Jump to content

Joe Biden 2023: The Dark Brandon Rises

StassneyHorn

By StassneyHorn
in Cloak Room

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 4.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Longhorn_Fan68
Longhorn_Fan68

Joe drops in to lay his old wrinkly nuts on Marge's ape-like chin. x-post from her dumb thread  

mooseoutfront
mooseoutfront

Just want to give a shout out to Dark Brandon The remainder of my wife's student loans were forgiven today She/we have been paying on them for 20 plus years We are now 100% debt free

elguapo
elguapo

Posted Images

Incredulity

Incredulity 11446

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, elfenix said:

granted i got out of the car 20 or so minutes ago so maybe something went off the rails but the real holy smokes was the first question (by the financial fucking times) asking if xi told biden when china would attack taiwan.

I agree he got a couple of non-softball questions.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
YGIFS

YGIFS 19447

Posted
Posted
33 minutes ago, Incredulity said:

Trump is a fucking lunatic. Not that that has much to do with Joe’s inability to deliver a coherent response to reporters questions 

I think you get an unfair rap on here.  I probably share more in common with you with regard to conservative values and sense of humor than either of us would care to admit.  But don't say that you think "Trump is a fucking lunatic."  You've voted for him, you've donated to him, and you'd blow him if given half the chance.  

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Incredulity

Incredulity 11446

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, YGIFS said:

admit.  But don't say that you think "Trump is a fucking lunatic."

I’ve said it repeatedly.  The Leftists won’t accept anything but complete fealty to their neomarxist ideology.

4 minutes ago, YGIFS said:

You've voted for him, you've donated to him, and you'd blow him if given half the chance.  

Youre Wrong John C Mcginley GIF

 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Fuck You 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
YGIFS

YGIFS 19447

Posted
Posted

I have my issues with the far left, as you do.  And fellatio jokes aside, and admittedly I don't know you in real life, but there is a less than 1% chance you didn't vote for Donald Trump.  This is fucking insane and you know it.  We're the only predominantly male, upper-middle class, mostly white/latino website in Texas (last I checked, a red state) who has like 6 outta 3,000 registered users who voted for Donald Trump.  C'mon man, we both know that's total bullshit.  I still think we have a lot in common humor-wise, but don't bullshit a bullshitter.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Incredulity

Incredulity 11446

Posted
Posted (edited)
10 minutes ago, YGIFS said:

I have my issues with the far left, as you do.  And fellatio jokes aside, and admittedly I don't know you in real life, but there is a less than 1% chance you didn't vote for Donald Trump.  This is fucking insane and you know it.  We're the only predominantly male, upper-middle class, mostly white/latino website in Texas (last I checked, a red state) who has like 6 outta 3,000 registered users who voted for Donald Trump.  C'mon man, we both know that's total bullshit.  I still think we have a lot in common humor-wise, but don't bullshit a bullshitter.  

I never said I didn’t, I never said I did.

I refuse to play the purity test “who do you vote for” bullshit that the leftists here love.  My vote is none of your fucking business, just as yours is none of mine.

Edited by Incredulity
  • Fuck You 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
aggie08

aggie08 21300

Posted
Posted
23 minutes ago, Incredulity said:

I never said I didn’t, I never said I did.

I refuse to play the purity test “who do you vote for” bullshit that the leftists here love.  My vote is none of your fucking business, just as yours is none of mine.

So you voted for Trump twice and will again in 2024. Got it. Glad we confirmed that for about the 89th time.

  • Hook 'Em 5
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Js1

Js1 85008

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, aggie08 said:

So you voted for Trump twice and will again in 2024. Got it. Glad we confirmed that for about the 89th time.

I’m sure it’s a “I’m not voting for Trump, I’m voting against senile communist Joe Biden. You made me vote for fascism! But everyone who voted for Biden only did it because they love him”

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Biff Tannen

Biff Tannen 45439

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Incredulity said:

If you want to see the end of Biden’s presidency watch the Q and A going on right now.  Holy smokes 

 

2 hours ago, Incredulity said:

Trump is a fucking lunatic. Not that that has much to do with Joe’s inability to deliver a coherent response to reporters questions 

 

1 hour ago, Incredulity said:

I agree he got a couple of non-softball questions.

 

 

 

1 hour ago, Incredulity said:

I’ve said it repeatedly.  The Leftists won’t accept anything but complete fealty to their neomarxist ideology.

Youre Wrong John C Mcginley GIF

 

 

1 hour ago, Incredulity said:

I never said I didn’t, I never said I did.

