Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
  On 7/7/2023 at 2:09 PM, Guadaloopy said:

Also, this game is easy to cheat and apparently lots of folks cheat this game.  There is no way that the most common score is a perfect 9.  

Expand  

I've noticed the same thing.  Got my first 9/9 yesterday.  I struggle any time the expansion teams are present.  My Topps complete sets ranged from 1985 - 1994, so my team knowledge is heavily weighted during that time frame.  I would organize the set by team then player in alphabetical order and put them neatly in the 9-sleeve plastic sheets in big a binder I got from my dad's work.  I think I could probably tell you Ozzie Virgil's hometown and how many games Kent Tekulve pitched in 1988 when he was on the Phillies.

I got 8/9 this morning but got stumped on Rockies / Tigers.  I've been consistently in the 5-7 range.  There's no way that many people are baseball statistic savants to hammer 9/9 consistently.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Posted
  On 7/7/2023 at 2:52 PM, Spaulding Smails said:

I've noticed the same thing.  Got my first 9/9 yesterday.  I struggle any time the expansion teams are present.  My Topps complete sets ranged from 1985 - 1994, so my team knowledge is heavily weighted during that time frame.  I would organize the set by team then player in alphabetical order and put them neatly in the 9-sleeve plastic sheets in big a binder I got from my dad's work.  I think I could probably tell you Ozzie Virgil's hometown and how many games Kent Tekulve pitched in 1988 when he was on the Phillies.

I got 8/9 this morning but got stumped on Rockies / Tigers.  I've been consistently in the 5-7 range.  There's no way that many people are baseball statistic savants to hammer 9/9 consistently.

Expand  

Brother?

holy shit, twilight zone…

I could have written this exact same thing word-for-word (thus my guess of “Zane smith” as a brave/cardinal today (he actually was with Braves/Pirates)

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted

The only thing I would possible do to this is make it timed. Not that people can't still cheat, but i think that would lower 9/9s alot.

The past two for me I have done within 3 mins but one of the other ones I did 't get 9 on I sat for prob 15 mins trying to think of a player.

Posted

Yeah I'm usually good for about 5 on my own, but then I have to cheat to get the rest. Usually I'll have a player in mind that I'm just not 100% sure on, but 55% of the time I'm right on those. 

Posted
  On 7/7/2023 at 4:15 PM, NorthLoop said:

Yeah I'm usually good for about 5 on my own, but then I have to cheat to get the rest. Usually I'll have a player in mind that I'm just not 100% sure on, but 55% of the time I'm right on those. 

Expand  

Be a man and let it rip.  Take the L when it comes.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted

So I'm afraid I've discovered the secret weapon.. I'm hoping that it doesn't take away from the fun of it but there's a certain relief pitcher that would work for 6 squares today.  

Posted
  On 7/7/2023 at 5:47 PM, texashorne said:
So I'm afraid I've discovered the secret weapon.. I'm hoping that it doesn't take away from the fun of it but there's a certain relief pitcher that would work for 6 squares today.  
Yeah good luck with that....fucked myself already by knowing Tejada had 200 hits with As and Balt and used him for Balt then couldn't use him for A's.

Posted
  On 7/7/2023 at 2:52 PM, Spaulding Smails said:

I've noticed the same thing.  Got my first 9/9 yesterday.  I struggle any time the expansion teams are present.  My Topps complete sets ranged from 1985 - 1994, so my team knowledge is heavily weighted during that time frame.  I would organize the set by team then player in alphabetical order and put them neatly in the 9-sleeve plastic sheets in big a binder I got from my dad's work.  I think I could probably tell you Ozzie Virgil's hometown and how many games Kent Tekulve pitched in 1988 when he was on the Phillies.

I got 8/9 this morning but got stumped on Rockies / Tigers.  I've been consistently in the 5-7 range.  There's no way that many people are baseball statistic savants to hammer 9/9 consistently.

Expand  

To be fair, the kind of person that plays the game is also the kind of person that really, really likes baseball.

But yeah, bitches be cheating.

