Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
5 minutes ago, Pig Bellmont said:

Five people now accusing Jordan. This will not end well 

Former UFC world champion Mark Coleman, who roomed with Jordan on several wrestling trips, also came forward Thursday, telling The Wall Street Journal that he thought there was “no way” Jordan didn’t know about the abuse.

“There’s no way unless he’s got dementia or something that he’s got no recollection of what was going on at Ohio State,” Coleman told the Journal. “I have nothing but respect for this man, I love this man, but he knew as far as I’m concerned.”

Posted

He has sex with an underaged boy and didn't understand why that was wrong. The larger point is that he still got reelected several times by his liberal constituents and his party gave him an important committee chairmanship..

Studds admitted what he did and all of a sudden 20 years down the road, wrestlers, some with questionable backgrounds and motives start this stuff about Jordan.

Studds is worse until the allegations against Jordan are proven true.

  • Fuck You 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, Brian Fantana said:

Well, see, Republicans think being gay is the same thing as being a pedophile.

No, fucking an underaged boy is worse than a pedophile.

Posted

A 40 something man with a 17 year old subordinate is pretty creepy. In most fields you'd lose your job for that, although the early 80s were a different time. I personally wouldn't be lining up to defend him.

Posted
3 minutes ago, realgreggym said:

He has sex with an underaged boy and didn't understand why that was wrong. The larger point is that he still got reelected several times by his liberal constituents and his party gave him an important committee chairmanship..

Studds admitted what he did and all of a sudden 20 years down the road, wrestlers, some with questionable backgrounds and motives start this stuff about Jordan.

Studds is worse until the allegations against Jordan are proven true.

17 is not underage for sex, even in Texas. Creepy, but not illegal, as has been repeatedly stated. 

Posted
11 minutes ago, realgreggym said:

He has sex with an underaged boy and didn't understand why that was wrong. The larger point is that he still got reelected several times by his liberal constituents and his party gave him an important committee chairmanship..

Studds admitted what he did and all of a sudden 20 years down the road, wrestlers, some with questionable backgrounds and motives start this stuff about Jordan.

Studds is worse until the allegations against Jordan are proven true.

The problem with your argument is that 17 is not underage. 

Posted
9 minutes ago, realgreggym said:

He has sex with an underaged boy and didn't understand why that was wrong. The larger point is that he still got reelected several times by his liberal constituents and his party gave him an important committee chairmanship..

Studds admitted what he did and all of a sudden 20 years down the road, wrestlers, some with questionable backgrounds and motives start this stuff about Jordan.

Studds is worse until the allegations against Jordan are proven true.

What do you mean start? He acted like a shithead years ago, nothing happened recently.  If YOU think studds should not have had legal sex in a May December relationship, ok that’s on you. But to excuse Jordan’s behavior bc he was ... on your team? Why excuse it? Wouldn’t a normal moral person find the former a bit creepy and the latter a dereliction of ethics and normal decency? Please explain why Jordan’s behavior should go unpunished now. 

Posted
9 minutes ago, achooloco said:

What do you mean start? He acted like a shithead years ago, nothing happened recently.  If YOU think studds should not have had legal sex in a May December relationship, ok that’s on you. But to excuse Jordan’s behavior bc he was ... on your team? Why excuse it? Wouldn’t a normal moral person find the former a bit creepy and the latter a dereliction of ethics and normal decency? Please explain why Jordan’s behavior should go unpunished now. 

Well you see, what you must understand is that because "both sides," we should just go ahead and give Jordan a pass.

  • Like 1
Posted
24 minutes ago, realgreggym said:

Studds is worse until the allegations against Jordan are proven true.

How will you determine this?

Because, you know, Jordan has denied it, so what else can you do at this point, right?

Posted

Wow.

Just wow at this bullshit "both sides" to defend Jordan. By saying a guy having sex with a 17 year old (LEGAL) is the same.

I don't want to live on this planet anymore.

Posted
26 minutes ago, MaybeACoordinator said:

17 is not underage for sex, even in Texas. Creepy, but not illegal, as has been repeatedly stated. 

Evidently it was back then. But even if it wasn't illegal, he suffered no consequences.

  • Fuck You 2
Posted
Just now, realgreggym said:

Evidently it was back then. But even if it wasn't illegal, he suffered no consequences.

He should have.

See how easy that was for me to say? You try it re: your boy now.

Posted
25 minutes ago, David Dennison said:

The problem with your argument is that 17 is not underage. 

You are correct but it was still inappropriate and he had no idea why. The larger point is that he continued to get reelected by his constituents..

Posted
5 minutes ago, wildcat09 said:

He should have.

See how easy that was for me to say? You try it re: your boy now.

If Jordan is guilty of the allegations, he should suffer the appropriate consequences. I have always said that going back to Packwood.

Posted
15 minutes ago, DDD Dad said:

How will you determine this?

