Jump to content

Quinn "La Joya" Ewers - The Man The Myth The Mullet

Coach pop a bitch

By Coach pop a bitch
in Football

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 20.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Jersey Man10
Jersey Man10
JesusSweatDuck
JesusSweatDuck
Hiphopopotamos
Hiphopopotamos

Posted Images

jimmyjazz

jimmyjazz 47059

Posted
Posted
12 minutes ago, Longhornlove said:

Based on what empirical evidence? Because Quinn sucks? All the people in here that think Arch is a better option right now are fucking morons. There is zero evidence but tons of emotion. Some are the worst fucking fans, they should go hide because they should be embarrassed. 

LOL Arch was a 1.000 recruit!

Wait . . .

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Texasborn91

Texasborn91 1088

Posted
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Longhornlove said:

Based on what empirical evidence? Because Quinn sucks? All the people in here that think Arch is a better option right now are fucking morons. There is zero evidence but tons of emotion. Some are the worst fucking fans, they should go hide because they should be embarrassed. 

Bc he’s responsible for 13 TDS as the backup. Half as many as the starter. His HC thought he had a better chance to beat UGA than Quinn. He unlocks the deep ball in sarks offesne and isn’t just a screen merchant. Got a couple others but I’m good. 
 

The data is not in your favor. Emotion is where you live right now. 12-2 matters. But that’s on the back of an all time Texas defense. Quinn turns it over too much, has shitty footwork mechanics, and has a downfield hit rate that rivals that of a storm trooper with a blaster rifle. 

Edited by Texasborn91
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ricky Butler

Ricky Butler 2798

Posted
Posted
15 minutes ago, Tex Long said:

Hits close to home. Miz Long followed up her Drama Majority with Law School. Well, and then back to Drama School with leading performer Gerry Spence.

Hey, not knocking it. I’m in the storytelling business. 
 

Just poking fun at the heavy handed Quinn analysis. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Longhornlove

Longhornlove 5176

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Texasborn91 said:

HC thought he had a better chance to beat UGA than Quinn

That isn't true for obvious reasons. If the coach believed that Arch would have finished out the game and been the starter the rest of the season. So, you think Sark is the holdup now, not Quinn. Interesting.

7 minutes ago, Texasborn91 said:

He unlocks the deep ball in sarks offesne and isn’t just a screen merchant. Got a couple others but I’m good. 

And has a propensity to throw into double and triple coverage

 

8 minutes ago, Texasborn91 said:

The data is not in your favor

Show your work, that isn't true at all. There is only speculation that Arch gives Texas a better chance to win any game that Quinn can't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Texasborn91

Texasborn91 1088

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Longhornlove said:

That isn't true for obvious reasons. If the coach believed that Arch would have finished out the game and been the starter the rest of the season. So, you think Sark is the holdup now, not Quinn. Interesting.

And has a propensity to throw into double and triple coverage

 

Show your work, that isn't true at all. There is only speculation that Arch gives Texas a better chance to win any game that Quinn can't.

By stating he has half as many TDs as the starter, being more mobile, and having a demonstrably better deep ball proves my point. What game do we drop if arch is the starter the whole season? We overpowered Michigan. Quinn did his best to keep Aggie in the game. He over powered a hobbled Florida secondary. Arkansas was in the 100’s as a pass defense and Quinn did nothing to take advantage of it. In the SEC champ game Quinn should have thrown at least 2 more picks. Goes on and on. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Red Five

Red Five 41694

Posted
Posted
26 minutes ago, Texasborn91 said:

Bc he’s responsible for 13 TDS as the backup. Half as many as the starter. His HC thought he had a better chance to beat UGA than Quinn. He unlocks the deep ball in sarks offesne and isn’t just a screen merchant. Got a couple others but I’m good. 
 

The data is not in your favor. Emotion is where you live right now. 12-2 matters. But that’s on the back of an all time Texas defense. Quinn turns it over too much, has shitty footwork mechanics, and has a downfield hit rate that rivals that of a storm trooper with a blaster rifle. 

With this defense constantly giving the ball right back to the offense, and with the best OL in probably 20 years, and the skill talent, in Sark's offense.... the numbers should be video game numbers. They ain't. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Texasborn91

Texasborn91 1088

Posted
Posted (edited)
25 minutes ago, Longhornlove said:

Against whom and when has those TDs come against. Facts matter. Get ahold of yourself. Arch has a similar turnover rate to Quinn with a higher interceptable throw percentage.

9-2 vs 25-9? Your math doesn’t math right

Edited by Texasborn91
Link to comment
Share on other sites
deech

deech 2387

Posted
Posted
23 minutes ago, chainsaw said:

He missed his chance to get drafted high. His stock went down, and if he returns (hopefully at another school) it will only drop more.

Disagree.  If he finishes these last three games strong and plays like he did against Michigan for most of them - he's going to get drafted in Round 2-3.    There is a staggering amount of incompetence at evaluating QB's at the GM level in the NFL.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hank Kingsley

Hank Kingsley 21655

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Longhornlove said:

Based on what empirical evidence? Because Quinn sucks? All the people in here that think Arch is a better option right now are fucking morons. There is zero evidence but tons of emotion. Some are the worst fucking fans, they should go hide because they should be embarrassed. 

Holy projection, Batman. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Red Five

Red Five 41694

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Longhornlove said:

All the people in here that think Arch is a better option right now are fucking morons.

We have been struggling at the QB position off and on for most of the season. Right now, Arch Manning is the betting favorite to win the 2025 Heisman. It is an extremely defensible position to think we'd be better on offense right now with Arch. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jimmyjazz

jimmyjazz 47059

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Texasborn91 said:

I’ve already argued this with you. The fact it happened at all is the proof. Why argue anything different 

I'm sorry, I don't remember discussing anything with you.  If Sark's benching of Quinn for less than half a quarter is evidence that he thought Quinn couldn't win the game, what does the fact that he benched Arch say about his thoughts on Arch?

