Arch Manning Being "Arch"

[tx 3 putt 77963]

1 minute ago, TrashMaster G said:

If we are glancing forward to next year, my only question is the OL Arch will have in front of him. We are going to say goodbye to a ton of experience up front after this year.

 

with transfer portal + NIL there are ZERO reasons for a blue blood program to have a 'down year' at any group/position (even more so at OL and DL)

[Funk Doctor Spock 12818]

Yeah, the o-line will be a question mark. We know Goosby will be fine. Campbell will be back because his NFL grade won't be high enough. Center will probably be Robertson/Cruz, which I have no idea how good either is. Cole Hutson will take over for Conner. The only true question will be RT. Will it be Cojoe or Baker?

[Voluminous Banality 1049]

1 hour ago, TrashMaster G said:

Someone 'splain please.

 

[TrashMaster G 17756]

18 minutes ago, tx 3 putt said:

 

with transfer portal + NIL there are ZERO reasons for a blue blood program to have a 'down year' at any group/position (even more so at OL and DL)

I get that, but there is no position group where chemistry is more important. Seems like plug-and-play is a little dicier here.

[wood 11620]

2 hours ago, Grande Mart said:

I think the Russians target people that made a D in Chem 301

That could be it lol. I barely even pulled a D in that class, too.

[wood 11620]

4 hours ago, Derka said:

Arch might not give up the job. he is making some THROWS. and he can run? like run run? wow. we are spoiled for riches.

Those last 2 throws were NFL throws. Holy shit. Eye popping.

[wood 11620]

3 hours ago, Orange&White said:

We can just call him V-White

Nice. He sure does remind me of VY, in all sorts of ways. Love, love, love seeing the Zone Read back in our offense.

[Deej 77240]

3 hours ago, Funk Doctor Spock said:

Sweet. I remember Lawrence being a .9999. Honestly, he really should have been a 1.000. I don't know what the knock on him was, but it was dumb. 

Anyway...all your 1.000 QBs are belong to us. 

His hair

[NaTeWHO 855]

2 hours ago, TrashMaster G said:

Someone 'splain please.

 

[52-80 19283]

1 hour ago, wood said:

That could be it lol. I barely even pulled a D in that class, too.

Fuck that auditorium class, esp at 8/9 in the morning

[Rickylovesweed 14842]

It will be interesting what happens if Arch does start the next 2 games. 

ULM and Miss State (gave up 30 and 41 in the last 2 weeks against unranked teams). Arch is probably going to put up video game numbers against both those teams if he starts. 

Can you bench Arch if he's putting up video game numbers in 3 straight weeks? 

[TrashMaster G 17756]

44 minutes ago, Rickylovesweed said:

It will be interesting what happens if Arch does start the next 2 games. 

ULM and Miss State (gave up 30 and 41 in the last 2 weeks against unranked teams). Arch is probably going to put up video game numbers against both those teams if he starts. 

Can you bench Arch if he's putting up video game numbers in 3 straight weeks? 

Oh, for fuck's sake. Quinn is not getting demoted. Quit asking stupid questions.

[Rickylovesweed 14842]

4 minutes ago, TrashMaster G said:

Oh, for fuck's sake. Quinn is not getting demoted. Quit asking stupid questions.

I think it's unlikely but you're kidding yourself if isn't a thought assuming Arch goes off in these next 2 games. 

At some point, you have to ride a guy that's putting up the type numbers he is. 14/18, 6 touchdowns, no turnovers, and over 300 yards passing with limited passing attempts is insane even given the competition. 

If he's putting up similar numbers in the next 2 weeks, I don't think it's nearly as clear cut as you think it is. 

 

[WelfareBuysMyWeed 5645]

1 hour ago, Rickylovesweed said:

Can you bench Arch if he's putting up video game numbers in 3 straight weeks? 

 

[Dbeasy 15241]

It took me awhile to come up with the closest nfl comparable to Arch. Probably Archie Manning. Maybe Johnny Unitas. 

[LTtxfan 49423]

Manning MADNESS in Austin | Arch Accounts for 5 TDs vs UTSA | Texas Longhorns Football | Reactions 

[LTtxfan 49423]

Arch Manning 5 TOTAL TDs in Texas’ blowout win vs. UTSA | ESPN College Football

[LTtxfan 49423]

9 hours ago, Orange&White said:

“He’s just an overrated 2 star from a private school and if his name wasn’t Manning no one would want him.”  So I’ve been told.

