Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

So the strings on your glove don’t count as touching a runner, but a batting glove tucked into your ass cheek does.  So dumb.  
Even still, Marcus has to be paying better attention than that 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Rage+1 1
Posted
1 minute ago, chemHORN said:

Giving up on offense.  Will have to win tomorrow or it's over.  

yep. just a bad staff and totally streaky hitting.  Phillies probably roll the Stros though

Posted
8 minutes ago, Sir Ulrich said:

The touching part of a tag only includes equipment when worn for its intended use. Once again these bum fuck umps kill a rally. 

Screenshot_20231019_211402_OneDrive.jpg

it says intended place.  since the player put the glove in his back pocket that is it's intended place and therefore considered worn.

  • Like 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, dcar00 said:

yep. just a bad staff and totally streaky hitting.  Phillies probably roll the Stros though

Yep streaky is right. No real even keel with this team. Either we are flying high or sucking shit through a straw. Hence why we looked dead in the water, then roared back to get a comfortable division lead with a week left and then gave it right back. Seems this team has a hard time pulling itself up and the losses keep piling up. Aside from 1st inning of game 2, the bats have been disappointing. 

Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, Billy Pilgrim said:

I think intended place is his hand

Fuck this bullpen 

then he should put it on his hand and not put it in his back pocket.

and yes fuck this pen

Edited by dcar00
Posted
9 minutes ago, dcar00 said:

it says intended place.  since the player put the glove in his back pocket that is it's intended place and therefore considered worn.

No reason to exempt jewelry and allow that after all the clarification. Even strings on a glove are exempted. 

Posted
1 minute ago, Sir Ulrich said:

No reason to exempt jewelry and allow that after all the clarification. Even strings on a glove are exempted. 

I agree- the placement of the glove there is closer to jewelry than equipment 

Posted

We bought tix to watch them clinch it in Game 6 for a reason.

Jordan shuts them down tomorrow and Nate has an epic Game 6 and then I'll personally take a dump on the Astros dugout roof for good measure.

I'll also hunt down and drop kick the banana boy.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

The good news is no team has ever lost the first two games of an LCS at home and won the series (0 for 31).  So either the trend will continue or the Rangers will own yet another record.  

Edited by chemHORN
Posted
21 minutes ago, dcar00 said:

it says intended place.  since the player put the glove in his back pocket that is it's intended place and therefore considered worn.

Then why even put that in the rule.  Just say all equipment on the person counts?

Posted
10 minutes ago, Sir Ulrich said:

No reason to exempt jewelry and allow that after all the clarification. Even strings on a glove are exempted. 

I don't disagree on the jewelry.  the strings on the glove I get.    

Posted
Just now, chemHORN said:

Then why even put that in the rule.  Just say all equipment on the person counts?

I agree.  anything on the runner should count including jewelry.  you are choosing to look like Mr.T.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...