I mean, this is really simple stuff you are failing to grasp.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
jimmyjazz

jimmyjazz 47059

Posted
Posted
30 minutes ago, Red Five said:

Right now, Arch Manning is the betting favorite to win the 2025 Heisman. It is an extremely defensible position to think we'd be better on offense right now with Arch. 

So Arch is Quinn 2024?

Great.  Now you tell us.

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Longhornlove

Longhornlove 5176

Posted
Posted
33 minutes ago, Red Five said:

We have been struggling at the QB position off and on for most of the season. Right now, Arch Manning is the betting favorite to win the 2025 Heisman. It is an extremely defensible position to think we'd be better on offense right now with Arch. 

How many first time starting QBs have won that award? The Manning name carries a lot of weight. What other evidence do they have to support that, none other than degenerate gamblers doing what they do, betting on shit. Doesn't mean he won't, doesn't mean he won't be a good QB next year. Where is the evidence Sark has played players that he thought didn't give us the best chance to win. Let me guess, the only evidence is Quinn playing with a sprained ankle with the game firmly in control. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BurntOrange&White

BurntOrange&White 41827

Posted
Posted (edited)
18 minutes ago, Longhornlove said:

How many first time starting QBs have won that award? The Manning name carries a lot of weight. What other evidence do they have to support that, none other than degenerate gamblers doing what they do, betting on shit. Doesn't mean he won't, doesn't mean he won't be a good QB next year. Where is the evidence Sark has played players that he thought didn't give us the best chance to win. Let me guess, the only evidence is Quinn playing with a sprained ankle with the game firmly in control. 

Cam Newton

johnny manziel

bryce young

Kyler Murray 

 

Edited by BurntOrange&White
Link to comment
Share on other sites
BurntOrange&White

BurntOrange&White 41827

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Longhornlove said:

Now how many were heisman favorites the season before they were starters? Thanks for helping me prove another one of my points.

That would be hard to find as idk what gambling sites existed back then to find preseason odds. But if manning throws for around 4k yards and 30 touchdowns with some rushing touchdowns to show his last name will carry on the hype machine. But I was just answering the question of first year starters winning Heisman. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Longhornlove

Longhornlove 5176

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, BurntOrange&White said:

That would be hard to find as idk what gambling sites existed back then to find preseason odds. But if manning throws for around 4k yards and 30 touchdowns with some rushing touchdowns to show his last name will carry on the hype machine. But I was just answering the question of first year starters winning Heisman. 

That's good, I wasn't being negative, literally thanks for giving that list. My point is out of those names, I'm 99% positive none of them were even pre-season favorites. I can't imagine any were even close. Bryce Young might have been on a short list but no way was he a favorite.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Red Five

Red Five 41694

Posted
Posted

Point being, it's not like we've got people demanding Cole Lourd get all of Ewers' snaps. Wanting Manning to play more at this stage is entirely defensible, and you probably shouldn't be calling people "fucking morons" for thinking that.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Red Five

Red Five 41694

Posted
Posted
Just now, Longhornlove said:

By the way, no need to imply that I said something that I didn't. My comment was as a starter. Pretty sure you knew exactly what I was talking about.

Fine. Starter. Whatever, the point is the exact same. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Thatguy

Thatguy 9315

Posted
Posted
Just now, Red Five said:

 

Yeah hard to believe I screwed that up. 

Geezus Christ. You knew what the fuck I meant. Nobody cares about a batted ball that falls harmlessly to the ground. Most people are talking about the tip ball INTs because those are what is important. What difference does that make anyway? Regardless, we had a lot more this year than last year total batted balls or not. I bet you can't even remember a single batted ball from last season. You guys like to derail a point when it doesn't fit your narrative. The point was last year when Jones was in we didn't see batted balls from his side with any frequency. He kept Campbell straight in pass pro. This was admitted to by the linemen themselves. He didn't lead the country in penalties. And he didn't bust protection like Williams does. The assertion that the line is better this year based on experience is laughable. Every stat that linemen are graded on when it comes to team success will be worse this year. Rushing yards per attempt. Sacks given up. Batted balls. That's the signs that a line is better not PFF grades. PFF grades don't show line cohesion and teamwork. Results do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
hobbes2702

hobbes2702 13392

Posted
Posted (edited)
31 minutes ago, Thatguy said:

Geezus Christ. You knew what the fuck I meant. Nobody cares about a batted ball that falls harmlessly to the ground. Most people are talking about the tip ball INTs because those are what is important. What difference does that make anyway? Regardless, we had a lot more this year than last year total batted balls or not. I bet you can't even remember a single batted ball from last season. You guys like to derail a point when it doesn't fit your narrative. The point was last year when Jones was in we didn't see batted balls from his side with any frequency. He kept Campbell straight in pass pro. This was admitted to by the linemen themselves. He didn't lead the country in penalties. And he didn't bust protection like Williams does. The assertion that the line is better this year based on experience is laughable. Every stat that linemen are graded on when it comes to team success will be worse this year. Rushing yards per attempt. Sacks given up. Batted balls. That's the signs that a line is better not PFF grades. PFF grades don't show line cohesion and teamwork. Results do.

Pretending Quinn hasn’t had an issue with batted balls his entire career is hilarious. You can still defend Quinn without just lying.

He had two batted against OU if I remember correctly. One that hit the ground and one that we still caught.

After watching a little highlights he also had at least 2 vs Tech, maybe a 3rd unless he just threw a duck.

Edited by hobbes2702
  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing


Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!

×
×
  • Create New...