Jump to content

Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty


Cairn Horn88

Recommended Posts

14 hours ago, jimmyjazz said:

Oh please baby Jeebus, let E Jean sue him AGAIN.

 

11 hours ago, Rimbo said:

Yeah he gonna get sued again.

His plan has to be to win the election and somehow make this all go away right?  Why would he keep doing this over and over?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Biff Tannen said:

 

His plan has to be to win the election and somehow make this all go away right?  Why would he keep doing this over and over?


he’s lived his entire life free of consequences, why should he be worried now ?

also, any man dumb enough to marry a hooker is one dumb mother fucker 

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Biff Tannen said:

 

His plan has to be to win the election and somehow make this all go away right?  Why would he keep doing this over and over?

I don't know that there's a plan of any kind. He's just accustomed to dodging trouble. He likely has confidence that he will work his same voodoo on all of these problems. He thinks he deserves absolute immunity right now. He likely fully believes he will be in the White House again where he will certainly claim that.

But plan? I don't hear a great strategist when I listen to Trump's rambling from the podium. I don't even get a sense of a particularly keen sense of reality. Just a shameless blowfish using deception to intimidate and fleece.

Edited by RomaVicta
  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Biff Tannen said:

 

His plan has to be to win the election and somehow make this all go away right?  Why would he keep doing this over and over?


i don’t think this works for the ny state cases

his worry is jack smith. smith has said (in a round about way) secrets were sold snd he has the receipts 

  • Rage+1 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Biff Tannen said:

His plan has to be to win the election and somehow make this all go away right?  Why would he keep doing this over and over?

Like @RomaVicta said, he has no plan, outside of maybe playing with RNC finances now that he controls it.  That was a genius move, because it gives him access to actual cash.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know that there's a plan of any kind. He's just accustomed to dodging trouble. He likely has confidence that the will work his same voodoo on all of these problems. He thinks he deserves absolute immunity right now. He likely fully believes he will be in the White House again where he will certainly claim that.
But plan? I don't hear a great strategist when I listen to Trump's rambling from the podium. I don't even get a sense of a particularly keen sense of reality. Just a shameless blowfish using deception to intimidate and fleece.

I don’t think y’all are paying attention. His plan is to become Putin. Get “elected” forever, steal money from the economy, pure power for power’s sake because he thinks he can/deserves it/whatever.

And we’re probably about to let him.

These. That’s the plan. He’s not a complex thinker. His plan is to be elected president again. But this time, not make the mistake of accepting limitations on his power - in reality, he is a king. An absolute monarch, with absolute power. And not just any power, the power of God himself (see “the divine right of kings”).
And that’s exactly what a combination of 1) his rabid base and 2) most of the spineless GQP elected officials nationwide are working towards.
Stop attributing any complex thought to him. It’s as simple as “seize all power, so I can do whatever I want that pleases me.”
And we’re about to say “sure, let’s give that a try, what could go wrong? I mean, we have to try it, because Biden is old and socialism and stuff.”
  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 2
  • Rage+1 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, tbone_ said:

we’re probably about to let him.

I have a lot of bad things to say about America. It was built on genocide and slavery. It has never not been racist, beginning with the 3/5th compromise, continuing through the Civil War, through the Chinese Exclusion Act, through Japenese internment camps, through Jim Crow, through the assassination of MLK and other civil rights leaders, through the Southern Strategy and "state's rights," through the Islamophobic "war on terror," through the Birther movement, into the election of Donald Trump and his Muslim Ban, family separations, Remain in Mexico, and the Great Replacement theory.

Our cherished institutions are bullshit. The Supreme Court is and always has been a tool for political operatives to achieve what they could never achieve through a popular vote. Congress is broken seemingly by design. The Electoral College did not make sense at the time of the founding and makes even less sense today.

Meritocracy is a myth. The idea that a person's accumulation of wealth corresponds to their contributions to society is a joke. American exceptionalism is unsubstantiated propaganda. And don't get me started on all of our unwarranted interference with the affairs of other countries.

