Jump to content

Quinn "La Joya" Ewers - The Man The Myth The Mullet


Coach pop a bitch

Recommended Posts

It is nice that the current biggest point of contention on this site is whether our really good QB is good enough to win a national championship. And whether our backup QB, who happens to be a fucking Manning, would be even better. 

It's an embarrassment of riches and such a massive change from the problems we were facing three seasons ago that I almost forget how down things were. It's like waking up from a bad dream. 

Some of you sad sacks could use a little perspective.

yvr4urh.gif

  • Hook 'Em 8
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/30/2024 at 11:29 PM, Ghost of LL said:

There is some serious unappreciation of aggy tears on this thread right now, and I find it really very puzzling.

Hahaha, not sure if anyone remembers this, but last summer, there was a thread on TexAgs called "Our Quarterback room is better than TU's." Since both our QB's were responsible for TD's in the Aggy game while their two QB superstars had none, I think that possibly might settled the argument.  

  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, UTEE97 said:

He turned the ball over twice, which led Sark to abandon giving him the ball because he didn't trust his quarterback any more. Without him keeping the ball, there is no passing game. Nothing disingenuous about what I said. 

Alright at this point I had to just look it up.  We got the ball back with a 10 point lead with 10:49 in the 4th.   We ran it 3 straight plays for gains of 8 yards, 16 yards and 8 yards.  Then on 2nd and 2, we ran it for a loss of 5 yards.   Then the 3rd and 7 was the shitty Bond route that should have been converted.    Then the fucking Punt got blocked.

We didn't get the ball back until 4:32 left when A&M had 2 TO's left and we ran to make them burn timeouts which was the obvious play.

There was no "abandoning giving Quinn the ball".  It was exactly what you would want to see from a play calling perspective in that scenario when you are beating their ass at the line of scrimmage.  

  • Hook 'Em 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, WinningIsHard said:

forgiving? playoffs? playoffs? You are one of the morons who hated PK, and didn't like sark...blah blah blah. I'll defend arch with the same vehemence I have defended sark, pk, quinn, taaffe and etc. Everything he does that isn't up to you chuckle fucks standards I'll be in his thread sticking up for him. He's a longhorn, that's all I need to know to defend him. 

Did you defend Charlie strong till the end?  

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Skipper said:

I just don't think this is correct, at least for last week.  Both 2nd half drives where we turned the ball over were great drives with good mix of run/pass.  First drive pass heavy before the pick six (we should have ran the damn ball at that point).  Next drive more run heavy but with multiple passing conversions.  I don't think we really "abandoned" the pass until the end when we were 100% milking clock.  We were trying to run the clock out before the 3rd and 7 incompletion to Bond for sure (and that was on Bond) but lost 5 yards on 2nd and 2 the play before.  

I just have absolutely zero issue with anything we did in that A&M game offensively outside of the play call on the pick 6.   I thought Sark called a great game other than that.  That was still some shit luck despite the play call.   Then Quinn has to protect the ball better his next drive and then the punt block was just WTF.    But as far as a macro "state of our offense" that is the best we have seen in a long time despite the WTF plays that made the game closer than it was.

Calling a zone read with a hobbled QB (even if he was moving better than expected) was bad. While Quinn fumbled, it was a good play by the defender on an absolutely brain dead, unnecessary play call. I get doing it if we were struggling to move the ball and needed to surprise the aggies with something. But we were stuff it down their throat at that point. Asking your gimpy QB to run a zone-read in that situation is just tempting the football gods. 

Overall, Quinn played really well on Saturday. The fumble was at least 50% on Sark for the play call. The int shouldn't have been thrown because it had no chance (defender was all over that route), but I'm pretty sure he was throwing it to the pylon where worse case scenario was going to be an incomplete absent the tip. This team in general just seems a bit snake bit when closing out games. Whether its the QB, the RB, the oline, or special teams, something goes wrong to keep us from comfortably finishing off the game. The only group that doesn't fuck up almost ever is the defense.  

  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, UTEE97 said:

He turned the ball over twice, which led Sark to abandon giving him the ball because he didn't trust his quarterback any more. Without him keeping the ball, there is no passing game. Nothing disingenuous about what I said. 

You have no clue what you watched at all or like I said, you’re be disingenuous. We were throwing the ball well into the 3rd, not stopping earlier in the quarter like you stated. He fumbled with 7 seconds left in the 3rd. By the time we got the ball in the 4th, it was all about running it down their throats and chewing clock. We stopped pushing the ball down field through the air because it would have been stupid to do so. Wisner and the oline were dominating them. If Sark didn’t trust Ewers to throw the ball, he wouldn’t have called the throw to Bond in the 4th. 

  • Hook 'Em 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Yev Kassem said:

Being happy with Quinn’s play this year is like enjoying a sad, dry, low-energy handjob from your significant other wearing a ratty nightgown. Yeah, you’ll probably still blow your load, but it’s not very fun. 

That’s more than 95% of this thread is getting these days 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Levi said:

You have no clue what you watched at all or like I said, you’re be disingenuous. We were throwing the ball well into the 3rd, not stopping earlier in the quarter like you stated. He fumbled with 7 seconds left in the 3rd. By the time we got the ball in the 4th, it was all about running it down their throats and chewing clock. We stopped pushing the ball down field through the air because it would have been stupid to do so. Wisner and the oline were dominating them. If Sark didn’t trust Ewers to throw the ball, he wouldn’t have called the throw to Bond in the 4th. 

Don’t try and be logical with some of the clowns here.

They do not seem capable of understanding logic.

