Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty

[YGIFS 19450]

True.  But I to go back to the historical notion, which admittedly is not a terra firma legal foundation, that these portions of the constitution simply could not encompass shit like this.  They could not be that prophetic.  The concept of a “country” so damn new and ideologically vague, that leading a usurpation of one was beyond the pale.  
there are AI crimes that will be committed in a decade’s time that not even the most visionary IP attorney or judge can foresee.  But they must be held accountable for the very simple reason that we were not capable of forecasting such gross abuses.  
 

I’ve also noticed a marked pivot away from “can’t catch me, I’m running for President!” To “it all still falls under my prior role and executive privilege!”

[TexasHooch 5122]

 

[Neonmoon 38129]

"It would have to be and speedily be you know impeached and convicted before criminal liability", if not, all gravy. "In this extreme cases, you'd expect a speedy conviction and impeachment"

lol

[tx 3 putt 76960]

 

5 minutes ago, TexasHooch said:

 

execute all the judges and it’s all gravy !

['stache 21816]

16 hours ago, HOOKEM4 said:

This works better with the Epstein stuff.

Lippman: It’s come to my attention that you took several trips to a sex island with a billionaire and had sex with numerous underaged girls.

Trumpstanza: was that wrong?. . .

[Underdog 28653]

Is RFK Jr representing Trump in this?  

[tx 3 putt 76960]

[wildcat09 29354]

It seems reasonable to infer from their position then that Trump intended to have all of Congress murdered on January 6th so that he couldn't be impeached.

[Mrs Whiggins 13050]

2 minutes ago, wildcat09 said:

It seems reasonable to infer from their position then that Trump intended to have all of Congress murdered on January 6th so that he couldn't be impeached.

[tx 3 putt 76960]

 

 

[TexasHooch 5122]

13 minutes ago, tx 3 putt said:

 

[jimmyjazz 45958]

Quote

According to Trump's lawyers, the President of the United States could order Seal Team Six to murder his political opponent and he would be immune from prosecution unless he was immediately impeached, convicted, and removed from office first 2/

I don't even understand how that could be tested.  What does "immediately" mean? 

Edited January 9 by jimmyjazz

[Underdog 28653]

Two weeks. 

[Al Bundy's Napoleon Hand 13585]

As long as a president has enough members of his own party in the House and Senate that will refuse to impeach and convict him, Trump's lawyers are arguing a president is free to assassinate his political rivals.

If you vote for the GOP, you're a piece of shit.

[Thrawn 538]

1 minute ago, Al Bundy's Napoleon Hand said:

As long as a president has enough members of his own party in the House and Senate that will refuse to impeach and convict him, Trump's lawyers are arguing a president is free to assassinate his political rivals.

If you vote for the GOP, you're a piece of shit.

That is exactly what I was thinking. Just control the house or senate and you are free to kill whoever you like. Clean house. Wipe out the opposing party. Never face any consequences. I know Trump could easily believe this (maybe even do it), but his lawyer has to know better. Right?

[Chuckie Finster 22694]

On top of the obvious "if your party controls more than 1/3 of the Senate, you can murder your political rivals" conclusion, now is also where we remember that almost every single Senator cited that Trump was no longer physically in office as their reason for voting against impeachment.

Given that argument combined with the arguments presented today, we are basically attempting to greenlight the Purge for any elected official in their last few weeks of office.

Edited January 9 by Chuckie Finster

[Underdog 28653]

Can’t wait to see Tyus and Rob Schneider on Fox tonight weighing in on this appeal. 

[tx 3 putt 76960]

1 minute ago, Underdog said:

Can’t wait to see Tyus and Rob Schneider on Fox tonight weighing in on this appeal. 

please, this is a serious matter, they’re bringing on the big guns ….

[Red Five 40859]

Oh good. "Should presidents be allowed to assassinate their political opponents? There are arguments on both sides. We'll discuss, next." 

[Underdog 28653]

3 minutes ago, tx 3 putt said:

please, this is a serious matter, they’re bringing on the big guns ….

 

[TexasHooch 5122]

Meanwhile, on Fox News:

There's not a single word on the entire site, that I could find, about the hearing today. 

[Neonmoon 38129]

14 minutes ago, Red Five said:

Oh good. "Should presidents be allowed to assassinate their political opponents? There are arguments on both sides. We'll discuss, next." 

Do you work for CNN? 

[dcbc 14484]

What the argument presupposes is that the hypothetical President has had ST6 kill enough opposition members of the house/senate so that he cannot be impeached/convicted.

 

We're through the looking glass, people.  

Edited January 9 by dcbc

[Red Five 40859]

1 minute ago, Neonmoon said:

Do you work for CNN? 