[Beantown Express 2.0 6568]

35 minutes ago, LTtxfan said:

Manning MADNESS in Austin | Arch Accounts for 5 TDs vs UTSA | Texas Longhorns Football | Reactions 

The way Arch handled that interview it was like listening to a 15 year Pro NFL QB.  He gave all the right answers about coaches, teammates, preparation.  He sounded like Brady answering a question which is impressive for a college kid who just played his first meaningful game.  

[Frank Drebin 5694]

Texags: 3 star talent with a 5 star name.

[EZ$ 2106]

17 minutes ago, Frank Drebin said:

Texags: 3 star talent with a 5 star name.

Does anyone have screenshots of this?

[skipmcgee 258]

8 hours ago, gofuckyourself said:

Yep, VY, Ewers and Arch the only three. Trevor Lawrence was .9999

Arch finished as a .9995, not a 1.0000.

ESPN had him ranked as the #3 QB…

[Doc Daneeka 6769]

4 hours ago, Rickylovesweed said:

It will be interesting what happens if Arch does start the next 2 games. 

ULM and Miss State (gave up 30 and 41 in the last 2 weeks against unranked teams). Arch is probably going to put up video game numbers against both those teams if he starts. 

Can you bench Arch if he's putting up video game numbers in 3 straight weeks? 

Yes. 

[Doc Daneeka 6769]

3 hours ago, Rickylovesweed said:

I think it's unlikely but you're kidding yourself if isn't a thought assuming Arch goes off in these next 2 games. 

At some point, you have to ride a guy that's putting up the type numbers he is. 14/18, 6 touchdowns, no turnovers, and over 300 yards passing with limited passing attempts is insane even given the competition. 

If he's putting up similar numbers in the next 2 weeks, I don't think it's nearly as clear cut as you think it is. 

 

A thought for whom? The coach who’s been starting Ewers and deals with the two every day? Or randos on the Internet? Because randos on the internet have the thought that the earth is flat. 

[Macanudo 13100]

7 hours ago, TrashMaster G said:

I get that, but there is no position group where chemistry is more important. Seems like plug-and-play is a little dicier here.

I agree with you but based on our schedule, the backups should get a ton of time this year.   Rotation should be on the coaches minds when games like yesterday happen.  

[kevwun 15944]

Really good OL haven’t moved around much in the portal so far.  It’s probably the toughest position group to bring in.  I don’t know if we will need it though.  Flood is supposed to really like the backups he has.

[TreatyOak 16813]

Nothing is more indicative of where Sark has taken the program than thinking how excited we were that Squints was being replaced by Colt’s brother. 

[Bateshorn 9964]

7 minutes ago, TreatyOak said:

Nothing is more indicative of where Sark has taken the program than thinking how excited we were that Squints was being replaced by Colt’s brother. 

 

Jesus that was a dark time.

[TexArcher 38437]

16 minutes ago, TreatyOak said:

Nothing is more indicative of where Sark has taken the program than thinking how excited we were that Squints was being replaced by Colt’s brother. 

TOO

SOON

[Rex Kramer 1442]

8 hours ago, tx 3 putt said:

 

with transfer portal + NIL there are ZERO reasons for a blue blood program to have a 'down year' at any group/position (even more so at OL and DL)

You have ZERO understanding of how an OL works. 

4 hours ago, Rickylovesweed said:

I think it's unlikely but you're kidding yourself if isn't a thought assuming Arch goes off in these next 2 games. 

At some point, you have to ride a guy that's putting up the type numbers he is. 14/18, 6 touchdowns, no turnovers, and over 300 yards passing with limited passing attempts is insane even given the competition. 

If he's putting up similar numbers in the next 2 weeks, I don't think it's nearly as clear cut as you think it is. 

 

It isn’t even a fleeting thought. Except to internet morons. 

[Frank Drebin 5694]

31 minutes ago, TreatyOak said:

Nothing is more indicative of where Sark has taken the program than thinking how excited we were that Squints was being replaced by Colt’s brother. 

Sadly, that was a significant upgrade.

[Nivek 17055]

Nothing is more indicative of where Sark has taken the program than thinking how excited we were that Squints was being replaced by Colt’s brother. 

Remind me to give you a swirly for bringing that up.

[Vertigo 20396]

1 hour ago, skipmcgee said:

Arch finished as a .9995, not a 1.0000.

ESPN had him ranked as the #3 QB…

Well Mack Brown had him rated as the number one safety so that should count for something.

[closetohumping 17553]

[tx 3 putt 77963]

3 minutes ago, closetohumping said:

[tx 3 putt 77963]

1 hour ago, Rex Kramer said:

You have ZERO understanding of how an OL works. 

