Jump to content

2020 Democratic Nominee


used2b

Recommended Posts

man, this Hickenlooper guy is a knowledgeable administrator and it is obvious he is a policy wonk. But he is a horrible speaker. A politician needs to be a better speaker than this. He like Beto has a DWI and an interesting life history. Too bad he is hard to follow when he speaks. His town hall is interesting but he is  no Kamala Harris as far as charisma. Neat dude though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:

So I went to google on my phone, didn’t type anything in, and this is what was on my screen.  I’m not a Bernie fan but that kind of information pushing is a little unsettling. 

497B04F2-60B6-46C2-9ABD-2F970E023C1C_zps

I usually get Longhorn articles from Burnt Orange Nation or tech articles popping up on my feed. That feed is a mirroring all the shit you spend time focusing on while on the internets. Google knows you keep researching anti-Bernie information.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, F250 said:

I usually get Longhorn articles from Burnt Orange Nation or tech articles popping up on my feed. That feed is a mirroring all the shit you spend time focusing on while on the internets. Google knows you keep researching anti-Bernie information.

 

It’s better than that time Rocco posted a screengrab and it had tranny porn ads all over it.  

God, I miss that ignorant fuck.  

  • Like 4
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

They should, most Democratic Jews in the U.S. don't care about the U.S. posture with Israel.  And it's the one good thing Trump seems to be doing, so it's a win-win for them.  I'm only a quarter Jew and a quarter Democrat, so this gambit makes perfect sense to me.  They may lose some monetary support, but shouldn't be too rough.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, bad_teammate said:

"Tranny" isn't cool. Don't say that.

I think when they do porn for money calling em trannies is still in the clear.   Just like women who have sex a lot - for money - are whores.  They wear the tag proudly.  

Anyways, yes Rocco did do that.  It was amazing.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think when they do porn for money calling em trannies is still in the clear.   Just like women who have sex a lot - for money - are whores.  They wear the tag proudly.  
Anyways, yes Rocco did do that.  It was amazing.  
Most trans sex workers have little say in what the videos they're featured in are called, or what they are referred to on the cover. The industry is tending positive somewhat, but trans-inclusive porn is still largely the exception to the rule.
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, bad_teammate said:

Kamala not going to AIPAC either. Hell yes.

 

she's still AIPAC's bitch, comparing Israeil Jews, who are mostly fascists to the Selma, Alabama 1965 struggles!   https://mondoweiss.net/2019/02/harris-because-struggle/

Kamala Harris told AIPAC she backs Israel because of civil rights struggle in Selma, 1965

 

AIPAC’s moderator asked Harris where her support for Israel came from, and the senator brought up the famous attempted civil rights march across the Edmund Pettus Bridge in Selma, en route to Montgomery, in March 1965.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, bad_teammate said:

I'm just happy that Ilhan Omar essentially won and that the Dems are moving away from these types of influences. Not a perfectly clean break, but it's progress.

Beto and Castro also on board.

Good job, everyone.

 

Ilhan Omar has been flattened by AIPAC / Shumer, silenced with the threat of losing committee positions.  Her Op-ed in the Wapo recently was undoubtedly written by someone else , gushing praise for zionism with a by-the-way small section for Palestinian rights.  She's been destroyed and we won't hear much from her on this topic ever again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, NowThis said:

Ilhan Omar has been flattened by AIPAC / Shumer, silenced with the threat of losing committee positions.  Her Op-ed in the Wapo recently was undoubtedly written by someone else , gushing praise for zionism with a by-the-way small section for Palestinian rights.  She's been destroyed and we won't hear much from her on this topic ever again.

Is my sarcasm meter broken?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, bad_teammate said:

PPP Iowa Poll

Joe Biden 29%
Bernie Sanders 15%
Elizabeth Warren 8%
Beto O'Rourke 7%
Amy Klobuchar 6%
Kamala Harris 5%
Cory Booker 4% 
Someone else 4%
Not sure 22%

Lots of undecideds to grab in Iowa.

Not Sure 2020! Definitely has my vote.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, NowThis said:

no, for those who follow these things closely, will make more sense. Read the prior sentences, she's been dominated due to threats. 

Younger more progressive elected Democratic reps are bucking the long established leadership, things do not seem to be trending against her. This sounds like a bunch of speculative nonsense if she still has the support of her constituents.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, GSU&UT said:

Younger more progressive elected Democratic reps are bucking the long established leadership, things do not seem to be trending against her. This sounds like a bunch of speculative nonsense if she still has the support of her constituents.

can you read? It's not about other issues, only Israel, starting with bad teammates quote about AIPAC. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, NowThis said:

can you read? It's not about other issues, only Israel, starting with bad teammates quote about AIPAC. 

He literally just posted a tweet that showed half the damn field of Dems running in the primary choosing to not go to the AIPAC conference, what in the hell are you talking about? How does that prove your point that she has been "destroyed" because of her opinions about AIPAC?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, GSU&UT said:

He literally just posted a tweet that showed half the damn field of Dems running in the primary choosing to not go to the AIPAC conference, what in the hell are you talking about? How does that prove your point that she has been "destroyed" because of her opinions about AIPAC?

they're not going because of MoveOn.org, not because of her, but that's not my point.  She's been silenced due to threats. This isn't hard man, not sure why you can't process it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, NowThis said:

they're not going because of MoveOn.org, not because of her, but that's not my point.  She's been silenced due to threats. This isn't hard man, not sure why you can't process it. 

Literally spell out what you mean by "silenced"? You're straight up claiming she won't ever have a public opinion again about Israel? This sounds just way too  tin-foil hat to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



×
×
  • Create New...