Jump to content

2020 Democratic Nominee

used2b

By used2b
in Cloak Room

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 23.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • bad_teammate

    3638

  • Hugo Stiglitz

    2212

  • Hank Kingsley

    1252

  • Js1

    1230

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Huckleberry
Huckleberry

No it doesn't, this is absurd selfishness on a grand scale. Nobody is getting punished. My wife and I paid off our student loans, and you know what I think about younger people or even those in our ge

henrygandorf
henrygandorf

i’ve really enjoyed the 900 posts from bt explaining how bernie people aren’t aggressive, obsessive, and very-online.  truly a learning experience. 

Bill Clinton
Bill Clinton

3rd or 4th thread but whos counting.  Name recognition and ability to collect money is most important to the Democratic Party. They aren't trying to win 2020, they are trying to rebuild and colle

Posted Images

Js1

Js1 87177

Posted
Posted

https://www.monmouth.edu/polling-institute/documents/monmouthpoll_us_052319.pdf/

Early (all states pre and on Super Tuesday) / Post-Super Tuesday

Biden - 26 / 38
Bernie - 14/16
Harris 14/8
Warren - 9/11
Pete - 6/6

Favorability with Dems (April in parenthesis)

Biden +57 (+1)
Harris +49 (+9)
Warren +46 (+14)
Bernie +44 (-)
Booker +28 (+4)
Pete +24 (-5)
Beto +21 (-10)

Overall Results (April in parenthesis):

Biden 33 (+6)
Bernie 15 (-5)
Harris 11 (+3)
Warren 10 (+4)
Pete 6 (-2)
Beto 4 (-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
elguapo

elguapo 4620

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, bad_teammate said:

If you're actually worried about Dems defecting in the 2020 elections, it's not the BernieBros who should concern you.

It's the #NeverBernies you should worry about.

 

As proof of this you offer up 4 tweets from 2 accounts?

Ok

Link to comment
Share on other sites
bad_teammate

bad_teammate 13508

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, elguapo said:

As proof of this you offer up 4 tweets from 2 accounts?

Ok

The actual proof is the PUMA movement from 2008 which was the exact same demographic of person and went 25% from Clinton (primary) to McCain (general)

It's a mirror, down to how they used to dismiss Obama support as sexist college frat boys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
williemackgarza

williemackgarza 1826

Posted
Posted

Do folks really like harris?
She seems like an egotistical cunt.
I still say its biden or bust, to beat Trump.
I think mayor pete could do it.
Trumps stepped on his own dick, had gaffes galore and 2.5 years of purely negative news reporting (fair or not) and he is still poling fairly well.
No other person coulda come thru all that shit and still be standing.
Man Id hate to be the next president if the opposition party has the house. Gonna be a free for all on digging in past business, taxes, banking personal history etc. galore.
Whatever happens, the run up to the next elections gonna be a real shit show.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
BradInATX

BradInATX 9208

Posted
Posted
Do folks really like harris?
She seems like an egotistical cunt.
I still say its biden or bust, to beat Trump.
I think mayor pete could do it.
Trumps stepped on his own dick, had gaffes galore and 2.5 years of purely negative news reporting (fair or not) and he is still poling fairly well.
No other person coulda come thru all that shit and still be standing.
Man Id hate to be the next president if the opposition party has the house. Gonna be a free for all on digging in past business, taxes, banking personal history etc. galore.
Whatever happens, the run up to the next elections gonna be a real shit show.

Every person who has ever been president is an egotistical cunt.
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
henrygandorf

henrygandorf 29225

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Hank Kingsley said:

*fart noises*

 

in case anyone is lazy (like i usually am), the 2%ers will be the only ones randomly split and assigned.  everyone else will be equally divided among the two nights - 10 debaters per night.

Eight candidates have a polling average at or above 2 percent right now: Joe Biden, Cory Booker, Pete Buttigieg, Kamala Harris, Amy Klobuchar, Beto O’Rourke, Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren. With the newly announced rule, four would be guaranteed to appear on the first night, and four would be guaranteed to appear on the second night.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Dbeasy

Dbeasy 15588

Posted
Posted
Do folks really like harris?
She seems like an egotistical cunt.
I still say its biden or bust, to beat Trump.
I think mayor pete could do it.
Trumps stepped on his own dick, had gaffes galore and 2.5 years of purely negative news reporting (fair or not) and he is still poling fairly well.
No other person coulda come thru all that shit and still be standing.
Man Id hate to be the next president if the opposition party has the house. Gonna be a free for all on digging in past business, taxes, banking personal history etc. galore.
Whatever happens, the run up to the next elections gonna be a real shit show.


This is an unfair view of Harris.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
troph

troph 25217

Posted
Posted

Red meat for our resident progressives to tear apart...

