Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty

[dcbc 14180]

5 minutes ago, Beantown Express 2.0 said:

Can any of the lawyers on here legitimately defend this type of action?  It sure looks like she is just protecting the guy that made her a judge no matter what crimes he may have committed.  

Yeah, I mean, she's either in the tank for him or isn't competent enough to manage all of these pretrial motions involving voluminous documents before a trial date this month.  Either idea is plausible, I suppose, or both.  That's not to be construed as a defense on my part.

Edited May 7 by dcbc

[Brisketexan 103148]

Just now, Bozo_Casanova said:

Honestly a beautiful car. 

Would I proudly drive that sonofabitch today?

You bet your fucking ass I would.

With the windows down, cranking some Jethro Tull.  Maybe some Thin Lizzy.

[C-Man 26536]

3 minutes ago, WhatTheBuck said:

I get it. Hindsight is 20/20. If she had only lived a few months longer than it wouldn’t be an issue and you wouldn’t be indirectly calling me a moron. If you want to put term limits on Supreme Court justices, I’m willing to listen to your argument. Yes, in retrospect, it would’ve been nice if Obama could’ve appointed her replacement rather than Trump. It would also be really nice if McConnell wasn’t a massive piece of shit who stole two SCOTUS seats for blatantly partisan and unconstitutional reasons. Let’s not lose sight of who the real villains are here. 

Except that McConnell didn't really do anything that is unconstitutional. It had just been previously understood by both parties that a sitting POTUS would not put forth any replacement SCOTUS candidates within a certain # of months of an upcoming Presidential Election. But, hey, look the GQP took their shot and have probably forever altered how this will be done in the future. It was the perfect time for them to do it because it gave the GQP control of the Court to roll back Roe and do their other fuckery.

[Beantown Express 2.0 6490]

1 minute ago, dcbc said:

Yeah, I mean, she's either in the tank for him or isn't competent enough to manage all of these pretrial motions involving voluminous documents before a trial date this month.  Either idea is plausible, I suppose.

That sounds like a bunch of fancy lawyer talk but since I imagine it coming from your avatar/Earl Campbell, I will allow it. 

[DigglerontheHoof 20450]

6 minutes ago, Beantown Express 2.0 said:

Can any of the lawyers on here legitimately defend this type of action?  It sure looks like she is just protecting the guy that made her a judge no matter what crimes he may have committed.  

If I've learned anything about lawyers, they can defend anyone against anything. 

[TwiceHorn 30716]

Just now, DigglerontheHoof said:

If I've learned anything about lawyers, they can defend anyone against anything. 

Kind of the nature of the beast. 

[Rimbo 25212]

18 minutes ago, tbone_ said:

Can someone remind me, did she just willingly violate the NDA or did this become public some other way?

How is it that she’s now talking freely about something that she, ostensibly, willingly signed and took consideration for agreeing to not talk about.

I’m sure this has all been covered before but I just can’t remember how it all squares.

 

14 minutes ago, immamac said:

never really understood that part either.

It was covered in today's testimony. Tldr, they were talking about it, she hired an attorney. Said attorney is now in prison for unrelated bullshit.

[Rimbo 25212]

5 minutes ago, Brisketexan said:

Would I proudly drive that sonofabitch today?

You bet your fucking ass I would.

With the windows down, cranking some Jethro Tull.  Maybe some Thin Lizzy.

Zep and Sabbath, personally. With a little bit of T-Rex thrown in.

[Brisketexan 103148]

Just now, Rimbo said:

Zep and Sabbath, personally. With a little bit of T-Rex thrown in.

You bring the cassettes, we'll work 'em into the rotation.  We got nothin' but time, man.  Nothin' but time.

[Rimbo 25212]

https://www.threads.net/@russell.delaine/post/C6rmK7Muv71/?xmt=AQGz90LEs3mu-A4-CMXGfIFiWg9P_EZCHgVMgvIMr-ozfA

 

[dcbc 14180]

2 minutes ago, C-Man said:

It had just been previously understood by both parties that a sitting POTUS would not put forth any replacement SCOTUS candidates within a certain # of months of an upcoming Presidential Election.