This is how this shit has worked for about eight years now. You hear something ridiculous from Dotard or Team Dotard, and next thing you know it's being "debated", as if it's a real issue.

[Horn Dog 9861]

I mean I guess this mean Biden is free to save democracy by any means necessary at this point.   Trump, prepare thy anus!

[yoladu 4094]

1 hour ago, tx 3 putt said:

[DigglerontheHoof 21200]

1 hour ago, Al Bundy's Napoleon Hand said:

As long as a president has enough members of his own party in the House and Senate that will refuse to impeach and convict him, Trump's lawyers are arguing a president is free to assassinate his political rivals.

If you vote for the GOP, you're a piece of shit.

If the court decides for dotard on this, I would expect Biden to have ST6 execute dotard immediately.  I'm okay w/ that. 

[Horn Dog 9861]

1 hour ago, Chuckie Finster said:

On top of the obvious "if your party controls more than 1/3 of the Senate, you can murder your political rivals" conclusion, now is also where we remember that almost every single Senator cited that Trump was no longer physically in office as their reason for voting against impeachment.

Given that argument combined with the arguments presented today, we are basically attempting to greenlight the Purge for any elected official in their last few weeks of office.

Its even worse than that.  Since the Speaker of the House and Senate Majority leader must bring impeachment proceedings up for a vote,  having just ONE of these individuals in their pockets means no successful impeachment/conviction.    At that point, if anyone speaks up, have them killed before a vote can be called, or hell, kill them during the vote and all resistance magically disappears.  So basically the president and ONE other individual have the constitutional right to impose their will on the entire country without consequence.   Just like the framers  intended.... 

 

[Neonmoon 38129]

18 minutes ago, Horn Dog said:

I mean I guess this mean Biden is free to save democracy by any means necessary at this point.   Trump, prepare thy anus!

As long as Biden has control of Senate and there is no vote to convict, then per Trump's attorneys, Biden can order Seal Team 6 to kill Trump and not be criminally liable. 

[Chuckie Finster 22694]

15 minutes ago, Neonmoon said:

As long as Biden has control of Senate and there is no vote to convict, then per Trump's attorneys, Biden can order Seal Team 6 to kill Trump and not be criminally liable. 

For the first time, kinda thinking Trump's lawyers may be on to something...

[F250 28777]

21 minutes ago, Neonmoon said:

As long as Biden has control of Senate and there is no vote to convict, then per Trump's attorneys, Biden can order Seal Team 6 to kill Trump and not be criminally liable. 

 

"Leave the Gun, Take the Cannoli."

 

[Pato del Muerto 52499]

24 minutes ago, Neonmoon said:

As long as Biden has control of Senate and there is no vote to convict, then per Trump's attorneys, Biden can order Seal Team 6 to kill Trump and not be criminally liable. 

Also my immediate take. Hope that was the follow up to the trump attorney answer. 

Edited January 9 by Pato del Muerto

[tbone_ 14123]

Can’t Biden just ban Trump from the election since the the sitting potus can do whatever the fuck he wants?

[jimmyjazz 45958]

10 minutes ago, tbone_ said:

Can’t Biden just ban Trump from the election since the the sitting potus can do whatever the fuck he wants?

I kinda like the more extreme option, but OK I guess.

[Gatorubet 30239]

13 minutes ago, tbone_ said:

Can’t Biden just ban Trump from the election since the the sitting potus can do whatever the fuck he wants?

hold on… I’m thinking. If Biden can do that, then Biden as commander in chief should reopen the selective service, drafting only Trump, his sons and Jared.

We can televise Boot Camp. It will be a modern-day Gomer Pyle….with pain. Everyone can hear his nonstop insulting of all things military. Then station him in some frozen Quonset hut in Alaska. If he leaves his post, he’s arrested for desertion.

 

[C-Man 27230]

1 hour ago, DigglerontheHoof said:

If the court decides for dotard on this, I would expect Biden to have ST6 execute dotard immediately.  I'm okay w/ that. 

 

57 minutes ago, Neonmoon said:

As long as Biden has control of Senate and there is no vote to convict, then per Trump's attorneys, Biden can order Seal Team 6 to kill Trump and not be criminally liable. 

Edited January 9 by C-Man

[BamaATL 16593]

4 minutes ago, Gatorubet said:

hold on… I’m thinking. If Biden can do that, then Biden as commander in chief should reopen the selective service, drafting only Trump, his sons and Jared.

We can televise Boot Camp. It will be a modern-day Gomer Pyle….with pain. Everyone can hear his nonstop insulting of all things military. Then station him in some frozen Quonset hut in Alaska. If he leaves his post, he’s arrested for desertion.