 

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2019/05/anti-trump-republicans-could-help-democrats-2020/589933/?utm_campaign=the-atlantic&utm_content=5cea0f742866ef00011c83f5_ta&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook

 

I tend to disagree with the premise that we must appeal to moderate Republicans. They have to fix their party not ruin ours.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bama Chick

Bama Chick 28596

Posted
Posted

Nope to that article.

 

I can agree with the THEORY of appealing to “Never Trumpers”.

 

But until those NT’s acknowledge the problem isn’t just Trump - it’s the entire Republican Party, then they aren’t worth bothering with.

 

Because Trump IS the Republican Party.

 

The RNC and the Trump re-election campaign have merged.

 

McConnell has flat out stated he has no intentions of working together with any Democrat that becomes president. Why should the President have to genuflect to someone who openly states that intention?

 

And anyone who holds up fucking Mitch McConnell as some example of possible bipartisan is showing their hand and true intentions. Fuck that guy.

 

I’m willing to listen to a Republican who says “Trump has destroyed our party. I still believe in what it used to be, but that doesn’t exist any longer. I’m voting for democrats for the foreseeable future until they get the message and burn Trumpublicanism out of the GOP.”

 

Any Republican with any sense knows the Democrats aren’t all AOC and Bernie. There are moderates in the party. The country isn’t going to convert to socialism or communism or whatever -ism boogeyman they fear overnight.

 

I know for most of these guys the past 30 years only happened to other people and it took a vulgar, orange, authoritarian carnival barker to embarrass them out of their comfortable privileged slumber but they already destroyed one party.

 

They don’t get to flounce in and make demands and ruin the other one.

 

Seriously guy, using working with McConnell as positive and example of your idea of good Republican????

 

GTFO.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
zork

zork 629

Posted
Posted

Remember, the DNC is not charged with fairness to any degree with how they do things when you see the dispersion of candidates for these debates.  How will they game it given that?  Who does the DNC prefer?

On 5/24/2019 at 4:11 PM, Hank Kingsley said:

*fart noises*

 

 

On 5/24/2019 at 4:18 PM, henrygandorf said:

in case anyone is lazy (like i usually am), the 2%ers will be the only ones randomly split and assigned.  everyone else will be equally divided among the two nights - 10 debaters per night.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
American Swindle

American Swindle 102

Posted
Posted (edited)
On 5/22/2019 at 1:07 PM, elguapo said:

I don't think Tulsi is a Putin puppet, but she does appear to be Putin's favorite Dem candidate.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2020-election/russia-s-propaganda-machine-discovers-2020-democratic-candidate-tulsi-gabbard-n964261

Puty's ultimate goal is to break up NATO and it's definitely interesting that Tulsi refrained from voting on the NATO support bill.

https://votesmart.org/candidate/129306/tulsi-gabbard?categoryId=22#.XOWPlchKiUl

 

The irony is you source NBC, a mainstream media outlet who profits from the very wars Tulsi is against,  who recently had a reporter quit and blow the whistle on how they deceive the public. 

 

http://republicbroadcasting.org/news/nbc-journalist-quits-then-blows-the-whistle-on-how-mainstream-media-deceives-the-public/

 

Yeah, they have ZERO desire to have anti-war rhetoric so no surprise they would peddle narratives like that about Tulsi.  

 

Anyway, Tell me again why we need NATO?  Could one be against NATO only on the merits that it's an economic boondoggle which pressures other countries into falling in line to support whatever adventures our Military Empire wants to pursue without being caught in the Russia-Boogey man net?  Your last comment is only coincidence imo and seems to exude more hysteria.  

 

 

Edited by American Swindle
  • Like 1
  • Fuck You 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hank Scorpio

Hank Scorpio 17924

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, Fozzz said:

I think it's more likely than not Trump wins in 2020.  

Please. This is ridiculously stupid. No matter who the nominee is, do you really think the DNC would just run the exact same campaign and bank on Trump’s favorability  numbers being so low that there’s no way they can lose so they just play to the middle and have no message other than “Not Trump”? There’s no way Democratic leadership would be that god damn fucking stupid. 

  • Like 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites
henrygandorf

henrygandorf 29225

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, Hank Scorpio said:

Please. This is ridiculously stupid. No matter who the nominee is, do you really think the DNC would just run the exact same campaign and bank on Trump’s favorability  numbers being so low that there’s no way they can lose so they just play to the middle and have no message other than “Not Trump”? There’s no way Democratic leadership would be that god damn fucking stupid. 

i know this is your schtick, but "not trump" is really resonating right now, and it's fucking sad.

it's polling way above actual issues like healthcare.  mind-bottling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
wildcat09

wildcat09 29579

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Hank Scorpio said:

Please. This is ridiculously stupid. No matter who the nominee is, do you really think the DNC would just run the exact same campaign and bank on Trump’s favorability  numbers being so low that there’s no way they can lose so they just play to the middle and have no message other than “Not Trump”? There’s no way Democratic leadership would be that god damn fucking stupid. 

Posts like this are why Hank is the best poster we’ve got.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing


Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!

×
×
  • Create New...