Jump to content

Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty

Cairn Horn88

By Cairn Horn88
in Cloak Room

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 28.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

HillCountryBevo
HillCountryBevo

Imagine your basis of hating Trump is because of mean tweets, January 6 and “hush money” trial all because liberal media is crooked. Fuck right off. This is my last post in this forum  dumb fucki

Al Bundy's Napoleon Hand
Al Bundy's Napoleon Hand

When you're a court, you just grab their asset, and they let you do it!

HillCountryBevo
HillCountryBevo

Bye bitch. Enjoy living in literal hell if your man Biden is re elected

Posted Images

jimmyjazz

jimmyjazz 45877

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Frank Drebin said:

Maybe he will remain one.  He currently is.  We will see what the appellate courts do.

But as the political maneuver the lawfare was, it failed spectacularly.  

I know this is difficult for you, Johnny I Inherited a Grocery Chain, but the convictions were the goal and they failed in no way whatsoever.

  • Hook 'Em 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites
aggie08

aggie08 21481

Posted
Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, Frank Drebin said:

Congrats!  The tactic really worked out well for you guys.  

Whether it was politically smart to pursue and whether suspected criminals, regardless of stature, should be put to trial if the evidence warrants it are two completely separate arguments, you agree?

Edited by aggie08
  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Chad Fuck

Chad Fuck 17658

Posted
Posted
21 minutes ago, Frank Drebin said:

Congrats!  The tactic really worked out well for you guys.  

You mean the American people?  For whom the judiciary serves?  Yes, I suppose so.

10 minutes ago, jimmyjazz said:

For the most part, they are.

Mostly they get theirs.  Teflon Don is, apparently, a real thing. 

I feel confident he'll do something once again to bring the scales of justice out once more.  He fucked it up once, he'll fuck it up again. 

  • Rage+1 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
DigglerontheHoof

DigglerontheHoof 21168

Posted
Posted
Just now, Chad Fuck said:

You mean the American people?  For whom the judiciary serves?  Yes, I suppose so.

Mostly they get theirs.  Teflon Don is, apparently, a real thing. 

I feel confident he'll do something once again to bring the scales of justice out once more.  He fucked it up once, he'll fuck it up again. 

Dude, he is immune from prosecution once he takes office.  We. Are. Fucked. 

  • Rage+1 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
aggie08

aggie08 21481

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Chad Fuck said:

I feel confident he'll do something once again to bring the scales of justice out once more.  He fucked it up once, he'll fuck it up again. 

Listen, I don't want to tell you how to live your life, but, for your sanity, abandon any hope of Trump every "getting what's coming to him." We'll get through this next 4 years, but there's definitely no satisfying conclusion waiting for us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TwiceHorn

TwiceHorn 31434

Posted
Posted
35 minutes ago, Frank Drebin said:

This is certainly an interesting tactic from an officer of the court.

 

"conspiracy against rights"

I can tell he's a Crackerjack lawyer.  That's something Biff might call a crime.

  • Hook 'Em 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Chad Fuck

Chad Fuck 17658

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, DigglerontheHoof said:

Dude, he is immune from prosecution once he takes office.  We. Are. Fucked. 

Immune from official acts, which remain pretty vague.  

2 minutes ago, aggie08 said:

Listen, I don't want to tell you how to live your life, but, for your sanity, abandon any hope of Trump every "getting what's coming to him." We'll get through this next 4 years, but there's definitely no satisfying conclusion waiting for us.

I hear you.  I'm not holding out any grand hopes.  We'll get through four years, agreed.  It's already unsatisfying, because there he is, still living and breathing.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
kevwun

kevwun 15758

Posted
Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, aggie08 said:

Listen, I don't want to tell you how to live your life, but, for your sanity, abandon any hope of Trump every "getting what's coming to him." We'll get through this next 4 years, but there's definitely no satisfying conclusion waiting for us.

Only thing he's can't skate on is dying.  Probably.

Edited by kevwun
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Chad Fuck

Chad Fuck 17658

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said:

"conspiracy against rights"

I can tell he's a Crackerjack lawyer.  That's something Biff might call a crime.

The BEST people.  Except this time around "best" looks like the last ones waiting to be picked for dodgeball at an institute for the mentally challenged. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
aggie08

aggie08 21481

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, kevwun said:

Only thing he's can't skate on is dying.  Probably.

Except now he's not going to die a sad loser, tweeting out about lord knows what. He's going to be celebrated as a conquering hero.

