Jump to content

Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty

Cairn Horn88

By Cairn Horn88
in Cloak Room

 Share

Recommended Posts

TexPx

TexPx 2309

Posted
Posted
Our good friend Chelsea Davis, RIP, erstwhile patent lawyer and florid bipolar schizophrenic, was a TCA grad.
ETA:  Correction, Clark, son of Lamar, current owner of KC Chiefs, went to St. Marks, not TCA.

I figured every Texan would be familiar with the Hunt family. I don’t know if there is anybody more influential in the current national sports landscape than Lamar.
  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 28.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

HillCountryBevo
HillCountryBevo

Imagine your basis of hating Trump is because of mean tweets, January 6 and “hush money” trial all because liberal media is crooked. Fuck right off. This is my last post in this forum  dumb fucki

Al Bundy's Napoleon Hand
Al Bundy's Napoleon Hand

When you're a court, you just grab their asset, and they let you do it!

HillCountryBevo
HillCountryBevo

Bye bitch. Enjoy living in literal hell if your man Biden is re elected

Posted Images

TwiceHorn

TwiceHorn 31184

Posted
Posted (edited)
9 minutes ago, TexPx said:


I figured every Texan would be familiar with the Hunt family. I don’t know if there is anybody more influential in the current national sports landscape than Lamar.

In addition to the three families, there's a lot of other weird shit in their story, some of which I didn't know. That D magazine article above is pretty fascinating. 

And the current, ongoing AG Hill III stuff is pretty bizarre and fascinating. 

Edited by TwiceHorn
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TwiceHorn

TwiceHorn 31184

Posted
Posted

Good editorial in NYT.  https://www.textise.net/showText.aspx?strURL=https%3A//www.nytimes.com/2023/11/07/opinion/trump-fraud-trial.html#site-content

Nothing particularly groundbreaking, I guess, but I like the way he puts things.  And it centers on the notion that Trump is, for maybe the first time in his life, really stuck in a highly factual forum, where his bloviation won't carry the day.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
gernblansten

gernblansten 3183

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, BamaATL said:

So I give it about ten minutes into her testimony before its clear she protecting herself and throwing her brothers completely under the bus.  

spacer.png

 

"This thing is bigger than my dad. This is big bank business, not a real estate issue. Look at him. Kareem Akbar. He's the head of the Trump Organization. That's right. The educated brother from the bank. He's the real head of the Trump Organization." 

  • Haha 4
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Biff Tannen

Biff Tannen 45477

Posted
Posted
32 minutes ago, Horn Under a Bad Sign said:

 

 

 

For those that don't want to go to the twitters:

Quote

BREAKING: Donald Trump’s daughter Ivanka Trump throws her husband Jared Kushner under the bus while testifying under oath at the Trump Organization’s $250 fraud trial in New York.

While being questioned by prosecutors from Attorney General Letitia James’ office, Ivanka Trump threw Kushner to the wolves, admitting under oath that it was Kushner himself who introduced her to the Deutsche Bank banker who helped Donald Trump and the Trump Organization commit financial fraud by inflating Trump’s assets in order to secure fraudulent loans for its Miami Doral gold course, the Old Post Office in D.C., as well as a large property in Chicago.

This is devastating news not only for the Trump Organization, but for her own husband Jared Kushner, which she just exposed to criminal liability for helping Trump and the Trump family business commit rampant fraud with her devastating testimony. Tick-tock, Jared Kushner…

 

  • Hook 'Em 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Popular Post
Gatorubet

Gatorubet 30064

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted
3 minutes ago, Rimbo said:

given that this was posted before she even took the stand, I have doubts about the veracity of the sources...

I have blocked Occupy Democrats from my feed. It’s all the same kind of bullshit - like clips that say “watch MTG destroy stupid Lib” on some twitter clip.

i’m very liberal and supportive of progressive causes, and it’s too much bullshit for me. 

  • Hook 'Em 14
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Horn Dog

Horn Dog 9644

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, gernblansten said:

spacer.png

 

"This thing is bigger than my dad. This is big bank business, not a real estate issue. Look at him. Kareem Akbar. He's the head of the Trump Organization. That's right. The educated brother from the bank. He's the real head of the Trump Organization." 

It's bigger than your mushroom dad??

Well-Yea.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TwiceHorn

TwiceHorn 31184

Posted
Posted (edited)

Ok, something just occurred to me here.

As far as I can tell, all of the loans in question here closed long prior to limitations, like 2010, 2011, 2012.  They objected to her testifying to any of that.

