Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Yeah, if KSU starts to shutout TCU for the rest of the game, that probably changes things. The committee could look at lots of things like Caleb getting injured last night. 

Edited by mdmost
Posted
2 minutes ago, MonkeyDoughnut said:
3 minutes ago, Sgt Hulk said:

One one side a TCU wins means they beat us to the playoffs.  A losseans fucking Bama is in it again. Fuck everything 

TCU is in no matter what, certainly over Alabama

Neither of you knows for sure, but you both have a 50/50 chance of being right.

Posted
Just now, IBuryPaul said:

I like this AT&T wedding commercial, "he's short." It's kinda funny and that chic is rumored on the internet to be a bit slutty, which I approve of.

Which chick?

You mean Milana Vayntrub, the Uzbek princess?

  • Drool 2
Posted
3 minutes ago, WhatTheBuck said:

Wins and losses have to count for something. You can’t say, “I don’t care if Alabama has 2 losses, I think they’re a good team and should be in over a team with a better record.”

Wins and losses do count.  But quality of wins and losses also counts.  So does strength of schedule.

If TCU loses this game, their resume isn't that great.  They'll have 0 great wins, 3 good wins (all close, and one of them avenged), and they'll have lost their last game.  Maybe they still get in and maybe the don't.  I'm just saying -- this is not a top 4 team, especially if they lose this game.  I think there are at least 8 teams who beat this team.

  • Like 1
Posted
30 minutes ago, WhatTheBuck said:

In a 10-team conference with a round robin schedule where all the teams have already played each other, definitely. 

Holy shit I just repped you. 

  • Like 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, BarthHollamew said:

Imagine that … using your QB in the run game against a TCU defense who is obviously so keyed in on your elite running back.   Next level stuff right there. . . sigh. 

Season 9 Nbc GIF by The Office <sarcasm>

Posted
2 minutes ago, TexArcher said:

Wins and losses do count.  But quality of wins and losses also counts.  So does strength of schedule.

If TCU loses this game, their resume isn't that great.  They'll have 0 great wins, 3 good wins (all close, and one of them avenged), and they'll have lost their last game.  Maybe they still get in and maybe the don't.  I'm just saying -- this is not a top 4 team, especially if they lose this game.  I think there are at least 8 teams who beat this team.

1 loss beats 2 losses. They’re in. Putting a 2-loss team in either the CFP or the BCS over a 1-loss team from a major conference has never happened before. That’s 24 years of precedent. Margin of victory doesn’t matter and, if anything, losing in the extra data point CCG would be seen as a quality loss. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
13 minutes ago, WhatTheBuck said:

Wins and losses have to count for something. You can’t say, “I don’t care if Alabama has 2 losses, I think they’re a good team and should be in over a team with a better record.”

I say TCU is in, win or lose. If the Big 12 hadn’t added a CCG just for the extra data point, TCU would already be in as an undefeated conference champ. Otoh, if they had 1 loss then the CCG would just give them a chance to lose both a conference championship and a playoff berth which they’d already earned during the regular season. That would be comical. 

Wins over quality teams have to count for something. With a 12 game playoff coming soon, there will be two types of teams that make it in- 0-3 loss teams from the Big 10 and SEC, and conference champs from PAC, B12 and ACC (and a G5). 

Posted
2 minutes ago, WhatTheBuck said:

1 loss beats 2 losses. They’re in. Putting a 2-loss team in either the CFP or the BCS over a 1-loss team from a major conference has never happened before. That’s 24 years of precedent. Margin of victory doesn’t matter and, if anything, losing in the extra data point CCG would be seen as a quality loss. 

There is about to be a huge segmentation between the SEC and Big 10 and everyone else. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, WhatTheBuck said:

1 loss beats 2 losses. They’re in. Putting a 2-loss team in either the CFP or the BCS over a 1-loss team from a major conference has never happened before. That’s 24 years of precedent. Margin of victory doesn’t matter and, if anything, losing in the extra data point CCG would be seen as a quality loss. 

It happened in 2007, just off the top of my head.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...