Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
18 hours ago, safe sex said:

A google search has led me to seeing about 50/50 for right or left, which sounds about right. Gay people can't make up our minds.

Seems like the sort of thing you wouldn’t want to vary by region or time. At least without adequate signage. 

Posted
20 hours ago, safe sex said:

A google search has led me to seeing about 50/50 for right or left, which sounds about right. Gay people can't make up our minds.

“Left is right and right is wrong.” That’s the rule I’ve always heard dating back to the mid 80’s when I got mine pierced. That was the standard then and I never heard otherwise in all the years I was wearing an earring. There’s an episode of Two and a Half Men where Alan gets his right ear pierced and Charlie informs him that the right ear is the gay ear so it still held true past the turn of the century. 

Posted (edited)

And I heard the opposite as a kid, and my lived experience has been the opposite. Much like everything cultural, this clearly has varied by location. 🤷‍♀️

 

Edited by safe sex
Posted
On 3/11/2023 at 5:36 PM, safe sex said:

A google search has led me to seeing about 50/50 for right or left, which sounds about right. Gay people can't make up our minds.

We still talking about ear fucking?

Posted (edited)

That Santos is still in office illustrates the moral, philosophical, and empirical bankruptcy of the GQP — a complete free fall born decades ago.

Let's not forget that it was Prez Bush 1 who said (in 1988) he would never apologize for America saying: "I don't care what the facts are." 

Edited by BevoAbyss
  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 2
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Sawbonz said:

We still talking about ear fucking?

I'm talkin' 'bout sex boy, what the hell you talkin' about?

 

Edited by Bullneck
Posted

but it does remind me of coming home with my gf from college and having just visited the vidya store we were planning to pop in a tape and watch whatever movie we had selected. turns out there was a tape already in there and it was my roommate's porn tape. he had paused it about 15 seconds before the chick in the scene pulls the dick out of her mouth and with a straight face says, "Cum in my ear." I bust out laughing. She busts out laughing. Neither of can bring ourselves to watch the conclusion. what a weird little man that roommate was.

  • Haha 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Longhorn_Fan68 said:

but it does remind me of coming home with my gf from college and having just visited the vidya store we were planning to pop in a tape and watch whatever movie we had selected. turns out there was a tape already in there and it was my roommate's porn tape. he had paused it about 15 seconds before the chick in the scene pulls the dick out of her mouth and with a straight face says, "Cum in my ear." I bust out laughing. She busts out laughing. Neither of can bring ourselves to watch the conclusion. what a weird little man that roommate was.

 

sorry about that bro. Did I ever thank you for rewinding?

 

 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Posted



but it does remind me of coming home with my gf from college and having just visited the vidya store we were planning to pop in a tape and watch whatever movie we had selected. turns out there was a tape already in there and it was my roommate's porn tape. he had paused it about 15 seconds before the chick in the scene pulls the dick out of her mouth and with a straight face says, "Cum in my ear." I bust out laughing. She busts out laughing. Neither of can bring ourselves to watch the conclusion. what a weird little man that roommate was.


Kevin, is that you? How have we never figured out that we've both been posting all these years?
Posted
1 minute ago, Patricio Swayze said:

 


I think he could set his sites higher.

 

As sung by George "La Madonna" Santos..................

Last night I dreamt of Dom Pedro

Just like I'd never gone, I knew the song

A young REP with eyes like the desert

It all seems like yesterday, not far away

  • Like 1
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
On 3/11/2023 at 6:35 PM, jimmyjazz said:

I'm pretty sure if one guy lets another guy stick his dick in his ear, at least one of them is sorta gay.

Maybe they have tinnitus? 

image.png.e4fc54b416edefef50e57c41bf7f4738.png

Posted

https://www.vice.com/en/article/n7eb4m/george-santos-congress-citizenship-first-generation

 

Quote

On Monday, George Santos, who represents New York’s 3rd Congressional District, issued a press release announcing he’ll be running for re-election next year. The release didn’t address claims that the Republican participated in a credit card skimming operation; what his lawyer was doing on and around January 6, 2021; his apparent lies about helping children living with a rare skin disease; allegations that he stole thousands of dollars from a disabled veteran’s dying dog; a job-seeker’s claim that Santos sexually harassed him in his congressional office; or any of the many other colorful scandals of which he’s at the center. 

