Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, HornOnTheBayou said:

 

OK, I have to call BS. He's not Ted Cruz-ugly. Are y'all being honest or are you playing the "I only bang 10s" card?

I’m dead serious. He looks like he gives off major fraud/poser vibes. Seasoned gays can spot those guys from a mile away 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
4 minutes ago, HornOnTheBayou said:

That's fair. I was thinking the heterosexual equivalent is Lauren Boebart. Disgusting individual who I would never socialize with. But, yes, would bang.

Aaron Schock is like *right there* as a gay Republican and blows this guy (phrasing) out of the water 

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted
9 hours ago, HornOnTheBayou said:

 

OK, I have to call BS. He's not Ted Cruz-ugly. Are y'all being honest or are you playing the "I only bang 10s" card?

He’s just not my type. He’s not ugly. He could buy me a drink, but that’s about as far as it would go. I don’t workout 5-6 days a week to hook up with 6s. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Haha 4
Posted
9 hours ago, Js1 said:

Aaron Schock is like *right there* as a gay Republican and blows this guy (phrasing) out of the water 

Aaron Schock is on an entirely different level. I would fuck him, but I’d hate myself after. 

  • Haha 3
Posted
32 minutes ago, SubliminalHorn said:

He’s just not my type. He’s not ugly. He could buy me a drink, but that’s about as far as it would go. I don’t workout 5-6 days a week to hook up with 6s. 

image.gif.e1580cd5941761c8b12187bc3bf962be.gif

  • Haha 1
Posted
30 minutes ago, Nice Guy Eddie said:

So a proven liar went from practically no income in 2020 to millions in 2022 by introducing wealthy people to each other? 

Well that was three years of law school tuition I pissed away.

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 3
  • Haha 2
Posted
37 minutes ago, Nice Guy Eddie said:

So a proven liar went from practically no income in 2020 to millions in 2022 by introducing wealthy people to each other? 

Maybe he monetized and licensed his name?

Posted

All of his lies are precious in different ways of course, but I think my favorite is that he claimed to own 13 properties, when in reality he owns zero and lives with his sister.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted

I imagine the GOP leadership has no problems with this scandal. Santos has moved the political talk from "can McCarthy find 218 votes" to the lies of a unknown politician that has zero power.

It wouldn't shock me if McCarthy's camp is behind some of the revelations about Santos. Even just advising some reporters to look more at Santos' background.

Posted (edited)
Quote

I imagine the GOP leadership has no problems with this scandal. Santos has moved the political talk from "can McCarthy find 218 votes" to the lies of a unknown politician that has zero power.

It wouldn't shock me if McCarthy's camp is behind some of the revelations about Santos. Even just advising some reporters to look more at Santos' background.


Not worth arguing, really, but I disagree with every bit of that.

Edited by TexasHooch
Posted
12 minutes ago, Nice Guy Eddie said:

I imagine the GOP leadership has no problems with this scandal. Santos has moved the political talk from "can McCarthy find 218 votes" to the lies of a unknown politician that has zero power.

It wouldn't shock me if McCarthy's camp is behind some of the revelations about Santos. Even just advising some reporters to look more at Santos' background.

If McCarthy can get his vote for Speaker then McCarthy doesn’t give a fuck about his lies. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, WhatTheBuck said:

If McCarthy can get his vote for Speaker then McCarthy doesn’t give a fuck about his lies. 

This. And he needs as many as he can get right now 

Posted

Of course that.  But that statement is a far cry from insinuating that he's somehow relieved from the scandal.

Here's a good article about it:

https://www.politico.com/news/2022/12/28/george-santos-kevin-mccarthy-house-speaker-00075706

Quote

While some of George Santos’ soon-to-be colleagues are encouraging investigations into his many resume fabrications, Kevin McCarthy’s speakership battle in a narrow majority is complicating his fate.

The New York Republican, who has admitted to fabricating much of his personal and professional biography, is set to be sworn into Congress the same day the House will start votes for a new speaker.

But House GOP leader McCarthy, with only four party votes to spare and an open rebellion among a handful of House conservatives, needs all the support he can get — even if it comes from a member-elect steeped in scandal.

Quote

“At a minimum, it was a colossal lack of judgment that has now put the conference in a very difficult position,” retiring Rep. John Katko (R-N.Y.), who represented a similarly moderate district in the state, said of Santos.

“Do they defend someone they know has made several material misstatements about his background? Or do they cut him loose with a razor-thin majority?” Katko added, calling it a “no-win situation.”

