Jump to content

Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty


Recommended Posts

Posted
4 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said:

Didn't someone else use "peekaboo" recently, when jigaboo seemed to be what was intended?  

rg3 made a slip on air w/ jig-a-boo 

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Haha 1
Posted

“People said that Jalen Hurts couldn’t get it done. He could not operate from the pocket,” said Griffin. “He’s not the quarterback of the future. I think he proved all those jigaboos wrong.”                           

  he meant to say bug-a-boos 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted

Yeah, I'm gonna go ahead and assume the obvious -- he knows "jigaboo" is too specific.  He dances around it by using a rhyming word.  He knows what he's doing.

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted
20 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said:

The actual order, in full. https://iapps.courts.state.ny.us/fbem/DocumentDisplayServlet?documentId=QTMYc/u0aKtvSXxU/ZmiiQ==&system=prod

Before we get too excited about this, Trump has already appealed the summary judgment (which may be premature), and it would be fairly SOP for the appeals court to stay this order pending appeal.

Pretty sure there’s already been a court monitor assigned after Trump organized the “Trump Organization II” under Texas law and NY was concerned about them trying to move assets outside the control of NY state. So sure appeals and all that, but there’s already a court ordered mechanism in place preventing them from liquidating or otherwise moving stuff around 

Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, Pig Bellmont said:

Pretty sure there’s already been a court monitor assigned after Trump organized the “Trump Organization II” under Texas law and NY was concerned about them trying to move assets outside the control of NY state. So sure appeals and all that, but there’s already a court ordered mechanism in place preventing them from liquidating or otherwise moving stuff around 

Right, but that order is geared toward the actual liquidation of the banned entities, which is, incidentally, all of them chartered or otherwise authorized to do business in the state.

But yeah, they already more or less couldn't move money or assets around thanks to the monitor.

Odd thing.  The order seems to directly reference only those entities having 'registered to do business" or filed an assumed name-type certificate under GBL 130.  That would seem to exclude any LLCs or corporations or other "chartered" entities under NY law.  I was under the impression that many or most of his entities were NY entities, although the Trump Org trust a Floriduh trust.

Edited by TwiceHorn
Posted
10 minutes ago, jimmyjazz said:

Yeah, I'm gonna go ahead and assume the obvious -- he knows "jigaboo" is too specific.  He dances around it by using a rhyming word.  He knows what he's doing.

Absolutely. Just like him using all caps RIGGERS. It’s so fucking juvenile. 

Posted
14 minutes ago, longhornmatt said:

I don’t know, guys.  I don’t think Donald Trump is racist.   Are you all just extrapolating this from the time he said the Central Park 5 should be executed even though they were innocent, the time he said every non-Anglo country was a shithole country, the fact that he based his political career on building a wall to keep out Mexicans because they’re all rapists, the times when he solicited support from white nationalists or when he glossed over them killing people in Charlottesville, the time he falsely accused Obama of being born in Africa, and every tweet he’s ever posted?

Let’s not overreach. 


 

IMG_6718.jpeg

  • Drool 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Snake Diggity said:

I don’t know.  Doesn’t seem like much of a stretch to assume that Donald Trump was being racist when he called a black person a word ending in “-aboo”.

And called her racist. There’s also his persistent pattern of using racist dog whistles, also of getting especially angry whenever the person who opposes him is black, particularly when it’s a black woman. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
1 hour ago, longhornmatt said:

I don’t know, guys.  I don’t think Donald Trump is racist.   Are you all just extrapolating this from the time he said the Central Park 5 should be executed even though they were innocent, the time he said every non-Anglo country was a shithole country, the fact that he based his political career on building a wall to keep out Mexicans because they’re all rapists, the times when he solicited support from white nationalists or when he glossed over them killing people in Charlottesville, the time he falsely accused Obama of being born in Africa, and every tweet he’s ever posted?

Let’s not overreach. 

Don’t forget that time he said the neo-Nazis and klansmen who marched in Charlottesville were “very fine people.”

  • Rage+1 2
Posted
21 minutes ago, The Dog said:

 


Stephen mueller was just spewing the same bs on the radio - the president is allowed to investigate election fraud. Trump was just doing his presidential duties !!!!

Posted
2 hours ago, TwiceHorn said:

Didn't someone else use "peekaboo" recently, when jigaboo seemed to be what was intended?  

Robert griffin said jigaboo when he meant bugaboo during a game this season. Maybe that?

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
1 hour ago, WhatTheBuck said:

Don’t forget that time he said the neo-Nazis and klansmen who marched in Charlottesville were “very fine people.”

No you stupid lib he said there were very fine people marching with the neo-nazis and klansmen who were there for entirely not racist reasons! Stop listening to msdnc's lies and read the actual transcript!

  • Haha 2
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, The Dog said:

 

Whoop there it is.  I am not 100% sure he'll lose.  I think and hope so, but it is a novel question, again.  And, I think he's entitled to appeal any decision, unfortunately.

The motion. https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67656604/74/united-states-v-trump/

ETA:  Gotta admit, that's a fairly solid brief.  Much better than the usual Trumpco product.  I think it probably slightly mischaracterizes some of the precedents, including Thompson v. Trump, but within the bounds of advocacy.

I think it falls apart, though, by considering the individual acts alleged in isolation and apart from the offenses charged.  Much like their whole "it's protected by the First Amendment."

One thing I had not seen before is that it contends that a former president can only be criminally charge with offenses for which he was impeached and convicted.  Ooof.  I think that's a bridge too far.