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Rage+1 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Yev Kassem said:

Being happy with Quinn’s play this year is like enjoying a sad, dry, low-energy handjob from your significant other wearing a ratty nightgown. Yeah, you’ll probably still blow your load, but it’s not very fun. 

That kind of handjob is very fun if it's being given while you're watching Quinn Ewers play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not to pick on Quinn, but he had a couple of "should have picked off" passes in the first half. Good throws on both, but wrong decisions.

His pick 6 pass was a  better decision than the aboves. Had it not been batted at the line it probably falls incomplete or perhaps gets completed with a good play, not really a winner of play obviously.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Levi said:

You have no clue what you watched at all or like I said, you’re be disingenuous. We were throwing the ball well into the 3rd, not stopping earlier in the quarter like you stated. He fumbled with 7 seconds left in the 3rd. By the time we got the ball in the 4th, it was all about running it down their throats and chewing clock. We stopped pushing the ball down field through the air because it would have been stupid to do so. Wisner and the oline were dominating them. If Sark didn’t trust Ewers to throw the ball, he wouldn’t have called the throw to Bond in the 4th. 

It's exhausting trying to argue with Quinn fanboys. The whole world sees what you refuse to acknowledge. Fine. 

  • Fuck You 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Hank_Hill said:

Idk, think the whole world sees dubs. Which I acknowledge. 

The video that was posted of the good pass to helm, Kirk Herbstreit of all people is praising Quinn for the skills he shows. That dude has never been shy to shit all over Texas and their players/coaches. The whole world sees it though. 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, UTEE97 said:

It's exhausting trying to argue with Quinn fanboys. The whole world sees what you refuse to acknowledge. Fine. 

@UTEE97: we stopped throwing the ball by early 3rd quarter because of Ewers.

*presents video evidence of the opposite being true* 

@UTEE97: You’Re SuCh a FaN BoY. 

Edited by Levi
  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, Yev Kassem said:

Being happy with Quinn’s play this year is like enjoying a sad, dry, low-energy handjob from your significant other wearing a ratty nightgown. Yeah, you’ll probably still blow your load, but it’s not very fun. 

I call those the "alright, fine" handjob and there's not a thing sad about them. 

sleeping-randy-marsh.gif

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, HtownHorn said:

Who said that? You guys are just making up shit to run cover for a QB that has clearly regressed from year 2 to year 3.

I just don’t care because we are achieving what I want which is winning. Sure he regressed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/17/2024 at 3:48 PM, Codaxx said:

There is no chance Texas makes noise in the playoffs, if Quinn throws for 200 yards a game. Debatable that Texas makes the playoffs, if Quinn throws for 200 vs A&M 

Found this gem lol. Thread is littered with this “if Quinn does this, if Quinn does that…we don’t make this or that” haha 

  • Hook 'Em 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Steamboat1874 said:

Arguing with Arch fanboys is what is exhausting.

Please show us how Arch would be better going forward than Quinn.

Speaking of stupid motherfuckers.

This thread isn’t about Arch, douche. Read the title. It’s about Quinn, and recently it’s about how he is the weak link on this team.

Thus, some people calling for Arch. I don’t think Arch should be starting at all. We ride or die with Quinn.

But when we die with him, you fanboys won’t have much to say because every other part of this team is championship caliber.

Edited by Ghost of Shag
Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, WinningIsHard said:

Found this gem lol. Thread is littered with this “if Quinn does this, if Quinn does that…we don’t make this or that” haha 

Cool, you must have a lot going on. I underestimated the defense and the run game. Glad they carried the load, especially the OL. Run game improvement the last few weeks is one of the better developments. Still think the pass game needs to improve to see Texas deep in the playoffs. I guess it is possible  that Quinn can be the Texas version of Dilfer. I’ll be happy if that is how it plays out 

Edited by Codaxx
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Codaxx said:

Cool, you must have a lot going on. I underestimated the defense and the run game. Glad they carried the load, especially the OL. Run game improvement the last few weeks is one of the better developments. Still think the pass game needs to improve to see Texas deep in the playoffs. I guess it is possible  that Quinn can be the Texas version of Dilfer. I’ll be happy if that is how it plays out 

LOL. You signed up a year after me and have 1500 more posts. Settle down James Dean. I told you and that crayon eating fuck BO&W to not panic about aggy. I have zero idea how you could underestimate Texas’s defense in the 12th game of the year. If they take the field goals offered to them they still don’t beat us lol. Water under the bridge now tho, Georgia will not be that easy to beat. Quinn needs to not turn the ball over. We can agree on that I think. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, WinningIsHard said:

LOL. You signed up a year after me and have 1500 more posts. Settle down James Dean. I told you and that crayon eating fuck BO&W to not panic about aggy. I have zero idea how you could underestimate Texas’s defense in the 12th game of the year. If they take the field goals offered to them they still don’t beat us lol. Water under the bridge now tho, Georgia will not be that easy to beat. Quinn needs to not turn the ball over. We can agree on that I think. 

No wonder Quinn is such a pussy....you can't even bother to @ me if you're going to bring me up, pussy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Hank_Hill said:

We weren’t supposed to be able to win in Fayetteville or CS with Ewers running the show. They’re running out of material.

I think the concern was/is that we can’t beat Georgia or Oregon with mediocre QB play, and Arch provides a threat in zone reads, RPO, and deep passes that defenses don’t have to plan for with Quinn. It’s possible that Quinn can be better than Arch at somethings (like reading defense, pinpoint accuracy in short to medium passes), but Arch’s strengths give us a better chance of beating elite teams. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...