 

Quote

It did, however, quote the congressman referring to himself as a “first-generation American”—meaning, according to common usage, the Census Bureau, and Harvard University’s immigration center, one who was born outside the United States.

Santos, a famously unreliable narrator of his own past, has said that he was born in Sunnyside, Queens to parents who emigrated from Brazil, and a 2013 Brazilian court document describes him as a U.S. national. This isn’t, though, the first time that an official communication from his campaign has contradicted his story; late last year, a statement attributed to his lawyer referred to Santos as an immigrant. And as Patch reported, according to one former coworker, Santos has said he was born in Brazil.

 

Quote

The significance of this is that the Constitution requires members of Congress to have been citizens for seven years. If Santos was born abroad, as his own campaign has now repeatedly said he was, that wouldn’t necessarily disqualify him from office, but it would raise questions about when he became a citizen, as well as why he had claimed to have been born in Queens. This isn’t an entirely academic matter; as VICE News has previously reported, no official body has looked into whether Santos is qualified for office, much less confirmed that he is, as no one is exactly in charge of doing so. (It’s also not exactly clear what would happen if he were found to be constitutionally ineligible, as no one in particular is in charge of enforcing the citizenship requirement.) 

 

Spoiler

Seeking clarity, and aware that an extensive review of Santos’ interminable public access show revealed his propensity for malapropisms, VICE News asked Santos’ campaign press team the following question: “In his statement announcing his re-election campaign, Representative Santos referred to himself as a ‘first-generation American.’ First-generation Americans are those who were born outside the United States and emigrated to the U.S. Is Representative Santos a first-generation American, and if not, why did he refer to himself as one?”

The response was straightforward and unambiguous: “Yes. He is a first generation American.”

In response to a follow-up question asking to whom specifically the claim that Santos was not born in the U.S. could be attributed (this question went unanswered), the press team complicated things.

“Let’s be clear,” the press team wrote. “There are two possible meanings of the adjective ‘first generation’ according to the Merriam-Webster dictionary. First generation can refer to a person born in the U.S. to immigrant parents or a naturalized American citizen. Both types of people are considered to be U.S. citizens.

“Congressman Santos was born in New York to immigrant parents.”

Nasya Woomer, a spokesperson for Santos’ congressional office, declined to comment on the Santos campaign’s apparent confusion over where the congressman was born and on whether he’s eligible to serve in Congress, saying, “Congressional offices do not comment on campaign matters.” (Woomer also did not answer a question about anti-vaccine legislation Santos is reportedly introducing called the Minaj Act, perhaps considering this a campaign matter.)

More questions may be in the offing; according to experts VICE News has consulted, the main venue in which questions of constitutional eligibility in New York State are contested are the courts, where an objector can attempt to prevent a candidate from accessing the ballot by filing a challenge and presenting evidence—such as a campaign’s statements—that they don’t meet the eligibility criteria.

 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Francisco 2.0 said:

according to common usage, the Census Bureau, and Harvard University’s immigration center, one who was born outside the United States.

Is this really the definition?  I’ve always taken it to mean the first American-born generation of immigrants.  Like, if his parents still aren’t citizens, how could he be 2nd generation?

  • Like 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Francisco 2.0 said:

as VICE News has previously reported, no official body has looked into whether Santos is qualified for office, much less confirmed that he is

This fucking simulation. 

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

"The exact nature of the charges couldn’t immediately be learned but the FBI and the Justice Department public integrity prosecutors in New York and Washington have been examining allegations of false statements in Santos’ campaign finance filings and other claims."

 

 

Hopefully they just made something up.

  • Haha 6
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Posted

Just another day in the GQP. Former president found liable for sexual assault and defamation and a sitting congressman has federal charges filed against him. Ho hum.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1


×
×
  • Create New...