 

If we are going to get creative, I'd prefer he had him boiled in oil at halftime of the upcoming Superbowl.  To make it fun, maybe a dunk tank.  

[956 Worldwide 34715]

2 hours ago, Chuckie Finster said:

On top of the obvious "if your party controls more than 1/3 of the Senate, you can murder your political rivals" conclusion, now is also where we remember that almost every single Senator cited that Trump was no longer physically in office as their reason for voting against impeachment.

Given that argument combined with the arguments presented today, we are basically attempting to greenlight the Purge for any elected official in their last few weeks of office.

Most of Trumps voters want him to do the purge so this doesn’t really damage him. 

[956 Worldwide 34715]

18 hours ago, YGIFS said:

True.  But I to go back to the historical notion, which admittedly is not a terra firma legal foundation, that these portions of the constitution simply could not encompass shit like this.  They could not be that prophetic.  The concept of a “country” so damn new and ideologically vague, that leading a usurpation of one was beyond the pale.  
there are AI crimes that will be committed in a decade’s time that not even the most visionary IP attorney or judge can foresee.  But they must be held accountable for the very simple reason that we were not capable of forecasting such gross abuses.  
 

I’ve also noticed a marked pivot away from “can’t catch me, I’m running for President!” To “it all still falls under my prior role and executive privilege!”

The guiding philosophy of the majority of the Supreme Court boils down to “the founders could have never imagined people as awful as us, ergo whatever we do must be allowed.” 

[jimmyjazz 45958]

34 minutes ago, Gatorubet said:

hold on… I’m thinking. If Biden can do that, then Biden as commander in chief should reopen the selective service, drafting only Trump, his sons and Jared.

We can televise Boot Camp. It will be a modern-day Gomer Pyle….with pain. Everyone can hear his nonstop insulting of all things military. Then station him in some frozen Quonset hut in Alaska. If he leaves his post, he’s arrested for desertion.

[tx 3 putt 76960]

I know it'll happen, but there's no way the courts can rule for trump on all this without giving biden absolute power ?

[jimmyjazz 45958]

7 minutes ago, tx 3 putt said:

I know it'll happen, but there's no way the courts can rule for trump on all this without giving biden absolute power ?

If there was ever a "never interrupt your opponent when he's making a mistake" moment, this is it.  FAFO.

[Underdog 28653]

47 minutes ago, Gatorubet said:

hold on… I’m thinking. If Biden can do that, then Biden as commander in chief should reopen the selective service, drafting only Trump, his sons and Jared.

Don't stop there, go ahead and draft Tucker, Hannity, Watters, Gym, Gaetz, mtg, boobs, Catturd, Fitton, etc... 

[C-Man 27230]

9 minutes ago, tx 3 putt said:

I know it'll happen, but there's no way the courts can rule for trump on all this without giving biden absolute power ?

 

1 minute ago, jimmyjazz said:

If there was ever a "never interrupt your opponent when he's making a mistake" moment, this is it.  FAFO.

The Democrats could be handed this power on a silver platter and wouldn't use it. Can't say the same for Republicans.

[Longhorn_Fan68 33871]

Just now, C-Man said:

 

The Democrats could be handed this power on a silver platter and wouldn't use it. Can't say the same for Republicans.

maybe they'll use it to prevent the pubs from ever getting to it. nah, that would be too off brand for them. fucking cowards

[Js1 85342]

Never change, y’all 

[Chad Fuck 17683]

I know it'll happen, but there's no way the courts can rule for trump on all this without giving biden absolute power ?

This supposes SCOTUS would apply the same standard to both parties which is utterly laughable right now.

[tbone_ 14123]

The Democrats could be handed this power on a silver platter and wouldn't use it. Can't say the same for Republicans.

This is true. The Democratic Party may actually be stupider than the Republican Party. Bold statement, I know.

[achooloco 1072]

4 hours ago, TexasHooch said:

Meanwhile, on Fox News:

There's not a single word on the entire site, that I could find, about the hearing today. 

still not a major headline (they had the GA DA about some illicit love and Sec Def having cancer) but they did add it way at the bottom with the shittiest fuckhead traitor title, "Trump attorney argues Biden is prosecuting his 'greatest electoral threat". FoxNews is a bunch of traitor shitheads.  

[Native Horn 3504]

1 hour ago, BamaATL said:

If we are going to get creative, I'd prefer he had him boiled in oil at halftime of the upcoming Superbowl.  To make it fun, maybe a dunk tank.  

There is a hole in this plan.  That sonuvabitch is so fat, he can walk on oil.