ztejas sucks

[Guest]

3 hours ago, Atticus said:

Aren't you an SMU guy? 

Our DBs lack ball skills, but leaving them out to dry would work better than this death by a thousand cuts thing. Our guys were missing tackles and getting ran over on others like last year too. Brought their hats and left the cattle.

PK should have dialed up more pressure and lived with it. Sark needs to make a move there ASAP. 

This is similar to the Charlie Strong "new offense" under Shawn Watson. Same old shit for the most part. Guys aren't playing close coverage consistently and the DL isn't getting much pressure either.

Yep. He needs to dispatch with PK pretty quickly. 

2 hours ago, ztejas said:

I mean seriously y'all are fucking children. 

"Hey Surly - I know we suck but it's okay because I don't like ztejas as a poster so that means our football team is actually going to be good!"

Get a grip. 

You need to log off for the night. 

[jimmyjazz 45958]

22 minutes ago, ztejas said:

I can't. I can't eliminate it. 

Honest question -- why not?  What is your connection with UT?  

I mean, I have paper on the wall.  You apparently don't, yet you're irrationally involved in the game in game out results to the point where you're miserable.

I hit Austin in 1982.  I've seen it all.  One game is nothing.  A few games are nothing.  People wanted to fire Mack Brown by the end of the 1999 season, and frankly, for several seasons after that.  It worked out, at least for the better part of a decade.  You have no idea where this is going.  The information just isn't there.  What information we do have is largely muddled and to some degree self-contradictory.  I know that's frustrating, but it isn't smart to ignore any good just to focus on the bad and say "see, it's hopeless".  That's just bad logic.  Go for it, I guess, but don't be surprised when people call it for what it is, which is irrational.

[gmr548 16580]

With an actual qb he beats both Tech and Bama. 

Go back to texags.

Bama was there for the taking anyway and they didn’t get it done. They had a two TD second half lead on, at best, the eighth best team On the nine game conference schedule, and took a L. With a backup QB he had Tech beat and blew it in no small part because he could not or would not adapt his play calling to fit the players he had available.

[Hate 20108]

I think I would rather read a Brisketexan post in the Cloakroom than read this thread.

[Grade of D as in David 13253]

Can we get Scott Frost?

[WinningIsHard 4032]

Hudson card fucking sucks, he sucks at knowing when to run, he sucks at finding a second option, his pocket awareness is horribad, he can’t hit a deep ball to save his life, and he loves to wait just a second longer than he should to hit an open man. Thanks to how much shit we have sucked through a straw he appears to be our only option while the Mullet Savior is healing. There are posters on here who could get first downs in sarks offense, and that ain’t hyperbole. If Ewers doesn’t come back and stay healthy then we are mega fucked and I mean like prolapse party fucked. Max johnson and Adrian Martinez are better than Hudson card ffs. 

[ztejas 43452]

1 minute ago, jimmyjazz said:

Honest question -- why not?  What is your connection with UT?  

I mean, I have paper on the wall.  You apparently don't, yet you're irrationally involved in the game in game out results to the point where you're miserable.

I hit Austin in 1982.  I've seen it all.  One game is nothing.  A few games are nothing.  People wanted to fire Mack Brown by the end of the 1999 season, and frankly, for several seasons after that.  It worked out, at least for the better part of a decade.  You have no idea where this is going.  The information just isn't there.  What information we do have is largely muddled and to some degree self-contradictory.  I know that's frustrating, but it isn't smart to ignore any good just to focus on the bad and say "see, it's hopeless".  That's just bad logic.  Go for it, I guess, but don't be surprised when people call it for what it is, which is irrational.

You're really making an asshole out of yourself at this point. I never said anything personal about anyone here. You keep attacking me personally. I don't give a shit what you have to say about me - I don't know you. You seem lost on that point. 

I bleed Texas football. I have for a long time since before I met you and I will for a long time going forward from now. 

[Rickylovesweed 14317]

4 minutes ago, jimmyjazz said:

Honest question -- why not?  What is your connection with UT?  

