Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
  On 4/30/2024 at 4:07 PM, gofuckyourself said:

Can't sell what you don't have.

One of the many problems was they didn't order/prepare enough food, particularly considering their sales expectations.

We live nearby and you'd show up at 2 pm on a weekend and everything was sold out, yet they're open until 10. No food and no sales yet (not) paying 8 staff to stand around.

Expand  

I heard they had an issue with keeping pickles available.

  • Haha 3
Posted

By not keeping pickles in stock, they made more money since they were still covered in the menu prices but not provided to the customer.

Maybe Miguel should’ve listened to that employee more often.

Posted

I went with 3 guys, waited 30+ minutes in line, waited 30+ minutes for our food. How is that even possible for BBQ?

We ordered well over $100 in bbq. Specifically asked for pickles and onions.

We got neither.

Then asked the obviously IQ challenged food runner for pickles.

They gave us a small ramekin with maybe 3 pickle slices in it.

Posted
  On 5/2/2024 at 8:18 PM, 4th and 5 said:

I went with 3 guys, waited 30+ minutes in line, waited 30+ minutes for our food. How is that even possible for BBQ?

We ordered well over $100 in bbq. Specifically asked for pickles and onions.

We got neither.

Then asked the obviously IQ challenged food runner for pickles.

They gave us a small ramekin with maybe 3 pickle slices in it.

Expand  

I mean, that's actually fast for them. That was pretty much the average wait both in line and for food at the trailer. Never understood why it took so long to get the food once you ordered. Why couldn't they do it like every other bbq joint where they cut the meat as you order it? Never made sense to me. 

Posted
  On 5/2/2024 at 9:45 PM, irishtexan said:

I mean, that's actually fast for them. That was pretty much the average wait both in line and for food at the trailer. Never understood why it took so long to get the food once you ordered. Why couldn't they do it like every other bbq joint where they cut the meat as you order it? Never made sense to me. 

Expand  

Line wait was due to one cashier.  Cashier had to take order, take payment, and grab orders of chips and queso.  Horribly inefficient.  The kitchen couldn't even keep up with that. 

Posted
  On 5/2/2024 at 11:21 PM, Jerry Callo said:

Line wait was due to one cashier.  Cashier had to take order, take payment, and grab orders of chips and queso.  Horribly inefficient.  The kitchen couldn't even keep up with that. 

Expand  

Yeah, that was my one experience with Valentina's at the trailer. Long wait in line, which is typical for a high-end BBQ place. However, most long trips through the line end with food on your tray as you walk away from the counter to go sit down and eat. Not there. Food was damn good, though.

Posted (edited)
  On 5/3/2024 at 3:25 PM, C-Man said:

Yeah, that was my one experience with Valentina's at the trailer. Long wait in line, which is typical for a high-end BBQ place. However, most long trips through the line end with food on your tray as you walk away from the counter to go sit down and eat. Not there. Food was damn good, though.

Expand  

Shorter line and shorter wait, but Stanley's is like that.  One cashier for dine-in and one for to-go.  Line hack is to call in your order from the line and go have a drink at the bar.  But you end up eating your food out of a styrofoam container, which isn't ideal.  But if you wait in line, it's reasonably quick, you speak your soup in a loud, clear voice, you pay, and your food comes out to you pretty quickly, and you have a chance to order your drink at the bar while you wait.  It's not the worst.

Edited by dcbc
Posted (edited)

https://austin.eater.com/2024/5/3/24148321/valentinas-tex-mex-bbq-new-owners-inkind-sale-wage-theft-allegations

The CEO of Austin-based hospitality tech company InKind, Johann Moonesinghe, is in the process of buying outValentina’s Tex Mex BBQ in Buda. He tells Eater in an email on Wednesday, May 1, that his restaurant group is “likely [going to] end up being the owner” of Valentina’s.

 

In an email to Eater, dated on April 27, Moonesinghe stated that Valentina’s landlord “locked them out for breach of their lease and significant past due rent,” on April 26, and of the reported debt, claimed that the restaurant owes his company InKind, a senior creditor, roughly $1.5 million. InKind is a mobile app that provides restaurants with loans through a credit system.

Edited by Anastasis
Posted

Pretty sure that inkind is the company that was selling $100 for $50 gift cards a while back. Is this some kind of predatory loan racket to come in and target over extended businesses? Or just a one off. 

Posted
  On 5/4/2024 at 11:31 AM, Anastasis said:

Pretty sure that inkind is the company that was selling $100 for $50 gift cards a while back. Is this some kind of predatory loan racket to come in and target over extended businesses? Or just a one off. 

Expand  

I doubt that Inkind really wants to be running a barbecue joint.  They will have the same issues as Valentina's - costs, labor, customer base.  They're likely trying to recoup as much of their investment as possible.  They probably want to sell it, but I suspect they'll have to shut it down eventually.

Posted
  On 5/4/2024 at 11:31 AM, Anastasis said:

Pretty sure that inkind is the company that was selling $100 for $50 gift cards a while back. Is this some kind of predatory loan racket to come in and target over extended businesses? Or just a one off. 