But where that may be important is that, yes there was a species of fraud occurring every time Trump submitted a bs SFC according to loan covenants.  So that sustains the summary judgment.  And those events all occurred within limitations.

But the fraud that set the loan terms occurred outside the statute of limitations.  So, I am not sure Engoron is really going to be able to look at the loan terms to decide a disgorgement number.  There may be some way around this.

But prepare your anus.

Edited by TwiceHorn
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Shut up Lou Holtz

Shut up Lou Holtz 2003

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said:

Ok, something just occurred to me here.

As far as I can tell, all of the loans in question here closed long prior to limitations, like 2010, 2011, 2012.  They objected to her testifying to any of that.

But where that may be important is that, yes there was a species of fraud occurring every time Trump submitted a bs SFC according to loan covenants.  So that sustains the summary judgment.  And those events all occurred within limitations.

But the fraud that set the loan terms occurred outside the statute of limitations.  So, I am not sure Engoron is really going to be able to look at the loan terms to decide a disgorgement number.  There may be some way around this.

But prepare your anus.

I don’t speak lawyer but this is what I got 

 

IMG_2296.gif.047b41303aa15ea8576ec5b6378453b1.gif

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Lurch

Lurch 5919

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said:

Ok, something just occurred to me here.

As far as I can tell, all of the loans in question here closed long prior to limitations, like 2010, 2011, 2012.  They objected to her testifying to any of that.

But where that may be important is that, yes there was a species of fraud occurring every time Trump submitted a bs SFC according to loan covenants.  So that sustains the summary judgment.  And those events all occurred within limitations.

But the fraud that set the loan terms occurred outside the statute of limitations.  So, I am not sure Engoron is really going to be able to look at the loan terms to decide a disgorgement number.  There may be some way around this.

But prepare your anus.

They've frequently brought up that the terms of the agreement required DJT to maintain a certain net worth.  Presumably if he had to attest to "still" being above the number (or perhaps failing to report that he had fallen under it) at any date inside the limitations, the savings he subsequently experienced on interest rates due to that fraud would be subject to disgorgement.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
YGIFS

YGIFS 19449

Posted
Posted

Please tell me somebody has worked up a meme of the two astronauts with Eric looking out into the distance, asking "Hey Dad, Revocable Trusts mean you trust me forever right?"  And Donald holding the pistol to his head, "Sure son, that's what it means..." 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
C-Man

C-Man 26991

Posted
Posted
7 hours ago, BearSchlong said:

My ex-wife was always whining about how she should have married her childhood friend Clark Hunt instead of me.

50/50 chance
- she was once in the same room with him
(probably at Kanakuk or Neiman Marcus)
- she blew him at church camp

My wife once dated the son of a former regent at Texas Tech. The dude is a billionaire. He's good friends with my ex-in laws, who sent him my way when he was having trouble insuring his $12M secondary residence in Montecito. I was showing my wife the pictures when we were working on it and told her, "See, you could've had this!"

And we laughed and laughed and laughed.

 

6 hours ago, TwiceHorn said:

In addition to the three families, there's a lot of other weird shit in their story, some of which I didn't know. That D magazine article above is pretty fascinating. 

And the current, ongoing AG Hill III stuff is pretty bizarre and fascinating. 

It's interesting that they try and legislate morality to everybody else when that family tree is crazy fucked up.

 

5 hours ago, TexasHooch said:

And she's on the stand.  Let the good times roll.

Can't wait for the "They're attacking his poor child to get at him" line in the lunchtime press conference.

Seth Meyers made that joke Monday night about bearded Eric and Junior -- the mean ol' prosecution was going after Trump's wittle "kids"

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Goredho

Goredho 17301

Posted
Posted
19 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said:

Ok, something just occurred to me here.

As far as I can tell, all of the loans in question here closed long prior to limitations, like 2010, 2011, 2012.  They objected to her testifying to any of that.

But where that may be important is that, yes there was a species of fraud occurring every time Trump submitted a bs SFC according to loan covenants.  So that sustains the summary judgment.  And those events all occurred within limitations.

But the fraud that set the loan terms occurred outside the statute of limitations.  So, I am not sure Engoron is really going to be able to look at the loan terms to decide a disgorgement number.  There may be some way around this.

But prepare your anus.

Are you saying Ivanka should prepare her anus? Engoron should prepare his anus? or I should prepare my anus?  Exactly whose anus is in jeopardy?

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 4
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing


Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!

×
×
  • Create New...