I mean, I have paper on the wall.  You apparently don't, yet you're irrationally involved in the game in game out results to the point where you're miserable.

I hit Austin in 1982.  I've seen it all.  One game is nothing.  A few games are nothing.  People wanted to fire Mack Brown by the end of the 1999 season, and frankly, for several seasons after that.  It worked out, at least for the better part of a decade.  You have no idea where this is going.  The information just isn't there.  What information we do have is largely muddled and to some degree self-contradictory.  I know that's frustrating, but it isn't smart to ignore any good just to focus on the bad and say "see, it's hopeless".  That's just bad logic.  Go for it, I guess, but don't be surprised when people call it for what it is, which is irrational.

Ztejas might be melting a bit but you don't think there's enough information? 

Sark is on track to lose at least 4 games in all 8 seasons as a head coach. Sark is now 7-9 at Texas with 4 losses to .500 (or worse) teams. There's plenty of information to suggest Sark isn't going to work here. 

The same was true of Strong and then we had a lame duck coach in year 3. I was negged into oblivion for suggesting Strong should have been fired after year 2 but the outlook is very similar with Sark. 

 

[redswingline 1057]

3 minutes ago, WinningIsHard said:

Hudson card fucking sucks, he sucks at knowing when to run, he sucks at finding a second option, his pocket awareness is horribad, he can’t hit a deep ball to save his life, and he loves to wait just a second longer than he should to hit an open man. Thanks to how much shit we have sucked through a straw he appears to be our only option while the Mullet Savior is healing. There are posters on here who could get first downs in sarks offense, and that ain’t hyperbole. If Ewers doesn’t come back and stay healthy then we are mega fucked and I mean like prolapse party fucked. Max johnson and Adrian Martinez are better than Hudson card ffs. 

[jimmyjazz 45958]

1 minute ago, ztejas said:

You're really making an asshole out of yourself at this point. I never said anything personal about anyone here. You keep attacking me personally. I don't give a shit what you have to say about me - I don't know you. You seem lost on that point. 

I bleed Texas football. I have for a long time since before I met you and I will for a long time going forward from now. 

How in the blue hell is what I asked a personal attack?  I just don't understand why you're so obsessed with the football team of a school you didn't attend.  It's not an attack.

[ztejas 43452]

3 minutes ago, Rickylovesweed said:

Ztejas might be melting a bit

Another dipshit. Keep 'em coming. 

I'm so insecure about my Texas fandom. Please God help. 

[Rickylovesweed 14317]

Just now, ztejas said:

Another dipshit. Keep 'em coming. 

I'm so insecure about my Texas fandom. Please God help. 

You do realize that I was defending you? 

Everyone is melting a bit after a bad loss. It's all good. I agree with you that Sark isn't the guy. 

[Poe It Up 126]

I feel bad for these poor guys pouring money into our NIL deals, man they’re getting fleeced. 

[ztejas 43452]

2 minutes ago, Rickylovesweed said:

You do realize that I was defending you? 

Everyone is melting a bit after a bad loss. It's all good. I agree with you that Sark isn't the guy. 

Apologies that was perhaps a rough characterization.  

[Mach 1 1677]

9 minutes ago, Poe It Up said:

I feel bad for these poor guys pouring money into our NIL deals, man they’re getting fleeced. 

Are you for real? I’ve seen your other stupid posts but this one is quite impressive.

Edited September 25, 2022 by Mach 1
Fat fingers

[jimmyjazz 45958]

5 minutes ago, Rickylovesweed said:

Ztejas might be melting a bit but you don't think there's enough information? 

Sark is on track to lose at least 4 games in all 8 seasons as a head coach. Sark is now 7-9 at Texas with 4 losses to .500 (or worse) teams. There's plenty of information to suggest Sark isn't going to work here. 

