Jump to content

Nancy Pelosi is a badass MF and I want her to be Speaker

Hugo Stiglitz

By Hugo Stiglitz
in Cloak Room

 Share

Recommended Posts

Hank Kingsley

Hank Kingsley 21785

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, sidis said:

man, that is one moment that really exemplifies the "political creature" thinking on things.  

fucking awful.

People frown on younger blood being high up in government because of a "lack of experience", but this is the shit you get from 80 year old politicians who have been in Washington since the Reagan years. Enough of this shit. 

  • Hook 'Em 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 3.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Bama Chick
Bama Chick

Oh horseshit. Only one side is espousing and excusing violence. Only one side is using dehumanizing lies and conspiracy theories to paint the other side as subhuman and inspiring their followers to

Ghost of LL
Ghost of LL

It's Happening. But before it happens, let's take a moment to acknowledge that Nancy Pelosi has been the most effective party leader since Sam Rayburn.  And without her, we wouldn't have gotten t

RomaVicta
RomaVicta

The red hats who show up with AR-15s to government offices because they oppose a vaccine? The red hats who assault the Capitol looking to kill political leaders? The red hats who don't believe or acce

Posted Images

wildcat09

wildcat09 29579

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Hank Kingsley said:

People frown on younger blood being high up in government because of a "lack of experience", but this is the shit you get from 80 year old politicians who have been in Washington since the Reagan years. Enough of this shit. 

Yeah, gerontocracy fucking sucks.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
gyroprotagonist

gyroprotagonist 2597

Posted
Posted
6 hours ago, Lobo said:

Wow, never liked her.  But I kinda respected the back-and-forth she had with Trump for a few months last year.  But this is just sad.  I'd like to say, "Well, you know what she meant."  But nope, she literally meant what she said, word-for-word.  She thinks she was honoring him.  I like Biden, but seems like the rest of the party leadership is back to being shitheaps once again.  Wow, somebody click deflate on her.  

it sure is easier to look smart when you are sparring vs Trump.  I guess she really misses that backdrop to work from.  Just a mind-numbingly stupid thing to think much less say out loud regarding a murder victim.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Anastasis

Anastasis 23720

Posted
Posted

I think that the criticism is a bit overblown. Certainly a better way to communicate around the issue, but feels like people just looking for nits to pick. Like the people flipping out over the tweet from the Raiders account. Dunking on allies. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest Lobo

Guest Lobo

Posted
Posted

It's not "our way."  she's a fucking out-of-touch shitbag.  So much more talent and passion in her party's ranks.  Fucking Hoyer and Clyburn are both one more iHOP meal away from dying.  Fuck ageism, they're all over 80 and can't go off-script because they'll use their phones to google shit like, "I'd like to personally thank George Floyd's corpse taking one for the team."  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Biff Tannen

Biff Tannen 46168

Posted
Posted

This seems like a good place to mention that a fuck ton of left-leaning posters are condemning her on this issue, while I haven’t heard peep from our resident conservatives about MTG, Boebert, Hawley, Cruz, or anyone else on that side who have done and said FAR worse things over the past days/weeks/months/years. I’m sure they just forgot. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
  • Rage+1 1
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
DalTxHornFan

DalTxHornFan 3130

Posted
Posted
31 minutes ago, Biff Tannen said:

This seems like a good place to mention that a fuck ton of left-leaning posters are condemning her on this issue, while I haven’t heard peep from our resident conservatives about MTG, Boebert, Hawley, Cruz, or anyone else on that side who have done and said FAR worse things over the past days/weeks/months/years. I’m sure they just forgot. 

“Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake.”

― Napoleon Bonaparte

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest Lobo

Guest Lobo

Posted
Posted

Yeah, you're right...before that...she never demonstrated any indications that she was out of touch and only in it for the power.  

The clip just further proves what me and every non-Trumper ever knew...it's time for her to move on.  Plenty of good people in her party to take the gavel.  And our nation is gonna need that somebody very, very soon.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
GW Hayduke

GW Hayduke 1957

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Lobo said:

Yeah, you're right...before that...she never demonstrated any indications that she was out of touch and only in it for the power.  

