Jump to content

Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty


Recommended Posts

Posted
3 hours ago, FirstTimeCaller said:

I'm sorry, how does a stake in a company that lost $49 million and only took in $3.4 million equate to $3.5 billion? 

Because each of the 2 million active users and bots are worth thousands apiece.  Don’t ask me how, it’s Trumpenomics, but those 2 million users/bots are somehow going to generate hundreds of millions in revenue. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 1
  • Rage+1 1
Posted
23 minutes ago, locodos said:

You do know they lost their starting Center in the SECSEC tournament...  They were never going anywhere after that.

 

Handlogten, a 7-foot-1 sophomore, had two rebounds in two minutes and was trying to come down with a third when he landed awkwardly on his left foot with 17:46 remaining in the first half. He immediately went down in pain and rolled onto his side, putting his hands to his face.

The sound of bone apparently breaking could be heard on TV with blood immediately visible on the back of his calf.

So he was likely out for the whole tournament then?

  • Haha 2
Posted
12 minutes ago, Sawbonz said:

Is Twitter even worth 4B currently?

They supposedly brought in $2.5 billion in advertising revenue last year, even if the ads are Viagra, video games, or dick enlargers.

  • Haha 2
Posted
5 minutes ago, atomheartbevo said:

They supposedly brought in $2.5 billion in advertising revenue last year, even if the ads are Viagra, video games, or dick enlargers.

I’m sensing a theme with your post. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Pato del Muerto said:

Don’t they have shares to protect?

Then they will be replaced by members that will bend the knee. Same as it ever was. 

Posted
3 hours ago, Neonmoon said:

I’m willing to bet that the board waives the 6 month lockup 

That whole stock is propped up by small money as it is.  They do that and it'll tank faster than you can say Person. Woman. Man. Camera. TV.

  • Drool 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, TexasHooch said:

That whole stock is propped up by small money as it is.  They do that and it'll tank faster than you can say Person. Woman. Man. Camera. TV.


pump and dump 

 

 

IMG_9424.jpeg

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Haha 3
Posted

Yass is the man behind the money. It’s like when one covk sucker like adelson dies off just another one or two right behind 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Posted
12 minutes ago, bluto said:

Yass is the man behind the money. It’s like when one covk sucker like adelson dies off just another one or two right behind 

He is why Abbott is obsessed with vouchers,

Posted (edited)

I

54 minutes ago, tx 3 putt said:


pump and dump 

 

 

 

It's a Meme SPAC stock, It's already a Pump and Dump. For him to make $500M at the current price he'd have to sell about 13.5M in stock. The current average volume is about 3.5M shares a day. There's just no way he can put that many shares on the market.  It just won't happen.

What WILL happen is that he'll try to collateralize his position by getting a loan on it.  No legitimate funding source is going to do that though.  Not for this turd burger.  The whole company isn't worth $500M, let alone $5B.

Some random billionaire or foreign source might give the cash as a Quid Pro Quo, but that's his only hope, and the SEC and federal prosecutors are watching.

Edited by TexasHooch
  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted (edited)
24 minutes ago, TexasHooch said:

I

No legitimate funding source is going to do that though.  Not for this turd burger.  The whole company isn't worth $500M, let alone $5B

Saudi Prince Friends GIF by Saturday Night Live
 

that’s pocket change for the saudis or china 

Edited by tx 3 putt
Posted (edited)

True, but they've already bought him- At least the Saudis have. And, unbelievably, the financial judgment against him really doesn't impact his chances of getting elected.

Edited by TexasHooch
Posted

Without diminishing the classified document aspect of tfg’s legal baggage, I am much more interested in Smith’s prosecutions regarding Jan 6. Those crimes, should he be convicted of them, would (to a rational observer,) erase his claim to hold office. Cannon is fodder for legal discussion, sure. But, eyes on the prize, folks.

Is Smith able to get a jury’s decision before the election?

  • Haha 3
Posted
11 minutes ago, Willfully Horn said:

Without diminishing the classified document aspect of tfg’s legal baggage, I am much more interested in Smith’s prosecutions regarding Jan 6. Those crimes, should he be convicted of them, would (to a rational observer,) erase his claim to hold office. Cannon is fodder for legal discussion, sure. But, eyes on the prize, folks.

Is Smith able to get a jury’s decision before the election?

At this rate it seems the only case with a +50% of getting done is Alvin Bragg's. 