I'm sorry, I don't think that's a complete read on the situation.  For starters, Sark showed slow but steady progress at UDub, and that was starting with an 0-12 program the year before he got there.  His own demons definitely got in the way at USC, and I certainly wouldn't have blamed the UT powers that be for saying "nope" on hiring him for that reason alone.  He did a pretty damn good job everywhere after that.  At Texas, the cupboard -- particularly the juniors and redshirt juniors, who are supposed to be your backbone -- fucking sucked.  I mean, ONE guy out of an entire class contributed (by my recollection)?  Come on.  That's brutal.  

I see Texas play the consensus #1 team in the country to essentially a standstill and I take that and weigh it against losing to a marginal top 40 team after our All-American RB fumbles in OT and I don't know what to think, but I damn sure don't just throw up my hands and say "burn it all down".  I say "I need more information". 

[4th&Five 41555]

9 minutes ago, jimmyjazz said:

How in the blue hell is what I asked a personal attack?  I just don't understand why you're so obsessed with the football team of a school you didn't attend.  It's not an attack.

Most CFB fans choose teams for reasons other than the academic institution it represents. 

[satyanash 14486]

29 minutes ago, Rickylovesweed said:

Sark is already stacking up bad losses. WV, Iowa State, and Kansas all finished around .500 or worse last year. Same with Tech this year. That's already 4 losses to .500 or worse teams in year 2.

In 2021, Sam Pittman went 9-4 in year 2 at Arky and Dave Aranda went 12-2 in year 2 at Baylor. Sark lost to them both, in addition to Lance Leipold in year 1 at Kansas who is currently 4-0 in year 2. This year, McGuire is 3-1 in year 1 at Tech and Sark lost to him as well.

Not only has Sark lost to every year 1 and year 2 coach he's faced, they are all on a better trajectory in their second year than Sark currently is. That's impressively bad. So far Sark has just three wins over P5 teams, and two of them fired their head coaches after losing to Sark. The evidence just keeps piling up.

[jimmyjazz 45958]

Just now, 4th&Five said:

Most CFB fans choose teams for reasons other than the academic institution it represents. 

Yeah, when they're 12.

[4th&Five 41555]

Just now, jimmyjazz said:

Yeah, when they're 12.

No. Not really. You think people filling these stadiums all went to those schools? You go to Texas games and think most of those folks are alums?

[Rickylovesweed 14317]

Just now, jimmyjazz said:

I'm sorry, I don't think that's a complete read on the situation.  For starters, Sark showed slow but steady progress at UDub, and that was starting with an 0-12 program the year before he got there.  His own demons definitely got in the way at USC, and I certainly wouldn't have blamed the UT powers that be for saying "nope" on hiring him for that reason alone.  He did a pretty damn good job everywhere after that.  At Texas, the cupboard -- particularly the juniors and redshirt juniors, who are supposed to be your backbone -- fucking sucked.  I mean, ONE guy out of an entire class contributed (by my recollection)?  Come on.  That's brutal.  

I see Texas play the consensus #1 team in the country to essentially a standstill and I take that and weigh it against losing to a marginal top 40 team after our All-American RB fumbles in OT and I don't know what to think, but I damn sure don't just throw up my hands and say "burn it all down".  I say "I need more information". 

There are a lot of variables that have made things difficult. 

But Sark is 7-9 at Texas with what I consider 4 bad losses. I'm seeing the same excuse making that posters made with Strong. I'm not asking Sark to be good just slightly above average to buy more time. 

 

 

[redswingline 1057]

21 minutes ago, jimmyjazz said:

How in the blue hell is what I asked a personal attack?  I just don't understand why you're so obsessed with the football team of a school you didn't attend.  It's not an attack.

I've dated enough women to know when they are having a melt down, give up trying to understand it, or help them understand where you are coming from.

It's hormones, its emotion. It's that time of the month. He's having a fan melt down. don't expect to make sense of it.

Edited September 25, 2022 by redswingline

[ztejas 43452]

2 minutes ago, jimmyjazz said:

Yeah, when they're 12.

Haha dude you're fucking clueless. 