 

I mean, I could have sworn McConnell pulled this out of his as, then reinserted it when it was Trump's time, but there's plenty I don't know.  But this is the first I've heard of this from someone who I would not consider a lunatic.

[Rimbo 25212]

Just now, Brisketexan said:

You bring the cassettes, we'll work 'em into the rotation.  We got nothin' but time, man.  Nothin' but time.

cassettes? fuck that newfangled tech

8-tracks all the way

[dcbc 14180]

7 minutes ago, Beantown Express 2.0 said:

That sounds like a bunch of fancy lawyer talk but since I imagine it coming from your avatar/Earl Campbell, I will allow it. 

And that, sir, is among many of the reasons I have that avatar (plus, who's cooler than Earl).  But to be less lawyerly about it, she seems biased and incompetent to me.

[Brisketexan 103148]

Just now, Rimbo said:

cassettes? fuck that newfangled tech

8-tracks all the way

Good sir, my cordoba will be late 70s vintage, with the latest in sound system technology....and of course, rich Corinthian leather.  I'll let you pick out the air freshener to hang from the rearview mirror, though.

[dcbc 14180]

8 minutes ago, DigglerontheHoof said:

If I've learned anything about lawyers, they can defend anyone against anything. 

You're not wrong. 

[locodos 5147]

1 minute ago, Brisketexan said:

You bring the cassettes, we'll work 'em into the rotation.  We got nothin' but time, man.  Nothin' but time.

8 tracks... 

This is the sound I hear in my head when I see that old POS

 

[jimmyjazz 45055]

13 minutes ago, Bozo_Casanova said:

Honestly a beautiful car. 

Day-drinking again?

[Brisketexan 103148]

Just now, dcbc said:

And that, sir, is among many of the reasons I have that avatar (plus, who's cooler than Earl).  But to be less lawyerly about it, she seems biased and incompetent to me.

Ding ding ding.  Her incompetence is what gave her the idea for a path to satisfy her bias.  "I'm too stupid to figure out any of these pre-trial issues.  WAIT...that will be a PERFECT excuse to do what I want to do....delay this trial forever!  My stupidity is brilliance!"

[dcbc 14180]

3 minutes ago, Rimbo said:

cassettes? fuck that newfangled tech

8-tracks all the way

We're going to need more Steely Dan.

[Rimbo 25212]

1 minute ago, dcbc said:

(plus, who's cooler than Earl)

 

the answer is none

none more cool

 

Just now, Brisketexan said:

Good sir, my cordoba will be late 70s vintage, with the latest in sound system technology....and of course, rich Corinthian leather.  I'll let you pick out the air freshener to hang from the rearview mirror, though.

 

In the interest of harmony, I propose a solution.

[Brisketexan 103148]

Just now, Rimbo said:

 

the answer is none

none more cool

 

 

In the interest of harmony, I propose a solution.

Peace through Kraco.  A life slogan if I've ever heard one.

[Brisketexan 103148]

1 minute ago, dcbc said:

We're going to need more Steely Dan.

Bring it.  We've got room in the back seat....hold on, lemme swing this super heavy giant seat back forward so you can get in...

[dcbc 14180]

1 minute ago, Rimbo said:

 

the answer is none

none more cool

 

 

In the interest of harmony, I propose a solution.

 

We had one of these in an old 1978 Chevy G20 Van we used to take on road trips.  The noise that thing made when you tried to use the Rew/FF function.

[Rimbo 25212]

Just now, dcbc said:

We're going to need more Steely Dan.

And if we're going LATE 1970s, I've got more suggestions.

 

[dcbc 14180]

1 minute ago, Brisketexan said:

Bring it.  We've got room in the back seat....hold on, lemme swing this super heavy giant seat back forward so you can get in...

It's going to sound killer on that Quadraphonic Blaupunkt.  I saw the ad for it in last month's OUI, which, I assure you, I read mostly for the ads.

