Jump to content
Required Reading for any Longhorn ×

Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty

Cairn Horn88

By Cairn Horn88
in Cloak Room

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 28.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

HillCountryBevo
HillCountryBevo

Imagine your basis of hating Trump is because of mean tweets, January 6 and “hush money” trial all because liberal media is crooked. Fuck right off. This is my last post in this forum  dumb fucki

Al Bundy's Napoleon Hand
Al Bundy's Napoleon Hand

When you're a court, you just grab their asset, and they let you do it!

HillCountryBevo
HillCountryBevo

Bye bitch. Enjoy living in literal hell if your man Biden is re elected

Posted Images

Gatorubet

Gatorubet 30321

Posted
Posted
27 minutes ago, Pato del Muerto said:

This should be like a colonel jessup line of questioning: if you know that they are your documents, why would you not admit to showing them to donors?  You can do what you want with your own property, right?

Did trump show you the documents he says he lawfully unclassified?

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Lurch

Lurch 5931

Posted
Posted
12 hours ago, TwiceHorn said:

Actually, although related, I think this thread, relating to his criminal legal troubles, deserves it's own thread.

There’s no way we’ll keep either thread in their lane.  It’s already a bunch of redundant posts.  

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Captainant

Captainant 27801

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, The Dog said:

 

I was told that things would be different because this is a criminal matter, not a civil. And yet, a criminal defendant is publicly attacking the judge and prosecutor and doing what he can to taint the jury pool by flooding the airwaves, not to mention his previous fuckery with coercing witnesses. 

I'll finally shut the fuck up about the bias of our justice system to favor fascist defendants when they stop getting favorable treatment. ANYONE else doing this shit would have been slapped with a gag order and fined and actioned already. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Foosters

Foosters 17889

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Captainant said:

I was told that things would be different because this is a criminal matter, not a civil. And yet, a criminal defendant is publicly attacking the judge and prosecutor and doing what he can to taint the jury pool by flooding the airwaves, not to mention his previous fuckery with coercing witnesses. 

I'll finally shut the fuck up about the bias of our justice system to favor fascist defendants when they stop getting favorable treatment. ANYONE else doing this shit would have been slapped with a gag order and fined and actioned already. 

You honestly have no idea what you're talking about. 

  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Goredho

Goredho 17421

Posted
Posted
50 minutes ago, aggie08 said:

I'm not convinced that you can throw 12 rocks at a hacky sack convention without finding one asshole who feels like it's his God-given duty to hang a jury and save Trump.

To be fair, you can't throw 12 rocks at a hacky sack convention without finding 5-7 who are ready to hang Trump and 5-7 who are ready to hang the DA.  Some may be able to set aside their incoming biases to be good jurors, but there are no blank slates in this country where Trump is concerned.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Dahobbs

Dahobbs 17686

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Captainant said:

I was told that things would be different because this is a criminal matter, not a civil. And yet, a criminal defendant is publicly attacking the judge and prosecutor and doing what he can to taint the jury pool by flooding the airwaves, not to mention his previous fuckery with coercing witnesses. 

I'll finally shut the fuck up about the bias of our justice system to favor fascist defendants when they stop getting favorable treatment. ANYONE else doing this shit would have been slapped with a gag order and fined and actioned already. 

It isn't going to go well for him. This will likely be brought to the Court's attention tomorrow. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Neonmoon

Neonmoon 38130

Posted
Posted

So the CNN legal guy broke down the main challenges Trump will raise. Correct me if I’m wrong, I’m paraphrasing 

1. State can’t enforce federal election laws 

2. Statute of Limitations 

3. Case is not related to Trump Org and shouldn’t be in front of this judge. Needs to be put back in pool of judges 

Says number 1 is unsettled law and will be the most interesting to follow. The other two, prosecutors should prevail 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Pig Bellmont

Pig Bellmont 8739

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Neonmoon said:

So the CNN legal guy broke down the main challenges Trump will raise. Correct me if I’m wrong, I’m paraphrasing 

1. State can’t enforce federal election laws 

2. Statute of Limitations 

3. Case is not related to Trump Org and shouldn’t be in front of this judge. Needs to be put back in pool of judges 

Says number 1 is unsettled law and will be the most interesting to follow. The other two, prosecutors should prevail 

 

Without knowing the charges this is kinda just throwing spaghetti at the wall. 

  • Hook 'Em 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
tx 3 putt

tx 3 putt 77478

Posted
Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, wildcat09 said:

Some of you guys thought there was no way he'd try to sell top secret intelligence:

 

 


the man is a traitor to this country. All traitors should have one ending. His followers are also traitors 

Edited by tx 3 putt
  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Gatorubet

Gatorubet 30321

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, Captainant said:

I'll finally shut the fuck up about the bias of our justice system to favor fascist defendants when they stop getting favorable treatment. ANYONE else doing this shit would have been slapped with a gag order and fined and actioned already. 

There is this thingy called due process, where a court will not act, you know, until the actual person accused of doing something is in front of the court with their lawyer.

As Trump lives in Florida, this instant fix within hours of the post is magical thinking. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
YGIFS

YGIFS 19452

Posted
Posted

"the tape they don't want me to reveal.  And SO FAR, I've adhered to it."

