Jump to content

SEC mega screenshots


Longhornfrenzy

Recommended Posts

I'm seeing a lot of the typical rationalizations from room temperature IQ sec fans (redundant) that Alabama is just dogshit and will lose a bunch of games. Who do they think will beat them? The teams on their schedule are fucking terrible and they're probably still the 2nd best team in the secsecsec at worst even if they've fallen off.

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Whoever runs the barstool sec account is as dumb as/might be an aggy. They literally borrowed the aggy take all week. "Texas will melt when they walk into an opposition stadium of 100,000" blah blah blah. Fucking inbreds.

Edited by Chopper
  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/8/2023 at 12:24 PM, TriStone said:

Seems like not all of you have realized how top-to-bottom lightspeed stupid these fanbases are.  The entire conference is just like aggies.  They make shit up, repeat it amongst one another, and poof, it becomes truth.

This is why I didn’t want to join the conference. Complete shit for brains college after college. 

  • Hook 'Em 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, billfromlaketravis said:

That’s Barstool for you. Hot take artists and boobs (Kayce Smith).

They’re either going to call their shot or face plant into pavement. 

It’s hysterical to watch her Aggie fan girl come out. She gets called out all the time. She tried to say that A&M had more money than Texas and Dave told her she was wrong. She’s a fool. Although, she did say in the preseason that she thought Texas would win the Big 12 but had us losing to Alabama

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Harvdog said:

It’s hysterical to watch her Aggie fan girl come out. She gets called out all the time. She tried to say that A&M had more money than Texas and Dave told her she was wrong. She’s a fool. Although, she did say in the preseason that she thought Texas would win the Big 12 but had us losing to Alabama

Where’s that video of her comparing ou-osu to Tex-a&m?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Harvdog said:

It’s hysterical to watch her Aggie fan girl come out. She gets called out all the time. She tried to say that A&M had more money than Texas and Dave told her she was wrong. She’s a fool. Although, she did say in the preseason that she thought Texas would win the Big 12 but had us losing to Alabama

So did 75% of this board

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Harvdog said:

It’s hysterical to watch her Aggie fan girl come out. She gets called out all the time. She tried to say that A&M had more money than Texas and Dave told her she was wrong. She’s a fool. Although, she did say in the preseason that she thought Texas would win the Big 12 but had us losing to Alabama

I saw Portnoy walk by at the game with his little entourage of sycophants. He was wearing a Horns Down cap. Fuck that douchebag.

  • Hook 'Em 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, Sejjr said:

I saw Portnoy walk by at the game with his little entourage of sycophants. He was wearing a Horns Down cap. Fuck that douchebag.

He actually picked Texas to start.  After being in Tuscaloosa for 2 days, the locals got him to switch. Pretty funny. He will make his way to Austin and try to make up. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Napoleon said:

This is why I didn’t want to join the conference. Complete shit for brains college after college. 

The SEC is a better academic conference on every level than the Big XII. For example, using the (admittedly deeply flawed) USNWR rankings, Texas goes from being the #1 college by almost 40 places over Baylor (yikes) to being the third highest ranked behind Vandy and Florida. The SEC t-shirt fans are admittedly frighteningly dumb.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, texifornia said:

The SEC is a better academic conference on every level than the Big XII. For example, using the (admittedly deeply flawed) USNWR rankings, Texas goes from being the #1 college by almost 40 places over Baylor (yikes) to being the third highest ranked behind Vandy and Florida. The SEC t-shirt fans are admittedly frighteningly dumb.

Well I have been informed today by my Aggie friend that they are #38 in WSJ and we are like 118...

Edited by TexasRenegade
  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Harvdog said:

Easier to get into A&M than Texas. 

That apparently isn't part of the metric.   Our ratings are largely identical except for salary impact vs other colleges where they kill us by like 26 points and diversity where we beat them by 13.

