Jump to content

Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty


Cairn Horn88

Recommended Posts

16 minutes ago, BamaATL said:

No the court had other business today, it resumes Tuesday, then is off again Wednesday for other business (I've read that this is customary in that court), then resumes Thursday and Friday.  

image.gif.70f67fd1d6036e86987151e9ad15924d.gif

  • Haha 4
  • Fuck You 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, BamaATL said:

Or flat doing nothing but truthing' which is apparently today's itinerary.  He's supposed to be at 2 campaign events Wednesday, interesting to see if those get canceled for wind or what ever else.  

IIRC isn't the gag violation hearing (which he has to attend) this Wednesday?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, BamaATL said:

Or flat doing nothing but truthing' which is apparently today's itinerary.  He's supposed to be at 2 campaign events Wednesday, interesting to see if those get canceled for wind or what ever else.  

He's been busting ass trying to get his trial canceled due to "wind".

  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, The Dog said:

IIRC isn't the gag violation hearing (which he has to attend) this Wednesday?

I've read that is possible, but nothing I've seen confirmed.  I don't know if he is required to attend that or not.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Redneck Mutha said:

He's been busting ass trying to get his trial canceled due to "wind".

Well according to Trump and many tremendous scientists and doctors, there is now such a thing as 'Wind Cancer'   DUH!?!?!?  Do your own research man.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, BamaATL said:

I've read that is possible, but nothing I've seen confirmed.  I don't know if he is required to attend that or not.  

just checked and it was originally for Wednesday but moved to Thursday. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Paging Dr. Lobo.  There is a Dr. Ham for you on Line 5.

 

https://dailyboulder.com/confused-and-helpless-trump-showing-clear-signs-of-dementia-psychologist-says/

 

Quote

In Gartner’s eyes, the stress of the trial could be exacerbating Trump’s decline, hastening the unraveling of a man once synonymous with authority.

“The trial is really a form of psychological torture for a malignant narcissist who needs to appear powerful. Instead, he appears small, confused, and helpless,” he observed.

 

Edited by dcbc
  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 1
  • Drool 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Horn Under a Bad Sign said:


I thought "so surely he's off campaigning somewhere"  but then I remembered that his right to free speech has been denied him so he's having to hole up on golf courses. 

Now that O.J. is dead, someone has to continue the search for Nicole's killer. 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, ChiTownDoc said:

I’ve seen similar hundreds of times.  Didn’t want to mention it because I get that people don’t believe the ‘we got him’ narrative, but I said WAY back all the trials would melt what’s left of his brain.  
I have seen the worst of narcissists fall apart when they’re stressed like this - many of them I had to sign into dementia units due to how quickly it all falls apart.  
There’s a 100% chance this is really going to affect him - but he could tough out another year, and we all see his delay tactics, and the election is the biggest one of those.  So let’s see…got my popcorn ready.  

Yeah.  I'm no doctor, but the first two weeks of this trial seems to have aged him.  

 

Or as the Candyman put it, "The suspense is terrible.  I hope it lasts." 

Edited by dcbc
  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Haha 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, ChiTownDoc said:

I’ve seen similar hundreds of times.  Didn’t want to mention it because I get that people don’t believe the ‘we got him’ narrative, but I said WAY back all the trials would melt what’s left of his brain.  
I have seen the worst of narcissists fall apart when they’re stressed like this - many of them I had to sign into dementia units due to how quickly it all falls apart.  

Honest question for you, Doc:  are you saying stress can cause dementia?  Or stress can accelerate dementia?  I can believe the latter, the former seems unlikely, but I'm but a simple man.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/27/2024 at 2:27 PM, Biff Tannen said:

I thought we were an autonomous collective.

 

Is that what "Hive Mind" means?

 

22 hours ago, C-Man said:

Eric says if Dad doesn’t get absolute immunity, Biden is going to prosecuted for the cocaine that was found at the White House.

https://www.threads.net/@aaron.rupar/post/C6TwM1WgTXo/?xmt=AQGz5eXFuSwGGfHkI2_dRYmPBxeFYHimRdHWVIjiRAwIMA

 

Eric's got that weird jaw and teeth thing going on also. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, ChiTownDoc said:

I’ve seen similar hundreds of times.  Didn’t want to mention it because I get that people don’t believe the ‘we got him’ narrative, but I said WAY back all the trials would melt what’s left of his brain.  
I have seen the worst of narcissists fall apart when they’re stressed like this - many of them I had to sign into dementia units due to how quickly it all falls apart.  
There’s a 100% chance this is really going to affect him - but he could tough out another year, and we all see his delay tactics, and the election is the biggest one of those.  So let’s see…got my popcorn ready.  

MAGA DGAF about Trump's dementia, only Joe's.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ChiTownDoc said:

I’ve seen similar hundreds of times.  Didn’t want to mention it because I get that people don’t believe the ‘we got him’ narrative, but I said WAY back all the trials would melt what’s left of his brain.  
I have seen the worst of narcissists fall apart when they’re stressed like this - many of them I had to sign into dementia units due to how quickly it all falls apart.  
There’s a 100% chance this is really going to affect him - but he could tough out another year, and we all see his delay tactics, and the election is the biggest one of those.  So let’s see…got my popcorn ready.  

He's going to be the first brain dead vegetable elected to the highest office of the land, isn't he?

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, ChiTownDoc said:

We don’t even know what all underlying issues could potentially lead to dementia - we do know that stress makes pretty much everything worse.  
As for stress…fatfuck thrives in chaos - that’s not necessarily stress for him. But sitting in court with people talking shit on you all day and actual peasants (how he sees them) deciding your fate?  Thats maximum stress for this POS.  MOARRRR

I’m curious to how they can even bring supporting character witnesses in. They can all be proven to be completely full of shit on cross rather easily. Trump is indefensible and they have him pretty dead to rights on the charges here. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, immamac said:

they have him pretty dead to rights on the charges here. 

