QB1 Quinn "La Joya" Ewers - The Man The Myth The Mullet

[gurt 743]

The fact is the ship has sailed on making the switch to Arch. I do think Arch would’ve given us the best chance at winning if he had remained the starter from Georgia on. Half a season of reps would’ve been enough to get him ready for the playoff. I don’t think we would’ve seen worse outcomes to this point because let’s be honest, Georgia is the only good team we’ve faced and they pushed us around.

But now, with two games left in the regular season? You have to roll with Quinn. Opportunity missed imo. But I am very afraid that he is going to piss down his leg against aggy. We might win bc of our defense but I’m not expecting much from the O. And I can’t see Quinn leading us to wins against anybody in the playoff outside of a byu or Boise state

[Derka 6,030]

14 minutes ago, jimmyjazz said:

Why do you need Quinn to be Tom Fucking Brady?  Why don't you just need him to play within the system, something Arch arguably can't do yet, and WIN THE FUCKING GAMES?

Wuinn was terrible and Texas lost the against the only team we’ve played with a pulse. what makes you think that we’re going to WIN THE FUCKING GAMES after kentucky and into the playoffs? because i know the answer ain’t quinn.

[Texasborn91 927]

1 minute ago, jimmyjazz said:

Which has jack shit to do with our ability to win games.  That fluff hardware means nothing.  Hey to Vince and Colt.

 

Not my money.  I don't give a fuck.  By the way, Arch is making big money and Sark thinks Quinn is the better choice right now for this attempt at a title.  Excuse me if I don't put a lot of stock in the opinions of a bunch of whiny fans on a football forum.

If we lost this game with Quinn’s stat line you would say it was an absolute choke job. The defense is the shit and allows our offense to drag its dick in the mud for loooooong stretches. We can’t throw for 200+ after everyone has lit up Arky through the air. 

[jimmyjazz 45,671]

Just now, Derka said:

Wuinn was terrible and Texas lost the against the only team we’ve played with a pulse. what makes you think that we’re going to WIN THE FUCKING GAMES after kentucky and into the playoffs? because i know the answer ain’t quinn.

And Sark is telling you the answer isn't Arch.  How thick are you?  Do you really believe there is some fuckery going on behind the scenes, or that Sark suddenly got stupid?

[Had Enough 2,063]

1 minute ago, StassneyHorn said:

Absolutely, if the run game is present and the team isn’t turning the ball over.

Alrighty.  It’s not impossible I reckon.

[Texasborn91 927]

1 minute ago, gurt said:

The fact is the ship has sailed on making the switch to Arch. I do think Arch would’ve given us the best chance at winning if he had remained the starter from Georgia on. Half a season of reps would’ve been enough to get him ready for the playoff. I don’t think we would’ve seen worse outcomes to this point because let’s be honest, Georgia is the only good team we’ve faced and they pushed us around.

But now, with two games left in the regular season? You have to roll with Quinn. Opportunity missed imo. But I am very afraid that he is going to piss down his leg against aggy. We might win bc of our defense but I’m not expecting much from the O. And I can’t see Quinn leading us to wins against anybody in the playoff outside of a byu or Boise state

Agree. I hope like hell Quinn turns it around somehow. 

[jimmyjazz 45,671]

Just now, Texasborn91 said:

If we lost this game with Quinn’s stat line you would say it was an absolute choke job.

I literally used the word "trash" to describe a stretch of Quinn's play yesterday.

 

Quote

. The defense is the shit and allows our offense to drag its dick in the mud for loooooong stretches. We can’t throw for 200+ after everyone has lit up Arky through the air. 

News flash:  it's a team effort.  Would we be better starting Arch against UK, A&M and whatever follows?  Be honest.

[Texasborn91 927]

1 minute ago, jimmyjazz said:

And Sark is telling you the answer isn't Arch.  How thick are you?  Do you really believe there is some fuckery going on behind the scenes, or that Sark suddenly got stupid?