 

imo, those days are gone. it’s a year to roster now. curious if ut has staff dedicated to scouting  potential transfer targets 

but yes, the OL is heart beat of the team 

[UncleSonny 6649]

1 minute ago, tx 3 putt said:

 

imo, those days are gone. it’s a year to roster now. curious if ut has staff dedicated to scouting  potential transfer targets 

but yes, the OL is heart beat of the team 

You may want to check in on how that’s going for Florida State 

[tx 3 putt 77963]

Just now, UncleSonny said:

You may want to check in on how that’s going for Florida State 

 

that’s why you need gold staff scouting potential targets 

horrible qb choice over there. i think things will swing back to kids wanting to stay in one place but some kids will easily be $$$ motivated 

[Sock Monkey 723]

SIAP

[Rex Kramer 1442]

13 minutes ago, tx 3 putt said:

 

imo, those days are gone. it’s a year to roster now. curious if ut has staff dedicated to scouting  potential transfer targets 

but yes, the OL is heart beat of the team 

Your opinions are terrible and I don’t care to read further. I’m just here to make fun of you. 

[TXpride 567]

One (maybe two) transfer OL can work fine (see Calvin Anderson). But the only reason to go that route is if the staff is intent on having some experience. Because we certainly don't lack bodies.

[UTexasFight 9659]

6 hours ago, Rickylovesweed said:

I think it's unlikely but you're kidding yourself if isn't a thought assuming Arch goes off in these next 2 games. 

At some point, you have to ride a guy that's putting up the type numbers he is. 14/18, 6 touchdowns, no turnovers, and over 300 yards passing with limited passing attempts is insane even given the competition. 

If he's putting up similar numbers in the next 2 weeks, I don't think it's nearly as clear cut as you think it is. 

 

I can’t believe I’m responding to this….

by all accounts Quinn is the unquestioned leader on this team and you don’t bench that guy after an injury (read: not poor performance) regardless of what his backup does in his place. The chemistry/locker room issues alone it would cause make it a non-starter.

 

Now if this is a month-long injury and arch puts up those kind of near perfect numbers in Dallas and against the UGA D…. it’s still a “no” but I will allow there will be some discussion.

[Levi 2606]

10 hours ago, TrashMaster G said:

If we are glancing forward to next year, my only question is the OL Arch will have in front of him. We are going to say goodbye to a ton of experience up front after this year.

The only thing that will be lacking is the experience. And I don’t see that as a reason we should look to the portal. The 9.95 reports and those in the know on here have stated that the coaches love what they have for the future. I think I slight bump in the road would be if Williams decides to leave after this year. 

[Hondo 682]

4 hours ago, LTtxfan said:

Arch Manning 5 TOTAL TDs in Texas’ blowout win vs. UTSA | ESPN College Football

The obvious is obvious, but the big takeaway from Manning's performance is in the details.  Details that have nothing to do with whether or not he was playing against UTSA or BAMA/UGA.

The quick release on the Golden slant was unreal.  You see it again when it really mattered - on the long TD to Wingo.  Watch that play again.  Without that insanely quick release, Manning never gets that throw away or it's a floating duck that gets picked off.  He was hit by the D-line and barely got it off as it was.

Those little details are what makes him good and will make him great.  Add in reading coverage/defenses and making good decision...from great to elite.

[Hondo 682]

44 minutes ago, closetohumping said:

And Hill says he's faster than Noah Lyles, so by the transitive property, Arch is an Olympic gold medalist sprinter.

[linux 1645]

6 hours ago, Rickylovesweed said:

I think it's unlikely but you're kidding yourself if isn't a thought assuming Arch goes off in these next 2 games. 

At some point, you have to ride a guy that's putting up the type numbers he is. 14/18, 6 touchdowns, no turnovers, and over 300 yards passing with limited passing attempts is insane even given the competition. 

If he's putting up similar numbers in the next 2 weeks, I don't think it's nearly as clear cut as you think it is. 

 

Stop it, there is zero tape on Manning UTSA was coverning him incorrectly plus all those busted coverages lead to video game numbers, As long as he is healthy Quinn is still the best QB in the roster and country.

[C-Man 27388]

Nothing is more indicative of where Sark has taken the program than thinking how excited we were that Squints was being replaced by Colt’s brother. 

I was thinking about that last night. Ten years ago, our QB room was Jerrod Heard and Tyrone Swoopes. Today, it’s Quinn Ewers and Arch Manning.

[Pimphand 6056]

 

[tbone_ 14296]

This can’t be accurate

[dcar00 14619]

the drive to start the 4th with the off balance throw to wingo and the subsequent TD pass was pretty special.

the throw to Wingo especially, is one that gets picked a lot.  It was UTSA but still very nice to see the execution.