Expand  

I've investigated other failed restaurants.  What some lenders do is to freely advance money with no collateral but take direct control of all future credit card receipts.  They pretty much have you by the balls at that point.  Doom loop.

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted
  On 5/4/2024 at 12:35 PM, DalTxHornFan said:

I've investigated other failed restaurants.  What some lenders do is to freely advance money with no collateral but take direct control of all future credit card receipts.  They pretty much have you by the balls at that point.  Doom loop.

Expand  

i'm dumb (as if you all didn't know that).

please explain.

 

Posted (edited)
  On 5/4/2024 at 1:20 PM, Shaggy3.0 said:

i'm dumb (as if you all didn't know that).

please explain.

 

Expand  

It is like a factoring arrangement.  In a normal factoring arrangement, a company will sell specific existing customer accounts receivable and will immediately get cash from the lender, say 65% of the face value. 

What I have been seeing in some restaurant deals is that the borrower is selling future credit card collections for cash today.  And the "lender" typically requires the store to use their credit card payment system, so that the "lender" has total control.  Like I said, pretty much a doom loop when a company gets involved with a "lender" like that. 

Edited by DalTxHornFan
  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
  On 5/4/2024 at 11:29 AM, Anastasis said:

https://austin.eater.com/2024/5/3/24148321/valentinas-tex-mex-bbq-new-owners-inkind-sale-wage-theft-allegations

The CEO of Austin-based hospitality tech company InKind, Johann Moonesinghe, is in the process of buying outValentina’s Tex Mex BBQ in Buda. He tells Eater in an email on Wednesday, May 1, that his restaurant group is “likely [going to] end up being the owner” of Valentina’s.

 

In an email to Eater, dated on April 27, Moonesinghe stated that Valentina’s landlord “locked them out for breach of their lease and significant past due rent,” on April 26, and of the reported debt, claimed that the restaurant owes his company InKind, a senior creditor, roughly $1.5 million. InKind is a mobile app that provides restaurants with loans through a credit system.

Expand  

There's tons of open liens on the business associated with the tenant finish-out construction as well.  I can't believe how the lender let them get away with opening without paying for construction in full.  So, just to recap, they owe a construction loan, they owe InKind $1.5M, they're "significantly past due on rent", and who knows how many other vendors they owe.  How does that happen in less than a year of being open unless there's significant fraud / embezzlement going down?  And how do these lenders let it get this far out of whack?  Predatory lender or not, how does InKind let an obviously struggling business accrue $1.5M in what I'm assuming is unsecured debt?

  • Hook 'Em 5
Posted (edited)

most mind blowing thing with factoring is the 'confession of judgment.' they already have a judgment against you, all they have to do is file it and they win!  it was a holy shit moment first time i saw one of those

Edited by elfenix
  • Hook 'Em 5
Posted

I had a late lunch meeting there maybe two months ago.  I was waiting in the parking lot and watched their provisioning at the back dock.  No, it wasn't a Sysco truck, it was two minivans offloading plastic bags of food from HEB.  I thought that it looked inefficient and thought that it might be a one off, but now I'm guessing that was the only company they could do business with by then.

  • Haha 2
Posted (edited)
  On 5/4/2024 at 2:25 PM, Spaulding Smails said:

There's tons of open liens on the business associated with the tenant finish-out construction as well.  I can't believe how the lender let them get away with opening without paying for construction in full.  So, just to recap, they owe a construction loan, they owe InKind $1.5M, they're "significantly past due on rent", and who knows how many other vendors they owe.  How does that happen in less than a year of being open unless there's significant fraud / embezzlement going down?  And how do these lenders let it get this far out of whack?  Predatory lender or not, how does InKind let an obviously struggling business accrue $1.5M in what I'm assuming is unsecured debt?

Expand  

So far, no repercussions at Buda EDC.  Main Street Buda is thriving.  Not really sure why they needed to go all out on Valentina's.  That is a big space.  Something along the line of a food court like Liberty Hill's Main Street Social would make more sense.  And guess what?  That place is privately financed!

 

Edited by DalTxHornFan
Posted (edited)
  On 5/4/2024 at 2:25 PM, Spaulding Smails said:

There's tons of open liens on the business associated with the tenant finish-out construction as well.  I can't believe how the lender let them get away with opening without paying for construction in full.  So, just to recap, they owe a construction loan, they owe InKind $1.5M, they're "significantly past due on rent", and who knows how many other vendors they owe.  How does that happen in less than a year of being open unless there's significant fraud / embezzlement going down?  And how do these lenders let it get this far out of whack?  Predatory lender or not, how does InKind let an obviously struggling business accrue $1.5M in what I'm assuming is unsecured debt?

Expand  

There is all kind of due diligence screw ups going on here.

Calling out to @YGIFS here, but the Buda EDC is using hotel tax revenue here.  They should be accountable to somebody.

Edited by DalTxHornFan
  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
  On 5/4/2024 at 1:36 PM, DalTxHornFan said:

It is like a factoring arrangement.  In a normal factoring arrangement, a company will sell specific existing customer accounts receivable and will immediately get cash from the lender, say 65% of the face value. 