The clip just further proves what me and every non-Trumper ever knew...it's time for her to move on.  Plenty of good people in her party to take the gavel.  And our nation is gonna need that somebody very, very soon.  

I understand a 5 second clip is evidence that all of your perceptions were correct. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
wildcat09

wildcat09 29579

Posted
Posted
39 minutes ago, GW Hayduke said:

I understand a 5 second clip is evidence that all of your perceptions were correct. 

This is such a weird take. How long did it take Trump to call nazis very fine people?

She said something stupid and offensive. It's not bad to criticize her for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
GW Hayduke

GW Hayduke 1957

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, wildcat09 said:

This is such a weird take. How long did it take Trump to call nazis very fine people?

She said something stupid and offensive. It's not bad to criticize her for it.

Equating the very fine people on both sides quote to Nancy’s 5 sec clip should probably be avoided for a lot of reasons.

I didn’t say it is bad to critique. My position is that a 5 second clip shouldn’t be considered evidence to support all of lobo’s old lady Nancy fantasies. I was also pointing out the collective convulsions of melted twitter brains - I like to mock twitter overreactions

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Longhorn_Fan68

Longhorn_Fan68 34106

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, GW Hayduke said:

Equating the very fine people on both sides quote to Nancy’s 5 sec clip should probably be avoided for a lot of reasons.

I didn’t say it is bad to critique. My position is that a 5 second clip shouldn’t be considered evidence to support all of lobo’s old lady Nancy fantasies. I was also pointing out the collective convulsions of melted twitter brains - I like to mock twitter overreactions

yeah, it was a gaffe, at worst. but it's also true that she should probably not be the spokesperson for the Dems in that particular moment. But whatever

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest Lobo

Guest Lobo

Posted
Posted
17 minutes ago, GW Hayduke said:

Equating the very fine people on both sides quote to Nancy’s 5 sec clip should probably be avoided for a lot of reasons.

I didn’t say it is bad to critique. My position is that a 5 second clip shouldn’t be considered evidence to support all of lobo’s old lady Nancy fantasies. I was also pointing out the collective convulsions of melted twitter brains - I like to mock twitter overreactions

My old lady fantasies?  The critique of Pelosi as speaker have been espoused by dozens of loyal liberals on here and millions of them nationwide.  I merely pointed out this is the latest straw that should break the back of the camel that needs to carry her out of leadership is all.  Mother Jones, the Atlantic, And a lot of other progressive outlets have wanted her to step side from many, many years.  
how do you not know that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
GW Hayduke

GW Hayduke 1957

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, Lobo said:

My old lady fantasies?  The critique of Pelosi as speaker have been espoused by dozens of loyal liberals on here and millions of them nationwide.  I merely pointed out this is the latest straw that should break the back of the camel that needs to carry her out of leadership is all.  Mother Jones, the Atlantic, And a lot of other progressive outlets have wanted her to step side from many, many years.  
how do you not know that?

I'm pointing out that a 5 second clip isn't really an excuse for an old lady fetish or really anything else

 

grandma GIF

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest Lobo

Guest Lobo

Posted
Posted

It’s not the excuse.  It’s part of a pattern with her.  That’s how patterns are formed, several smaller pieces indicating a history and a future.  People don’t just wake up disconnected one morning.  They exhibit a pattern of behavior for many years that you can observe and then use to foresee future behaviors.  It also works with objects, animals, climate, and most of the known universe.  
Before those five seconds and after those five seconds, I observe her as needing to step down. But during those five seconds, she was top notch.  How’s that? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 2 months later...
  • 8 months later...
RomaVicta

RomaVicta 30591

Posted
Posted (edited)
37 minutes ago, Bravo said:

 

 

Negged for repeating a distortion to make Pelosi appear crazy and disoriented.

