Jump to content

Political Cartoons - The Politics Thread.

ROFL BOX

By ROFL BOX
in Cloak Room

 Share

Recommended Posts

RomaVicta

RomaVicta 29902

Posted
Posted

image.png.1fea1d3853df7f98878b3b34517f3c3e.png

Don't forget keenly worded posts on the internet! I did my part!

The above enrages me towards those in the public who lead opinion and debate (Dems, News media) and my own failure to find even a little way to change minds. I'm not built for an argument-proof world. 

Maybe the electorate wasn't ready for it until the spectre of the choice between an old crook who could still sound vital and a good man too old for the job. 

Anyway, better days, my friends!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

US183
US183
US183
US183
US183
US183

Posted Images

RomaVicta

RomaVicta 29902

Posted
Posted
16 minutes ago, brakeman said:

image.png.445c69daa70188a19b4d79d2c728aca8.png

I think it would be more like a gross Aggie joke from the late 60s.

 An Aggie set the world record by picking a 15 pound booger out of his nose. Sadly, his head collapsed before he could eat it.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Popular Post
Sheep Have Wool

Sheep Have Wool 1053

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted
11 hours ago, PRONG HORN said:

Above cartoon is a pretty weird flex considering every democrat voted to keep in new language used to weaken protections for women in Title IX.  

This seems self evident, but I thought I'd ask: Do you ever actually stop to think about or fact check the things you read on Xwitter or Truth Social or wherever the fuck you're getting your "information?" Didn't that statement strike you as odd?

Here's the actual resolution that passed the House that the Democrats voted against. It's a paragraph. You could read the whole thing! This resolution doesn't call out specific language. It entirely rejects the update to Title IX. Here's the entire update. It's long, and it's probably a big ask for you to read the whole thing, but here's a shorter fact sheet.

Can you explain why you think entirely rejecting an update that would keep Baylor from Baylor-ing quite as hard in the future is a good idea? Or do you really think things like requiring timely resolution, preventing retaliation, or anything else in this 15 page list of bullet points "weakens protections for women?" Or you so completely caught up in your weird obsession with trans people that you can see a joke in the lol thread and miss it entirely that it just seems not worth it to have those other protections if you can't also keep discriminating against trans people in schools?

  • Hook 'Em 8
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
RomaVicta

RomaVicta 29902

Posted
Posted

Sooooo, Mr. @PRONG HORN believes that an attack on "we're not going back" should be launched at the Dem's inferior record on the rights of women? You do this without selecting Right to Choice as your battleground or a comparison of each party's record on women office holders and influence. No, you go to the wording on Title IX language. You evidently fucked up even that narrow line of attack.

We all know how much you hate Donald even though you carry his water. He still represents the party in opposition to the party you like to take pot shots at. That is, your best choice for opposition to the Dems on women's issues is a pussy-grabbing rapist who leads the party determined to force women to carry every conception to birth whether they like it or not. 

Thus is the path of the return to the deluded notion of  American Greatness. 

But, of course, you're just an unbiased arbiter of right and wrong with no political affiliation. 

I have no idea what the cartoon at the bottom of your post represents. I'm sure it's another obscure reference supplied to you by disingenuous operatives as yet another masterful stroke against the ebil libs. It packs the expected amount of poignance and wit.

You guys really aren't very good at this when you're not preaching to the choir. Even then, you're not very good at it; it's just that your audience is largely comprised of degenerate, hateful fools.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
LTbear

LTbear 4168

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, PRONG HORN said:

GPCR-x8-XYAEci-SA.jpg

Quote that was proven as fake way back in 2021.

I really don't understand your constant doubling down on both your utter laziness and on proving just how incredibly stupid and gullible you really are. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
DigglerontheHoof

DigglerontheHoof 21183

Posted
Posted
45 minutes ago, LTbear said:

Quote that was proven as fake way back in 2021.

I really don't understand your constant doubling down on both your utter laziness and on proving just how incredibly stupid and gullible you really are. 

It’s part of a vast misinformation campaign..that’s what nazis do.

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing


Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!

×
×
  • Create New...