Uh, threatening to reveal sensitive information if pressed by courts or prosecutors can and has worked in civil cases.  But one thing I know about the national security apparatus, they don't really bend to veiled threats to make sure you don't get in trouble.  

Almost everything he said in that short clip with Hannity is very incriminating if you can take is balls outta your ears.  

How the fuck did he know Richard Nixon sold that stuff for $18mm?  A half-dozen published Nixon experts on UT campus alone, not a one of 'em knows that.  Only way he could know that would have to dispatched staffers to various Presidential Libraries to review physical paperwork of archives and artifacts kept by ex-Presidents.  Essentially what was "checked-out" or requested for delivery to the facility, but never receveived.  They all have some version of this process so they know what to ask the family for after the former POTUS dies.  Other than some cool anecdote behind how a Bush received a book of poetry written by the King of Zimbabwe that he kept, no biographer is gonna pour through the whole list of documents held back---if they'd even let the author see that list to begin with.  As such, staffers would have been dispatched with clearance to see exactly what level of shit ex-Presidents can keep before he left office, and they used that as a jumping off point to try to see exactly how much more than that they could try and get away with.  

What's the fancy legal term for when you don't just grab what was on your desk on moving day, but rather weeks and months of planning your crime?  Starts with a P

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Pato del Muerto

Pato del Muerto 52610

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, YGIFS said:

"the tape they don't want me to reveal.  And SO FAR, I've adhered to it."

Uh, threatening to reveal sensitive information if pressed by courts or prosecutors can and has worked in civil cases.  But one thing I know about the national security apparatus, they don't really bend to veiled threats to make sure you don't get in trouble.  

Almost everything he said in that short clip with Hannity is very incriminating if you can take is balls outta your ears.  

How the fuck did he know Richard Nixon sold that stuff for $18mm?  A half-dozen published Nixon experts on UT campus alone, not a one of 'em knows that.  Only way he could know that would have to dispatched staffers to various Presidential Libraries to review physical paperwork of archives and artifacts kept by ex-Presidents.  Essentially what was "checked-out" or requested for delivery to the facility, but never receveived.  They all have some version of this process so they know what to ask the family for after the former POTUS dies.  Other than some cool anecdote behind how a Bush received a book of poetry written by the King of Zimbabwe that he kept, no biographer is gonna pour through the whole list of documents held back---if they'd even let the author see that list to begin with.  As such, staffers would have been dispatched with clearance to see exactly what level of shit ex-Presidents can keep before he left office, and they used that as a jumping off point to try to see exactly how much more than that they could try and get away with.  

What's the fancy legal term for when you don't just grab what was on your desk on moving day, but rather weeks and months of planning your crime?  Starts with a P

Pre-medicated

  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Gatorubet

Gatorubet 30321

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, YGIFS said:

"the tape they don't want me to reveal.  And SO FAR, I've adhered to it."

Uh, threatening to reveal sensitive information if pressed by courts or prosecutors can and has worked in civil cases.  But one thing I know about the national security apparatus, they don't really bend to veiled threats to make sure you don't get in trouble.  

Almost everything he said in that short clip with Hannity is very incriminating if you can take is balls outta your ears.  

How the fuck did he know Richard Nixon sold that stuff for $18mm?  A half-dozen published Nixon experts on UT campus alone, not a one of 'em knows that.  Only way he could know that would have to dispatched staffers to various Presidential Libraries to review physical paperwork of archives and artifacts kept by ex-Presidents.  Essentially what was "checked-out" or requested for delivery to the facility, but never receveived.  They all have some version of this process so they know what to ask the family for after the former POTUS dies.  Other than some cool anecdote behind how a Bush received a book of poetry written by the King of Zimbabwe that he kept, no biographer is gonna pour through the whole list of documents held back---if they'd even let the author see that list to begin with.  As such, staffers would have been dispatched with clearance to see exactly what level of shit ex-Presidents can keep before he left office, and they used that as a jumping off point to try to see exactly how much more than that they could try and get away with.  

What's the fancy legal term for when you don't just grab what was on your desk on moving day, but rather weeks and months of planning your crime?  Starts with a P

Phake news?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
YGIFS

YGIFS 19452

Posted
Posted

Premature ejaculation ? 

Just now, High Plains Drifter said:

 

he doesn't know shit. he pulled that number out of his billowy orange asshole.

I meant knowing the whole story about Nixon keeping docs/gifts.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TwiceHorn

TwiceHorn 31540

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, Captainant said:

I was told that things would be different because this is a criminal matter, not a civil. And yet, a criminal defendant is publicly attacking the judge and prosecutor and doing what he can to taint the jury pool by flooding the airwaves, not to mention his previous fuckery with coercing witnesses. 

I'll finally shut the fuck up about the bias of our justice system to favor fascist defendants when they stop getting favorable treatment. ANYONE else doing this shit would have been slapped with a gag order and fined and actioned already. 

The fucking thing hasn't even started yet.

Christ.

  • Hook 'Em 5
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
BrickHorn

BrickHorn 18287

Posted
Posted
19 minutes ago, YGIFS said:

How the fuck did he know Richard Nixon sold that stuff for $18mm?

A man came up to him — a big, burly guy, with tears in his eyes — and he said “Sir, I paid Richard Nixon $18 million for the stuff he had.”

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Haha 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing


Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!

×
×
  • Create New...