I refuse to play the purity test “who do you vote for” bullshit that the leftists here love.  My vote is none of your fucking business, just as yours is none of mine.

image.gif.a5755c69fbecf56a1f96152e8ae7ec99.gif

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Boss Hogg

Boss Hogg 808

Posted
Posted
53 minutes ago, Doc Sam Beckett said:

spacer.png

 

What exactly are you saying dipshit? 

What is so hard to understand? Blinken did not look happy that Biden called Xi a dictator. Whether you believe it is true or not, the timing of doubling down on it immediately after a summit meeting is poor. Especially after what I would assume were a lot of assurances and backpedaling on his previous remarks by his subordinates. It shows a lack of discipline and decorum at best, or a lack of awareness at worst.

 

There was another clip of him saying Israel was agreeing to a pause, then saying whoops I mightve said too much and addressing Blinken. Not Potus’ best showing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Neonmoon

Neonmoon 38127

Posted
Posted
6 hours ago, Boss Hogg said:

It shows a lack of discipline and decorum at best, or a lack of awareness at worst

A lack of decorum? decorum? 

Biden could pull his pants down and take a shit on a picture of Xi and I wouldn’t give a fuck. In the context of voting, the bar has been set at democracy v fascism. 
 

 

  • Hook 'Em 5
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Incredulity

Incredulity 11446

Posted
Posted (edited)
10 minutes ago, SubliminalHorn said:

You voted for trump, anything you say or think is worthless 

Well There It Is Jurassic Park GIF
 

For the record that’s not how democracy works.  So the next time you’re pissing down your leg about, “saving democracy” try to be just a bit more self aware.

Edited by Incredulity
  • Fuck You 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Captainant

Captainant 27250

Posted
Posted
7 hours ago, Boss Hogg said:

What is so hard to understand? Blinken did not look happy that Biden called Xi a dictator. Whether you believe it is true or not, the timing of doubling down on it immediately after a summit meeting is poor. Especially after what I would assume were a lot of assurances and backpedaling on his previous remarks by his subordinates. It shows a lack of discipline and decorum at best, or a lack of awareness at worst.

 

There was another clip of him saying Israel was agreeing to a pause, then saying whoops I mightve said too much and addressing Blinken. Not Potus’ best showing. 

 

4 hours ago, Thetexashammer said:

He's got dementia now. When he was vice president, before he was demented, he took bribes from China. Does that clarify for you?

 

24 minutes ago, Incredulity said:

But, but, but Chip Roy!!!!

Lulz id love to see the venn diagram of yalls outrage over this vs your outrage over when the last guy you voted for saluted a North Korean general in front of a communist dictator. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 2
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Horn Dog

Horn Dog 9588

Posted
Posted
19 minutes ago, Captainant said:

 

 

Lulz id love to see the venn diagram of yalls outrage over this vs your outrage over when the last guy you voted for saluted a North Korean general in front of a communist dictator. 

Exactly.

”Our chief concern is whether our leaders show decorum to others and whether they display any evidence of mental illness!!”

—GOP voter 2023

  • Haha 7
  • Rage+1 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Voldemort86

Voldemort86 2259

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, GopherRock said:

 

 

1) owned the libs

2) primal MAGA yells 

3) prevent the dems from doing anything to improve non-rich folks lives

4) take away access to needed programs that help the poor

oh yeah……how do GOP candidates get more than 10% of the nationwide vote again? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
atomheartbevo

atomheartbevo 89304

Posted
Posted
8 hours ago, mchookem said:

i mean... is someone arguing he's not a dictator? we are talking about chinese China, right?

8 hours ago, aggie08 said:

Wait, I thought Biden was in China's back pocket?

Well, you see, with Republicans, Biden is not doing enough to stand up to China and to support Taiwan and he won't defend Taiwan, but then if he pushes for more funding for Taiwan or for closer ties with Taiwan, or legislation that helps encourage American companies to move some of their operations out of China, or calls Xi a dictator, then he's trying to get us in a war with China.

Because you see, this is what a proper leader does when faced with adversarial Asian leaders

sq_tov_nk_salute_180614.jpg

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
  • Drool 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Neonmoon

Neonmoon 38127

Posted
Posted

Democrat President

Republican Voters - What about the deficit? What about decorum? He wore a tan suit!

Republican President

Republican Voters - Tax cuts actually reduce the deficit. It's science. It's just a bit of minor treason. What's the big deal?