Fani's is too big and sprawling to get to Trump at the end.

J6 is bogged down in the SCs absolute immunity case, then jury selection . . .

The only way the MAL case gets tried is if Smith gets Cannon thrown off the case but even then she's probably locked it up for Trump with double jeopardy shenanigans.

I would love to hear Smith file some kind of Bedminster case but what I heard on the radio the other day was there wasn't enough probable cause to search for documents when the time was right.  So we have the hands we are dealt.

The bottom line according to MSNBC is that our justice system isn't going to save us, so it's up to the voters.

  • Rage+1 1
  • Drool 1
Posted (edited)
19 minutes ago, chainsaw said:

first time GIF

Right. 
 

I must have missed the legal discussions which explain why the American people have no right to expect answers to the existential legal questions that arose 1537 days ago.

Edited by Willfully Horn
Math is hard
  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
3 hours ago, bluto said:

Yass is the man behind the money. It’s like when one covk sucker like adelson dies off just another one or two right behind 

spacer.png

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 2
Posted
39 minutes ago, Willfully Horn said:

Cannon is fodder for legal discussion

We were just gonna let this gem go by?

Brisket, make some room on the ledge. I have no faith in our legal system. And I'm a white guy.

  • Like 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, Bullneck said:

At this rate it seems the only case with a +50% of getting done is Alvin Bragg's. 

Fani's is too big and sprawling to get to Trump at the end.

J6 is bogged down in the SCs absolute immunity case, then jury selection . . .

The only way the MAL case gets tried is if Smith gets Cannon thrown off the case but even then she's probably locked it up for Trump with double jeopardy shenanigans.

I would love to hear Smith file some kind of Bedminster case but what I heard on the radio the other day was there wasn't enough probable cause to search for documents when the time was right.  So we have the hands we are dealt.

The bottom line according to MSNBC is that our justice system isn't going to save us, so it's up to the voters.

I guess I willfully have held out hope the legal system had balls; at least a sliver of respect for the cojones of Lincoln, circa 1861..

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Willfully Horn said:

Without diminishing the classified document aspect of tfg’s legal baggage, I am much more interested in Smith’s prosecutions regarding Jan 6. Those crimes, should he be convicted of them, would (to a rational observer,) erase his claim to hold office. Cannon is fodder for legal discussion, sure. But, eyes on the prize, folks.

Is Smith able to get a jury’s decision before the election?

Spongebob Squarepants GIF

Posted
10 hours ago, TexasHooch said:

the SEC and federal prosecutors are watching.

The dotcom bubble and 2008-2009 financial crisis have shown the SEC is the most worthless enforcement agency in the government.  Feds, led by dipshit Garland are just behind them in incompetence.  But the free markets will make sure capital finds its proper place, right?

fuck me, fuck all of us.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted

Someone is gruntled that his shot at an inheritance is disappearing. 

Also, in the history of American jurisprudence, there has never been a half a billion dollar judgment….

I’m sure the neck beards are nodding in agreement.

  • Haha 6
Posted
2 minutes ago, Gatorubet said:

Someone is gruntled that his shot at an inheritance is disappearing. 

Also, in the history of American jurisprudence, there has never been a half a billion dollar judgment….

I’m sure the neck beards are nodding in agreement.

I am disgruntled at your use of gruntled. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Gatorubet said:

Someone is gruntled that his shot at an inheritance is disappearing. 

Also, in the history of American jurisprudence, there has never been a half a billion dollar judgment….

I’m sure the neck beards are nodding in agreement.

Texaco would (have) liked to have a word with Eric 

 

The dick drawer probably has a couple that are close

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted
1 minute ago, mantis toboggan said:

I am disgruntled at your use of gruntled. 

My voice recognition software probably picked up on ‘Eric Trump’ and assumed he would get everything wrong. 

Posted
10 minutes ago, Bullneck said:

From the article.  Each square is $10,000 so that's some kind of legal bills the past few years:

21540781_1710959257680.png

 

USA Today, not in color.  Does not compute.

Posted

I just spent a weekend with some hard core Trumpers. My lord. Let me sum everything up. "Both sides suck, but Hunter Biden! and Joe is old and senile and stupid and trans people are ruining this country and immigrants and Trump has done nothing wrong. But yeah, both sides you know? Because I'm reasonable." 

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Rage+1 5
  • Drool 1


×
×
  • Create New...