That is my take on America, and although I'm incredibly jaded about America and disinclined to believe anything positive about it, one of the few attributes about America that I can't deny is that for better or for worse (usually for worse) the people are very attached to individualism and the principles of limited power. Moreso than the Russian people. Sure, we haven't been tested much in that respect since FDR, but I just don't see an overwhelmingly Millennial and Gen Z workforce going along with an autocracy.

  • Hook 'Em 6
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, tx 3 putt said:

Should you wear a condom for civil rape ?

 

Christ...he got walked over. 

To be clear she's clearly deflecting and gaslighting. I just hate how he kept letting her talk over him. 

But she used her experience as a shield and that was a tough spot for George. 

Edited by horngrad03
Sp
  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Rage+1 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a lot of bad things to say about America. It was built on genocide and slavery. It has never not been racist, beginning with the 3/5th compromise, continuing through the Civil War, through the Chinese Exclusion Act, through Japenese internment camps, through Jim Crow, through the assassination of MLK and other civil rights leaders, through the Southern Strategy and "state's rights," through the Islamophobic "war on terror," through the Birther movement, into the election of Donald Trump and his Muslim Ban, family separations, Remain in Mexico, and the Great Replacement theory.
Our cherished institutions are bullshit. The Supreme Court is and always has been a tool for political operatives to achieve what they could never achieve through a popular vote. Congress is broken seemingly by design. The Electoral College did not make sense at the time of the founding and makes even less sense today.
Meritocracy is a myth. The idea that a person's accumulation of wealth corresponds to their contributions to society is a joke. American exceptionalism is unsubstantiated propaganda. And don't get me started on all of our unwarranted interference with the affairs of other countries.
That is my take on America, and although I'm incredibly jaded about America and disinclined to believe anything positive about it, one of the few attributes about America that I can't deny is that for better or for worse (usually for worse) the people are very attached to individualism and the principles of limited power. Moreso than the Russian people. Sure, we haven't been tested much in that respect since FDR, but I just don't see an overwhelmingly Millennial and Gen Z workforce going along with an autocracy.

They don’t have a fucking say. The older voters will impose an autocracy on them, and that’s the point of autocracy, there’s not a fucking thing they can do about it once it’s in place.
  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Brisketexan said:


They don’t have a fucking say. The older voters will impose an autocracy on them, and that’s the point of autocracy, there’s not a fucking thing they can do about it once it’s in place.

Older voters won't be enough of a factor in 4 years, and I'm specifically talking about efforts to keep power through antidemocratic means. They won't only have to contend with Capitol Police. Even if they were to succeed on Jan 6, they won't be able to hold onto power on Jan 7 or later unless enough of the workforce goes along with their plan.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, horngrad03 said:

But she used her experience as a shield and that was a tough spot for George. 

That is what's so fucking odious

Edited by safe sex
  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Rage+1 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, tx 3 putt said:

Should you wear a condom for civil rape ?

 

People are giving George kudos for this interview but to me, it is soft as baby shit. I would love a UK reporter to crack on these weak fucks. 
 

“Incorrect, I’m not shaming you for rape, which is an odious allegation, and to be frank, I find the allegation beneath you, and that of your office. I am asking if you find your position of supporting rape victims to be incongruous with your position of supporting a rapist?”

 

b

  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Neonmoon said:

People are giving George kudos for this interview but to me, it is soft as baby shit. I would love a UK reporter to crack on these weak fucks. 
 

“Incorrect, I’m not shaming you for rape, which is an odious allegation, and to be frank, I find the allegation beneath you, and that of your office. I am asking if you find your position of supporting rape victims to be incongruous with your position of supporting a rapist?”

 

b

Medhi Hasan would have annihilated her. 

  • Hook 'Em 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

She came out looking terrrible. She didn't make sense of her claim. She ignored the rational voice of Stephenopoulos.

I'm not sure how to call that a loss for the host. Other people have their ways, but letting Mace repeat the same rubbish over and over was not a losing strategy.

  • Hook 'Em 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Pato del Muerto said:

She looked good though eh?

