Jump to content

Quinn "La Joya" Ewers - The Man The Myth The Mullet


Coach pop a bitch

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 22.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

7 hours ago, Hookem2147 said:

This is a really weird way to look at things. If he transfers and plays better next year it will probably be because he didn’t get hurt for the 5th straight season and has started 40 college games. We have 20 years of data points on Sarkisian’s offense and QB development. We are a very good offense with Quinn Ewers. I guess the indictment of the offense would be we have….a very good offense? Is it an indictment of his QB development that another program paid Ewers $6 million to come play for them, allowing us to start a guy named Arch Manning?

He probably doesn’t throw the ball much because he’s played 7 non-garbage time snaps since September.

I think your take is biased. College football fans don't have to give Sark the benefit of the doubt for not developing both Quinn and Arch. His offensive success in the past came mostly when he was an OC under legendary HCs. His offense hasn't looked anywhere like a top tier offense at Texas and if you can't do it with #1 rated QBs, great OLs, and 5 star WRs, then you're not a great playcaller any more.

Watching the Lions execute a beautiful hook and ladder the day before yesterday, I was thinking why Sark doesn't call these kinds of plays once in a while. Seriously, our offensive playcalling hasn't been that great and I don't know if it's because Quinn can't execute or Sark has stopped being innovative with age and the additional responsibilities.

Edited by UTEE97
  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, UTEE97 said:

I think your take is biased. College football fans don't have to give Sark the benefit of the doubt for not developing both Quinn and Arch. His offensive success in the past came mostly when he was an OC under legendary HCs. His offense hasn't looked anywhere like a top tier offense at Texas and if you can't do it with #1 rated QBs, great OLs, and 5 star WRs, then you're not a great playcaller any more.

Watching the Lions execute a beautiful hook and ladder day before yesterday, I was thinking why Sark doesn't call these kinds of plays once in a while? Seriously, our offensive playcalling hasn't been that great and I don't know if it's because Quinn can't execute or Sark has stopped being innovative with age.

The coach on the other sideline later on today seems to think otherwise about Sarkisian and his abilities as an OC. 

“There’s a lot of good offensive schemes out there, and then there’s offensive coaches who change their scheme and are constantly getting better,” Dillingham said Monday. “I think that’s something that he’s done as good if not better than anybody in the country is if you turned on his tape from 10 years ago, it’s going to be unrecognizable to his tape right now. That is very challenging to do when you’re successful. When you’re successful, you want to keep doing what got you successful. 

“It’s very challenging to be, in my opinion, to be humble enough to constantly continually adapt to the current landscape to the rules. You can’t cut block on the perimeter, to RPOs and how they change the game in terms of substitution patterns, and now you can slow teams down that sub late. You couldn’t do that 15 years ago. He has always adapted with the game and almost been ahead of the curve a little bit, and that’s really challenging to do.”

 

 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, BurntOrange&White said:

Did Quinn? 

 

8 hours ago, hobbes2702 said:

I doubt it. But that seems like a strange response to my post.

That is the only upside on the year to this point. 

So the only reason I'm going to start the RS-FR over the JR is off the RS-FR can win games the JR cannot. 

Otherwise, what is the point? 

If QB2 is better right now, and will pass to a better result, sure, promote QB2. Otherwise we're just yappin.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, UTEE97 said:

Watching the Lions execute a beautiful hook and ladder the day before yesterday, I was thinking why Sark doesn't call these kinds of plays once in a while. 

Replace "Sark" with "any play caller at any level”.

And if I'm missing the Sarkasm, forgive me.

Edited by Slacks
  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Hook1997 said:

 

@Thatguy is a Helobious sock at this point right?  Like Helob but Quinn’s family member?  There’s no way he’s not kin to Ewers, right….  This seriously has to be a bit if he’s not?  There’s no one else who takes any criticism and responds like this to every post right?  If he doesn’t have a brother this is his dad, uncle or mom?  I swear he’s great if the pocket is clean and it’s 82.5 degrees…. That’s what you sound like. 

The fact that you think me saying Quinn plays his best ball when we open it up is crazy shows either how much you don't see when watching our games or how much you are so hoping he fails while you are watching, you don't see what he is successful doing. Go back and watch any game Quinn played well and watch how we called it. It's not rocket science.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Hook1997 said:

 

@Thatguy is a Helobious sock at this point right?  Like Helob but Quinn’s family member?  There’s no way he’s not kin to Ewers, right….  This seriously has to be a bit if he’s not?  There’s no one else who takes any criticism and responds like this to every post right?  If he doesn’t have a brother this is his dad, uncle or mom?  I swear he’s great if the pocket is clean and it’s 82.5 degrees…. That’s what you sound like. 

