Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:

I keep forgetting you’re a Russia denier.  As if they haven’t been toppling democracies across the world for the last 10 years.

"Russia doesn't even exist." - bad_teammate, probably

Posted
1 hour ago, bad_teammate said:

If you're actually worried about Dems defecting in the 2020 elections, it's not the BernieBros who should concern you.

It's the #NeverBernies you should worry about.

 

i'm not worried about the #neverbernies

Posted

https://www.monmouth.edu/polling-institute/documents/monmouthpoll_us_052319.pdf/

Early (all states pre and on Super Tuesday) / Post-Super Tuesday

Biden - 26 / 38
Bernie - 14/16
Harris 14/8
Warren - 9/11
Pete - 6/6

Favorability with Dems (April in parenthesis)

Biden +57 (+1)
Harris +49 (+9)
Warren +46 (+14)
Bernie +44 (-)
Booker +28 (+4)
Pete +24 (-5)
Beto +21 (-10)

Overall Results (April in parenthesis):

Biden 33 (+6)
Bernie 15 (-5)
Harris 11 (+3)
Warren 10 (+4)
Pete 6 (-2)
Beto 4 (-)

Posted
3 hours ago, bad_teammate said:

If you're actually worried about Dems defecting in the 2020 elections, it's not the BernieBros who should concern you.

It's the #NeverBernies you should worry about.

 

As proof of this you offer up 4 tweets from 2 accounts?

Ok

Posted
1 minute ago, elguapo said:

As proof of this you offer up 4 tweets from 2 accounts?

Ok

The actual proof is the PUMA movement from 2008 which was the exact same demographic of person and went 25% from Clinton (primary) to McCain (general)

It's a mirror, down to how they used to dismiss Obama support as sexist college frat boys.

Posted

Starting to think that Kamala might get the brass ring. If Stacey Abrams jumps in that would complicate things, but Kamala's fundamentals are good and if her fundraising has been strong I think she drains Biden of voters over the long haul.

  • Like 1
Posted

Do folks really like harris?
She seems like an egotistical cunt.
I still say its biden or bust, to beat Trump.
I think mayor pete could do it.
Trumps stepped on his own dick, had gaffes galore and 2.5 years of purely negative news reporting (fair or not) and he is still poling fairly well.
No other person coulda come thru all that shit and still be standing.
Man Id hate to be the next president if the opposition party has the house. Gonna be a free for all on digging in past business, taxes, banking personal history etc. galore.
Whatever happens, the run up to the next elections gonna be a real shit show.

  • Like 2
Posted
Do folks really like harris?
She seems like an egotistical cunt.
I still say its biden or bust, to beat Trump.
I think mayor pete could do it.
Trumps stepped on his own dick, had gaffes galore and 2.5 years of purely negative news reporting (fair or not) and he is still poling fairly well.
No other person coulda come thru all that shit and still be standing.
Man Id hate to be the next president if the opposition party has the house. Gonna be a free for all on digging in past business, taxes, banking personal history etc. galore.
Whatever happens, the run up to the next elections gonna be a real shit show.

Every person who has ever been president is an egotistical cunt.
  • Like 2
Posted
5 minutes ago, Hank Kingsley said:

*fart noises*

 

in case anyone is lazy (like i usually am), the 2%ers will be the only ones randomly split and assigned.  everyone else will be equally divided among the two nights - 10 debaters per night.

Eight candidates have a polling average at or above 2 percent right now: Joe Biden, Cory Booker, Pete Buttigieg, Kamala Harris, Amy Klobuchar, Beto O’Rourke, Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren. With the newly announced rule, four would be guaranteed to appear on the first night, and four would be guaranteed to appear on the second night.

Posted
Do folks really like harris?
She seems like an egotistical cunt.
I still say its biden or bust, to beat Trump.
I think mayor pete could do it.
Trumps stepped on his own dick, had gaffes galore and 2.5 years of purely negative news reporting (fair or not) and he is still poling fairly well.
No other person coulda come thru all that shit and still be standing.
Man Id hate to be the next president if the opposition party has the house. Gonna be a free for all on digging in past business, taxes, banking personal history etc. galore.
Whatever happens, the run up to the next elections gonna be a real shit show.


This is an unfair view of Harris.
Posted

Nope to that article.

 

I can agree with the THEORY of appealing to “Never Trumpers”.

 

But until those NT’s acknowledge the problem isn’t just Trump - it’s the entire Republican Party, then they aren’t worth bothering with.

 

Because Trump IS the Republican Party.

 

The RNC and the Trump re-election campaign have merged.

 

McConnell has flat out stated he has no intentions of working together with any Democrat that becomes president. Why should the President have to genuflect to someone who openly states that intention?

 

And anyone who holds up fucking Mitch McConnell as some example of possible bipartisan is showing their hand and true intentions. Fuck that guy.