She gives major bad kisser and pillow princess vibes. I'm not like, super adverse to the latter necessarily, but combined with the former it's a big red flag.

Her earrings were cute tho

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, safe sex said:

She gives major bad kisser and pillow princess vibes. I'm not like, super adverse to the latter necessarily, but combined with the former it's a big red flag.

Her earrings were cute tho

we talking about Nancy Mace or Katie Britt?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Older voters won't be enough of a factor in 4 years, and I'm specifically talking about efforts to keep power through antidemocratic means. They won't only have to contend with Capitol Police. Even if they were to succeed on Jan 6, they won't be able to hold onto power on Jan 7 or later unless enough of the workforce goes along with their plan.

See…this is the thing people don’t get. Once the authoritarian takes power, it doesn’t matter if the masses go along with it later or not. The authoritarian regime can use brutal force to keep the disgruntled “work force” in line. And it will. That’s how these things go.
  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Biff Tannen said:

 

His plan has to be to win the election and somehow make this all go away right?  Why would he keep doing this over and over?

you think he has a plan?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, chainsaw said:

I have a lot of bad things to say about America. It was built on genocide and slavery. It has never not been racist, beginning with the 3/5th compromise, continuing through the Civil War, through the Chinese Exclusion Act, through Japenese internment camps, through Jim Crow, through the assassination of MLK and other civil rights leaders, through the Southern Strategy and "state's rights," through the Islamophobic "war on terror," through the Birther movement, into the election of Donald Trump and his Muslim Ban, family separations, Remain in Mexico, and the Great Replacement theory.

Our cherished institutions are bullshit. The Supreme Court is and always has been a tool for political operatives to achieve what they could never achieve through a popular vote. Congress is broken seemingly by design. The Electoral College did not make sense at the time of the founding and makes even less sense today.

Meritocracy is a myth. The idea that a person's accumulation of wealth corresponds to their contributions to society is a joke. American exceptionalism is unsubstantiated propaganda. And don't get me started on all of our unwarranted interference with the affairs of other countries.

That is my take on America, and although I'm incredibly jaded about America and disinclined to believe anything positive about it, one of the few attributes about America that I can't deny is that for better or for worse (usually for worse) the people are very attached to individualism and the principles of limited power. Moreso than the Russian people. Sure, we haven't been tested much in that respect since FDR, but I just don't see an overwhelmingly Millennial and Gen Z workforce going along with an autocracy.

And yet, we're still doing pretty good. We're still allowed (in most states) to point out these flaws. We still have the power (outside of GOP-controlled areas) to make things better. I was ambivalent at best about moving out to California back in the day; I'm feeling really great about it now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Brisketexan said:

The authoritarian regime can use brutal force to keep the disgruntled “work force” in line.

We're not conditioned to accept that in the same way the Russians are. That was my whole point.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Rimbo said:

we're still doing pretty good.

That's highly subjective. I can appreciate the progress that has been made, but it doesn't even scratch the surface of atonement for genocide, slavery, and the wholesale theft of assets from Japanese, German, Italians, and other people. The fact Donald Trump has been president and could be president again is another indictment of the conscience of the American people. There's a lot of work to be done, and it's not happening fast enough.

My point was simply that we shouldn't extrapolate anything from how Russia responded to an autocratic takeover. Even though we are shitty, we are very different from them.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Brisketexan said:


See…this is the thing people don’t get. Once the authoritarian takes power, it doesn’t matter if the masses go along with it later or not. The authoritarian regime can use brutal force to keep the disgruntled “work force” in line. And it will. That’s how these things go.

And then you get a revolution.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And then you get a revolution.

Sure, you eventually do.
In between (and during that revolution) you spill untold gallons of blood and set the country back decades….if you’re lucky enough to throw off the fascist internally. Check up on how well “throwing off the fascist yoke” worked for Germany and Italy, for example.
This is our concern dude. We know that this “body” can ultimately survive this cancer. We’re just saying MAYBE it would be wise not to contract it on purpose, being that the cure involves surgery/amputation and brutal chemo and radiation that takes years off your life.
  • Hook 'Em 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Biff Tannen said:

And then you get a revolution.