From Fox Fucking News: She was hosting an event in honor of Billie Jean King who is present at this statement.

Pelosi was being amusing referencing the honoree, and likely her statement about having mentioned King to Zelenskyy isn't to be taken literally unless you have [what's that terrifying word the GЯP likes so much? oh yea!] a hidden agenda. 

Portraying wit as senility. Here's to you, Mr. Amateur Operative. Budweiser salutes your total disregard for facts or your own integrity. Put on your team jersey and have a cold one. Kill America one sip at a time.

Edited by RomaVicta
Forgot to make the Я red. In the spirit of amateur operatism: "I don't know why a GOP would be upset. I just did it because red is their color. It's actually a compliment. I hate Biden but am glad he won....
Link to comment
Share on other sites
RomaVicta

RomaVicta 30591

Posted
Posted

 

Negged for doubling down on a lie and not even caring about what is true. Can you prove that that Pelosi did what you claim? Can you prove that, if she did, Zelenskyy did not himself understand the context? You make an assertion. Back it up. 

The obviously well-intentioned tweet you quote doesn't even mention that King was there. That's willful dishonesty that you endorse by quoting it yourself. 

I was tempted to give you pos rep for absolutely defining yourself, but I just can't encourage this kind of thing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mrs Whiggins

Mrs Whiggins 13050

Posted
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, RomaVicta said:

You're particularly poor at sophistry. What was the intent of the tweet you quote? That intent is a lie.

Here is the portion of the transcript from which that is taken to aid in your efforts. Nancy was speaking at her weekly press conference which combines several topics because she is capable of having more than one thing on her plate. She is seguing from one topic to the next because to open with Ukraine (which is what most of the press questions would be and were about) overshadows what was a scheduled event, in fact, scheduled prior to the situation in Ukraine. That is not to diminish the importance of Ukraine, but her opening is about women for the month devoted to their accomplishments, and God knows, we can't open a conference with them being talked about first and certainly not that *gasp* lesbian, Billie Jean King. King, of course, being empathetic, offering up sympathy for the leader of another country under duress and Pelosi passing that on, transitions into the next topic, Ukraine. Ohmergawd, stop the presses, Nancy is a lunatic.

Quote

 

Speaker Pelosi.  Good afternoon, everyone. 

This has been quite a day.  But I have to tell you that we began the day – this being Women's History Month — honoring women in history.  And one of them is in the present: Billie Jean King came.  We all basked in the glow of Billie Jean King as we honored Patsy Mink. 

This – in the next couple of months, we'll observe the 50th anniversary of Title IX.  And Title IX, you know what that meant for women in education as well as sports activities.  That word was very important in the law.  Patsy Mink made it happen.  Pretty soon, we'll have a statue – excuse me, a painting, a picture of Patsy Mink and – a more obvious display in the Capitol.  She was the first woman of color to serve in the Congress of the United States. 

But today we had the Sidwell Friends basketball team — which are the all‑out champions — their coach.  We had Wendy Mink, the daughter of Patsy Mink.  So again, I start with something that we had been looking forward to, that we savored at the time and take great pride in.  In fact, when I spoke to President Zelensky, I said, ‘Billie Jean King sends you her regards and wants to know how she can help.’

In any event – so here we are, with very serious legislation on the Floor today.  And the legislative process, sausage‑making that it is, it's working its way.  We'll be back on the Floor shortly.  We'll have a bipartisan omnibus bill, a funding bill that includes $13.6 billion in funding for Ukraine, humanitarian, economic and military – defense spending.  A separate funding package to continue the battle about coronavirus that we are taking out of the omnibus.  And of course, that I mentioned, the omnibus bill.  And then we have a bill, a sanctions bill banning import of Russian oil and energy products, not just oil, into the U.S. and taking other steps to isolate Russia in the world, including a review of their participation in the WTO, the World Trade Organization. 

Continues but I've cut that off for brevity. It goes on to discuss Ukraine further as well as other topics followed by a Q and A with media.