You sure about that? 

I don't even know what the alleged illegality is, but you think it's a fine deal? 

Paying off a chick to keep her from talking about an affair doesn't sound like election interference to me... But you think 12 people will all not have a reasonable doubt that it is? 

 

 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's on trial for falsifying business records to cover up the payoff.  All the election interference, affair cover up stuff is just to make it look more interesting.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, ChiTownDoc said:

We don’t even know what all underlying issues could potentially lead to dementia - we do know that stress makes pretty much everything worse.  
As for stress…fatfuck thrives in chaos - that’s not necessarily stress for him. But sitting in court with people talking shit on you all day and actual peasants (how he sees them) deciding your fate?  Thats maximum stress for this POS.  MOARRRR

And a lot of these witnesses are people whom he either employed or worked with and thought we’re loyal to him. While he believes he has the right to turn on people and throw them under the bus to save his ass, it clearly drives him crazy that these same people might throw him under the bus to save their asses.

  • Hook 'Em 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Slacks said:

You sure about that? 

I don't even know what the alleged illegality is, but you think it's a fine deal? 

Paying off a chick to keep her from talking about an affair doesn't sound like election interference to me... But you think 12 people will all not have a reasonable doubt that it is? 

 

 

Have you read the charges? It’s not gonna matter that he’s convicted or found guilty. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Pato del Muerto said:

Yeah it’s not THAT she got paid, it’s HOW she got paid that is the alleged illegality. 

 Because the the statute of limitations expired on his very obvious and concrete felony violation of campaign finance laws. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/23/2024 at 7:42 PM, LTbear said:

I had the same reaction to that tweet. All his stupidity but much better grammar. Am I stupid or is there an insanity where he starts claiming he didn't actually write the tweets and that therefore whatever his Truth Social Manager types doesn't have any bearing on a gag order...

Maybe he installed Grammarly on his phone?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, immamac said:

I’m curious to how they can even bring supporting character witnesses in. They can all be proven to be completely full of shit on cross rather easily. Trump is indefensible and they have him pretty dead to rights on the charges here. 

I’m hoping the prosecution reads trump’s mean tweets about the person that is his character witness during their cross examination followed by the question: what is your reaction to this?

  • Haha 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Felix said:

He's on trial for falsifying business records to cover up the payoff.  All the election interference, affair cover up stuff is just to make it look more interesting.


all dumb ass had to do was pay CASH 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 2
  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, immamac said:

I’m curious to how they can even bring supporting character witnesses in. They can all be proven to be completely full of shit on cross rather easily. Trump is indefensible and they have him pretty dead to rights on the charges here. 

Character witnesses aren't a big deal in criminal trials, or really any trials because putting them on opens the door to the prosecution to bring its own character evidence in.

And, they may serve a purpose with a defendant unknown to the jury, but not with Trump.  There's no character witness alive that could change anyone's mind on Trump.

The incongruous bits of the case are that the records in question were falsified, but to whom?  They aren't public records or of a publicly traded company. The answer to that one is to anyone investigating the books, like here.

But the real rub may be using the federal crime (election/campaign violations) as the "predicate" to raise the falsifying businesits records to a felony. The jury may not bite on that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Slacks said:

You sure about that? 

I don't even know what the alleged illegality is, but you think it's a fine deal? 

Paying off a chick to keep her from talking about an affair doesn't sound like election interference to me... But you think 12 people will all not have a reasonable doubt that it is? 

Tell us you have no idea about anything without telling us you have no idea about anything.  Low info citizens are the death of the republic.  

  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tell us you have no idea about anything without telling us you have no idea about anything.  Low info citizens are the death of the republic.  
It's crazy all the career ending shit that Trump just stumbles through and it's considered NBD. Gary Hart, Howard Dean, Al Fraken, comedian, with an I'll advised tittie honk. Toast; career over. Trump- polls improve . Nutso.
  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Rage+1 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A good piece on Pecker's final day of testimony and an opinion that "standard operating procedure" is too sleazy to work on the jury. https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/standard-operating-procedure-sure-seems-criminally-sleazy

Also contains something I think was missing from the day-by-day narrative posted by Francisco:  

All of which is why AMI consulted with an election law attorney before the McDougal agreement was finalized, Pecker explains. 

But as far as Pecker knows, the election law attorney only reviewed the plain text of McDougal’s contract, which didn’t mention anything about Pecker’s arrangement with Trump and Cohen or his expectation that he would be reimbursed for buying McDougal’s story.

Kaboom.

Also, a good piece, citing to Jack Balkin's (a real, live crit, by the way, meaning CLS scholar) and Steve Vladeck's blogs. on why the reportage of the immunity argument at SCOTUS was hysterical and catastrophizing.  https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/catastrophizing-the-oral-argument-in-trump-v.-u.s

Edited by TwiceHorn
  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Slacks said:

Paying off a chick to keep her from talking about an affair doesn't sound like election interference to me.

Holy fuck! It doesn’t? What in the fuck does if that doesn’t?

I can’t believe anyone would say what you just said.

  • Rage+1 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TheRealRonWeaver? said:


There’s a “smart one?”

I picture Trump's legal team prepping Eric for testimony in one of these trials like the dumbass in 'Stripes'

"Here's what we need you to say, Eric.  As the smart one in the family."

Eric, "Uh, there was one?"  

Link to comment
Share on other sites



×
×
  • Create New...