 

The University of Texas at Austin

 

Austin, TX

 

Scores and Ranks

 

Rank/Score

 

Overall Rank

 

118

Overall Score

 

73.5

 

Student Outcomes

 

Score/Timeframe

 

Salary Impact vs. Similar Colleges

 

57

 

Graduation Rate vs. Similar Colleges

 

90

 

Years to Pay Off Net Price

 

1 year, 6 months

 

Survey Results

 

Score

 

Learning Opportunities

 

67

 

Preparation for Career

 

69

 

Learning Facilities

 

78

 

Recommendation Score

 

81

 

Diversity

 

Score

 

Diversity

 

67

 

Cost and Returns

 

Amount

 

Average Net Price

 

$17,519

 

Value Added to Graduate Salary

 

$46,713

 

Texas A & M University - College Station

 

College Station, TX

 

Scores and Ranks

 

Rank/Score

 

Overall Rank

 

38

Overall Score

 

79.9

 

Student Outcomes

 

Score/Timeframe

 

Salary Impact vs. Similar Colleges

 

83

 

Graduation Rate vs. Similar Colleges

 

89

 

Years to Pay Off Net Price

 

1 year, 10 months

 

Survey Results

 

Score

 

Learning Opportunities

 

65

 

Preparation for Career

 

71

 

Learning Facilities

 

81

 

Recommendation Score

 

82

 

Diversity

 

Score

 

Diversity

 

53

 

Cost and Returns

 

Amount

 

Average Net Price

 

$20,976

 

Value Added to Graduate Salary

 

$44,877

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That apparently isn't part of the metric.   Our ratings are largely identical except for salary impact vs other colleges where they kill us by like 26 points and diversity where we beat them by 13.
 
The University of Texas at Austin
 
Austin, TX
 
Scores and Ranks
 
Rank/Score
 
Overall Rank
 
118
Overall Score
 
73.5
 
Student Outcomes
 
Score/Timeframe
 
Salary Impact vs. Similar Colleges
 
57
 
Graduation Rate vs. Similar Colleges
 
90
 
Years to Pay Off Net Price
 
1 year, 6 months
 
Survey Results
 
Score
 
Learning Opportunities
 
67
 
Preparation for Career
 
69
 
Learning Facilities
 
78
 
Recommendation Score
 
81
 
Diversity
 
Score
 
Diversity
 
67
 
Cost and Returns
 
Amount
 
Average Net Price
 
$17,519
 
Value Added to Graduate Salary
 
$46,713
 
Texas A & M University - College Station
 
College Station, TX
 
Scores and Ranks
 
Rank/Score
 
Overall Rank
 
38
Overall Score
 
79.9
 
Student Outcomes
 
Score/Timeframe
 
Salary Impact vs. Similar Colleges
 
83
 
Graduation Rate vs. Similar Colleges
 
89
 
Years to Pay Off Net Price
 
1 year, 10 months
 
Survey Results
 
Score
 
Learning Opportunities
 
65
 
Preparation for Career
 
71
 
Learning Facilities
 
81
 
Recommendation Score
 
82
 
Diversity
 
Score
 
Diversity
 
53
 
Cost and Returns
 
Amount
 
Average Net Price
 
$20,976
 
Value Added to Graduate Salary
 
$44,877

giphy.gif
  • Like 1
  • Haha 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am on the road and figured I’d listen to that Finebaun dude (that looks like a pecker) and man that show was rough.

Is there another similar SEC show or is that what we’re stuck with? I think most of the guests were clinically retarded - not a single coherent thought.

Who do the fans at Florida and Vanderbilt listen to?

He’s perfect for the Ags though. Fucking perfect.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, TexasRenegade said:

Well I have been informed today by my Aggie friend that they are #38 in WSJ and we are like 118...

I read this earlier this week/within the last 7 days.

Then this has a&m as the #6 public university in the country. (Texas isn’t listed among the Top 10 that they cover.

