Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 988
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
1 minute ago, Nicole44 said:

It’s called sorcery (or coaching) but who cares? It can’t be done by anyone we’ve hired.

No one we’ve tried has ever brought most of his offense, including his Heisman contender quarterback with him.

Posted
Just now, pops said:

Does ewers keep his starting job if rising is the backup this year? 

I think the more relevant question is would Ewers even come out of spring practice with the starting gig. Rising had a pretty damn good season last year

Card 2021 stats - image.png.8e9a5d8a8e444039a95c1cd25e1565de.png

Rising 2021 stats - image.png.82d962202afc298344b539cfeacc0d03.png

Posted
11 minutes ago, tejas60 said:

just checking in to say FUCK Lincoln Riley and usc right in the ass.

Yeah although Lincoln Riley and USC fucked OU in the ass.

So the assfucker of those cock suckers is my friend 

or something like that 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 2
Posted

Man say what you will about Riley but that creep can roll. Caleb had a wide open guy the whole time he could have easily thrown to but was able to wait for the guy further down the field…who was also open.

  • Rage+1 1
Posted
Just now, Nicole44 said:

It’s called sorcery (or coaching) but who cares? It can’t be done by anyone we’ve hired.

Texas went from 5-7 to 8-4 though, should've been 11-1 really. 

Best turnaround ever was Lou Holtz at South Carolina.  The were 1-10 in 1998, 0-11 in 1999 (Lou's first year) and in 2000 they went 8-4 beating Ohio State in the Outback Bowl. 

  • Like 1
Posted

It's more than that. Look how the players are calm and confident... almost nonchalant. Sickening. Dickface Lincoln has it going on for loving so many dicks 

I want that for Texas...without the dick loving or dickface

  • Haha 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, NAVY said:

Yeah although Lincoln Riley and USC fucked OU in the ass.

So the assfucker of those cock suckers is my friend 

or something like that 

and that's fair.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, Horn80 said:

Ewers was pretty darn good this year and be better next season.

I'm not on the anti ewers train at all. I think he'll only get better. I just wonder if sark had rising as an option if he would have gotten the job when Quinn was clearly struggling. Rising looks like he's 15 years older. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, Make em eat Taco Bell said:

Texas went from 5-7 to 8-4 though, should've been 11-1 really. 

Best turnaround ever was Lou Holtz at South Carolina.  The were 1-10 in 1998, 0-11 in 1999 (Lou's first year) and in 2000 they went 8-4 beating Ohio State in the Outback Bowl. 

Should've been 11-1? This is very aggy. Those losses were legit and justified. 

Posted
1 minute ago, CptnJiggleBits said:

What does the left hand nails have  written on them.  Saw f u c k on the right hand. Maybe Utes or Chip?

Guess utes or utah. He's gone with fuck the opponent all year. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
They are in the playoffs not cusp. They have already done enough today to get in. 

I think you’re right but I need to see the committee actually not somehow shoehorn in Bama or Ohio St before I can feel 100% confident
  • Haha 1
Posted

I think you’re right but I need to see the committee actually not somehow shoehorn in Bama or Ohio St before I can feel 100% confident

Been a long time since no bama osu or Clemson
Posted
Just now, Vic Mackey said:

Should've been 11-1? This is very aggy. Those losses were legit and justified. 

Bama loss was clearly invalid. I rarely complain about reffing, maybe 1/500 sporting events, but that game was stolen.  Tech/OKState was trash defense blame coaching.  TCU was a legit loss. 

Posted
Texas went from 5-7 to 8-4 though, should've been 11-1 really. 
Best turnaround ever was Lou Holtz at South Carolina.  The were 1-10 in 1998, 0-11 in 1999 (Lou's first year) and in 2000 they went 8-4 beating Ohio State in the Outback Bowl. 

And I think a 3 win increase (which you’re right could have/should have been more) is a bigger deal than it initially looks. To think about it another way, another 3 win increase next season to 11-1 would certainly be a big deal.
Posted
9 minutes ago, Make em eat Taco Bell said:

Texas went from 5-7 to 8-4 though, should've been 11-1 really. 

Spare the dumb "should've been" arguments. Read up on Parcells. You are what your record says you are. 

We were an above average team, 8-4, that's it. 

Posted

I’ve whined about it on the Bowling thread and will whine about it here: PLEASE don’t let Utah be our Alamo bowl opponent (again)!

Not because of the Cam stuff or if I think who would win. Just because they are SUCH a boring fucking team to watch!

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
Just now, mdleast said:


And I think a 3 win increase (which you’re right could have/should have been more) is a bigger deal than it initially looks. To think about it another way, another 3 win increase next season to 11-1 would certainly be a big deal.

this team reminds me so much of 2018 which had several veterans playing their last season.  We lose Bijan and Rojo to the NFL and a few guys from the defense. I do love J brooks at RB though.  Too much leadership, talent and experience gone on defense.  It's going to be a challenge especially if Ewers is hurt , where is the QB depth - a fish Arch? Other guys need to step up big time. 

Posted
5 minutes ago, Vic Mackey said:

Should've been 11-1? This is very aggy. Those losses were legit and justified. 

I actually think this is the correct take. "We would have won/had more wins if ___________ had just _____________" sounds like some shit aggie would say.

Posted
Just now, ztejas said:

P12 is such a joke. SC is going to get dusted in the playoff. 

SC is peaking at the right time so, they can probably beat anyone if they play like this.

  • Haha 1
Posted
Just now, Horn80 said:

SC is peaking at the right time so, they can probably beat anyone if they play like this.

Agree with you. Fuck Lincoln but he can coach. Fuck cam but he can play. And they have athletes everywhere. 

Posted
1 minute ago, Horn80 said:

SC is peaking at the right time so, they can probably beat anyone if they play like this.

 

1 minute ago, Vic Mackey said:

USC will beat TCU or Michigan if they play them. No one is beating Georgia so it won't matter.

Y'all are some prisoners of the moment. CLA hung 45 on SC last week. Michigan whipped tOSU in Columbus. TCU is undefeated and just hammered ISU by 40 points. 

Posted
1 minute ago, ztejas said:

 

Y'all are some prisoners of the moment. CLA hung 45 on SC last week. Michigan whipped tOSU in Columbus. TCU is undefeated and just hammered ISU by 40 points. 

Well, let’s see what happens.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, Horn80 said:

SC is peaking at the right time so, they can probably beat anyone if they play like this.

SC and Michigan are both playing great ball, right now. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Make em eat Taco Bell said:

USC right now can beat any of the other CFB teams except GA. USC will easily handle Michigan, but at #4 if TCU wins, USC is playing GA. 

and USC fans will root hard for KSU. 

Not so sure about that. Michigan will probably own the line of scrimmage there. Not thinking the run game will work as well for SC. Caleb will do some special stuff no matter what, but i think Michigan is for real this year and i like the way they get stronger in second halves. They can give Georgia a real problem too.

  • Hook 'Em 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...