Sark tells you what he thought when he had to pull Quinn in the UGA game. If Arch scores points you never see Quinn again. 

[Texasborn91 927]

1 minute ago, jimmyjazz said:

I literally used the word "trash" to describe a stretch of Quinn's play yesterday.

 

News flash:  it's a team effort.  Would we be better starting Arch against UK, A&M and whatever follows?  Be honest.

It’s a team game but the QB is the most important position in sports and ours is lacking. Big regression since injury. 
 

honestly if Arch got a whole weeks worth of #1 reps? I think he would out play Quinn vs Kentucky. 

[jimmyjazz 45,671]

2 minutes ago, Texasborn91 said:

Sark tells you what he thought when he had to pull Quinn in the UGA game. If Arch scores points you never see Quinn again. 

LMAO you have no fucking idea if that's true.  He put Quinn back in, that's what you saw.

[Texasborn91 927]

1 minute ago, jimmyjazz said:

LMAO you have no fucking idea if that's true.  He put Quinn back in, that's what you saw.

He said himself he didn’t know if Quinn was going back in at the half. 

[BurntOrange&White 39,860]

1 minute ago, Texasborn91 said:

He said himself he didn’t know if Quinn was going back in at the half. 

Yeah but how do you know he said that himself? Fucking moron! - jimmyjazz probably 

[jimmyjazz 45,671]

3 minutes ago, Texasborn91 said:

He said himself he didn’t know if Quinn was going back in at the half. 

. . . and (bear with me here) he put Quinn back in at the half.  I know it's hard to see shit right in front of your face and understand the implications, but we have the facts right in front of us.

[Texasborn91 927]

Just now, jimmyjazz said:

. . . and (bear with me here) he put Quinn back in at the half.  I know it's hard to see shit right in front of your face and understand the implications, but we have the facts right in front of us.

How about we be concerned with the fact that Quinn was so mind fucked he had to be pulled you dense skulled mother fucker! Generated 17 yards of offense in a half. Unfucking acceptable. 

[jimmyjazz 45,671]

Just now, Texasborn91 said:

How about we be concerned with the fact that Quinn was so mind fucked he had to be pulled you dense skulled mother fucker! Generated 17 yards of offense in a half. Unfucking acceptable. 

It's a perfectly legitimate concern.  Now tell me that you think Sark is either (a) too stupid (b) too egotistical or (c) on the take.

Every team has a relative weak spot.  Ours is QB.  Deal with it.  All we should be wanting is for the QB who gives us the best chance of winning to be on the field.  That's all that matters.

[Hank Kingsley 20,834]

19 minutes ago, gurt said:

The fact is the ship has sailed on making the switch to Arch. I do think Arch would’ve given us the best chance at winning if he had remained the starter from Georgia on. Half a season of reps would’ve been enough to get him ready for the playoff. I don’t think we would’ve seen worse outcomes to this point because let’s be honest, Georgia is the only good team we’ve faced and they pushed us around.

But now, with two games left in the regular season? You have to roll with Quinn. Opportunity missed imo. But I am very afraid that he is going to piss down his leg against aggy. We might win bc of our defense but I’m not expecting much from the O. And I can’t see Quinn leading us to wins against anybody in the playoff outside of a byu or Boise state

If we could pin this post it would drastically limit the back and forth on the thread. 

 

[mwaadeeb 1,174]

Say we beat Kentucky, even if Quinn doesn't put all this shit to bed (so we're in the same spot as we are now) -- who here would honestly start Arch at Kyle Field?

[BurntOrange&White 39,860]

[Hank_Hill 18,665]

22 minutes ago, Texasborn91 said:

Sark tells you what he thought when he had to pull Quinn in the UGA game. If Arch scores points you never see Quinn again. 

“If Arch played better he’d be starting” 

yea that’s the mans point. 