  • Rage+1 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Gap03

Gap03 3303

Posted
Posted
On 11/7/2024 at 3:15 PM, TwiceHorn said:

"conspiracy against rights"

I can tell he's a Crackerjack lawyer.  That's something Biff might call a crime.

Don't worry - Aileen, Clarence or one of their brethren will hold his hand through the process until he can articulate a colorable enough position to bankrupt anyone that had the temerity to question Dotard's integrity.

  • Rage+1 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ojo Rojo

Ojo Rojo 1946

Posted
Posted
On 11/8/2024 at 9:49 PM, Frank Drebin said:

Payback is going to be a bitch.  And it’s coming soon.  

This is an intellectual integrity test:

1. Do you think that prosecuting people for political reasons is acceptable?
2. Do you think political actors should be prosecuted when they have committed a crime?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
jimmyjazz

jimmyjazz 45877

Posted
Posted

Yeah, what guys like Johnny Grocery bitch about isn't actually something like lawfare, it's their perception that lawfare was used against his side.  Using it against the other side is totally cool, because he'a  big fucking hypocrite.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Captainant

Captainant 27620

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, jimmyjazz said:

Yeah, what guys like Johnny Grocery bitch about isn't actually something like lawfare, it's their perception that lawfare was used against his side.  Using it against the other side is totally cool, because he'a  big fucking hypocrite.

That's a classical fascist tactic - accuse your enemy of doing to you what you're about to do to them. By constantly claiming victimhood and nursing grievances it empowers their internal moral high ground to keep digging in. And it helps to engender support from an uninformed public since they have a vague impression of that norm already being broken.

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
C-Man

C-Man 27183

Posted
Posted
15 minutes ago, jimmyjazz said:

Yeah, what guys like Johnny Grocery bitch about isn't actually something like lawfare, it's their perception that lawfare was used against his side.  Using it against the other side is totally cool, because he'a  big fucking hypocrite.

You misspelled "gigantic piece of shit"

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TwiceHorn

TwiceHorn 31434

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Evil Bill Obrien said:

So "lawfare" is fine when the GOP does it? Cool Cool...

Yeah, over here in the CR, we worry about whether it's right to take the low road or not.

The Trumpists go straight there all the time every time.

  • Hook 'Em 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
hornmpa96

hornmpa96 2618

Posted
Posted

Haha - Frank thinks the rocket scientists (otherwise known) as the House Republicans will actually find something this time. That group had to bring a consultant in to teach most of the members to tie their shoes. They can put GED Boebert in charge of this investigation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Balcones

Balcones 317

Posted
Posted
21 minutes ago, hornmpa96 said:

Haha - Frank thinks the rocket scientists (otherwise known) as the House Republicans will actually find something this time. That group had to bring a consultant in to teach most of the members to tie their shoes. They can put GED Boebert in charge of this investigation.

Yep. They’ve already sent over a bunch of doctored documents to the FISA court ready to get info.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Gatorubet

Gatorubet 30183

Posted
Posted
On 11/7/2024 at 3:12 PM, DigglerontheHoof said:

Dude, he is immune from prosecution once he takes office.  We. Are. Fucked. 

Charles Guiteau succeeded - and he was flat nuts.

 If two people have already made serious attempts to kill him i doubt they are gonna stop now that he’s President.  Which is kind of like prosecution….but different.  And totally unconcerned with presidential pardon power or immunity. 

  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Captainant

Captainant 27620

Posted
Posted

Judge overseeing 'fake elector' case recuses himself after defense accuses him of anti-Trump bias

GOP "You have to recuse yourself, you have anti-Trump bias!!"

Judge "Well, I don't, I follow the law, but to maintain decorum I'll recuse"

Dems to Judge Cannon "you have pro-Trump bias, you have to recuse yourself to maintain decorum"

Judge Cannon "Go fuck yourself"

  • Rage+1 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Michael Knight

Michael Knight 12976

Posted
Posted (edited)

Donald Trump Got Away With Everything

If his prosecutions were already on life support, Trump’s stunning election last week all but killed them—a bitter reality reflected by a report Wednesday that Smith is planning to step down from his role before the president-elect takes office in January. According to the New York Times, Smith—who has been baselessly accused by Trump and his allies of conducting “lawfare” on behalf of Democrats—is looking to wrap his work in the coming weeks, and will resign, along with members of his team. How, exactly, he will close his two cases is unclear. But what is certain is that they will not make it to trial.

 

https://www.vanityfair.com/news/story/jack-smith-reportedly-stepping-down

Edited by Michael Knight
  • Rage+1 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing


Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!

×
×
  • Create New...