Edited May 7 by dcbc

[Sbbruin 21568]

12 minutes ago, DigglerontheHoof said:

If I've learned anything about lawyers, they can defend anyone against anything. 

I was thinking about that when perusing the monkey torturer thread.  Somebody is going to defend that fuckhead.  That's just not something I could ever do.

[Rimbo 25212]

3 minutes ago, Brisketexan said:

Peace through Kraco.  A life slogan if I've ever heard one.

i mean let those of us who have not enhanced our fine automobile's appearance with a Kraco snap-on whitewall cast the first stone.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[Brisketexan 103148]

Just now, dcbc said:

It's going to sound killer on that Quadraphonic Blaupunkt.  I saw the ad for it in last month's OUI.

I am perfectly fine with this thread diversion.  It's the threadjack we need and deserve.

Found this bad boy for sale for $19k:

Or if you wanna go full burnt orange....nearly $40k...

[SydneyCarton 47095]

51 minutes ago, dcbc said:

He has not testified and may not testify.  If his denial come into evidence in some other way, that's another story.  I still think there's an argument that it's relevant, but for the reasons mentioned above, it's in, it likely isn't harmful, and so it's a moot point.

Pretty sure it came into evidence already through other means. 

[dcbc 14180]

2 minutes ago, Sbbruin said:

I was thinking about that when perusing the monkey torturer thread.  Somebody is going to defend that fuckhead.  That's just not something I could ever do.

In my defense, I once turned down a client who asked me to represent him in a simple name change . . . to Skywalker.

[Red Five 40110]

What options does Jack Smith have at this point?

Imagine a situation where he has evidence that Trump has been selling off those documents. What then?

[Red Five 40110]

In my defense, I once turned down a client who asked me to represent him in a simple name change . . . to Skywalker.

That would have worked if you hadn’t stopped me.

[dcbc 14180]

 

2 minutes ago, Red Five said:

What options does Jack Smith have at this point?

Imagine a situation where he has evidence that Trump has been selling off those documents. What then?

 

Set those pretrial motions for hearings and request a new trial setting.

Just now, Red Five said:

That would have worked if you hadn’t stopped me.

Username definitely checks out.

['stache 21491]

35 minutes ago, tbone_ said:

Can someone remind me, did she just willingly violate the NDA or did this become public some other way?

How is it that she’s now talking freely about something that she, ostensibly, willingly signed and took consideration for agreeing to not talk about.

I’m sure this has all been covered before but I just can’t remember how it all squares.

I've always wondered what the remedy would be for violation of an NDA related to hush money. If a politician pays a women $1,000,000 to sign an NDA and not disclose her allegations of rape against said politician, she takes the money, and goes ahead and speaks about it publicly, does the politician then sue to recover the $1,000,000 plus additional damages? Does that go to a jury?

"Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, the bitch took money and signed a contract to not disclose publicly that my client raped her, and she should be punished for said disclosure." Would a jury really punish a rape victim? I guess the defense would be that it wasn't really rape but to keep her from even making an accusation, but a trial on the matter is just as damaging if not more than what the NDA was meant to prevent. It also feels like an illegal contract. I'm happy I don't practice in this area. 

[Bozo_Casanova 25509]

7 minutes ago, Sbbruin said:

the monkey torturer thread

That what

[dcbc 14180]

1 minute ago, Bozo_Casanova said:

That what

[Rimbo 25212]

7 minutes ago, dcbc said:

In my defense, I once turned down a client who asked me to represent him in a simple name change . . . to Skywalker.

you mother fucker

Edited May 7 by Rimbo

[Rimbo 25212]

4 minutes ago, Red Five said:

That would have worked if you hadn’t stopped me.

(True story: Ramis ad-libbed that line.)

[Sawbonz 26736]

33 minutes ago, WhatTheBuck said:

Hindsight is 20/20

If you’re pushing 90 and have stage 4 pancreatic cancer foresight is pretty clear as well 

[Sbbruin 21568]

11 minutes ago, Bozo_Casanova said:

That what

I'm not even gonna look for it.