What I have been seeing in some restaurant deals is that the borrower is selling future credit card collections for cash today.  And the "lender" typically requires the store to use their credit card payment system, so that the "lender" has total control.  Like I said, pretty much a doom loop when a company gets involved with a "lender" like that. 

Expand  

 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted

If only they could have convinced all of their customers to tip the staff 300% every visit, they might just have made it. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 3
Posted

Seems like all these pitmasters who want to expand would actually save money by paying someone who knows how to run a restaurant to actually, you know, run their restaurant.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
  On 5/4/2024 at 6:10 PM, Deej said:

Seems like all these pitmasters who want to expand would actually save money by paying someone who knows how to run a restaurant to actually, you know, run their restaurant.

Expand  

At least find someone who knows how to source pickles.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
  On 4/30/2024 at 5:18 PM, CooterBrown said:

By not keeping pickles in stock, they made more money since they were still covered in the menu prices but not provided to the customer.

Expand  

Pickle and diming their customers. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 2
  • Haha 4
  • Rage+1 1
  • Drool 1
Posted
  On 5/4/2024 at 3:57 PM, DalTxHornFan said:

So far, no repercussions at Buda EDC.  

 

Expand  

the same buda edc will subsidize another, larger boondoggle.  the tap-in restaurant noted in a a previous post.

one spectacular fail was not enough.  second public fail on the way.

thank you sir, can i have another?

 

  On 5/4/2024 at 4:01 PM, DalTxHornFan said:

Calling out to @YGIFS here, but the Buda EDC is using hotel tax revenue here.  They should be accountable to somebody.

Expand  

absolutely

Posted
  On 5/4/2024 at 2:25 PM, Spaulding Smails said:

There's tons of open liens on the business associated with the tenant finish-out construction as well.  I can't believe how the lender let them get away with opening without paying for construction in full.  So, just to recap, they owe a construction loan, they owe InKind $1.5M, they're "significantly past due on rent", and who knows how many other vendors they owe.  How does that happen in less than a year of being open unless there's significant fraud / embezzlement going down?  And how do these lenders let it get this far out of whack?  Predatory lender or not, how does InKind let an obviously struggling business accrue $1.5M in what I'm assuming is unsecured debt?

Expand  

1.5 for T.I.?  That's a shitload.  Did they lease a building that was completely unsuitable for restaurant use?

Posted
  On 5/4/2024 at 10:30 PM, Gil Bang said:

1.5 for T.I.?  That's a shitload.  Did they lease a building that was completely unsuitable for restaurant use?

Expand  

Worse than what you said.  No clue on the total amount of the construction loan for TI, but I'm guessing it was closer to $2M based on what I know about the project.  It was a quasi white box situation, so just a shell with extensive finish out.  

Here's the kicker... The $1.5M is ON TOP of the construction loan.  That's my point.  They've accrued an additional $1.5M in debt to InKind PLUS unpaid rent PLUS I'm guessing unpaid vendors in less than a year.  

  • Like 2
Posted
  On 5/5/2024 at 1:30 AM, Spaulding Smails said:

Worse than what you said.  No clue on the total amount of the construction loan for TI, but I'm guessing it was closer to $2M based on what I know about the project.  It was a quasi white box situation, so just a shell with extensive finish out.  

Here's the kicker... The $1.5M is ON TOP of the construction loan.  That's my point.  They've accrued an additional $1.5M in debt to InKind PLUS unpaid rent PLUS I'm guessing unpaid vendors in less than a year.  

Expand  

so there's a story here.  the press should look into it.

 

Posted
  On 5/5/2024 at 1:30 AM, Spaulding Smails said:
Worse than what you said.  No clue on the total amount of the construction loan for TI, but I'm guessing it was closer to $2M based on what I know about the project.  It was a quasi white box situation, so just a shell with extensive finish out.  
Here's the kicker... The $1.5M is ON TOP of the construction loan.  That's my point.  They've accrued an additional $1.5M in debt to InKind PLUS unpaid rent PLUS I'm guessing unpaid vendors in less than a year.  

Plus his taxes which I expect are fed and state issues. Plus his liens. Plus whatever comes from his labor investigating.

Miguel and wife are up the creek.
  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
  On 5/5/2024 at 9:03 PM, Texzilla588 said:


Plus his taxes which I expect are fed and state issues. Plus his liens. Plus whatever comes from his labor investigating.

Miguel and wife are up the creek.

Expand  

I've followed this thread for the bizarre train wreck quality it brings. Until this post, it never really hit me that there could be personal finance issues at stake here. What part of the debts that you guys are calculating would pierce the corporate veil?

Posted
  On 5/6/2024 at 3:36 PM, closetojumping said:
I've followed this thread for the bizarre train wreck quality it brings. Until this post, it never really hit me that there could be personal finance issues at stake here. What part of the debts that you guys are calculating would pierce the corporate veil?
There are most certainly personal guarantees on some if not most of the debt. Also, some tax liability and department of labor liability could have personal ramifications.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...