Jump to content

Kenny Paxton/Dave P's Impeachment Game Day Thread

atomheartbevo

By atomheartbevo
in Cloak Room

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

washparkhorn
washparkhorn

At Home Depot, you can do it and we can help

DDD Dad
DDD Dad

This guy drops more names of people he knows and likes than @YGIFS

Brisketexan
Brisketexan

That's not true.  There was definitely a vote.  It was $3 million to zero.  The vote took place in Dan Patrick's bank account.  It was not interfered with by any italian satellites or china with bambo

Posted Images

South Austin

South Austin 52521

Posted
Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, Beau Vine said:

Oh Yeah Reaction GIF by NBA

Mr. Bangert, you were pretty clear in answering Mr. Hardin's questions, and you obviously went behind my client's back before going to the FBI, but isn't it true, sir . . . and I want simply a yes or no answer to my question . . . and you may have put this in a text message that you since deleted . . . but isn't it true that Joe Esposito's "You're The Best" is THE most underrated song of the 1980's?

Edited by South Austin
  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
  • Rage+1 1
  • Drool 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
South Austin

South Austin 52521

Posted
Posted

Ryan Vassar. 

spacer.png

Link

Quote

Ryan Vassar is the General Counsel at the Cicero Institute. Ryan previously served as Deputy Attorney General for Legal Counsel in Texas and as General Counsel. Ryan clerked for Justice Don R. Willett on the Supreme Court of Texas for three years. He received a B.B.A. in Accounting from Texas Tech University and a J.D. from South Texas College of Law Houston.

The Cicero Institute

Quote

The Cicero Institute is a nonpartisan public policy organization with deep experience in government, legislation and the law, technology, and entrepreneurship. Together, we develop and fight for policies at the state level that restore liberty, accountability, and innovation in American governance.

spacer.png

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
chainsaw

chainsaw 9872

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, South Austin said:

This guy seems meeker than Jeff Mateer, and Buzbee could probably rattle him real good, but it looks like he's handing this witness off to another one of his sophomores.

Edit: And just like that, he's crying.

Weak men also cry.

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
VinyVango

VinyVango 694

Posted
Posted
"General Paxton told us that he didn't trust law enforcement."
Very nice.
 
Also, I must not understand what heresay is...

I believe that comment would be within the party admission exception to the hearsay rule
"General Paxton told us that he didn't trust law enforcement."
Very nice.
 
Also, I must not understand what heresay is...

I believe that comment would be within the party admission exception to the hearsay rule
Link to comment
Share on other sites
VinyVango

VinyVango 694

Posted
Posted
"General Paxton told us that he didn't trust law enforcement."
Very nice.
 
Also, I must not understand what heresay is...

I believe that comment would be within the party admission exception to the hearsay rule
"General Paxton told us that he didn't trust law enforcement."
Very nice.
 
Also, I must not understand what heresay is...

I believe that comment would be within the party admission exception to the hearsay rule
Link to comment
Share on other sites
A-Tex Devil

A-Tex Devil 2451

Posted
Posted
Just now, South Austin said:

But we’re the best people.

Oh, I agree on my behalf as well.  I've been depo'd twice as a fact witness for deals that went into litigation later.  It's hard to just not talk and talk......  But I also remember rolling my eyes almost audibly when one of the attorneys tried to put on his big boy voice and pin me down on something.   Dude, I'm not on trial here... chill out.

Which leads to my question (and disappointment).  I guarantee you these guys can be raging assholes behind the scenes at the AG's office.  Why so timid here in cross?  They aren't on trial.  Fucking show some backbone and confidence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
pyrohornIII

pyrohornIII 4816

Posted
Posted

Paxton is still on the FBI hook, right?   Is there a chance anything said here can make that worse for him, or the FBI already knows anything that could come out during all this?   So he can be exonerated here, but still found guilty later on criminal charges, right?  Seems that would make our R senate idiots that will be sold as god fearing patriots?   Further evidence of the deep state tearing down our country?   

 

Sorry, I'm obviously not a lawyer, so nice now and then to escape the impeachment foolishness and look at the larger picture.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TwiceHorn

TwiceHorn 31510

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Beau Vine said:

So...another christo-fascist lawyer from the AG's office to testify?   Crazy...

There is no other kind.  At least not the ones that orbit the AG.  I'm sure there's plenty of sane civil servant types in the AGs office, but they don't orbit the AG.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Rage+1 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TwiceHorn

TwiceHorn 31510

Posted
Posted
23 minutes ago, pyrohornIII said:

Paxton is still on the FBI hook, right?   Is there a chance anything said here can make that worse for him, or the FBI already knows anything that could come out during all this?   So he can be exonerated here, but still found guilty later on criminal charges, right?  Seems that would make our R senate idiots that will be sold as god fearing patriots?   Further evidence of the deep state tearing down our country?   

 

Sorry, I'm obviously not a lawyer, so nice now and then to escape the impeachment foolishness and look at the larger picture.

I don't think any of this can hurt a federal investigation much.  It has vast potential to hurt Paxton, though.

About the worst thing going on here (for both a federal investigation and for Paxton) is that these people are getting their "stories" under oath, making it more difficult for them to credibly deviate from them in the future.  Because the stories against Paxton are pretty inherently factual, and the stories for are not, more damage is being done to Paxton than to future or current criminal investigations.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Sawbonz

Sawbonz 27580

Posted
Posted
44 minutes ago, Beau Vine said:

"General Paxton told us that he didn't trust law enforcement."

Very nice.

 

Also, I must not understand what heresay is..."Did anyone else speak up?" "Objection, heresay!"  WTF?

image.png

Apparently it is any time you hear anyone say anything

Link to comment
Share on other sites
chainsaw

chainsaw 9872

Posted
Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, DDD Dad said:

Why can't Rusty ask a proper question on direct?

Every question has been leading and nearly all have been calling for speculation.

This defense lawyer is so much more competent than Buzbee and Ralph it's not even funny.

He's too folksy and down home for that. When you're a star, they let you do it.

Edited by chainsaw
  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing


Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!

×
×
  • Create New...