 

 

Edited by Mrs Whiggins
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Biff Tannen

Biff Tannen 46168

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Mrs Whiggins said:

Here is the portion of the transcript from which that is taken to aid in your efforts. Nancy was speaking at her weekly press conference which combines several topics because she is capable of having more than one thing on her plate. She is seguing from one topic to the next because to open with Ukraine (which is what most of the press questions would be and were about) overshadows what was a scheduled event, in fact, scheduled prior to the situation in Ukraine. That is not to diminish the importance of Ukraine, but her opening is about women for the month devoted to their accomplishments, and God knows, we can't open a conference with them being talked about first and certainly not that *gasp* lesbian, Billie Jean King. King, of course, being empathetic, offering up sympathy for the leader of another country under duress and Pelosi passing that on, transitions into the next topic, Ukraine. Ohmergawd, stop the presses, Nancy is a lunatic.

 

Your entire post translates to the peanuts teacher voice to people like bravo. 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
  • Rage+1 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest Lobo

Guest Lobo

Posted
Posted

I think she's on campus right now as we speak.  Which will upset many, many alums.  I don't care for her myself, but she bothers Trump...so high-five, I say!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 1 month later...
Satchel

Satchel 6982

Posted
Posted

Well, it looks like Pelosi will now have to travel outside of the SF Archdiocese in order to receive communion. What happened to the well formed Catholic conscience being upright and truthful?
 

Catholic News Agency 
 

quote:
Washington, D.C. Newsroom, May 20, 2022 / 13:03 pm 

Archbishop Salvatore Cordileone announced on Friday that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi should not be admitted to Holy Communion in the Archdiocese of San Francisco, nor should she present herself to receive the Eucharist, until she publicly repudiates her support for abortion. 

Cordileone said on May 20 that the step was “purely pastoral, not political” and came after Pelosi, D-Calif., who has described herself as a “devout Catholic,” repeatedly rebuffed his efforts to reach out to her to discuss her abortion advocacy.  

Cordileone said that he sent the notification to Pelosi, “a member of our archdiocese,” on May 19. The Democratic leader did not immediately respond publicly to Cordileone’s announcement after it was released to the media Friday afternoon. In a 2008 interview with C-SPAN, Pelosi said being denied Communion would be “a severe blow,” describing herself at the time as a “regular communicant.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Satchel

Satchel 6982

Posted
Posted

Here are the sins for which one must receive absolution before receiving Communion. Why then, is Pelosi being singled out?
 

If one has not gone to confession first,  one must  NOT receive Holy Communion if HE OR SHE IS GUILTY of having committed  the following  MORTAL sins, KNOWING that they are GRAVE and in spite of that, FREELY CHOSE to do it:

1. Having MISSED a SUNDAY or HOLY DAY MASS WITHOUT a valid reason (i. e., out of laziness, giving priority to sports, shopping, parties etc.)

2. Having SEX OUTSIDE of marriage, with ONE’S SELF (masturbation) or with SOMEONE else (either opposite or same sex); having voluntarily indulged in pornography.

3. COHABITING with someone WITHOUT BEING MARRIED IN THE CHURCH and LIVING as if they were spouses (either with opposite or same sex)

4. Having DESECRATED the Holy Eucharist or committed the sin of SACRILEGE (by receiving Holy Communion without being in the state of grace, i.e., free of any mortal sins)

5. Having used CONTRACEPTIVES (pills, condoms, IUD’s, patches)

6. Having committed ABORTION, encouraged someone to abort, or participated in the abortion

7. Having committed MURDER or participated in the destruction of lives, including embryos and mercy-killing or euthanasia. Having committed acts of violence, physical, verbal, psychological abuse against other persons and their integrity.

8. Having committed GRAVE INJUSTICE towards one’s subordinates or co-employees etc. or in the exercise of one’s profession (for example, unjust wages, retainment of wages, unjust accusation, false testimony, defamation, calumnies, unjust firing of employees, kickbacks, corruption) 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing


Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!

×
×
  • Create New...