 

I’m willing to listen to a Republican who says “Trump has destroyed our party. I still believe in what it used to be, but that doesn’t exist any longer. I’m voting for democrats for the foreseeable future until they get the message and burn Trumpublicanism out of the GOP.”

 

Any Republican with any sense knows the Democrats aren’t all AOC and Bernie. There are moderates in the party. The country isn’t going to convert to socialism or communism or whatever -ism boogeyman they fear overnight.

 

I know for most of these guys the past 30 years only happened to other people and it took a vulgar, orange, authoritarian carnival barker to embarrass them out of their comfortable privileged slumber but they already destroyed one party.

 

They don’t get to flounce in and make demands and ruin the other one.

 

Seriously guy, using working with McConnell as positive and example of your idea of good Republican????

 

GTFO.

 

Posted

Remember, the DNC is not charged with fairness to any degree with how they do things when you see the dispersion of candidates for these debates.  How will they game it given that?  Who does the DNC prefer?

On 5/24/2019 at 4:11 PM, Hank Kingsley said:

*fart noises*

 

 

On 5/24/2019 at 4:18 PM, henrygandorf said:

in case anyone is lazy (like i usually am), the 2%ers will be the only ones randomly split and assigned.  everyone else will be equally divided among the two nights - 10 debaters per night.

 

 

 

Posted (edited)
On 5/22/2019 at 1:07 PM, elguapo said:

I don't think Tulsi is a Putin puppet, but she does appear to be Putin's favorite Dem candidate.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2020-election/russia-s-propaganda-machine-discovers-2020-democratic-candidate-tulsi-gabbard-n964261

Puty's ultimate goal is to break up NATO and it's definitely interesting that Tulsi refrained from voting on the NATO support bill.

https://votesmart.org/candidate/129306/tulsi-gabbard?categoryId=22#.XOWPlchKiUl

 

The irony is you source NBC, a mainstream media outlet who profits from the very wars Tulsi is against,  who recently had a reporter quit and blow the whistle on how they deceive the public. 

 

http://republicbroadcasting.org/news/nbc-journalist-quits-then-blows-the-whistle-on-how-mainstream-media-deceives-the-public/

 

Yeah, they have ZERO desire to have anti-war rhetoric so no surprise they would peddle narratives like that about Tulsi.  

 

Anyway, Tell me again why we need NATO?  Could one be against NATO only on the merits that it's an economic boondoggle which pressures other countries into falling in line to support whatever adventures our Military Empire wants to pursue without being caught in the Russia-Boogey man net?  Your last comment is only coincidence imo and seems to exude more hysteria.  

 

 

Edited by American Swindle
  • Like 1
  • Fuck You 1
Posted
On 5/23/2019 at 7:52 AM, Hugo Stiglitz said:

I keep forgetting you’re a Russia denier.  As if they haven’t been toppling democracies across the world for the last 10 years.

THE IRONY HERE IS MIND BOTTLING. 

  • Fuck You 1
Posted
On ‎5‎/‎26‎/‎2019 at 8:43 AM, Celery Man said:

Being a “never Trumper” and casting a vote to keep him in office is about the most Tahoe thing you could possibly do.

Fixed for ya

Posted

This is good. The qualifying criteria should become harder the closer to Iowa. Let them all duke it out this summer and then narrow it down one debate at a time 

 

  • Like 1
Posted
On 5/27/2019 at 8:09 PM, Message Board User said:

It's nothing but identity politics with this group.

 

Came here to post this. Damn those Democraps are STACKED for 2020. 

Posted
4 hours ago, Fozzz said:

I think it's more likely than not Trump wins in 2020.  

Please. This is ridiculously stupid. No matter who the nominee is, do you really think the DNC would just run the exact same campaign and bank on Trump’s favorability  numbers being so low that there’s no way they can lose so they just play to the middle and have no message other than “Not Trump”? There’s no way Democratic leadership would be that god damn fucking stupid. 

  • Like 9
Posted
4 minutes ago, Hank Scorpio said:

Please. This is ridiculously stupid. No matter who the nominee is, do you really think the DNC would just run the exact same campaign and bank on Trump’s favorability  numbers being so low that there’s no way they can lose so they just play to the middle and have no message other than “Not Trump”? There’s no way Democratic leadership would be that god damn fucking stupid. 

i know this is your schtick, but "not trump" is really resonating right now, and it's fucking sad.

it's polling way above actual issues like healthcare.  mind-bottling.

Posted
5 minutes ago, Hank Scorpio said:

Please. This is ridiculously stupid. No matter who the nominee is, do you really think the DNC would just run the exact same campaign and bank on Trump’s favorability  numbers being so low that there’s no way they can lose so they just play to the middle and have no message other than “Not Trump”? There’s no way Democratic leadership would be that god damn fucking stupid. 

Posts like this are why Hank is the best poster we’ve got.

  • Like 2


×
×
  • Create New...