[Hank Kingsley 20,834]

Just now, Hank_Hill said:

“If Arch played better he’d be starting” 

yea that’s the mans point. 

It's a terrible point. He was thrown into the lion's den with no starter reps all week with an offense that was already sputtering. 

I wonder how some would feel on here if Arch never entered the UGA game. Those 2-3 drives are doing a lot of heavy lifting in the "Arch isn't ready" camp. 

 

[Hank_Hill 18,665]

Just now, Hank Kingsley said:

It's a terrible point. He was thrown into the lion's den with no starter reps all week with an offense that was already sputtering. 

I wonder how some would feel on here if Arch never entered the UGA game. Those 2-3 drives are doing a lot of heavy lifting in the "Arch isn't ready" camp. 

 

No, Sarks opinion based on 2 years of practice and in game reps is doing the heavy lifting. Either you trust that or you don’t in which case Sark isn’t the guy.

[mwaadeeb 1,174]

3 minutes ago, Hank Kingsley said:

It's a terrible point. He was thrown into the lion's den with no starter reps all week with an offense that was already sputtering. 

I wonder how some would feel on here if Arch never entered the UGA game. Those 2-3 drives are doing a lot of heavy lifting in the "Arch isn't ready" camp. 

 

I know how I'd feel. I'd remember the crazy-stupid shit he did when he wasn't throwing bombs in his two starts and say "he isn't ready." Do you think he should start at Kyle?

[Hank Kingsley 20,834]

6 minutes ago, Hank_Hill said:

No, Sarks opinion based on 2 years of practice and in game reps is doing the heavy lifting. Either you trust that or you don’t in which case Sark isn’t the guy.

I think he's stubborn. I get why. It's ideal for the QB transition to play out the way he wants for recruiting purposes. It's healthier for the program this way. 

I just hope it doesn't burn us in these remaining games, but all the signs are there right now.  If we're gonna stick with Quinn, take off the training wheels and kid gloves and expect more out of him. 

 

Edited 5 hours ago by Hank Kingsley

[Hank Kingsley 20,834]

3 minutes ago, mwaadeeb said:

I know how I'd feel. I'd remember the crazy-stupid shit he did when he wasn't throwing bombs in his two starts and say "he isn't ready." Do you think he should start at Kyle?

I think Sark should do more to make sure he's ready as a contingency plan at Kyle Field.  

[jimmyjazz 45,671]

10 minutes ago, Hank_Hill said:

No, Sarks opinion based on 2 years of practice and in game reps is doing the heavy lifting. Either you trust that or you don’t in which case Sark isn’t the guy.

Let's not forget that Quinn did far better in the 2nd half against UGA than he had been doing when he took a seat.  60%, 194 yards, 2 TD, 0 INT, UT outscored UGA 15-7.  Mind-blowing?  No.  But he somewhat redeemed himself.

[BurntOrange&White 39,860]

2 minutes ago, jimmyjazz said:

Let's not forget that Quinn did far better in the 2nd half against UGA than he had been doing when he took a seat.  60%, 194 yards, 2 TD, 0 INT, UT outscored UGA 15-7.  Mind-blowing?  No.  But he somewhat redeemed himself.

Do second half of Vandy

[immamac 42,733]

3 hours ago, mwaadeeb said:

What bugs the shit out of me are the mouth-breathing absolutist morons on this thread who can't even muster an iota of respect for a guy who has underperformed relative to his recruiting profile but is the best QB we've had in forever.

 

3 hours ago, Had Enough said:

Exactly how is he better than Sam?  Are you basing that on winning a championship in a mediocre big 12?  

Could you imagine Sam with this level of talent and this Oline? He would have won a fucking Heisman. 

[immamac 42,733]

I still think one of sarks biggest mistakes when he got here was running Sam off for the likes of Casey and Hudson. Sam's NIL money would have been Astronomical. 