Posted

Immaculate Grid 96 7/9:

🟩🟩
🟩🟩
🟩🟩🟩
 

 

Fucked around at the start and blew two guesses naming a 20 game winner for the blue jays instead of just taking the easy answer 

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

Posted

Immaculate Grid 96 8/9:

🟩🟩

🟩🟩🟩

🟩🟩🟩

  Reveal hidden contents

 

Posted
  Reveal hidden contents

 

Posted (edited)

Immaculate Grid 96 8/9:

🟩🟩
🟩🟩🟩
🟩🟩🟩
 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

Edited by Pato del Muerto
Posted

man do i get stuck on which players played for two specific teams. that steve avery shit yesterday was 100% a shot in the dark, i was so crunk when i hit that one lol. 

im currently 6/6 and just sitting here with three guesses that are likely doing to be steve avery shots in the dark. im already a friend for this game lol. 

me at 11:58 every evening, waiting for the new one to come out:

 

IMG_6404.jpeg

Posted (edited)

Immaculate Grid 96 5/9:

🟩
🟩🟩
🟩🟩
 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

Edited by Hammerin Hank
Shit the bed on one guess trying to pick a 20 game winner for the Giants instead of an mvp
Posted

Immaculate Grid 96 7/9:

🟩🟩
🟩🟩
🟩🟩🟩
 

I screwed up with my 20 game winner for OAK and couldn’t use him for the OAK/SF square and couldn’t think of another.  Total blank on PIT/TOR.  

Posted

Immaculate Grid 96 6/9:

 

🟩

🟩🟩

🟩🟩🟩

 

I am terrible at remembering which dudes played for two teams. My brain typically only remembers a player playing for one team unless it is somebody like Barry Bonds who was a legit star for two teams.

I got Jeff Kent because somehow in the depths of my memory I remembered he started out with the Jays but that was kind of crazy luck.

I was just musing out loud to myself about "20+ game winner who also won the MVP" and my wife, who knows nothing about baseball, just blurts "oh Sandy Koufax". So that was funny. One square for my wife.

Sandy Koufax might have retired in 1966 but his legend lives on I guess.

 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
  On 7/8/2023 at 5:08 PM, Valmy77 said:

By the way how do they not have a picture for Willie Mays? UT guys who were .200 career hitters have pics in that thing but not Willie Mays.

Expand  

Yeah i thought the same thing. Billy Wagner the other day didn’t have one either.

 

Posted
  On 7/7/2023 at 5:47 PM, texashorne said:

So I'm afraid I've discovered the secret weapon.. I'm hoping that it doesn't take away from the fun of it but there's a certain relief pitcher that would work for 6 squares today.  

Expand  

Relief pitchers are the key to being good at this.

Posted (edited)

well, i'm 6/6 so far, and it's looking like 6 is what i'll finish with. damn these goofy ass team pairings lol. washington and kc? don't nobody watch them, lol. 

edit: oh shit i just got one. the dream is still alive.

Edited by shadow_operative
Posted

Damn Royals...mind just went blank

Immaculate Grid 97 7/9:

🟩

🟩🟩🟩

🟩🟩🟩

  Reveal hidden contents

 

Posted

So full disclosure Im drunk....but man fuck wash/kc. I sat for 15 mins trying to come up with some bitch and then Terrance Gore sounded like a great answer......survey says......X


  Reveal hidden contents

 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted (edited)

Immaculate Grid 97 8/9:

🟩🟩
🟩🟩🟩
🟩🟩🟩

  Reveal hidden contents

 

Edited by Huckleberry
  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted

Immaculate Grid 97 6/9:

🟩🟩
🟩🟩
🟩🟩
 

Dammit.  I think this is the first time I’ve struggled with a stat/award column.  I made 3 guesses at a Ranger with 30 SB and missed on all.  

Posted

Immaculate Grid 97 5/9:

🟩🟩
🟩🟩
🟩

 

Damn. I went through virtually all of the Nats I could think of and I had nothing. Even Matt Adams, who I thought had played for everybody, didn't work.

But it was afterwards I realized I probably could have used Expos for the Nats and gotten a few. Damnit.

Posted
  On 7/9/2023 at 1:37 PM, Guadaloopy said:

Immaculate Grid 97 6/9:

🟩🟩
🟩🟩
🟩🟩
 

Dammit.  I think this is the first time I’ve struggled with a stat/award column.  I made 3 guesses at a Ranger with 30 SB and missed on all.  

Expand  
  Reveal hidden contents

 

Posted
  On 7/9/2023 at 5:04 PM, Valmy77 said:

Immaculate Grid 97 5/9:

🟩🟩
🟩🟩
🟩

 

Damn. I went through virtually all of the Nats I could think of and I had nothing. Even Matt Adams, who I thought had played for everybody, didn't work.

But it was afterwards I realized I probably could have used Expos for the Nats and gotten a few. Damnit.

Expand  

Exactly. Waiting for the Phillies/Nationals square so I can use Pedro Martínez when most use Trea Turner. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...