Jump to content

2020 Democratic Nominee

used2b

By used2b
in Cloak Room

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 23.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • bad_teammate

    3638

  • Hugo Stiglitz

    2212

  • Hank Kingsley

    1252

  • Js1

    1230

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Huckleberry
Huckleberry

No it doesn't, this is absurd selfishness on a grand scale. Nobody is getting punished. My wife and I paid off our student loans, and you know what I think about younger people or even those in our ge

henrygandorf
henrygandorf

i’ve really enjoyed the 900 posts from bt explaining how bernie people aren’t aggressive, obsessive, and very-online.  truly a learning experience. 

Bill Clinton
Bill Clinton

3rd or 4th thread but whos counting.  Name recognition and ability to collect money is most important to the Democratic Party. They aren't trying to win 2020, they are trying to rebuild and colle

Posted Images

Bruh Man

Bruh Man 3160

Posted
Posted
15 minutes ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:

Been saying for a while Pete is legit in Iowa.  

Good luck in the next debate Pete! 

Good luck? You think the legacy media will ever grill him like they do Warren/Bernie? Not a chance. Pete is exactly the type of candidate they love - white, ivy league, corporate centrist. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hank Kingsley

Hank Kingsley 20708

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, Bruh Man said:

Good luck? You think the legacy media will ever grill him like they do Warren/Bernie? Not a chance. Pete is exactly the type of candidate they love - white, ivy league, corporate centrist. 

Buttigieg does a ton of TV appearances. The TV hosts and most pundits on there like him. There's a reason he's on TV all the time and others aren't. It's because he's REALLY GOOD at it. 

I promise you if Bernie, Warren, Biden, Harris, Klobuchar, etc. exposed themselves to that many TV appearances, they'd stumble a lot more than he does. 

 

Now print and online journalists? They are much more critical of Pete. 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
bad_teammate

bad_teammate 13132

Posted
Posted

Yes, he does. His rhetoric is what has changed dramatically. It's gone from "M4A is a good idea and we'll get to it on a smooth glide path that will eventually eliminate private insurance" to "Forcing people off their private health insurance is wrong!"

And, as was true in February, it's all a lie.

He sees his path and he's going down it. Smart, aspirational boy.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
tantric superman

tantric superman 4667

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Message Board User said:

The far left progressives are going to need some consoling after Pete wins Iowa and NH and Biden wins SC and Nevada, effectively ending Warrens and Bernies campaigns.

The moderates are going to need some consoling after Pete wins Iowa and NH and Biden wins SC and Nevada, effectively ending Warrens and Bernies campaigns, and the progressives stay at home for the general election.
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TexEx15

TexEx15 17487

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, tantric superman said:

 

 

The moderates are going to need some consoling after Pete wins Iowa and NH and Biden wins SC and Nevada, effectively ending Warrens and Bernies campaigns, and the progressives stay at home for the general election.

You can’t really believe the progressives are staying home.  They may not be happy but they damn sure are not risking trump getting re-elected. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hank Kingsley

Hank Kingsley 20708

Posted
Posted (edited)
36 minutes ago, bad_teammate said:

Yes, he does. His rhetoric is what has changed dramatically. It's gone from "M4A is a good idea and we'll get to it on a smooth glide path that will eventually eliminate private insurance" to "Forcing people off their private health insurance is wrong!"

And, as was true in February, it's all a lie.

He sees his path and he's going down it. Smart, aspirational boy.

It's called campaigning. And explaining to voters the policy differences between candidates. 

 

Edited by Hank Kingsley
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hugo Stiglitz

Hugo Stiglitz 23357

Posted
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Hank Kingsley said:

It's called campaigning. And explaining to voters the policy differences between candidates. 

The issue is Pete abandoned openly campaigning as an advocate for single player and then chose to campaign against it. That’s more than a pivot, it’s a flip.  Yes, we know about his plan. Yes, we know it’s politics but for other advocates of single payer, it’s a betrayal. It means he wasn’t serious about getting to universal healthcare and it hurts his credibility in the eyes of progressives.  It’s exactly what you thought Warren was going to do but she didn’t. 

Edited by Hugo Stiglitz
Link to comment
Share on other sites
bad_teammate

bad_teammate 13132

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, Hank Kingsley said:

It's called campaigning. And explaining to voters the policy differences between candidates.