[scottsins 1,960]

yep. if you bench ewers for arch at any point this season then anything short of a national title is a disaster. it would be such a huge and unneeded negative storyline for this team to have to deal with. it’s makes sense why sark would believe in his own ability to guide this team to a title with QE at the helm, and it’s certainly a much safer option than the alternative. still, barring some sort of divine miracle or disney movie, freaky friday, rookie of the year situation occurring with quinn, he is who he is, and who he is is not the type of qb or leader who can guide this team to reaching its full potential.

I get your point, but isn’t it a negative storyline that Sark is keeping the better QB, who gives us the best chance to win on the bench? Who the fuck wants to play for a coach that does that?

[Had Enough 2,063]

2 minutes ago, immamac said:

I still think one of sarks biggest mistakes when he got here was running Sam off for the likes of Casey and Hudson. Sam's NIL money would have been Astronomical. 

No idea how this all went down.  I don’t think Sam ever gets recruited by Sark, but I bet he’d do damn well for him.  If he wasn’t serious about bringing Sam back, that was poorly done.

[Texasborn91 927]

30 minutes ago, Hank_Hill said:

“If Arch played better he’d be starting” 

yea that’s the mans point. 

Dude, we were already down 20-0. Sacrificial lamb but we were in absolute desperation mode 

[mwaadeeb 1,174]

9 minutes ago, immamac said:

Could you imagine Sam with this level of talent and this Oline? He would have won a fucking Heisman. 

I loved Sam but I'd go with Parcells on this one.

[jimmyjazz 45,671]

12 minutes ago, BurntOrange&White said:

Do second half of Vandy

Sark didn't bench Ewers against Vandy you stooge.

[Texasborn91 927]

4 minutes ago, Had Enough said:

No idea how this all went down.  I don’t think Sam ever gets recruited by Sark, but I bet he’d do damn well for him.  If he wasn’t serious about bringing Sam back, that was poorly done.

I think I remember seeing something about Sark asked Sam to come back but  Sam was ready to move on

[immamac 42,733]

Just now, Texasborn91 said:

I think I remember seeing something about Sark asked Sam to come back but  Sam was ready to move on

Lolno

[Hank_Hill 18,665]

Sark would’ve had Ehlinger for one year tops? Did we even have our NIL shit together in 2021 for it to be “astronomical”?

[AnotherLawyer 389]

1 hour ago, sith_horn said:

You didn't even respond to the points already made before you went ballistic with your fuck you negs. While Vagisil can't cure what ails thee, it might help to ease some of your symptoms ... counselor.

Look,Sith horn, why don’t you fuck off back to your pet tarantulas and/or snakes? I wasn’t responding to your mom’s basement ass in the first place.

Edited 4 hours ago by AnotherLawyer
“Ails thee”…you fucking loser.

[BurntOrange&White 39,860]

Just now, Hank_Hill said:

Sark would’ve had Ehlinger for one year tops? Did we even have our NIL shit together in 2021 for it to be “astronomical”?

Corporate wise I believe it would have been 

[immamac 42,733]

1 minute ago, Hank_Hill said:

Sark would’ve had Ehlinger for one year tops? Did we even have our NIL shit together in 2021 for it to be “astronomical”?

Yeah, remember what happened year 1 of sark? 

Just now, BurntOrange&White said:

Corporate wise I believe it would have been 

Yep, and everyone LOVED Sam. He was also not a complete potato in front of the camera and had a pretty good amount of charisma.

This is like saying Bijan didn't make any NIL money the first year of NIL lol. 

[HtownHorn 14,602]

3 hours ago, mwaadeeb said:

Arch threw a few of the worst passes I've ever seen in my life against ULM, just total fucking idiot throw into triple-coverage passes. I think our coaches know what they're doing in this matter.

And the next week against MSU he stopped and started looking to the intermediate routes, while still delivering the bombs in stride.

[BurntOrange&White 39,860]

Just now, HtownHorn said:

And the next week against MSU he stopped and started looking to the intermediate routes, while still delivering the bombs in stride.

