inheritance is half what her brother gets, she cannot leave the house officially without her husband's permission, she cannot do anything without her husband's permission – she cannot leave the country.

So the rights of a woman in the Muslim world is so so weak. Even if she gets raped, she is the one to blame. So in order for a woman to have some sort of dignity, she must act as radical if not even more radical than men. She must act as if she is the guardian of Islam, the guardian of her own prison. She becomes an advocate for obedience of women to Islam. She will actually report on girls who don't cover their heads.

The predicament of women is it divides women. Women are not allowed to freely meet and very often men tell the wife that you can't befriend this woman. If a Muslim woman living in the Middle East, or even in the West, starts adopting activities such as joining a feminist movement she becomes an apostate immediately. And the punishment for apostasy is death.

.......

There is nothing in the Middle East called moderate Muslim. You're either a Muslim or not. The problem is not so much the people but the ideology. Cultural Muslims are like sheep almost. They have to abide. They just want to survive. But anyone who takes Islam seriously and believes Islam seriously must follow sharia. That is the predicament. The [Jordan] queen can be a western minded woman, the King could be a moderate, peaceful man, but unfortunately the destiny of a country does not depend on honorable leaders who want to have peace.

Muslim leaders who want to live in peace and reject jihad, they want to reject sharia, become apostates. And what happens to those leaders? Many of them get killed. And that is why if you listen to the Jordanian queen or king or whatever Muslim leader, they have to present moderation in a very diplomatic way or else they will become apostates and their life will be threatened.

CP: How would you explain all the Muslim women living in the Middle East who are well treated by their husbands?

Darwish: Women have adapted themselves to living knowing that men are the power in their lives. That does not mean that all Muslim women are walking slaves in chains. No. You know why some Muslim women are living a good life? There's one reason – their husbands are good people, they are humane people. But the reason why their husbands are good people is not because of Islam, it's because of their humanity.

When I say that women don't have much rights because men have all the rights, it doesn't mean that all Muslim men are evil or bad. The majority of Muslim people are just human being - good and bad like everybody else. But I don't attribute the goodness between Muslim men and women towards each other to Islam. I attribute it to the humanity and observing the Judeo-Christian culture and emulating them.

CP: You warn that American-born Muslim students are advocating for sharia laws to be imposed in the U.S. Many American's first reaction is that could never happen. Do you think it could happen, why?

Darwish: Yes, and I'll tell you how that can happen. There is a French Algerian Muslim sociology professor by the name of Mohamed Sabaoui. He recently said the following in France, a western nation, a democracy:

The laws of your Republic do not conform to those of the Koran, and should not be imposed on Muslims, who can only be governed by Sharia law. We are therefore going to seize the power that is our due. We will start in Roubaix, which is a town with a Muslim population of over 60% ... and the next mayor will be Muslim… we will declare Roubaix an independent Muslim enclave, and we will impose Sharia (the law of God) on all the inhabitants. We will declare Roubaix an independent Muslim enclave, and we will impose Sharia (the law of God) on all the inhabitants. The Christian minority will have the status of dhimmis [non-Muslims with fewer rights]. This will be a category in which you will be able to buy back your rights in exchange for a tax.

Can you believe that this is being said today in France? As soon as Muslims congregate in one area and become a political power in that area, they will elect their own leaders. And as soon as they elect their own leaders they will say we will impose sharia law.

That is how sharia can happen - by congregating in one area and they have a very high birth rate. Compared to western women, the Muslim women birth rate is about three times more. And it is just a matter of time and there are already cities in France that are 60 percent Muslim.

In America it can happen, it is just a matter of time. It is just how fast they can congregate and extend their population in one area.

CP: Is there anything you want to add?

Darwish: Yes, I want to make sure that every American that feels hesitant or doubtful that it is not proper to criticize sharia Islamic law because it is a religious right to read my book or read about sharia on the internet. If you read about it you'll discover it is the most horrific and cruel law that was ever created on earth. And in order for sharia to gain legitimacy, to make people respect and abide by it, they had to link it to religion.

But it was created 150 years after Mohammed died and also it was inspired by the Quran, the Hadiths and the lifestyle of Mohammed and it is really not a religion. It is really not a religion because it violates the rights of non-Muslims. It actually demands Muslims to kill non-Muslims. It is allowed. That is why we cannot consider it a religion.

https://www.christianpost.com/news/interview-ex-muslim-woman-on-life-under-sharia-law-37992/

 

  • Fuck You 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing


Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!

×
×
  • Create New...