Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, TexArcher said:

Bishop got fouled 634 times right there.

But they call it’ on the other end. Huggy whines to get that kind of one sided BS

Posted
Just now, conVINCEd said:

It was a block.  And a charge.

CBB refs should just call more blarges. Two fouls and basket counts if it goes lol

Posted
7 minutes ago, OB3 said:

Still have no clue what that call was

Blarge—once ref signaled block and the other signaled charge. They decided to go with the block but completely forgot the ball went in so it should have been an And-1, which is odd because they counted the basket. 

Ray Natili must still be drunk from last night.

Posted
Just now, Degenerate Gardner said:

Lowell Galindo is more disinterested in talking about the actual game being played than any play by play guy ever.

Because we're winning and he's upset.

Posted

What’s weird about the Blarge call is I swore Men had a rule in their game for a while where if it was a Blarge (block and charge called by different refs) you give a foul to both players. 

Posted
5 minutes ago, Pancho said:

What’s weird about the Blarge call is I swore Men had a rule in their game for a while where if it was a Blarge (block and charge called by different refs) you give a foul to both players. 

Isn’t that what they did?

Posted
16 minutes ago, Js1 said:

No Lowell, we don’t really care to see Tre Mitchell back in Austin after he abandoned this team. 

Seriously, what was Mitchell's issue last year? Just flaked out? Homesick? Seemed bizarre at the time. Not that I miss him at all. 

Posted
Just now, Gut Wagon said:

Seriously, what was Mitchell's issue last year? Just flaked out? Homesick? Seemed bizarre at the time. Not that I miss him at all. 

His dad thought Beard should run the offense through him. He was tweeting and/or liking tweets by fans saying Beard didn't know how to run a good offense.

Posted
5 minutes ago, Wally Pryor said:

No under 4 TO?  Weird.

I think they had a rule change when someone takes a timeout within 30 seconds of the media TO window

Posted
3 minutes ago, txhorns said:

Isn’t that what they did?

I think that’s exactly what they did. I thought they changed the rule, but I guess not. I shouldn’t listen in the background to Lowell and Crean either.

Posted
1 minute ago, Pancho said:

I think they had a rule change when someone takes a timeout within 30 seconds of the media TO window

Yep, spot on. Went back and looked at the box score and WVU called one at 4:29. And in the box it also said "Official TV Timeout"

Thanks. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Pancho said:

I think that’s exactly what they did. I thought they changed the rule, but I guess not. I shouldn’t listen in the background to Lowell and Crean either.

In that situation does the basket count? Do they go to the arrow to determine possession?

Posted
1 minute ago, Pato del Muerto said:

Really great half. Just need to come out good in the second half so there’s no hope of a comeback. 

You know that Galindo is dying for comeback.

Posted
Just now, txhorns said:

In that situation does the basket count? Do they go to the arrow to determine possession?

The second or third explanation from crean was that both are assessed fouls, basket is good, no and 1, and go to possession arrow. 
 

I guess we were lucky they they didn’t get the basket and the ball in that scenario. 
 

still think it was just a charge though- disu was there and his heel was up and off the line. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...