Because, you know, Jordan has denied it, so what else can you do at this point, right?

We have a legal system.

Posted
14 minutes ago, Js1 said:

Wow.

Just wow at this bullshit "both sides" to defend Jordan. By saying a guy having sex with a 17 year old (LEGAL) is the same.

I don't want to live on this planet anymore.

You could move to California.

  • Fuck You 2
Posted
Just now, realgreggym said:

We have a legal system.

This is a political issue for Jordan. The legal issue is probably time barred, although I don't know what the statute of limitations is for failure to report in Ohio.

Posted
4 minutes ago, realgreggym said:

You are correct but it was still inappropriate and he had no idea why. The larger point is that he continued to get reelected by his constituents..

You aren’t making a point. Your both sides trolling. 

  • Like 1
Posted
19 minutes ago, DDD Dad said:

Well you see, what you must understand is that because "both sides," we should just go ahead and give Jordan a pass.

I am not giving any one a pass and never have given a pass to anyone on my side of the aisle. If they did something wrong, there should be consequences and as I said earlier, I have been saying that since Packwood.

Posted
1 minute ago, realgreggym said:

I am not giving any one a pass and never have given a pass to anyone on my side of the aisle. If they did something wrong, there should be consequences and as I said earlier, I have been saying that since Packwood.

Gary Johnson voter?

Posted
5 minutes ago, realgreggym said:

I am not giving any one a pass and never have given a pass to anyone on my side of the aisle. If they did something wrong, there should be consequences and as I said earlier, I have been saying that since Packwood.

Tahoe, you need to consider shedding the entire concept of "my side of the aisle."  Once you do you can free your mind to think for yourself.  It's quite liberating.

Posted
7 minutes ago, David Dennison said:

Gary Johnson voter?

no, been voting republican since Nixon. But if someone on my side of the aisle does something illegal, there should be consequences.

Posted
3 minutes ago, DDD Dad said:

Tahoe, you need to consider shedding the entire concept of "my side of the aisle."  Once you do you can free your mind to think for yourself.  It's quite liberating.

I'm not Tahoe but I will consider your comment right after you find a cure for Trump Derangement Syndrome. 

I have been thinking for myself for decades.

  • Fuck You 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, realgreggym said:

no, been voting republican since Nixon. But if someone on my side of the aisle does something illegal, there should be consequences.

Straight ticket?  Good to see you think for yourself.

Posted
17 minutes ago, realgreggym said:

no, been voting republican since Nixon. But if someone on my side of the aisle does something illegal, there should be consequences.

That's one hell of a time to jump on that train.

Posted

whoa.  this 'greg' guy is circling the drain.  see how hard he's working?

 

greg.

say, what's the name of that guy who uses greg davis?

Posted
28 minutes ago, DDD Dad said:

Straight ticket?  Good to see you think for yourself.

Just like all the posters on the who are you voting for thread that said the same thing.

Posted
1 minute ago, yaqdum said:

whoa.  this 'greg' guy is circling the drain.  see how hard he's working?

 

greg.

say, what's the name of that guy who uses greg davis?

greggym is a long time poster on the basketball boards, mainly, for most ut sites since the 90's. IIRC.

What usernames did you use in the past?

Posted
2 minutes ago, yaqdum said:

whoa.  this 'greg' guy is circling the drain.  see how hard he's working?

 

greg.

say, what's the name of that guy who uses greg davis?

Not working hard at all. I am just trying to show posters some courtesy by answering them. I have no idea what the rest of your rambling is.

Posted
2 hours ago, High Plains Drifter said:

Tnis was on Fox News at my regular breakfast joint (sound was off). On the graphic, they forgot to put the "R" next to his name. Weird.

That's actually an improvement over their usual practice of falsely labeling R sex scandal perps as Dems

oreilly-foley-d-1.jpg

fnc-20090624-sanford.jpg

Posted
1 minute ago, zork said:

greggym is a long time poster on the basketball boards, mainly, for most ut sites since the 90's. IIRC.

What usernames did you use in the past?

zork, for some reason, my username didn't work here so I just made a minor change to be able to sign in. Greggym is the only username that I have ever used.

Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, realgreggym said:

zork, for some reason, my username didn't work here so I just made a minor change to be able to sign in. Greggym is the only username that I have ever used.

yes.   I don't want to diminish your contributions in the CR on the various Israeli threads over the years either but mainly I remember your basketball stuff.

Edited by zork
Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, realgreggym said:

That just means that I have a lot of experience on this subject matter.

Maybe this fall you might consider researching each candidate on his or her merits rather than pulling a straight party line.  You know, pick the best candidate for the position rather than blindly vote by party.

Edited by DDD Dad
Posted
16 minutes ago, zork said:

yes.   I don't want to diminish your contributions in the CR on the various Israeli threads over the years either but mainly I remember your basketball stuff.

Thanks. I mainly post on bball stuff. Its much safer. lol



×
×
  • Create New...