IMG_7608.thumb.jpeg.c5b6966848aaeb924185ff3a391d83ad.jpeg

IMG_7609.thumb.jpeg.18f3e901c1259fe5eee8644a03b2d178.jpeg

https://www.cnbc.com/amp/2023/09/13/best-public-colleges-and-universities-in-the-us.html


Definitely an anti-woke slant to ignore UC schools and Texas, but perhaps my earnings since graduation are helping to lower UT’s ranking. 🤷‍♂️ Sorry.

  • Haha 2
  • Rage+1 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Handcruser said:

I am on the road and figured I’d listen to that Finebaun dude (that looks like a pecker) and man that show was rough.

Is there another similar SEC show or is that what we’re stuck with? I think most of the guests were clinically retarded - not a single coherent thought.

Who do the fans at Florida and Vanderbilt listen to?

He’s perfect for the Ags though. Fucking perfect.

"Let the Bama fans talk" is literally the Finebaum brand. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Napoleon said:

I read this earlier this week/within the last 7 days.

Then this has a&m as the #6 public university in the country. (Texas isn’t listed among the Top 10 that they cover.

IMG_7608.thumb.jpeg.c5b6966848aaeb924185ff3a391d83ad.jpeg

IMG_7609.thumb.jpeg.18f3e901c1259fe5eee8644a03b2d178.jpeg

https://www.cnbc.com/amp/2023/09/13/best-public-colleges-and-universities-in-the-us.html


Definitely an anti-woke slant to ignore UC schools and Texas, but perhaps my earnings since graduation are helping to lower UT’s ranking. 🤷‍♂️ Sorry.

Yeah, that's the same ranking metric from the WSJ @TexasRenegade references above. 70% of the final ranking is based on "student outcomes," which is really just income potential above the average of someone with only a high-school education, net price of attendance, and how long the WSJ calculates it takes to pay off the net price. The latter is not even based on real data (how long it actually takes graduates to do so) and income reporting, especially for undergraduate degrees, is highly skewed and biased at any given school. This ranking is inherently going to hurt any school with a larger number of liberal arts degrees.

Here's a broad description of the overall calculation:

"College scores in our ranking are based on three factors: student outcomes, accounting for 70% of the rankings; the learning environment at 20%; and diversity, at 10%."

Edited by MuellerHorn
  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, MuellerHorn said:

Yeah, that's the same ranking metric from the WSJ @TexasRenegade references above. 70% of the final ranking is based on "student outcomes," which is really just income potential above the average of someone with only a high-school education, net price of attendance, and how long the WSJ calculates it takes to pay off the net price. The latter is not even based on real data (how long it actually takes graduates to do so) and income reporting, especially for undergraduate degrees, is highly skewed and biased at any given school. This ranking is inherently going to hurt any school with a larger number of liberal arts degrees.

Here's a broad description of the overall calculation:

"College scores in our ranking are based on three factors: student outcomes, accounting for 70% of the rankings; the learning environment at 20%; and diversity, at 10%."

Also, Florida is the number one overall public (and FIU, number four) because so many of their in-state kids go to school for basically free due to the Florida Bright Futures Scholarship program. This presents a huge impact to the "net price" portion of the calculation.

Edited by MuellerHorn
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, MuellerHorn said:

Yeah, that's the same ranking metric from the WSJ @TexasRenegade references above. 70% of the final ranking is based on "student outcomes," which is really just income potential above the average of someone with only a high-school education, net price of attendance, and how long the WSJ calculates it takes to pay off the net price. The latter is not even based on real data (how long it actually takes graduates to do so) and income reporting, especially for undergraduate degrees, is highly skewed and biased at any given school.

Here's a broad description of the overall calculation:

"College scores in our ranking are based on three factors: student outcomes, accounting for 70% of the rankings; the learning environment at 20%; and diversity, at 10%."

I'll must admit that when I think of sheepskins, it's all about aggy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, JesusSweatDuck said:

Bama fans are going to struggle with their new situation.  

If they win the rematch, how would I know that isn’t the fluke?  Let’s just cancel our respective schedules and play 9 more times and then round it out with us beating tech and them beating auburn. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...