Kenny Paxton/Dave P's Impeachment Game Day Thread

[A-Tex Devil 2,446]

Shit.... I have to get in car and get home.  Want to see the Buzbee/Moore fireworks!

[Beau Vine 54,226]

Lulz.

 

[cactusflinthead 27,598]

That's a different location from the one I posted in the wrong thread this morning before the coffee kicked in.

There's gotta be a coordinated effort to hit them.

I wonder if that's the bunch Stickland is fronting. He's getting paid by the guy out in W. Texas. Or one of the other shitheads.

[Disco Strangler 1,877]

 

Bring in Nate Paul to testify!

[Nice Guy Eddie 13,512]

Can the “prosecution” side subpoena someone to show up to testify? It would be powerful to bring in a few people like Nate and Paxtons girlfriends to either testify or just take the 5th.

[Francisco 2.0 32,392]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[YGIFS 19,450]

Yeah, no conflict of interest here folks.  Only reason she didn't let Dan Patrick in on the spit roast with Nate and Kenny "David P." is because the D.P. initials were already spoken for.  As was her good hand.  

[atomheartbevo 89,665]

1 hour ago, Disco Strangler said:

 

Bring in Nate Paul to testify!

[Pato del Muerto 52,498]

3 hours ago, Brisketexan said:

This.

Paxton's power is tied to his position.

Take away the position, and he's just another wonky-eyed blowhard piece of shit.  There's a glut of those in this state, so good luck standing out from the crowd, Kenny boy.

The federal indictments must be a differentiator

[Brisketexan 105,139]

1 hour ago, Francisco 2.0 said:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At this point, how humiliating is it to be one of the Republicans she WOULDN'T screw?  I mean, she's demonstrated breathtakingly low standards and you, good sir...well, you don't even meet those.

[NWBuck 8,565]

1 hour ago, YGIFS said:

Yeah, no conflict of interest here folks.  Only reason she didn't let Dan Patrick in on the spit roast with Nate and Kenny "David P." is because the D.P. initials were already spoken for.  As was her good hand.  

Sure, but being dp'ed by D.P.s would be a special moments 

[Pescado_Rojo 19,416]

Dan only gets sexually aroused by women when he’s taking away their rights

[Beau Vine 54,226]

30 minutes ago, Brisketexan said:

At this point, how humiliating is it to be one of the Republicans she WOULDN'T screw?  I mean, she's demonstrated breathtakingly low standards and you, good sir...well, you don't even meet those.

I always assumed that Dani Goeb is a lesbian.

[Dnaguy 11,964]

2 hours ago, Disco Strangler said:

 

Bring in Nate Paul to testify!

Mad rep sir

[Dnaguy 11,964]

2 hours ago, Francisco 2.0 said:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[atomheartbevo 89,665]

WFAA has today’s pre-game warmup going on

 

[safe sex 11,726]

11 hours ago, Beau Vine said:

I always assumed that Dani Goeb is a lesbian.

Negged on principle.

[YGIFS 19,450]

You can't say "Lesbian", it's "Governors in Comfortable Shoes"  

 

https://clip.cafe/good-morning-vietnam-1987/the-mississippi-river-broke-through-a-protective-dike-today/t/1/

Edited September 12, 2023 by YGIFS

[Deej 76,790]

11 hours ago, Pescado_Rojo said:

Dan only gets sexually aroused by women when he’s taking away their rights

Dan has never been sexually aroused by women. 

[atomheartbevo 89,665]

Why is it delayed?

[That Guy 955]

I spoke with someone in the know and they confirmed that it’s because you touch yourself. 

Edited September 12, 2023 by That Guy

[DDD Dad 14,339]

According to WFAA no idea.

[CTC2 2,797]

20 minutes ago, Deej said:

Dan has never been sexually aroused by women. 

[atomheartbevo 89,665]

 

Stephen Miller:

A MESSAGE TO THE GOOD PEOPLE OF TEXAS: No Attorney General in the United States has done more to fight for us against the corrupt Biden Administration than Ken Paxton.

Not only does Paxton have a historic record of suing the Biden regime for its radical, extreme, lawless edicts but he has a historic track record of winning — enjoining one unconstitutional and unlawful policy after another. In short, Ken Paxton is the rule of law’s best friend — and the lawless left’s worst legal nightmare.

Given how much contempt the Radical Left and Ruling Class have for rules, norms, laws, truth or justice it should come as no surprise that they have engineered an impeachment against Paxton to remove Biden’s opponent from the chess board.

The Administration in power wants Ken out of the Attorney General’s office. It’s just that simple. And the Liberal Democrats and Liberal Republicans in the Texas State Legislature are all to eager too join forces in doing Joe Biden’s dirty work for him: voiding the overwhelming vote Paxton received in the last election. They want to use an unjust, scurrilous and outrageous impeachment to silence the voice and values of the people of Texas. They hate Democracy.