If you disagree tell us what Ewers is good at?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, UpperWestside said:

The coach on the other sideline later on today seems to think otherwise about Sarkisian and his abilities as an OC. 

“There’s a lot of good offensive schemes out there, and then there’s offensive coaches who change their scheme and are constantly getting better,” Dillingham said Monday. “I think that’s something that he’s done as good if not better than anybody in the country is if you turned on his tape from 10 years ago, it’s going to be unrecognizable to his tape right now. That is very challenging to do when you’re successful. When you’re successful, you want to keep doing what got you successful. 

“It’s very challenging to be, in my opinion, to be humble enough to constantly continually adapt to the current landscape to the rules. You can’t cut block on the perimeter, to RPOs and how they change the game in terms of substitution patterns, and now you can slow teams down that sub late. You couldn’t do that 15 years ago. He has always adapted with the game and almost been ahead of the curve a little bit, and that’s really challenging to do.”

 

 

I don't think you ever heard of coach speak.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, UTEE97 said:

His offense hasn't looked anywhere like a top tier offense at Texas and if you can't do it with #1 rated QBs, great OLs, and 5 star WRs, then you're not a great playcaller any more

What is your definition of a top tier offense? I just want to know what you are judging it off of.

Points per game? Yards per game? Yards per play? SP+ ranking? Eyeball test?

  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Hookem2147 said:

What is your definition of a top tier offense? I just want to know what you are judging it off of.

Points per game? Yards per game? Yards per play? SP+ ranking? Eyeball test?

Texas offense 

OFEI: 18th

OF+: 10th

Pts per drive- 15th

Yards per play- 18th

Good offense, not elite.. Top tier is tough, not sure what that exactly means 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just for a frame of reference, $6M is roughly what a late 2nd round pick is guaranteed on a 4 year deal.

4 years.

Not 1 year.

Most of our fans think Quinn will be lucky to get taken in the first two rounds, so if we accept that as true, then he would be nuts not to take one more year in college for $6M.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, jimmyjazz said:

Just for a frame of reference, $6M is roughly what a late 2nd round pick is guaranteed on a 4 year deal.

4 years.

Not 1 year.

Most of our fans think Quinn will be lucky to get taken in the first two rounds, so if we accept that as true, then he would be nuts not to take one more year in college for $6M.

Well, I guess ND and Miami can afford to drop $6M on a QB. That figure sounds far-fetched to me when you consider our NIL collective budget is what? $22M? Or maybe I'm misremembering.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Hookem2147 said:

What is your definition of a top tier offense? I just want to know what you are judging it off of.

Points per game? Yards per game? Yards per play? SP+ ranking? Eyeball test?

How about scoring points in the second half? We have out talented everyone this season except UGA. I am super glad that we are winning the games we are supposed to unlike what we did with the last two coaches and late Mack. A better offensive showing against UGA would have won us the games. We should win today with sheer talent and then it gets interesting. That's when Sark the genius OC needs to perform.

Edited by UTEE97
  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, jimmyjazz said:

Just for a frame of reference, $6M is roughly what a late 2nd round pick is guaranteed on a 4 year deal.

4 years.

Not 1 year.

Most of our fans think Quinn will be lucky to get taken in the first two rounds, so if we accept that as true, then he would be nuts not to take one more year in college for $6M.

2nd round is 9.9-6.3mm

https://www.nflmockdraftdatabase.com/big-boards/2025/consensus-big-board-2025?pos=QB

this has Quinn around pick 50. I think their 1 is clearly Sanders and Ward.. The order on the next 4 QBs is likely to be very volatile. Definitely an argument for any of the QBs in the next tier to return for the cash. Argument against is this is considered one of the weakest QB classes in decades, which probably means their will be a HOFer in the group 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Hook1997 said:

If you agree he hasn’t held the offense back some this year take my bet??

Your bet is the dumbest fucking bet I've ever heard of. So next year when CJ Baxter is back, and we are better at receiver I am supposed to bet that the quarterback won't throw for more yards than this year when we've had only one good receiver for most of the year and two rbs that weigh like 100lbs each? Of course the quarterback will throw for more yards next year. Just like the quarterback threw for more yards last year when we had better personnel as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Codaxx said:

Depends on the position in the 2nd round. “Around 6mm” is the last pick of the 2nd round. It’s 9.9mm to 6.3mm. They upped the salaries this year for the draft 

Holy shit, dude.  This is what I said:  "$6M is roughly what a late 2nd round pick is guaranteed".  You really don't need to pick this nit.  We're talking about a ~ 4X difference in annual pay.  (Please note the "~", meaning "approximately", drink a beer or switch to decaf.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Thatguy said:

Your bet is the dumbest fucking bet I've ever heard of. So next year when CJ Baxter is back, and we are better at receiver I am supposed to bet that the quarterback won't throw for more yards than this year when we've had only one good receiver for most of the year and two rbs that weigh like 100lbs each? Of course the quarterback will throw for more yards next year. Just like the quarterback threw for more yards last year when we had better personnel as well.