 

[Rickylovesweed 14317]

2 minutes ago, satyanash said:

In 2021, Sam Pittman went 9-4 in year 2 at Arky and Dave Aranda went 12-2 in year 2 at Baylor. Sark lost to them both, in addition to Lance Leipold in year 1 at Kansas who is currently 4-0 in year 2. This year, McGuire is 3-1 in year 1 at Tech and Sark lost to him as well.

Not only has Sark lost to every year 1 and year 2 coach he's faced, they are all on a better trajectory in their second year than Sark currently is. That's impressively bad. So far Sark has just three wins over P5 teams, and two of them fired their head coaches after losing to Sark. The evidence just keeps piling up.

The evidence is clear as day like it was with Strong. 

 

[jimmyjazz 45958]

3 minutes ago, ztejas said:

Haha dude you're fucking clueless. 

 

Sure.  I grew up rooting for Mizzou.  I went to UT.  We played Mizzou my first game on campus.  I had no problem rooting against Mizzou.

So, no, I'm not fucking clueless, I'm just not an irrational t-shirt fan.

[ztejas 43452]

Just now, jimmyjazz said:

Sure.  I grew up rooting for Mizzou.  I went to UT.  We played Mizzou my first game on campus.  I had no problem rooting against Mizzou.

So, no, I'm not fucking clueless, I'm just not an irrational t-shirt fan.

I grew up bleeding for Texas. I still bleed for Texas. I'll always bleed for Texas. Go fuck yourself and quit characterizing someone that you don't know. You've been a total fucking dick tonight. Fuck you. 

[gmr548 16580]

I think I would rather read a Brisketexan post in the Cloakroom than read this thread.

[dcar00 14210]

5 minutes ago, Rickylovesweed said:

The evidence is clear as day like it was with Strong. 

 

it's a little less clear given the QB situation but we have 3 successive HC's that have put up shitty D's and DC's.  we've had 3 good D's in the last 13 years.

[Poe It Up 126]

17 minutes ago, Mach 1 said:

Are you for real? I’ve seen your other stupid posts but this one is quite impressive.

What are they getting out of it? Losses to tech I suppose. 

[Gil Bang 25960]

3 minutes ago, dcar00 said:

it's a little less clear given the QB situation but we have 3 successive HC's that have put up shitty D's and DC's.  we've had 3 good D's in the last 13 years.

So it's Sark's fault that Boom is pussywhipped and his wife made him nope out?

[gmr548 16580]

The evidence is clear as day like it was with Strong. 
 

Charlie Strong beat Patrick Mahomes in Lubbock. Twice.

Sark lost to… Forgot his name already.

[Rickylovesweed 14317]

7 minutes ago, dcar00 said:

it's a little less clear given the QB situation but we have 3 successive HC's that have put up shitty D's and DC's.  we've had 3 good D's in the last 13 years.

I believe it's even more clear with Sark. 

At least the Strong supporters had the argument that Strong went 12-1 and 11-2 prior to Texas which justified a longer leash. Sark has never produced a season like that. There's years of information available that indicates Sark's ceiling is likely 8-4. 

It was stupid to bring Strong back for a year 3 and it would be even dumber with Sark if Texas finishes around .500. 

 

 

Edited September 25, 2022 by Rickylovesweed

[jimmyjazz 45958]

7 minutes ago, ztejas said:

I grew up bleeding for Texas. I still bleed for Texas. I'll always bleed for Texas. Go fuck yourself and quit characterizing someone that you don't know. You've been a total fucking dick tonight. Fuck you. 

Yeah, I'm the dick.

[ATXhorn17 1617]

~sArK iS ChAnGiNG tHe CuLtURe~

[ztejas 43452]

2 minutes ago, jimmyjazz said:

Yeah, I'm the dick.

Yeah, you are. 

[dcar00 14210]

7 minutes ago, Gil Bang said:

So it's Sark's fault that Boom is pussywhipped and his wife made him nope out?

No, its his fault he  is 7-9 at Texas with losses to Kansas and Tech.

[Gil Bang 25960]

Just now, dcar00 said:

No, its his fault he  is 7-9 at Texas with losses to Kansas and Tech.