 

Posted
It's not even "several material misstatements". He is not the person he claimed to be, at all. 
This. But he's already promised McCarthy his vote which displays the single most important attribute to GQP members: fealty.
  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Rage+1 1
Posted

From the above linked article:

Quote

As of now, only Democrats are calling for Santos to resign from the post that was considered a longshot win for Republicans in the first place. And the GOP — both locally and in the House — is unlikely to call for him to step down in the thin majority. But one Republican familiar with the discussions said Santos has told New York party leaders that he won’t seek reelection after this term. If he doesn’t make that statement openly soon, the Republican said, he risks those leaders publicly pulling support.

Interesting, but what the hell difference does an open statement make? Every lie he's told has been an open statement. But he'd be telling the truth this time?

Posted
28 minutes ago, horn4life said:

now THAT should be the slogan of the Republican Party!

Except they’re not Christ-ish at all. They’re very un-Christ-ish. (Same goes for most Christians.)

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
43 minutes ago, Red Five said:

It's not even "several material misstatements". He is not the person he claimed to be, at all. 

a Republican who is a complete and utter fraud, and lies constantly about everything?  
sounds about right. 

  • Rage+1 1
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Posted

Right. Like gay men don’t get beer goggles or lower their standards when it’s last call, the bar’s about to close, and they don’t want to go home alone. I’m sure that never happens. 

Posted
13 hours ago, Js1 said:

I’m dead serious. He looks like he gives off major fraud/poser vibes. Seasoned gays can spot those guys from a mile away 

Santos: “Guys, I’m not gay.”

Guys: “yeah but you just had 3 dicks up your ass while doing poppers and humming lady Gaga on the stage at the Eagle in front of everyone.”

Santos: “Yeah but I’m NOT GAY.”

  • Haha 1
Posted
14 hours ago, Js1 said:

I’m dead serious. He looks like he gives off major fraud/poser vibes. Seasoned gays can spot those guys from a mile away 

What kind of seasoning do you put on . . . oh, never mind.

Posted
2 hours ago, Red Five said:

All of his lies are precious in different ways of course, but I think my favorite is that he claimed to own 13 properties, when in reality he owns zero and lives with his sister.

He's a look at one of his properties:

monopoly-update.jpg

Posted

I look forward to Trump/Santos doing shockingly well in the GOP primary, because this country's death rattle will continue to be hyperbolic, yet somehow real.

 

  • Rage+1 1
Posted
6 hours ago, South Austin said:

Well that was three years of law school tuition I pissed away.

First thought I had as well. And it was obvious when he started blathering about "servicing GPs and LPs" that he had no idea what he was talking about. Or he was referring to blowing them. 

Posted
5 hours ago, Pancho said:

Santos: “Guys, I’m not gay.”

Guys: “yeah but you just had 3 dicks up your ass while doing poppers and humming lady Gaga on the stage at the Eagle in front of everyone.”

Santos: “Yeah but I’m NOT GAY.”

According to my bro-in-law who used to manage a gay club in the Pennsylvania/New Jersey Borderlands, this wasn't uncommon. The place would be full, almost nobody gay. Nope. Just ask them. Maybe the other guy was gay, not them.

There were other factoids, but the main one was: on Lesbian Night, there will be fights.

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
  • Drool 1
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Posted
6 hours ago, WhatTheBuck said:

Right. Like gay men don’t get beer goggles or lower their standards when it’s last call, the bar’s about to close, and they don’t want to go home alone. I’m sure that never happens. 

We just hop on grindr 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
58 minutes ago, SubliminalHorn said:

We just hop on grindr 

I want to say that was the app that a friend met his now husband on. They were just supposed to just hook up and now several years of marriage later they just closed on a house in the Hudson Valley up near Fishkill.

Posted
2 hours ago, RDCanecutter said:

According to my bro-in-law who used to manage a gay club in the Pennsylvania/New Jersey Borderlands, this wasn't uncommon. The place would be full, almost nobody gay. Nope. Just ask them. Maybe the other guy was gay, not them.

There were other factoids, but the main one was: on Lesbian Night, there will be fights.

https://www.theonion.com/why-do-all-these-homosexuals-keep-sucking-my-cock-1819583529

  • Haha 4
  • Drool 1
Posted

There are lots of dudes out there who will tell you they're straight while sucking another dude's dick. That's why the term "Men who have sex with men" has started getting a lot more usage (esp after monkeypox).



×
×
  • Create New...