There’s no guarantees on any of that…. Baxter went down as soon as touched until the last part of the season and fumbled a lot, a WR room that will be mostly new and a pretty much all new oline.  But hey, if you know I’m right.  That’s ok to admit you’re wrong about you son.  The offensive weapons and line next year will not be a huge difference from this one.   

Edited by Hook1997
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, jimmyjazz said:

Holy shit, dude.  This is what I said:  "$6M is roughly what a late 2nd round pick is guaranteed".  You really don't need to pick this nit.  We're talking about a ~ 4X difference in annual pay.  (Please note the "~", meaning "approximately", drink a beer or switch to decaf.)

You seem delicate. I’ll remember that in the future 

  • Fuck You 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Stringer said:


Oh it’ll just turn into “we won it all IN SPITE OF Quinn and that idiot Sark”

I think a natty would bring him legend status. Maybe the same tier of greatness as VY and Colt, but I have a feeling he'd still be looked at as slightly beneath them. Colt woulda beaten Bama, but any QB1 could win the 2025 CFP

Edited by chainsaw
Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, Thatguy said:

Your bet is the dumbest fucking bet I've ever heard of. So next year when CJ Baxter is back, and we are better at receiver I am supposed to bet that the quarterback won't throw for more yards than this year when we've had only one good receiver for most of the year and two rbs that weigh like 100lbs each? Of course the quarterback will throw for more yards next year. Just like the quarterback threw for more yards last year when we had better personnel as well.

Baxter is not going to be back in a way that he is an impact player until at least mid season. 
The oline is also going to be at least 4 new starters. the WR room is going to be similar I would say. We will always have a great Wr room under Sark. To pretend this offense is going to have more overall talent next year is ridiculous. If Arch is indeed better than Quinn next year, that’s an indictment on Quinn.

All that said, who gives a shit. Quinn is about to ball the fuck out and get us to the next round. 

Edited by hobbes2702
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Hook1997 said:

There’s no guarantees on any of that…. Baxter went down as soon as touched until the last part of the season and fumbled a lot, a WR room that will be mostly new and a pretty much all new oline.  But hey, if you know I’m right.  That’s ok to admit you’re wrong about you son.  The offensive weapons and line next year will not be a huge difference from this one.   

This is a dumb post. This is the weakest our receiver room has been in awhile considering Bond has been down most of the season. We kicked a 5 star off the team who would be playing right now. We are playing two receivers who shouldn't be playing in Wingo(not ready) and Moore. Yes Baxter went down but Brooks was there and better than what we have now. Brooks ran for 1140 at 6 a pop. We always had a back who could get their own yards until this year. These two go down with contact. Next year we are going to bring in receivers both in recruiting and the portal just like we did this year, and they will likely be healthier and more available than the shitshow this year and we won't be kicking one of our most talented ones off the team. You are only saying we won't be better because saying anything else won't fit the narrative you are pushing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, hobbes2702 said:

Baxter is not going to be back in a way that he is an impact player until at least mid season.

Baxter got hurt before the season even started. He will be ready to go when the conference season starts. The young backs will be a year along too, and we will still have the backs we currently have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Thatguy said:

Baxter got hurt before the season even started. He will be ready to go when the conference season starts. The young backs will be a year along too, and we will still have the backs we currently have.

I’m not sure where you’ve heard that. Everything I’ve seen reported has serious questions about him being ready next season. The only thing I’ve seen is Tashard saying he will be ready by July. But there’s a difference between being ready and being back.

And again, we replace the entire oline. Just stop dude. You’re making an insane fucking argument.

Edited by hobbes2702
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Outside of the first drive, the whole Offense has looked liked hammered shit. Quinn has played the same as he has all year long, though the pass he missed to a wide open Moore is not one that he typically misses. 

The performance only further validates that he's fine to good, but not the kind of player that elevates our offense. There were two over the top plays to be had in that half, and he made neither. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, RichUT said:

Outside of the first drive, the whole Offense has looked liked hammered shit. Quinn has played the same as he has all year long, though the pass he missed to a wide open Moore is not one that he typically misses. 

The performance only further validates that he's fine to good, but not the kind of player that elevates our offense. There were two over the top plays to be had in that half, and he made neither. 

We will need him to go out and win the game next week. He will not be able to do so. Just prepare yourself. This offense gets in the mud far too often. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...