 

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
  • Drool 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Js1

Js1 85008

Posted
Posted (edited)

I'm only going to say one thing about polling and then I'm probably done with it until summer.

It is bad. 

There's something completely broken with it right now, and I have a hunch it is non-response bias, but the opposite direction of 2020.  In 2020, more likely than not, Dem-leaning voters were staying home, avoiding COVID and were around to answer the phone. Hence why Biden had much better polling numbers than his 2020 results. 

2022 and 2023 and 2024? I just don't think Dems are answering the phone, period. Poll after poll showing Trump/GOP winning young voters, even against non-Biden candidates, and 1/3 of black voters?  Fundamentally wrong. It is not going to happen.  

Anecdotally, my AT&T spam app on my phone shows it has blocked 7 political calls in the last 5 days. I don't even get notification these were blocked, so I sure as hell am not going to answer them. They could be fundraising, they could be polling - either way, they're blocked and my phone doesn't even make a noise. 

Polling is just a tool - feed bad data in, you get bad data out of it.  2022 midterms + 2023 special elections are much more indicative of 2024 than polling.  It is a business that needs to just be put out to pasture. 

Edited by Js1
  • Hook 'Em 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Snake Diggity

Snake Diggity 4607

Posted
Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, Js1 said:

I'm only going to say one thing about polling and then I'm probably done with it until summer.

It is bad. 

There's something completely broken with it right now, and I have a hunch it is non-response bias, but the opposite direction of 2020.  In 2020, more likely than not, Dem-leaning voters were staying home, avoiding COVID and were around to answer the phone. Hence why Biden had much better polling numbers than his 2020 results. 

2022 and 2023 and 2024? I just don't think Dems are answering the phone, period. Poll after poll showing Trump/GOP winning young voters, even against non-Biden candidates, and 1/3 of black voters?  Fundamentally wrong. It is not going to happen.  

Anecdotally, my AT&T spam app on my phone shows it has blocked 7 political calls in the last 5 days. I don't even get notification these were blocked, so I sure as hell am not going to answer them. They could be fundraising, they could be polling - either way, they're blocked and my phone doesn't even make a noise. 

Polling is just a tool - feed bad data in, you get bad data out of it.  2022 midterms + 2023 special elections are much more indicative of 2024 than polling.  It is a business that needs to just be put out to pasture. 

NO ONE under 40 answers their phone, not even for people they know.  And they don’t respond to spam texts.  I am not sure how you accurately poll people under 40 but it isn’t over the phone or via email.  Most people in their 40s are the same way.  Polling via phone is only going to accurately gauge the over 50 vote.

Edited by Snake Diggity
  • Hook 'Em 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Biff Tannen

Biff Tannen 45439

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, Snake Diggity said:

NO ONE under 40 answers their phone, not even for people they know.  And they don’t respond to spam texts.  I am not sure how you accurately poll people under 40 but it isn’t over the phone or via email.  Most people in their 40s are the same way.  Polling via phone is only going to accurately gauge the over 50 vote.

I would amend that to under 60.  My old job had a customer demo of mainly age 40-70 and it was like pulling teeth to get someone to answer a call.  Email or text?  A lot better.  Yet the higher ups couldn't understand it just kept wanting us to hammer people with calls.  

Meanwhile, in Europe, where they actually have laws about spam calls, they answer their phones all the time.  This is an American problem.

  • Hook 'Em 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Captainant

Captainant 27250

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Biff Tannen said:

Meanwhile, in Europe, where they actually have laws about spam calls, they answer their phones all the time.  This is an American problem.

FCC don't give a FUCK about protecting communications and forcing telcoms to actually implement the STIR/SHAKEN framework to prevent the rampant phone number spoofing that's really the main issue with the spam calls.

Good 'ol regulatory capture

  • Hook 'Em 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Snake Diggity

Snake Diggity 4607

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Biff Tannen said:

I would amend that to under 60.  My old job had a customer demo of mainly age 40-70 and it was like pulling teeth to get someone to answer a call.  Email or text?  A lot better.  Yet the higher ups couldn't understand it just kept wanting us to hammer people with calls.  

Meanwhile, in Europe, where they actually have laws about spam calls, they answer their phones all the time.  This is an American problem.

I think 40-70 is a grey area where the tendency is correlated with rural vs urban.  Rural people in their 40s probably answer their phones a lot more than city folk in their 50s, and city folk in their 60s probably don’t answer their phones much at all.  That is just my observation of my own social network so it could be way off.  But I think it’s something that has changed significantly since 2016.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing


Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!

×
×
  • Create New...