Yes, Pete is campaigning by using right-wing talking points against single-payer. And it's working very well for him among white people with money. I know that. There are a lot of people who don't want progressive change, but they hate Donald Trump so they're desperately looking for someone who will best serve the interests of private capital and extreme wealth.

Pete is positioning himself to be that guy because he wants to win.

I know this. It's obvious.

And I don't like him for it. You can like him for it, that's fine.

Am I supposed to respect him for being a cynical liar?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hugo Stiglitz

Hugo Stiglitz 23357

Posted
Posted
32 minutes ago, Hank Kingsley said:

Medicare public option isn't progressive change? 

Pete is campaigning against single payer.  That is anti-progressive.  Subsequently his plan is irrelevant because it doesn’t remove the profit motive. 

Imagine living in a country and never having to worry about basic health insurance.  Imagine not being forced to have whatever plan your employer decides for you.  No more huge medical bills to fret.  No more “is this in my network?”  Sounds like tyranny to Pete.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
bad_teammate

bad_teammate 13132

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Hank Scorpio said:

To be fair to Pete, naked ambition to become president while not actually believing in anything and changing you positions to whatever is most politically expedient is a tried and true method to become President. 

Yes, and if he beats Bernie then complete idiots are going to be on here saying, "Heh you leftists thought that consistency and goodness would win. So naive."

Yes, we fucking know. We know.

We just don't want it to happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
tantric superman

tantric superman 4667

Posted
Posted
51 minutes ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:

Pete is campaigning against single payer.  That is anti-progressive.  Subsequently his plan is irrelevant because it doesn’t remove the profit motive. 

 

Any plan is relevant unless single payer is a system that will inevitably prevail in any election scenario.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
bad_teammate

bad_teammate 13132

Posted
Posted

As long as the profit motive is allowed to live in the provision of insurance then every advance made will be rolled back by the monied interests who want to exploit that profit opportunity.

Which is what some of you want to happen, and these conversations would be more productive if those who want that just admitted it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
henrygandorf

henrygandorf 29179

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:

Pete is campaigning against single payer.  That is anti-progressive.  Subsequently his plan is irrelevant because it doesn’t remove the profit motive. 

is profit motive your #1 concern with healthcare reform?

i'm pretty sure it is, as i think it was you who said as much on a different thread.  just double-checking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Fozzz

Fozzz 152

Posted
Posted



https://news.gallup.com/poll/268094/millions-lost-someone-couldn-afford-treatment.aspx?utm_source=twitterbutton&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=sharing

More than 13% of American adults -- or about 34 million people -- report knowing of at least one friend or family member in the past five years who died after not receiving needed medical treatment because they were unable to pay for it, based on a new study by Gallup and West Health.

hell of a system we got here. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Js1

Js1 85112

Posted
Posted

https://www.ajc.com/news/state--regional-govt--politics/ajc-poll-trump-faces-tough-election-fight-georgia/gqTRms8eLIL1TEFW2r8pKN/

Tldr:

Biden 51-43 over Trump
Sanders 48-43
Warren 47-44
Pete 46-43
Harris 45-44

And this is a poll that has Trump at 45/54 in approval but Kemp at 55/35 approval.  

Hey look, more obvious polling that Trump is STRUGGLING to get support over his approval rating.  Almost like it's a trend. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
GRHorn

GRHorn 105

Posted
Posted
35 minutes ago, Js1 said:

https://www.ajc.com/news/state--regional-govt--politics/ajc-poll-trump-faces-tough-election-fight-georgia/gqTRms8eLIL1TEFW2r8pKN/

Tldr:

Biden 51-43 over Trump
Sanders 48-43
Warren 47-44
Pete 46-43
Harris 45-44

And this is a poll that has Trump at 45/54 in approval but Kemp at 55/35 approval.  

Hey look, more obvious polling that Trump is STRUGGLING to get support over his approval rating.  Almost like it's a trend. 

https://www.ajc.com/blog/politics/ajc-poll-hillary-clinton-has-slim-lead-over-donald-trump-georgia/eNbidHSeh1xo3D99QBzJMO/

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing


Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!

×
×
  • Create New...