His touchdown down the sideline to Deandre Moore is a throw Quinn has NEVER made 

[Had Enough 2,063]

1 minute ago, immamac said:

Yeah, remember what happened year 1 of sark? 

Yep, and everyone LOVED Sam. He was also not a complete potato in front of the camera and had a pretty good amount of charisma.

This is like saying Bijan didn't make any NIL money the first year of NIL lol. 

People can’t get past that ArKansas game but after that the pass protection improved,  the run blocking had moments of some pretty damn good stuff.

Sark doesn’t want his QB to run.  That first year wasn’t so much about winning as building.  Probably easy in his mind to say screw that.  I’ll bite the bullet and build towards 2024.

[Hank_Hill 18,665]

3 minutes ago, BurntOrange&White said:

His touchdown down the sideline to Deandre Moore is a throw Quinn has NEVER made 

There’s plenty of valid criticisms of Ewers I don’t know why y’all resort to things that can be proven wrong. 2022 Bama to Worthy. Opposite side of the field I guess. 

[immamac 42,733]

6 minutes ago, Had Enough said:

People can’t get past that ArKansas game but after that the pass protection improved,  the run blocking had moments of some pretty damn good stuff.

Sark doesn’t want his QB to run.  That first year wasn’t so much about winning as building.  Probably easy in his mind to say screw that.  I’ll bite the bullet and build towards 2024.

I swear some of y'all can't really remember stuff and it really feels like a lot of you don't watch a lot of football and rewind and Rewatch and watch on slo mo and look at what happened. Just watch once in real time and highlights. 

[Hank_Hill 18,665]

Sam should starts

[BurntOrange&White 39,860]

19 minutes ago, Hank_Hill said:

There’s plenty of valid criticisms of Ewers I don’t know why y’all resort to things that can be proven wrong. 2022 Bama to Worthy. Opposite side of the field I guess. 

The one where he had a clean pocket and didn't get hit? I'm talking about the throw where Manning stands in the pocket delivers a perfect throw knowing he's going to get destroyed....Quinn has never made a throw like that. 

 

 

Quinn has never made a pass like this, period.

 

 

[HtownHorn 14,602]

56 minutes ago, immamac said:

Could you imagine Sam with this level of talent and this Oline? He would have won a fucking Heisman. 

Yep Sam's worst season as the QB1 is better than every season we've seen from Ewers, and he was running an antiquated offense that beat him into submission.

[Hank_Hill 18,665]

10 minutes ago, BurntOrange&White said:

The one where he had a clean pocket and didn't get hit? I'm talking about the throw where Manning stands in the pocket delivers a perfect throw knowing he's going to get destroyed....Quinn has never made a throw like that. 

 

 

Quinn has never made a pass like this, period.

 

 

Yea I mean it was the same throw but sure if you want to add things to change the argument. Par for the course in this thread. 

[BurntOrange&White 39,860]

Just now, Hank_Hill said:

Yea I mean it was the same throw but sure if you want to add things to change the argument. Par for the course in this thread. 

I didn't change anything....I said Quinn has never made a throw like Arch did to Deandre Moore for a touchdown. You're the one who rant to a throw that is nothing like what I mentioned.

[HtownHorn 14,602]

34 minutes ago, Hank_Hill said:

There’s plenty of valid criticisms of Ewers I don’t know why y’all resort to things that can be proven wrong. 2022 Bama to Worthy. Opposite side of the field I guess. 

Was he laid out during that throw and still delivered a near perfect pass? The throw to Worthy was a poor throw that Worthy made a great adjustment to catch. Ewers absolutely can not throw back side posts to save his life. Just like the 1st drive on Saturday, Ewers threw the ball over the right shoulder of Golden, who was breaking open on the post route. It's incredible just how poor he is at throwing that pass considering it's a staple of the Sarkisian offense.