Jump to content

Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty


Recommended Posts

Posted
39 minutes ago, Chewbacca said:

You on the western slope?  

No, we’re pretty much at the border of Chaffee, Fremont and Custer counties.  Each is within a 15 min drive of the house.  Chaffee is sane, but has its share of zealots.  The other two are a deep, angry shade of red.

Posted
4 minutes ago, Goredho said:

No, we’re pretty much at the border of Chaffee, Fremont and Custer counties.  Each is within a 15 min drive of the house.  Chaffee is sane, but has its share of zealots.  The other two are a deep, angry shade of red.

What you wrote sounds like a lot of the people in west Grand county, too.  East Grand (where the resort is) is pretty normal for CO but once you get to Granby and go west, it gets nutty.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
7 minutes ago, Chewbacca said:

What you wrote sounds like a lot of the people in west Grand county, too.  East Grand (where the resort is) is pretty normal for CO but once you get to Granby and go west, it gets nutty.

Yeah, it seems sort of like a big rural/urban divide, but affluent resort areas with their relatively higher levels of wealth and education seem pretty normal (light blue). If it’s rural and doesn’t have anything attractive to outsiders who bring a cosmopolitan mindset, it’s likely a libertarian hellscape full of people who are convinced liberty’s end is nigh. Summit County vs Park County is that way, too.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
23 minutes ago, Goredho said:

Yeah, it seems sort of like a big rural/urban divide, but affluent resort areas with their relatively higher levels of wealth and education seem pretty normal (light blue). If it’s rural and doesn’t have anything attractive to outsiders who bring a cosmopolitan mindset, it’s likely a libertarian hellscape full of people who are convinced liberty’s end is nigh. Summit County vs Park County is that way, too.

Wait until you hear them start talking about the wolves.  Holy shit, are wolves the biggest boogeyman you've ever heard of?  From what I've heard, I'm pretty sure the wolves are coming to impregnate your wife and steal your kids while they eat all your pets and livestock.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 3
Posted
1 hour ago, Chewbacca said:

Wait until you hear them start talking about the wolves.  Holy shit, are wolves the biggest boogeyman you've ever heard of?  From what I've heard, I'm pretty sure the wolves are coming to impregnate your wife and steal your kids while they eat all your pets and livestock.

Fukin furries <spits>

  • Haha 1
Posted
5 hours ago, Biff Tannen said:

Uh, don't you have to be convicted of something first, in order to be pardoned of it?  I don't think you can pre-emptively pardon.  IANAL.

John Eastman, Mark Meadows, Mo Brooks, Matt Gaetz, Andy Biggs, Louie Gohmert, Scott Perry, and Marjorie Taylor Greene all sought blanket pardons from Trump following the Jan. 6 insurrection. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Rage+1 2
  • Drool 1
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 2
Posted
2 hours ago, TwiceHorn said:

Because there's zero evidence that pence or biden took the information willfully.  Or retained it willfully. 

Maybe if you repeat it to him a few more times it will sink in.

Nah, probably not. 

Posted
2 hours ago, TwiceHorn said:

Because there's zero evidence that pence or biden took the information willfully.  Or retained it willfully. 

Here’s what gets me. Trump was driving drunk at 120 miles an hour and went through the red light and T-boned that van full of nuns, causing the van to burst into flames. They charged him with all kinds of stuff. 

On the other hand, I saw a car with a Biden sticker going to the grocery store. There was no sticker anywhere on the bumper of Trump’s car, but the Biden car driver was clearly in Biden’s pocket. And yet - Trump gets charged with a crime for driving his car, while Biden willfully allows his name on the back of the other car - and nobody charges the driver of THAT car with anything.  And Biden, the head of the crime family giving out the bumper stickers skates with NO charges! 

Y'all are either obtuse or gaslighting cunts. 

  • Hook 'Em 7
  • Like 1
  • Rage+1 1
Posted
59 minutes ago, Red Five said:

Yeah he didn't have time in a year and a half to separate his personal stuff from all the stuff he stole. Please, try that in court. 

He makes many calls and has many meetings.

  • Haha 1
Posted
3 hours ago, Hermanator said:

Still no one has answered my original question and explained how low level government employees and contractors willfully taking home classified information to work at home and keeping it unsecured should be multiple years in federal prison while the Vice President of the US willfully taking classified information to his personal home to work on it and keeping there unsecured should be just no big deal give it back and we're all cool. 

Classified information was jeopardized either way. 

Y'all are either obtuse or gaslighting cunts. You've become what you claim to hate here. Instead of striving for unbiased treatment and application of government you're making excuses for when your team commits a crime just like the idiot maga fucks do. 