The bogus allegations now being re-litigated (and debunked) in this impeachment were all brought to the voters before Paxton’s massive reelection victory and were all rejected by the wise voters of Texas. By what right to the most liberal members of the Texas legislature now conspire to remove from office the very man Texas voters just installed in that office?

Nothing would make the Texas-hating radicals in the current Administration happier than taking your bold, determined and courageous Texas Attorney General away from you. The man who has been battling for you against open borders, human trafficking, assaults against your sacred first and second amendment rights, Big Tech tyranny, dictatorial regulation, and every other threat to your freedom.

So the choice, Texas, is simple. And it is binary. Do you stand with Ken Paxton or Joe Biden? Do you side with the Constitution or the Radical Left? Do you fight to regain your borders or help ensure their absolute erasure? Tell your members in the Texas Senate to stop a grievous wrong and to stand with Ken Paxton, to stand with Texas, and to protect your families and your children from the lawless and authoritarian administration now reigning in Washington DC.

[chainsaw 9,868]

Are the deliberations going to be televised?

[royiv 9,317]

8 minutes ago, chainsaw said:

Are the deliberations going to be televised?

No.

[chainsaw 9,868]

2 minutes ago, royiv said:

No.

I wonder if they will keep some kind of record of it. It's official Senate business, after all.

[DDD Dad 14,339]

Starting up now.

[atomheartbevo 89,665]

1 minute ago, DDD Dad said:

Starting up now.

Wonder why the delay.

[atomheartbevo 89,665]

 

Angela took two pages of notes during the affair questioning yesterday.
 

 

[DDD Dad 14,339]

Goeb said that both sides had matters they wanted to raise (presumably evidentiary motions of some sort) outside presence of jury.

[TDunk 590]

I'm sure they'll blame Starbucks unions.  Damn hipsters. 

[atomheartbevo 89,665]

 

[YGIFS 19,450]

I've heard some crazy divorce stories in my day, but "Your honor, let me submit my two pages of handwritten notes about my husband's affair that I wrote while hearing testimony in the State Senate regarding his financial fraud felonies."  

Hard to say who could rip Ken's droopy head off faster, Angela, Nate Paul, or the Cartel?  

[TDunk 590]

2 pages? What kind of weird shit is side eye into? 

[atomheartbevo 89,665]

 

[YGIFS 19,450]

Finished by the end of the week, Gov. Patrick?  How convenient.  Saturday is the launch of the Subaru "September to Remember" sale.  

[Guest]

17 minutes ago, YGIFS said:

Finished by the end of the week, Gov. Patrick?  How convenient.  Saturday is the launch of the Subaru "September to Remember" sale.  

[Teebox 89]

Are we taking odds yet on the final vote on this thing?

 

[Guest]

7 minutes ago, Teebox said:

Are we taking odds yet on the final vote on this thing?

 

I have zero idea. On one hand, the votes at the beginning seemed to mean he was in deep. But watching a fair amount of the actual trial, it's just a complete mess. I guess I'd give the edge to the prosecution, but I'm having a hard time seeing it as a slam dunk of any sort. 

Actually think the defense just being so insane on attacking yet not offering any real proof he wasn't nefarious is a net negative.

[Al Czervik 1,229]

58 minutes ago, YGIFS said:

Finished by the end of the week, Gov. Patrick?  How convenient.  Saturday is the launch of the Lesbaru "September to Remember" sale.  

 

[chainsaw 9,868]

So I'm guessing they spent an hour arguing about attorney client privilege before we got started

[VinyVango 693]

Hardin rambling through prosecution time … he can’t seem to ask a clean, clear question.

[Nice Guy Eddie 13,512]

43 minutes ago, Teebox said:

Are we taking odds yet on the final vote on this thing?

 

He'll be acquitted but some of those voting for acquittal will publicly state that they're have grave concerns about how Paxton ran his office, and they have full confidence that Paxton has learned his lesson.

[Js1 85,336]

10 minutes ago, Nice Guy Eddie said:

He'll be acquitted but some of those voting for acquittal will publicly state that they're have grave concerns about how Paxton ran his office, and they have full confidence that Paxton has learned his lesson.

Susan Collins was elected to the Texas Senate? 

[safe sex 11,726]

I just want it on record that I do not drive a Subaru

[Horn80 6,122]

If Paxton is not found guilty of all articles (which is hard to believe) does Texas law allow the AG to be subject to a recall vote?

[South Austin 52,500]

17 minutes ago, Horn80 said:

If Paxton is not found guilty of all articles (which is hard to believe) does Texas law allow the AG to be subject to a recall vote?

No, but we will send a strongly worded letter to him.

[Longhorn_Fan68 33,870]

41 minutes ago, safe sex said:

I just want it on record that I do not drive a Subaru

VW?

[Js1 85,336]

37 minutes ago, Horn80 said:

If Paxton is not found guilty of all articles (which is hard to believe) does Texas law allow the AG to be subject to a recall vote?

Lol like Texas would have a law allowing it’s elected noblemen be accountable to their constituents outside of election years