[Gatorubet 29398]

44 minutes ago, WhatTheBuck said:

Yes, in retrospect, it would’ve been nice if Obama could’ve appointed her replacement rather than Trump. It would also be really nice if McConnell wasn’t a massive piece of shit who stole two SCOTUS seats for blatantly partisan and unconstitutional reasons. Let’s not lose sight of who the real villains are here. 

Nobody needed hindsight to recognize the problem with a decent replacement if she held on too long-  and her age and the type of cancer that she had pretty much takes away the need for hindsight.  People were screaming about it at the time.  Anyone here who has tried to pry an elderly parent out of their home for their own good will cosign that it is almost impossible for them to do it of their own volition.  Same deal with the stakes being much higher.

But please don’t act like the Turtle’s plan was unknowable when he had already publicly stated that his goal was to defeat anything that Obama wanted to achieve.

 

Edited May 7 by Gatorubet

[Bozo_Casanova 25509]

Just now, Sbbruin said:

I'm not even gonna look for it.

Yeah i regret asking

[RDCanecutter 25770]

3 hours ago, Gatorubet said:

 

They see Trump and go up to him, two big burly Corinthians with tears in their eyes, and tell him, “Sir, the Bible you are selling is the most spiritual copy we have ever seen…”

Trump says he’ll buy the bar a round of drinks, and then leaves without paying.

Malaka.

[Gatorubet 29398]

49 minutes ago, mdmost said:

The least shocking news of the day.

Trump classified documents trial postponed indefinitely

PUBLISHED TUE, MAY 7 20245:02 PM EDTUPDATED 3 MIN AGO

Kevin Breuninger@KEVINWILLIAMB

SHAREShare Article via FacebookShare Article via TwitterShare Article via LinkedInShare Article via Email

KEY POINTS

A federal judge indefinitely postponed the criminal classified documents trial of former President Donald Trump, a court filing shows.

Republican presidential candidate and former U.S. President Donald Trump gestures while he walks with his attorney Todd Blanche, as his criminal trial over charges that he falsified business records to conceal money paid to silence porn star Stormy Daniels in 2016 continues, at Manhattan state court in New York City, U.S., May 6, 2024. 

Brendan Mcdermid | Reuters

A federal judge Tuesday indefinitely postponed the criminal classified documents trial of former President Donald Trump, a court filing shows.

The trial on charges that Trump willfully retained classified national security records after leaving the White House and then hid them from federal authorities was scheduled to start May 20.

But U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon wrote in Tuesday’s court order that it “would be imprudent” to finalize a trial date “at this juncture” when various pre-trial issues have yet to be resolved.

Cannon pointed to pending questions about how classified information will be handled in the high-profile trial of the former president, and “additional pretrial and trial preparations necessary to present this case to a jury.”

To move forward with the trial in May would be “inconsistent with the Court’s duty to fully and fairly consider” those issues, she wrote.

“The Court therefore vacates the current May 20, 2024, trial date (and associated calendar call), to be reset by separate order following resolution of the matters before the Court, consistent with Defendants’ right to due process and the public’s interest in the fair and efficient administration of justice,” Cannon ruled.

Casablanca shocked gif

[SubliminalHorn 6328]

Ok so need Georgia to get its case going. What’s going on there?

[YGIFS 19444]

If there really is a deep state, it's doing Trump's bidding, dragging it's feet, and apparently on more drugs/booze than I plan to be after his demise/defeat/death

[Gatorubet 29398]

14 minutes ago, RDCanecutter said:

Malaka.

[Gatorubet 29398]

53 minutes ago, DigglerontheHoof said:

If I've learned anything about lawyers, they can defend anyone against anything. 

[Dbeasy 14733]

Where can I find the graphic embarrassing details of stormy Daniel’s’ testimony? I want to ridicule the orange moron. 

[RomaVicta 29472]

6 hours ago, TexArcher said:

Conservatives don't want their kids to hear about any sex except 4-pump missionary between a hetero white man and his hetero white wife.  

Yea, like anybody ever makes it to the fourth pump. It's a pipe dream.