The fat and happy do not seem to make for a risky revolutionary surge. As I wrote elsewhere, it's concerning that we don't even get mass demonstrations about Trump and the GOP.

I, sadly, see this going down rather tamely.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, SydneyCarton said:

Why does an insurance company need to retain outside counsel over a bond they wrote?

I'm guessing this is like a corporate bond issue on small scale, where there are bond underwriting counsel.  And, because there is an unusually high risk of default (ie the bond being seized in whole or in part after the appeal), a good bit of that is enforcing the security/collateral obligations the bond provides.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Neonmoon said:

People are giving George kudos for this interview but to me, it is soft as baby shit. I would love a UK reporter to crack on these weak fucks. 
 

“Incorrect, I’m not shaming you for rape, which is an odious allegation, and to be frank, I find the allegation beneath you, and that of your office. I am asking if you find your position of supporting rape victims to be incongruous with your position of supporting a rapist?”

She would just keep repeating her talking points and accuse them of shaming her. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Biff Tannen said:

His plan has to be to win the election and somehow make this all go away right?  Why would he keep doing this over and over?

He’s a narcissist with the emotional maturity of a 4-year-old. He can’t help himself. 

  • Hook 'Em 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, SydneyCarton said:

Why does an insurance company need to retain outside counsel over a bond they wrote?

 

2 hours ago, TwiceHorn said:

I'm guessing this is like a corporate bond issue on small scale, where there are bond underwriting counsel.  And, because there is an unusually high risk of default (ie the bond being seized in whole or in part after the appeal), a good bit of that is enforcing the security/collateral obligations the bond provides.

Probably what Twice says but the name of the law firm (Akerman) immediately jumped out at me. At first, I assumed it was talking about The Ackerman, who is a HUGE partner with Chubb. Ackerman is basically their crisis management firm who handles investigations, deep, deep, deep background checks, high risk security situations (guarding against K&R and other shit like that). Then I realized that there's also a law firm that is spelled a little differently so who knows?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It will be so delicious if Jean Carroll gets to sue this moron for a (counts fingers) third time.

https://www.cnbc.com/2024/03/10/trump-denies-carrolls-claims-after-posting-91point6-million-bond-.html

image.png.8951c828e985f4126d5179f5cea79309.png

 

image.png.e8dac8697383587db9900d1872ba1c8f.png 

 

What we really didn't know back in 2014 was that Pop wasn't counting Spurs world championships. He was either counting Trump indictments or Jean Carroll lawsuits.

giphy.gif

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like how in every re-defamement, he keeps saying that he has no idea who she is. Dude how much time did you spend in that courtroom? If you don't know who she is at this point you should probably see a doctor.

  • Hook 'Em 7
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, C-Man said:

 

Probably what Twice says but the name of the law firm (Akerman) immediately jumped out at me. At first, I assumed it was talking about The Ackerman, who is a HUGE partner with Chubb. Ackerman is basically their crisis management firm who handles investigations, deep, deep, deep background checks, high risk security situations (guarding against K&R and other shit like that). Then I realized that there's also a law firm that is spelled a little differently so who knows?

I believe it refers to Akerman LLP, f/k/a Akerman Senterfitt.  A pretty big but low-profle biglaw firm.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Red Five said:

I like how in every re-defamement, he keeps saying that he has no idea who she is. Dude how much time did you spend in that courtroom? If you don't know who she is at this point you should probably see a doctor.

Maybe he still thinks she’s Marla Maples. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Red Five said:

I like how in every re-defamement, he keeps saying that he has no idea who she is. Dude how much time did you spend in that courtroom? If you don't know who she is at this point you should probably see a doctor.

I don't understand what is even going on anymore. He's supposedly being held accountable for the defamement but now he can just continue to do it? At what point does this just become something that he simply cannot do anymore? Do the punishments get worse for each subsequent case? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites



×
×
  • Create New...