Yeah, sark should have picked a school with better players

[C-Man 27230]

Gary Patterson or Jeff Traylor would be a major step up compared to the dogshit we put out on the field today.

Neither of those guys get Ewers transfer or Arch commitment so I might pump the brakes a bit.

[ztejas 43452]

1 minute ago, dcar00 said:

No, its his fault he  is 7-9 at Texas with losses to Kansas and Tech.

If you care about Texas you'll show @jimmyjazzyour papers. 

[GreenspointTexas 9602]

For the last fucking time, hire the guy that has built 6 programs from the ashes:

 

Willie Fritz

[Gil Bang 25960]

1 minute ago, C-Man said:

Neither of those guys get Ewers transfer or Arch commitment so I might pump the brakes a bit.

DING DING DING WINNER WINNER ETC

[dcar00 14210]

2 minutes ago, Gil Bang said:

Yeah, sark should have picked a school with better players

I know its a bit but we have better players than Kansas and Tech.  what we don't have are better coaches.

[satyanash 14486]

1 minute ago, Gil Bang said:

Yeah, sark should have picked a school with better players

With better players than Kansas and Tech? News flash, he did. We beat Tech by 35 last year, in case you didn't notice.

[A’Dam Psycho 1470]

I just wanna know when we’re gonna stop playing pussy ball on defense? Why do we keep giving teams 10 yd cushion? Bend don’t break bullshit should not happen at Texas with 4 & 5 stars. That’s shit the Kansas, Iowa St, TCU, etc of CFB have to do. Why are we such a soft as baby shit program?

[Rickylovesweed 14317]

Just now, Gil Bang said:

DING DING DING WINNER WINNER ETC

Posters made these same arguments with Strong. 

Who cares who Sark gets if we are 7-9 with bad losses? Arch means nothing now because Sark is going to need a miracle in year 3. When Sark is fired after year 3 will Arch even stay at Texas? 

 

[dcar00 14210]

Just now, A’Dam Psycho said:

I just wanna know when we’re gonna stop playing pussy ball on defense? Why do we keep giving teams 10 yd cushion? Bend don’t break bullshit should not happen at Texas with 4 & 5 stars. That’s shit the Kansas, Iowa St, TCU, etc of CFB have to do. Why are we such a soft as baby shit program?

Pac 12 DC out front shoulda told ya.

[Elmer_Fudd 22226]

5 minutes ago, A’Dam Psycho said:

I just wanna know when we’re gonna stop playing pussy ball on defense? Why do we keep giving teams 10 yd cushion? Bend don’t break bullshit should not happen at Texas with 4 & 5 stars. That’s shit the Kansas, Iowa St, TCU, etc of CFB have to do. Why are we such a soft as baby shit program?

Because we continue to hire DC's like Orlando and PK that want DL to occupy blockers, play soft coverage, or blitz from 20 yards away (TO).

 

[Tree Fidy 1174]

36 minutes ago, satyanash said:

In 2021, Sam Pittman went 9-4 in year 2 at Arky and Dave Aranda went 12-2 in year 2 at Baylor. Sark lost to them both, in addition to Lance Leipold in year 1 at Kansas who is currently 4-0 in year 2. This year, McGuire is 3-1 in year 1 at Tech and Sark lost to him as well.

Not only has Sark lost to every year 1 and year 2 coach he's faced, they are all on a better trajectory in their second year than Sark currently is. That's impressively bad. So far Sark has just three wins over P5 teams, and two of them fired their head coaches after losing to Sark. The evidence just keeps piling up.

Look at you finding the silver lining.  Look, I’m not a sunshine pumper, but you are an insufferable bitch!

[ztejas 43452]

40 minutes ago, jimmyjazz said:

Sure.  I grew up rooting for Mizzou.  I went to UT.  We played Mizzou my first game on campus.  I had no problem rooting against Mizzou.

So, no, I'm not fucking clueless, I'm just not an irrational t-shirt fan.

 

[Texas Flood 1356]

Jesus stfu already