Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Re: Milwaukee, SIAP but checking out the Harley museum might be kinda cool for Lil Shep.

Check out the Milwaukee Public Market

I gotta disagree with 3Putt on the stadium 

this summarizes my feeling on it (and selig)

 

74CAB200-84A1-47EF-B085-BBE6B511BA6E.jpeg

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 1
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, Jshep34 said:

Don't think brewers will be playing when we go. I looked into tours and they offer one called the Selig tour

In addition to the ballpark, you get exclusive access to a special area worthy of the former Commissioner.

image.thumb.jpeg.884e07c4ffa2d53678dcdff100964568.jpeg

  • Like 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, Scraps said:
1 hour ago, Wulaw Horn said:
I’ve got those tattoo’d on my dick. Only room for 6 
more. 

I didnt know Yordan posted here

I’m not going to say I’d suck it, but I might hold it in my mouth until the swelling goes down. 

Posted (edited)
58 minutes ago, Jshep34 said:

Don't think brewers will be playing when we go. I looked into tours and they offer one called the Selig tour


there’s a Selig museum, in stadium 

 

83CD5D1C-F63C-4F12-A838-CA0E509230F9.jpeg

C2D05DEA-C610-4C47-9A59-F6D0008A082C.jpeg

06AA7B55-B99E-43CC-9C62-A487CCAE8D9B.jpeg

 

Edited by tx 3 putt
  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Jshep34 said:

Don't think brewers will be playing when we go. I looked into tours and they offer one called the Selig tour

You’ve seen shitters before…

Posted (edited)

Not even counting Framber... or that other guy from Cuba.

WBC.jpg

Edited by slorch
Posted

Not sure if this increases, decreases or has no effect on the likelihood of Tucker doing an extension. Maybe he decides his long term demands aren’t realistic. On the other hand, maybe he’s pissed off. Or maybe it doesn’t make a shit. 

 

Posted

Based on my understanding of what Brown has been saying, money has not been the issue, the number of years that Crane is comfortable offering has been. If you offer Tucker an eight-year deal, I bet he takes it.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted

If the arbitration thing makes a difference he was never signing again anyway.  Players know this is the system, it's one they negotiated.  It just is what it is.  

Frankly I hate the system because it pits you against your own players in trying to downplay them.  But at this point it's almost 50 years of "is what it is".  

The gap is big, but I also think it was somewhat intentional to get him to sign a better long term deal.  It may have backfired, and now that the Astros won, maybe not because it could be more incentive to just get it over with and sign a long term deal and get that money back

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
4 hours ago, TonyTexas said:

Not sure if this increases, decreases or has no effect on the likelihood of Tucker doing an extension. Maybe he decides his long term demands aren’t realistic. On the other hand, maybe he’s pissed off. Or maybe it doesn’t make a shit. 

 

It's been a few years, so i may be mistaken, but I think Bregman lost his arbitration case right before signing his extension. Put me in the it-don't-make-a-shit camp. 

Posted
39 minutes ago, Seasick Sailor said:

It's been a few years, so i may be mistaken, but I think Bregman lost his arbitration case right before signing his extension. Put me in the it-don't-make-a-shit camp. 

It was the year before arbitration and the Astros were going to pay like $640k for that last year (which Breggy didn't like).

then they signed him to the bigger deal: https://www.cbssports.com/mlb/news/astros-third-baseman-alex-bregman-have-reportedly-agreed-on-a-six-year-100-million-contract/

I'd assume we'll see the same with Tucker. If he signs a long term deal it's year over year will be much higher than what he's getting this year.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, kevwun said:

They can always add on to it.  I like his future a whole lot, but I'm not ready to lock him for 10 years just yet.


he has #1 potential 

Edited by tx 3 putt
Posted

I said we should offer Javier 5/50 a couple different times. 64M is sort of a big number considering he’s got 3 years of arbitration left and the baseline he’s starting at is 3M. That essentially means his arb is going to cost about 20M, so they gave him 2/44 sight unseen. 
That’s a pretty fair deal both ways. I love it. If Brown is as good as I think he will be then that keeps the competitive window open through 27. 
I think I’m going to love the new GM. 
Good for a Javier too. He locks up generational wealth and is still a FA before 30. 

Posted

probably backloaded the shit out of that deal like we did with Alvarez. He was only seeking $3.5 million in arbitration so this was probably an easier deal to make.

Tucker will be more difficult since he wants more years - but he's even better at his position.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
12 minutes ago, henrygandorf said:

image.thumb.jpeg.553ae1ba6996756389e804fb56c7eca2.jpeg

Just came to post that I can’t wait to hear the boos at Javier at the start of the game  the next time he steps foot in yankee stadium…. And the boos toward judge near the end of the game after his 4th K

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 2
Posted

"The deal is for $64M per"

I'd pay it per year.  Well not really, but I always get a kick out of the tweets chop it off there with just the source's twitter handle on the next line.  Same thing happened with Yordan's extension... $150MM per year?  Fucking worth it.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...