I will not do that. If you don't maintain proper principles of fairness and justice in your heart and mind you're not much better than the maga shits. A lot of you need to evaluate your lives and beliefs for your own good. 

Negged. You've been given the answer countless times.

Posted
3 minutes ago, cactusflinthead said:

Does he still have a lawyer?

Maybe.

What he still has is 35% of America, eating out of the palm of his hand.  That insane, psychopathic piece of shit that you just listened to in that interview, is a GOD to these people.

  • Rage+1 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, cactusflinthead said:

Does he still have a lawyer?

 

After this interview, he may not.

I get why a Stephen Jones will represent a Timothy McVeigh.  I do not get why counsel (well, not as many as before, but still) will line up to represent Trump.

 

 

 

Posted
19 hours ago, Bama Chick said:

I mean, y’all are trying to reason with a dude who still willingly goes by a username in praise of Tom Fucking Herman……

Star Trek Bones GIF

  • Like 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Gil Bang said:

"he breaks the law like I do"

-some dipshit in Alabama making moonshine

And some contractor in Leander, and some realtor in Grapevine, and some small business owner in Vidor, and ….

  • Rage+1 2
Posted
3 hours ago, Celery Man said:

can we have a separate thread to explain this over and over again

Screenshot_20230616_153607_Firefox.thumb.jpg.8555488d87b789c74b8a911c6eb91186.jpg

seriously y'all...

take advantage of message board features that improve your experience

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
Posted

"I had copies of magazines."

Aren't those just called magazines? Unless Mar-a-Lago is the only high-end golf resort with a fucking microfiche.  I mean, Biden age shit aside...do these people listen to the insane shit that pours out of his outer labia throat?  

What in the fuck.  This 35% really is beyond fucking stupid.  

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
  • Rage+1 1
Posted
1 hour ago, WhatTheBuck said:

Maybe if you repeat it to him a few more times it will sink in.

Nah, probably not. 

If he was here to debate honestly, it might.  He's not.

Posted
1 minute ago, Hookah Horns said:

Not saying it's a winning story, but it's by far the best defense he's farted out his mouth. 

It makes enough sense that people who are stupid/low character enough to still be republicans can nod and shut the door on the ??? thoughts.

Posted
11 minutes ago, Chewbacca said:

If he was here to debate honestly, it might.  He's not.

His bias has been clear from the start when he tried to equate Biden’s possession of documents to Trump’s while not addressing Pence’s possession of documents at all. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Francisco 2.0 said:

 

After this interview, he may not.

I get why a Stephen Jones will represent a Timothy McVeigh.  I do not get why counsel (well, not as many as before, but still) will line up to represent Trump.

John Adams represented the British soldiers charged with the Boston massacre.  He got them acquitted. 

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 3
Posted
10 minutes ago, WhatTheBuck said:

His bias has been clear from the start when he tried to equate Biden’s possession of documents to Trump’s while not addressing Pence’s possession of documents at all. 

Nah, he's been pretty clearly anti Trump for quite some time.

He has also demonstrated a less than firm grasp on the legal system and the fine points thereof.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said:

Nah, he's been pretty clearly anti Trump for quite some time.

He has also demonstrated a less than firm grasp on the legal system and the fine points thereof.

Yeah, my take is that he’s not a bad guy inherently, he just doesn’t understand what we’re talking about and he gets really mad because he thinks we’re supporting inequity in the rule of law.  Annoying, but I have to respect his motive.

Posted
Are you unable to read or do you simply not want to read?

Yeah. My exchange with him was telling:

“How were they able to prove it against these folks?”

“Well, they plead guilty and submitted a sworn confession.”

“Oh, so they got screwed over because they didn’t have the means to fight it so the rich get the better treatment like Biden, etc!”
(Paraphrased).

This is typical “just asking questions”.

He already “knows” the answer. He just wants to get someone else to say it. When they don’t, he’s fucking lost and just ignores the information as presented BY A BUNCH OF PRETTY GOOD FUCKING LAWYERS trying to patiently explain the shit to him.
  • Hook 'Em 7
Posted
51 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said:

Nah, he's been pretty clearly anti Trump for quite some time.

He has also demonstrated a less than firm grasp on the legal system and the fine points thereof.

Then he's just an idiot.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Gatorubet said:

Yeah, my take is that he’s not a bad guy inherently, he just doesn’t understand what we’re talking about and he gets really mad because he thinks we’re supporting inequity in the rule of law.  Annoying, but I have to respect his motive.

He was thinking "it's bad to have classified documents," period.  And, that's true as far as it goes, but it's not necessarily criminal.



×
×
  • Create New...