Jump to content

2020 Democratic Nominee

used2b

By used2b
in Cloak Room

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 23.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • bad_teammate

    3638

  • Hugo Stiglitz

    2212

  • Hank Kingsley

    1252

  • Js1

    1230

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Huckleberry
Huckleberry

No it doesn't, this is absurd selfishness on a grand scale. Nobody is getting punished. My wife and I paid off our student loans, and you know what I think about younger people or even those in our ge

henrygandorf
henrygandorf

i’ve really enjoyed the 900 posts from bt explaining how bernie people aren’t aggressive, obsessive, and very-online.  truly a learning experience. 

Bill Clinton
Bill Clinton

3rd or 4th thread but whos counting.  Name recognition and ability to collect money is most important to the Democratic Party. They aren't trying to win 2020, they are trying to rebuild and colle

Posted Images

Fozzz

Fozzz 152

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Aqua Buddha said:

So she's like Jeb?

If she ran again, it would end in a very Jeb like fashion.  Tens of millions raised and 3% of the vote in the primary.

She’s more bloodthirsty than Jeb.  Hillary in charge and you know people are going to die. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hugo Stiglitz

Hugo Stiglitz 23356

Posted
Posted (edited)

Some meaningless statistics but I thought it would be interesting to see how many twitter followers the contenders have at this moment in time.  

*For the senators that have two official accounts, their numbers will be combined and noted with the *.

Hillary Clinton 23.5M

Joe Biden 3M

*Bernie Sanders 16.8M

*Kamala Harris 2.5M

Kristen Gillibrand 1.2M

*Elizabeth Warren 6.7M

*Cory Booker 4.1M

Tom Steyer 0.2M

Michael Avenatti 0.9M

Oprah Winfrey 41.6M

Mike Bloomberg 2.2M

Eric Swalwell 0.4M

Beto O’Rourke 1M

Andrew Gillum 0.5M

John Hickenlooper 0.1M

Mitch Landrieu 0.1M

Amy Klobuchar, .5M


John Delaney 11k


Jay Inslee 154k
 

Eric Holder 0.5M

Howard Schultz 0.0659M

Edited by Hugo Stiglitz
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 3 weeks later...
Bozo_Casanova

Bozo_Casanova 26281

Posted
Posted
Some meaningless statistics but I thought it would be interesting to see how many twitter followers the contenders have at this moment in time.  
*For the senators that have two official accounts, their numbers will be combined and noted with the *.
Hillary Clinton 23.5M
Joe Biden 3M
*Bernie Sanders 16.8M
*Kamala Harris 2.5M
Kristen Gillibrand 1.2M
*Elizabeth Warren 6.7M
*Cory Booker 4.1M
Tom Steyer 0.2M
Michael Avenatti 0.9M
Oprah Winfrey 41.6M
Mike Bloomberg 2.2M
Eric Swalwell 0.4M
Beto O’Rourke 1M
Andrew Gillum 0.5M
John Hickenlooper 0.1M
Mitch Landrieu 0.1M
 
Who else?



Amy Klobuchar, .5M
John Delaney (the only declared candidate) 11k
Jay Inslee 154k

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Brandywine

Brandywine 1313

Posted
Posted

I love Joe, and I think he may be the only one in that group that can stand toe to toe with Trump and probably beat him. But with him we’re back to going old time Dem party and no new blood. Maybe that’s where you add Beto or Kamala. I don’t think Bernie has a chance. And a lot of them in that group don’t have the personality to win. Some just turn me off like Warren. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Patrick Bateman

Patrick Bateman 3903

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Brandywine said:

I love Joe, and I think he may be the only one in that group that can stand toe to toe with Trump and probably beat him. But with him we’re back to going old time Dem party and no new blood. Maybe that’s where you add Beto or Kamala. I don’t think Bernie has a chance. And a lot of them in that group don’t have the personality to win. Some just turn me off like Warren. 

You think Joe Biden is the only one current Democrat who can win an election over Trump?   A poor candidate beat Trump in the popular vote by more than the size of Chicago and since then he's only gotten more unpopular in swing states like Michigan, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Arizona, and North Carolina.  I understand the concern about the Dems and it's well earned but I think there are several folks you can put up who stand more than a chance.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Js1

Js1 85110

Posted
Posted
8 hours ago, Brian Fantana said:

Maybe lets not trot out more old, irrelevant, boring candidates. 

We haven't elected a Democratic president older than 60 since James Buchanan.  My money is with a younger candidate.  Sorry Bernie, Uncle Joe and Warren.  You're too old.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
atomheartbevo

atomheartbevo 89441

Posted
Posted
11 hours ago, Brandywine said:

I love Joe, and I think he may be the only one in that group that can stand toe to toe with Trump and probably beat him. But with him we’re back to going old time Dem party and no new blood. Maybe that’s where you add Beto or Kamala. I don’t think Bernie has a chance. And a lot of them in that group don’t have the personality to win. Some just turn me off like Warren. 

Last month, Trump lost Michigan, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Arizona. 

These are states that he held numerous campaign rallies in for various candidates.

He couldn’t close the deal.

Hell, he campaigned for a decorated fighter pilot in Arizona, a state that hosts one of the largest training bases for fighter pilots.  And that fighter pilot lost to a bisexual atheist. 

Thats over 55 electoral votes that he lost between those states.  Where is he going to make those EVs up?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Brian Fantana

Brian Fantana 6668

Posted
Posted
8 hours ago, OatmealRaisinCookie said:

lol, you are such a pooooooon

No you fool, I love hunting and that's just not hunting. I say the same shit about dipshits who go hunt on high fenced properties and kill bucks that are half tame or more from being fed and cared for their whole lives.

Bozo gets it. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Onboard 2.0

Onboard 2.0 9083

Posted
Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, Brian Fantana said:

Shocker, Onboard misses the point entirely. 

Didn't miss shit. It's not hunting, its eradication. Some might condsider it hunting, but it's not.  

Shocker, maybe you need to read more better.

Edited by Onboard 2.0
NVM, LOL from Fantana.......
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
tantric superman

tantric superman 4667

Posted
Posted (edited)

It's hunting. It's pursuing wild animals to kill them. 

Some people hunt for food.

Some people hunt for sport.

Some people hunt for eradication.

I figure the majority of non-hunters would be upset least with Beto if he killed off feral hogs and maybe made an edible one into sausage to feed the caravan than if he shot bambi.

giphy.gif

 

Edited by tantric superman
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ghost of LL

Ghost of LL 15492

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, horncyclist said:

How so?

Beto is really the only candidate who can clear the field.  His fundraising prowess--especially if joined with the Obama machine--would deprive Warren and Harris of needed funds.  And his grassroots organizational support would make him a very formidable candidate in Iowa.

If Obama throws his weight behind Beto--behind the scenes, of course--it would be nearly impossible for any other challenger to put together enough of a coalition to overcome Beto's advantages.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing


Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!

×
×
  • Create New...