Will be interesting to see how the government responds.

Edited by TwiceHorn
Posted
2 hours ago, longhornmatt said:

I don’t know, guys.  I don’t think Donald Trump is racist.   Are you all just extrapolating this from the time he said the Central Park 5 should be executed even though they were innocent, the time he said every non-Anglo country was a shithole country, the fact that he based his political career on building a wall to keep out Mexicans because they’re all rapists, the times when he solicited support from white nationalists or when he glossed over them killing people in Charlottesville, the time he falsely accused Obama of being born in Africa, and every tweet he’s ever posted?

Let’s not overreach. 

*Facepalm*

CDN media

Posted

"The smallest house in Palm Beach is probably worth 50 million dollars."

Lulz.  I searched Zillow for homes FOR SALE in Palm Beach, and found 66 priced less than $50M.  48 of those were less than $18M.  He's just pathologically incapable of not making shit up.

Posted
11 minutes ago, 4th&Five said:

Does he think what he’s saying actually makes sense?

He's a broken record. That's the same stupid, baseless shit he said on Monday, on Tuesday, on Wednesday and, apparently, again today.

4 hours ago, The Dog said:

 

Doesn't this open up some potentially bad issues for Mazars?

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted

If he was a career politician or tech geek/self-made billionaire and he was just one of this disconnected narcissists who had no idea what real life shit costs, I'd almost give him a pass for thinking an $18mm taxable value on a property could be really worth an FMV of $1.5bn.  But here's thing MAGA nation, the guy's whole schtick is that he's an expert in FUCKING REAL ESTATE!  Who the fuck goes from a 70/30 or 80/20 capital stack on a resort-residence and then voluntarily says under oath, "Yeah, no it's not actually $5mm in equity I have at 23%, it's more like $5mm in equity at 0.23%.  That's insane.  Nobody from any walk of life would ever think that possible. 

He over-leveraged it, undercut it for taxes, overhyped it for loans on other properties, payments came due, and the house of cards crumbled once he left office. 

But of course our resident Texas MAGA dipshits decry, "I'm not in Palm Beach, but here in Waco...it's not uncommon for a resident or hotel to sell for 2 or 3x what the tax rolls show.  Mar-a-Lago at $18mm could easily be worth that, especially given its current owner's prestige." 

you realize your real estate god thinks it's not 3x, the cap rate differential on it isn't even mathematically possible.  The shit he's claiming about the corrupt, politically motivated judge and courts at least has a basis in emotion and feelings of being wronged.  What he's suggesting financially literally defies the laws of physics and arabic numbers.  It's like the dumbass who let the casino's slot machines get knocked over on 3 straight triple-bonus wins in the DeNiro movie.  It's a statistical impossibility.  It literally cannot happen.  The original LTV and cap stack, even with over zealous estimates and bankers looking to get something a little bit bigger than they're entitled to, can't make that term sheet on anything with $1.4 billion dollars of those numbers.  You can't be off by 97% in commercial underwriting on real assets, unless there's criminal fraud.  This isn't a fucking rare painting or IP unicorn where multiples are vague even on a good day.  But won't stop some of you from trying to suck his dick again so you can go back to feeling validated.  

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted
16 hours ago, Gatorubet said:

IMG_1776.thumb.png.7a68dec1d54892e5c278ec76e6f7c46e.png

“ I’m not sure if you carry a phone, but by any chance, would you have even one dollar??”

I didn't know that Jesus feathered his hair.

 

  • Haha 1
Posted
22 hours ago, Beau Vine said:

Fuck that.  I'm not living anywhere where soccer is the main sport.  

just circling back to that. this is why I have started researching which EU countries have reciprocity with my architecture license. Starting my search with Czech Republic and going from there. Mmmmm, Czech women

  • Drool 1
Posted
47 minutes ago, C-Man said:

He's a broken record. That's the same stupid, baseless shit he said on Monday, on Tuesday, on Wednesday and, apparently, again today.

Doesn't this open up some potentially bad issues for Mazars?

Bender testified that Mazars just compiled the information provided by Trump, and of course that great, powerful disclaimer protects Mazars and not Trump and the court so found.

  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Francisco 2.0 said:

 

 

 

Quote

According to Pratt's account, as described by the sources, Pratt told Trump he believed Australia should start buying its submarines from the United States, to which an excited Trump -- "leaning" toward Pratt as if to be discreet -- then told Pratt two pieces of information about U.S. submarines: the supposed exact number of nuclear warheads they routinely carry, and exactly how close they supposedly can get to a Russian submarine without being detected.

Is this bad?

  • Rage+1 8
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Francisco 2.0 said:

 

 

 

ASW is hard enough already asshole. Shut your fucking mouth. 

Us military losers and suckers have real life work to do. 

Fuck you traitor piece of shit. 

  • Hook 'Em 8
  • Like 1
Posted

Was curious what the most expensive home ever sold in the US for so I looked it up. $239 million for a penthouse duplex in Manhattan. Of course, that home doesn't have deed restrictions attached to it restricting its use to be a private club. I don't think someone is going to buy a piece of property for 8x that amount and want to live in a private club with 500 members. Maybe they want to run it like a business? Dues are apparently $20k annually, but let's say the average member spends $100k a year at the club. That's $50 million in annual revenue. Minus expenses, let's generously say it's throwing off $12.5 million in EBITDA. No one is paying >100x for that.

  • Hook 'Em 2


×
×
  • Create New...