Jump to content

World Cup Day 6 - Wales/Iran, Qatar/Senegal, Netherlands/Equador


Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, UTexasFight said:

Are there any audio/radio options other than fox simulcast? Going to be driving for 6 hours Sunday.

TV broadcasters on the radio is worthless 

The games are likely covered on Sirius FC if you have Sat radio. 

EDIT my bad Fox Sports

https://investor.siriusxm.com/news-events/press-releases/detail/1900/fifa-world-cup-qatar-2022-matches-air-live-on-fox#:~:text=NEW YORK – November 15%2C 2022,18.

Edited by Captain Ron
Posted
4 minutes ago, Captain Ron said:

Thanks.

Yeah, that’s all I could find too.

I swear in prior world cups they had a broadcast specific for radio. TV PxP announcing and putting that on the radio is pointless 

Posted
1 hour ago, kingkoopa6 said:

we gonna be in a fight v Iran-  they aint no hoes

21 shots.. and we got what, a hand full vs wales?

Yeah 6 shots, 1 on goal with 60% possession. This is where Harry Doyle wonders if that's actually better than scoring in America 

Posted
4 minutes ago, Captain Ron said:

Let me rephrase that - I don't see that as interference.

That was a bullshit call. Once the keeper committed to his right that offsides player is not affecting play at all. That's a garbage call.

Posted

Not sure it actually called down, but ESPN says VAR overturned it. If that is the case, it is terrible. You can at least say that the on-field refs may subjectively think the guy influenced it but video shows differently. 

Posted
1 minute ago, Dr. Teeth said:

Not sure it actually called down, but ESPN says VAR overturned it. If that is the case, it is terrible. You can at least say that the on-field refs may subjectively think the guy influenced it but video shows differently. 

It was a VAR call. There is ZERO that video shows to make that offsides.

The player wasn't interfering with the keeper. If he went left and the ball goes in, sure. But once he jumped right he CLEARLY wasn't influenced by the guy in the offsides position. There isn't anyone one he is influencing. 

Posted (edited)

This is NOT offsides. This is a terrible call. He does nothing to influence play. Now if he touched it, sure, but I don't see contact.

 

EDIT - and it is not clear who calls it off VAR or the on the field refs.

 

Edited by Captain Ron
Posted

I think the Dutch wanted to defend and counter. But Ecuador has a really nice attack, so they kept the pressure on them.

 

Van Gaal isn't a great manager, hence why they turn off their attack.

Posted
I think the Dutch wanted to defend and counter. But Ecuador has a really nice attack, so they kept the pressure on them.
 
Van Gaal isn't a great manager, hence why they turn off their attack.

Ecuador scored just as many as Argentina in qualifying. They are a good team that will cause problems in the knockout stage if they can beat Senegal.

Holland look asleep playing on cruise control waiting for Qatar.
Posted (edited)
44 minutes ago, MNLonghornFUKM said:

Qatar officially eliminated 5 days into it lol. Not a bad way to spend $220 billion

Hold on, what?  220 Billion?  I see the articles but I can’t fathom it. 

Edited by Wulaw Horn

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...